From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
By Paul Homewood
I was in the middle of writing up the story of the heatwave and the supposed record June temperature set at Class 5 junk station Santon Downham, when lo and behold three days after the event the Met Office “discovered” an even higher temperature in Norfolk on the Friday!
Amazingly Lingwood, near Norwich, was nearly half a degree hotter than even Santon Downham, which should set alarm bells ringing:


Both are junk Class 5 sites, but Lingwood is truly worse than junk, as Ray Sanders has diligently revealed at Tallbloke.
As Ray notes, the weather station is just yards north of the edge of a thick wood, apparently in someone’s back garden:


The winds were from the south on Friday, so that bank of trees acted as a very efficient sun trap, preventing any air circulation. It is also surrounded on the other three sides by a tall hedge.
It really is difficult imagining a worse site for measuring temperatures.
Lingwood really does sum up how bad the Met Office’s temperature network is. In fact, it has gone beyond descriptions such as “bad” or “poor”. It is now corrupt, in the same way as the Soviets manipulated statistics for political purposes.
The Met Office keep these sites going, and even open new ones, because they need the artificially high temperatures they produce for political purposes.
Their excuse that it is hard to find pristine sites is hogwash. I could drive out of Norwich and within ten minutes find plenty of open fields, perfect for meteorological purposes.
I’m away at the mo, so my full analysis will be published in the next day or so. That is, as long as the Met Office don’t miraculously find an even hotter place in the meantime!

