Parmesan Cheese Is Not Endangered by Climate Change, Reuters

From ClimateREALISM

By Linnea Lueken

A photo presentation from Reuters claims that parmesan cheese is threatened by climate change because heat waves are causing declining milk production and more expensive cool storage costs. This is false. Cheese production has been increasing amid modest warming, and the cost of temperature controlled storage is not going to get cheaper if you force a transition away from less expensive energy sources like fossil fuels.

The presentation, “How climate change is putting traditional parmesan cheese at risk,” introduces the topic by saying that “Heat waves are taking a toll on Italy’s parmesan cheese industry, reducing milk production and increasing energy costs,” and that cooling is expensive.

One photo caption of cheese in cold storage says that the peak of recent heatwaves in Montecavolo di Quattro Castella, Italy, caused a 30 percent increase in daily power use. Another shows dairy cows being misted with water to cool them down.

If the climate change of the past decades were damaging cheese production, one would expect to see yields of milk and cheese production drop along with the modest temperature increase. Based on ERA5 reanalysis satellite anomaly data (whether or not this dataset/model can be trusted is up for debate) there has been an increase in the number of “hot days,” or days above 86°F in Italy, but data simply does not show that it’s impacting the production of cheese.

In fact, Parmigiano Reggiano, one of the main cheeses highlighted in the Reuters coverage, has experienced significant growth in production over the past decade, setting a new all-time record in 2021 that was then broken in 2025. (See the chart, below). This is despite the fact that there are fewer cows. So the production growth is based on improved yields from cows. Like all agricultural products, not every year is going to be a great one, but the long-term trend for Parmesan is positive.

Weather events like heatwaves will always add to electricity costs, and always have.

Ironically, what actually could endanger parmesan production is if Italy leans too hard into so-called green energy, which is more expensive and could make production cost-prohibitive for many cheesemakers.

Italy has already begun to make this mistake. Electricity demand is rising even as Italy increases the amount of intermittent, expensive solar it has installed across the country. Despite solar installed capacity expansion, electricity generation in Italy has declined as the country attempts to “decarbonize.” Natural gas still powers the bulk of Italian electricity, but cheap coal has been shut down over time. Renewables like wind and solar are not cheaper than traditional electricity generation fuels when the Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity are accounted for; electricity generated from solar can be 10 times as expensive as natural gas and four times more expensive than coal.

Also, it should be obvious that culling dairy herds in order to mitigate the impact of cattle on methane emissions as some European leaders have recommended, would also be disastrous for all cheese production.

While it may be an interesting to see how weather can impact the cost of electricity or animal husbandry and dairy operations, it is false to claim climate change is causing problems for Italy’s cheese producers.  Parmesan production is thriving, but if Italy insists on “decarbonizing” in the name of climate change, it may suffer some real declines. With this story, Reuters is reaching for a political angle rather than accurately portraying the state of Italy’s dairy industry and the threats posed to it by expensive, intermittent wind and solar power.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 7 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
ntesdorf
July 18, 2026 7:30 pm

This is a particularly cheesy old story from the bowels of Reuters.

Scissor
Reply to  ntesdorf
July 18, 2026 8:02 pm

Cheesy but no Gouda.

sherro01
July 18, 2026 8:25 pm

Linnea,
You are involved in communication in the US, so do you have a view on why major US communicators consistently publicize discredited stories about climate?
Is this a form of trump Derangement Syndrome, where several big guys declined to broadcast his talk on Chinese Communist party involvement in past US elections?
Are the major US communicators a part of the Democrat far left, or do they have another agenda like TDS?
As an Australian scientist, I find it weird that they frequently promote what I would quicky call poor science. Why? It rubs off over here, with our current Government being climate change fanatics.
Geoff S

SxyxS
Reply to  sherro01
July 19, 2026 12:53 am

It can not be a form of TDS as these kind of stories have been publicized way before Trump entered politics.
It’s not TDS but standard MO.

In this case the standard fearporn(AGW threatens everything) meets predictive programming,
as at one point the negative effects of Green Energy and war on Farming will kick in –
and then it’ll be blamed on Global Warming and say : I told you so.

Same story with burned acreages and water shortages where an increase in population and deliberate missmanagement(the region of Munich had the highest precipitation in 2025, a few month later they have the Greens in charge and a “water shortage”)
will lead to the desired outcome.

Now if such scenarios hit the minds of people who got a “climate education ” (AGW propaganda and vote-left-indoctrination by the state,considered a good thing by some conservatives)
they’ll accept any kind of tyranny in order to get saved from the climate catastrophy.

Reuters&Co don’t not suffer from TDS and irrational warming fear – they have created them on purpose.
That’s the reason why they went on with the baseless Russian Collusion for years but rather ignore or marginalize the Chinese collusion claims that may have more substance .

Reply to  SxyxS
July 19, 2026 10:48 am

Climate alarmism makes life easy for “journalists” as they an pretty much just make up stories- compared to the hard work of serious journalism.

Colin Belshaw
Reply to  sherro01
July 19, 2026 1:18 pm

Linnea,
I, too, have a question, or questions, which are aimed at both you and Anthony:
Your eloquent, but straightforward data-driven rebuttals of the catastrophic nonsense repeatedly published by the likes of the Guardian (top of the list?) and others, do you ever get a response? No – I’ll rephrase that: do you ever get a coherent response?
And do you ever send your rebuttals direct to the publishing entity? And if you do, is there ever any response . . . or do they simply behave in a manner which they consider appropriate for an evil denialist?

Neil Pryke
July 18, 2026 9:42 pm

Now…a battery fire on an electric delivery truck…or solar panels on a warehouse roof…

Reply to  Neil Pryke
July 19, 2026 12:01 am

Just a question of time my friend, just a question of time…

John Hultquist
Reply to  Neil Pryke
July 19, 2026 8:09 am

… will ruin any Parmesan cheese therein. Or did I miss your point?

July 18, 2026 11:53 pm

“dairy cows misted with water to cool them down”…

Well if they’re kept in a shitty barn and being the kind of “turbo cow”, bred especially to produce milk in abundance, it does not surprise me.

Tell that to a farmer who has his cows in free range and old breeds…he’ll laugh so hard he’ll fall off his milk chair.

I think the crap a cow drops on a daily basis contains way less shit than this news from Reuters.

maybe a cow joke in accordance to this never ending retarded heat wave BS:

Which type of milk maids do cows prefer during the hot summer months?
The ones with cold hands.

Well I find it funny, the other joke I have in mind consists of Trump, the result of tonight’s endgame and a telephone. sarc

Ddwieland
July 19, 2026 7:24 am

Once again we see the nonsensical claim that “climate change” is causing some bad thing. It’s now uncommon for “news” reports to reference global warming, which can be measured if it occurs, and instead attribute troubles to unmeasurable “climate change”. The reversal of meaning never occurs to alarmists and blind followers, who ignore the fact that change is a result of some force, not a force itself.

KevinM
July 19, 2026 1:50 pm

“Parmigiano Reggiano is named after two of the areas which produce it, the Italian provinces of Parma and Reggio Emilia (Parmigiano is the Italian adjective for the city and province of Parma and Reggiano is the adjective for the province of Reggio Emilia)”

plus

“Summer temperatures in Parma, Italy, range from average highs of 28°C to 31°C (82°F to 88°F) and average lows of 17°C to 20°C (63°F to 68°F).”