Not All Daily Temperature Records Are the Same

From the Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Cliff Mass

Yesterday, the temperature at SeaTac Airport rose to 89F,  beating the all-time daily record for the date (86F)!

Today, even if the temperature is the same, it won’t break any records.

How could this be?

It turns out that not all records are equal.

Let me explain.

Below is a plot of observed temperatures (blue bars), average temperature range (brown band),  and record highs (red) and lows (blue) for June at Boeing Field in Seattle.

Look carefully at the record highs.   A large variation of record highs in June from 81F to 104F!  Generally around 90F.   

So why the variability?    

It turns out that to get the really high temperatures in western Washington, the atmosphere needs to organize itself in a very specific way, generally with a strong upper-level ridge and offshore-directed flow at low levels.

And on some days, by the luck of the draw, the atmosphere gets the right setup for maximal heat. After many years, the needed flow pattern occurs, and the temperature climbs to record levels.

Global warming plays very little role in these records—the key is getting the right atmospheric flow situation.

Would you like me to prove this to you?

Here is a plot of the highest maximum temperature each year between June 7 and June 21 since 1950 at Olympic Airport (a less urbanized location than SeaTac).   No apparent upward trend.

Turning back to SeaTac, below is a plot of the highest temperature on June 14th at that location (below).  

2025 was the warmest year on record for that date.  But note!  There is no trend in the record temperatures for that date over the entire period of record.

In fact, the highest temperatures on June 14th are trending down!  (brown line).  

So the global warming claims for the origin of such records should be taken with a large grain of salt.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Nick Stokes
June 15, 2026 10:09 pm

It turns out that not all records are equal.”

Well, yes. I think the enthusiasm for records for the calendar day are pretty much a US thing. And as shown, flaky.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 15, 2026 11:18 pm

Yes. Daily temperatures in a specific location are an extremely noisy metric.

That’s why climate scientists focus more on long term trends across large geographic areas rather than isolated calendar day records.

They provide a much more reliable estimate of the underlying climate signal.

Deniers, on the other hand, like to cherry pick this noise because the large scale, long term trend is far less favorable to their position. 

leefor
Reply to  Eldrosion
June 15, 2026 11:30 pm

“19 Mar 2026A California desert community tied the highest March temperature ever recorded in the U.S., amid a record-breaking winter heat wave in the Southwest.’

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-shore-california-ties-march-temperature-record-southwest-heat-wave/

You mean those lying, denying bastards? 😉

Reply to  leefor
June 16, 2026 12:09 am

As I said:

That’s why climate scientists focus more on long term trends across large geographic areas rather than isolated calendar day records.”

The word “more” does not imply that one metric completely disregards the other.

Rather, it indicates that one metric receives greater emphasis than the other. The second metric is still considered and given attention, as the evidence in your linked source demonstrates.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  Eldrosion
June 15, 2026 11:35 pm

As the human body does not have one temperature, neither does a large geographical area, particularly land.
Catch up – the Northern Hemisphere does not have the same climate as the Southern Hemisphere.
Carbon dioxide does not control the global climate, many other things are the primary causes of changes such as precession of the equinox, alteration in the elliptical orbit around the sun, distance of earth from sun as altered by the huge planets Jupiter, Neptune and Uranus with moons and periodic changes in the magnetosphere of the sun modulating the cosmic ray nucleation of ice crystals forming clouds. There is even present in stratigraphic studies for the passage of the solar system through one of the arms of the Milky Way.
And, btw, the overall warming has stopped and the cooling period has already commenced.
I accepted it as a fact that climate changes from my youth, eighty years ago and probably before you were born

Reply to  Phillip Chalmers
June 16, 2026 12:24 am

neither does a large geographical area, particularly land.”

Large geographic regions have average temperatures that can be measured, calculated, and monitored over time.

Catch up – the Northern Hemisphere does not have the same climate as the Southern Hemisphere.”

I did not say there was.

Carbon dioxide does not control the global climate, many other things are the primary causes of changes such as precession of the equinox, alteration in the elliptical orbit around the sun, distance of earth from sun as altered by the huge planets Jupiter, Neptune and Uranus with moons”

Precession mainly changes when seasons occur relative to Earth’s position in its orbit. So its climatic effects are strongest at regional and seasonal scales. There isn’t a large effect on global mean insolation.

It’s also operating on timescales that are MUCH SLOWER than the RAPID WARMING we’re currently observing, just like the other variables you mentioned.

And, btw, the overall warming has stopped and the cooling period has already commenced.”

No, it hasn’t. The longterm UAH trend is currently about 0.16°C/decade.

Back in 2002, I saved a cooling prediction by John Daly:

http://www.john-daly.com/press/press-01a.htm#iceman

Since then, there have been countless predictions of imminent cooling. Virtually all of them have either failed outright or are performing very poorly against observed temperatures. Given this track record, it’s ironic that climate skeptics often accuse mainstream climate science of making poor predictions.

GHGs are expected to remain a persistent warming influence, and the temperature record continues to reflect that.

Reply to  Eldrosion
June 16, 2026 12:40 am

Daily temperatures in a specific location are an extremely noisy metric.

Especially daily maximums at single locations, which have a very high signal-to-noise ratio.

Anyone seriously looking for a warming signal would use long term, regional monthly averages.

Here’s NOAA’s 1950-present June average temperature record for Washington State with linear trend. The warming is right there.

Screenshot-2026-06-16-083930
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 16, 2026 1:25 am

Not only a US thing but a U.K. thing too.

June 15, 2026 10:22 pm

As always. Warm temperature records = climate change; global warming. Cold record temperatures, well that’s just weather. Never fails. I appreciate the facts and data presented by Cliff.

MrGrimNasty
June 16, 2026 12:45 am

Looking at one date certainly tells you nothing about the presence, or not, of a warming climate.

Such records throw up all sorts of weirdness. In the Central England Temperature series of nearly 400 years, there was one day in June (I think) that stood alone having never reached 90F until a couple of years ago.

There is still one day in the middle of June that is a clear 2C colder on average than all the rest. This is nothing but pure chance. Clearly if the record is maintained for long enough, it should ‘catch up’.

What is sure is that currently the overall maximum envelope is being nudged up year after year.

Reply to  MrGrimNasty
June 16, 2026 1:23 am

One day in June 1975 saw a cricket match in Derbyshire abandoned not because of rain but because of snow.