Solar Power Threatens to Overwhelm Electricity Grid

From THE DAILY SKEPTIC

by Will Jones

Solar power is threatening to overwhelm the UK electricity grid this summer as gluts of supply create a risk of blackouts and leave households and businesses facing being asked to consume excess power. The Telegraph has the story.

Energy chiefs are drawing up plans to stop the electricity grid being overwhelmed by solar power this summer.

The National Energy System Operator (Neso) said it would be forced to use “more tools, more often” to keep power networks stable when sunny weather caused surges in energy generation.

This would include paying households and factories to consume excess power for the first time, as well as potentially issuing unprecedented orders to switch off large power stations.

Neso issued the warning as Rachel Reeves travelled to Washington, where she is expected to urge a gathering of world leaders to “follow her plan” to combat the energy crisis caused by the conflict in the Middle East.

At the International Monetary Fund summit, the Chancellor will call for “collective action” while urging countries to embrace Net Zero to boost energy security.

She will also pledge to “do all in her power to keep costs down for the British public”, warning against “knee-jerk decisions that are unaffordable and deepen economic pain”. …

In its summer outlook, published on Tuesday, Neso said war in Iran would push prices higher because of Britain’s dependence on gas, but that it had no concerns about the security of electricity supplies this summer.

However, it warned that gluts of solar power and “low demand” periods were making the grid more difficult to manage as Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, rolled out swathes of new wind and solar farms to hit Net Zero.

Grid instability occurs when energy demand is low but renewables still generate large amounts of power. If not counterbalanced, this can trigger blackouts.

But many onshore solar and wind farms are not directly connected to the main transmission system and cannot be managed by Neso, which is tasked with keeping electricity networks stable.

It means it must balance the system in other ways, such as paying larger power plants to turn off or paying consumers to ramp up demand.

The amount of solar on the grid has more than doubled to 22 gigawatts in the past decade, as households and businesses have sought to cut their power bills by installing rooftop panels.

Worth reading in full.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bryan A
April 14, 2026 10:20 pm

Gee now there’s a mixed message. Solar (Zero emission energy) creates a problem with a glut of rooftop solar installations. So the solution is to embrace Net Zero??? Isn’t Net Zero defined as a glut of renewable energy sources?

Reply to  Bryan A
April 15, 2026 12:08 am

Nett Zero is like kayak made from icecubes, has nothing to do with what it’s named after. But watch it get renamed in time as the absurdity becomes clearer

Bryan A
April 14, 2026 10:23 pm

Gluts of Solar at Low Demand Periods creating a problem? Solution … install solar that only works at High Demand Periods. Oh … Wait…
Solar DOESN’T WORK at High Demand Periods does it?

Reply to  Bryan A
April 14, 2026 11:59 pm

🤣😂😁

Chris Hanley
April 14, 2026 10:54 pm

That photo — have the British gone insane?
PV systems in regions of moderate insolation like Switzerland and countries north of the Swiss Alps act as net energy sink.
“PV systems in regions of moderate insolation like Switzerland and countries north of the Swiss Alps, provide little more than material-intensive, labour-intensive and capital-intensive energy, resulting in high consumption of resources.”
Where are they going to put them all in 10 – 15 years?
AI: Australia faces a massive influx of end-of-life solar panels, with over 60,000 tons reaching end-of-life last year and a growing risk of hazardous heavy metals, including lead and cadmium, leaching into the environment if sent to landfill.
Currently recycling is not economic, governments will end up subsidizing installation operation and safe disposal of the useless things.

Chris Hanley
Reply to  Chris Hanley
April 14, 2026 11:00 pm

Correction: subsidizing installation operation and disposal of the useless worse than useless things.

April 14, 2026 10:54 pm

Being paid to use electricity or even getting it for free at certain times makes no economic sense in and anyway.
In Britain on warm sunny summer days everybody is out enjoy the 3 days of warmth not at home washing, ironing and using an oven. The best that can be hoped for is a mass lawn mowing, until the nirvana of net zero when every home has an electric heating and cooling system.

observa
April 14, 2026 11:22 pm

If only the pesky deplorables didn’t want electricity at the right voltage and frequency at all the wrong times then the brains trust would be home and hosed.

Rod Evans
April 14, 2026 11:34 pm

The most disturbing feature of this latest revealing concern about excess solar, is the Chancellor still finding some obscure logic to suggest it requires everyone to support this waste of public money supporting overbuilding of intermittent electricity generation.
Ed Miliband has just walked all over objectors in East Anglia Suffolk/Lincolnshire by authorising the largest build yet of solar panel installations. The company behind the project happens to be one of the Labour Party’s biggest donors, make of that what you will.
The driver of this madness is curtailment payments. The installers of these wind parks know they are harvesting state compensation payments for when the grid is oversupplied and they are told to shut off supply.
As the number of wind and solar parks grow in number so does the curtailment payments i.e. money for doing nothing. With solar it is particularly insidious. The only time it can produce maximum output is when demand is at its lowest thus curtailment payments become the commercial incentive to cover ever more farmland in pointless solar panels.
Only a completely mad literally insane administration could countenance doing this.
At the same time, Labour government are banning extraction of our own oil and gas, insisting we must import such from Norway who are extracting it from the very same North Sea we are banning our domestic firms from accessing?
If anyone can explain Reeves and Miliband’s logic please enlighten us?