AI Data Centers Are the Heroes, Not the Villains

By Gilbert Hyatt

Fifty years ago, critics called the idea of a single integrated-circuit chip for a computer a fantasy. As the creator of that chip, I called it the future. I was right. 

The critics are back, this time casting AI data centers as a crisis for American infrastructure, water and local communities. They’re wrong again. The data center companies are the heroes, not the villains. Yes, AI is hungry for electricity and water. But data centers are feeding it. The companies building these data centers are pouring billions of dollars into new power sources and new water sources. 

McKinsey estimates $7 trillion in global data-center capital expenditure by 2030, with more than 40% flowing to the U.S. Having committed that kind of money, these companies are now building their own dedicated sources of electricity and water. Those investments will make energy less expensive and more readily available for everyone, not just for the tech companies footing the bill. And within the next 20 years, fusion reactors and “super-hot rock” geothermal sites will likely deliver electrical energy and clean water costing not much more than sunshine and rainwater.

These solutions will help support America’s all-of-the-above energy portfolio, while reducing and hopefully eliminating dependence on Arab oil. 

The leading technology is enhanced geothermal, with Meta signing a geothermal power deal last year to supply its data centers. Next come small “modular” fission reactors—compact nuclear plants that can be factory-built and deployed almost anywhere. And eventually, enormous fusion reactors will harness the same power that generates sunlight, fueled by deuterium, a form of heavy hydrogen found in virtually limitless supply in seawater.  

The technology is well understood for advanced geothermal and modular fission; the challenge is commercialization at scale, and data-center capital is significantly accelerating that timeline.

AI data centers are essential to American dominance of the worldwide AI race. Opponents are stirring up opposition to the AI data centers, miscasting them as a major problem to infrastructure. If they succeed, the effect will be to drive data centers into foreign countries, hampering America in the AI race. Local opposition has already delayed or denied dozens of U.S. data center developments. That friction has only intensified the industry investment in dedicated power sources that bypass the existing Grid entirely.

Moreover, the infrastructure issue is only temporary and will soon be resolved as advanced geothermal and modular fission reactors are commercialized. In the near term, companies are deploying modular gas turbines that can power data centers in weeks rather than years — and can supply the Grid during peak demand. 

The activists hide these critical points—“temporary” and “soon”—and miscast it as an endless problem. But here is the irony: the activists are actually helping because focusing attention on a problem in America focuses investment and produces much quicker solutions. Data centers accounted for roughly 78% of all built-environment venture investment in 2025. The Data Center companies have the wealth and the motivation to make it happen sooner rather than later.

The world became addicted to cheap oil, and that addiction continues to this day with expensive oil. But, metaphorically speaking, future generations may wonder what the Strait of Hormuz had to do with the world’s energy supply because the Strait did not have any geothermal sites or fission reactors—all it had was seawater. And by then, geothermal sites and modular reactors will have been dispersed around the world, rendering the oil chokepoints irrelevant.

I’ve seen this before. When I set out nearly sixty years ago to put a whole computer on a single chip, the critics tried to make it sound like a fantasy. I founded Micro Computer, Inc. in the 60s, got it financed, and that “fantasy” went on to run the world. The same skepticism now aimed at AI and data centers that power AI will look just as shortsighted in hindsight. 

My work on the microprocessor came out of my efforts to help America win the cold war against the Soviet Union. Today, I’m writing this for the same reason: keeping America first. As America celebrates its 250th birthday, let’s remember that the data centers powering AI are financing America’s future, not draining it.

Gilbert Hyatt is an American engineer, scientist and inventor known for his pioneering work in microcomputer technology.  

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
3.8 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Marty
July 18, 2026 2:46 pm

Logically, you would expect the states and cities to be competing to host data centers. These are clean high paying jobs that probably will attract educated affluent people. In Chicago, where I live, we have one fifth of all the world’s fresh water in the five great lakes, and we have massive nuclear power plants in Clinton, Illinois that operate at less than full capacity. We have the Mississippi River to the west, the Illinois River in the central state, and the Ohio River to the south providing all the fresh water you could ever want. We have world class universities that can provide specialists of every type. Yet our Democratic billionaire governor, Pritzker, a child of inherited wealth, signed a bill for a one year pause on data centers. It makes no sense. But then global warming makes no sense either.

gyan1
July 18, 2026 2:46 pm

People opposing data centers and AI are anti human development obstructionists. When AI is married to quantum computing a whole new world will unfold. Musk is putting data centers in space eliminating the energy requirements on the Earth anyway so it is very temporary.

Editor
Reply to  gyan1
July 18, 2026 3:29 pm

Is putting data centers in space? I know he’s talking about it, but I haven’t heard him say how they’re going to be cooled. The only option in space is to radiate heat and for a large data center that requires a huge radiator (smaller if you can make a heat pump to greatly increase coolant temperature that gets radiated).

This is one chicken that I very strongly recommend not counting until you see one hatch.

gyan1
Reply to  Ric Werme
July 18, 2026 4:09 pm

 “I know he’s talking about it, but I haven’t heard him say how they’re going to be cooled.”

Space is -270C. Cooling will not be an issue. 24/7 solar power will reduce energy costs significantly.  He’s not just talking about it. It’s a primary objective being actively developed.

Editor
Reply to  gyan1
July 18, 2026 5:03 pm

Per Google AI, “Modern data centers consume massive amounts of electricity, with power requirements ranging from 1 to 5 MW for small facilities and 100 MW or more for hyperscale campuses.” Let’s look at the geometric mean, a 10 MW data center. Computers like to be cool, to radiate 10 MW from a 50°C with a 100% efficient black body radiator, it can handle some 620 W/m2 per https://www.spectralcalc.com/blackbody_calculator/blackbody.php So we need a radiator some 16,000 m2, or 125 m squared. This is pretty big. Of course, I haven’t touched on the power source’s efficiency. If it’s a nuclear reactor, it might be 50% efficient, if it’s perovskite solar panels, maybe 25% efficient. I assume those radiators can be at a higher temperature, but we could need another 16,000 m2, but perhaps that can be on the back side of the PV array.

That’s something like 4X the size of the ISS – and completely filled in. For a solar powered data center a high orbit to give you more than 50% daylight would be nice. Or just do the heavy computing when the sun shines. Note that the moon suffers from occasional solar eclipses, what we call a lunar eclipse, so even at that distance, it’s not 24×7 power. It takes a lot of energy to get to high Earth orbit, so keep that in mind.

At any rate, I have not looked into what Musk is dreaming of. If you have, please share.

Bob
July 18, 2026 2:51 pm

There are several issues here.

Number one AI, we are going to have AI whether some like it or not. I have no problem with AI in the US, I feel AI will be handled more responsibly here than anywhere else.

Number two the crowds who are voicing their opposition to AI are the same ones opposed to almost all other progress fossil fuel, nuclear, dams, heating and cooling, individual freedom, free markets, capitalism and so on. They will always find something to complain about, they move from one issue to another, they have lost all credibility by now.

Number three we don’t have a shortage of energy, we have the resources, the know how and the ability to build all the power we need our only obstacle is obstructionist government.

Number four water. Water is a resource we must use judiciously. The naysayers act like once AI has used water it is gone forever, I don’t see how that is possible. Why can’t that water be recycled and reused or used for other purposes?

Number five I was all in with this guy until he started talking about geothermal and fusion. We don’t need to make promises about some future processes that may or may not become feasible. Like I said before we have the resources, know how and ability to make more power than we need. Let’s not travel down the DEFRA road. Any new technology that comes on line we should embrace if it works, let’s not make promises we may regret later.

Randle Dewees
Reply to  Bob
July 18, 2026 3:19 pm

Number four water. Water is a resource we must use judiciously. The naysayers act like once AI has used water it is gone forever, I don’t see how that is possible. Why can’t that water be recycled and reused or used for other purposes?

Kind of hard to reuse it when it goes up out of the cooling tower into the sky.

MarkW
Reply to  Randle Dewees
July 18, 2026 3:49 pm

It will return to the earth as rain in short order.

Erik Magnuson
Reply to  Bob
July 18, 2026 3:23 pm

Number five I was all in with this guy until he started talking about geothermal and fusion.

I’m also skeptical about both. Geothermal is nice in that it is a dispatchable renewable energy source, but it is a niche source. Fusion still has a lot of unanswered questions on materials, means to convert released energy to electric power, and production of Tritium if using D-T reactions.

Editor
July 18, 2026 3:24 pm

My problem with the AI wave is that it appears to be a bubble, one that may burst very messily. Recently I’ve seen reports that companies are regretting some of their commitment to shifting to AI tools and are hiring back some of the people they dumped. (My personal sense is that only an AI can understand some the code it generates since people only have about seven cells of shortterm memory. That could make understanding problems in that code very challenging, though AI can help.)

More annoying is the material going into data centers and the ripple effect on everything else. Last year in April I rebuilt this computer and bought 32 GB of fairly pedestrian DRAM for $55. Newegg now lists it at $230, but that’s down from $280. (There are getting to be hints that some of the huge data centers that are planned will be scaled back a lot.)

I suppose I can’t complain, I got a good price, and certainly better than the dollar a byte price for core memory (a good price) around 1970! The first DRAM I bought was 16 kB for a TRS-80 for $75 in 1979. Amazing! And here in New Hampshire, the surge in egg prices didn’t impact me, as bird flu didn’t have a big presence here, so $4 per dozen from the farm down the street.

When the Internet bubble burst in the 1990s, some companies almost went out of business having built more equipment than they could sell for months. The AI bubble may be more spectacular. With luck, it will be time for another rebuild then.

MarkW
July 18, 2026 3:45 pm

Geothermal will never be more than a bit player when it comes to power generation. Like hydro, there simply aren’t that many suitable sites.

Herman Pope
July 18, 2026 4:23 pm

That is optimistic, wonderful, why are we not already using nuclear power to clean water and pump it through pipelines to wherever it is needed? Brackish water could even be used to replenish the Great Salt Lake. Pump Seawater there and separate fresh water and put the brackish into the lake. Why are we not using more nuclear power to power regional power grids that can run independent when the huge, complicated, grids fail? If we do have any major conflicts, we cannot protect wind and solar and battery farms along with the long transmission lines and complicate grids that use chips from China to control much of it. Many who promoted the Green Energy and got wealthy on those scams, are now trying to invest in Data Centers and they now realize they need 24/7/365 reliable, abundant, power that can be protected from man and nature.

Phillip Chalmers
July 18, 2026 4:49 pm

I do not believe that one person produced the latest advance in processor hardware and I do not have any time for fantasists touting the nuclear fusion dreams.
And I do not believe that a machine will ever have the quality called human intelligence by simply becoming a gigantic calculator or collecting and mixing up all the beliefs in all the cultures in all the languages of the human race.