The Genesis Revitalizing U.S. Scientific Research

By Duggan Flanakin

One day after the launch of the Artemis 2 mission to the moon – the first in over half a century – the Department of Energy announced the launch of the Genesis Mission – a bold initiative to transform how the U.S. conducts scientific research and engineering. By democratizing access to advanced computing capabilities, the initiative could unlock new levels of scientific discovery and innovation that benefit the entire country.

The White House says the Genesis Mission has the potential to dramatically accelerate breakthroughs in fusion energy, power grid optimization, and materials science. The mission is built on three pillars – a computing platform for accelerating discovery, a portfolio of national challenges to serve as proving grounds, and a university engagement effort to rethink STEM education.

First announced last November, the mission is led by DOE Under Secretary for Science Dr. Dario Gil. President Trump lured Gil away from a 22-year career at IBM, where he had risen to senior vice president and director of IBM Research. Gil says the Genesis Mission “is building something like ‘an internet’ of science. It’s an intelligence layer connecting all the scientific instruments, laboratories, and universities into a seamless ecosystem for discovery.”

To kick off the Genesis Mission, the DOE announced a $293 million Request for Application (RFA), “The Genesis Mission: Transforming Science and Energy with AI.” The agency invited interdisciplinary teams to leverage novel AI models and frameworks to address 26 national challenges spanning advanced manufacturing, biotechnology, critical materials, nuclear energy, and quantum information science.

The RFA is open to teams from DOE National Laboratories, U.S. industry, and academia. Phase I awards range from $500,000 to $750,000 for a 9-month project period. Phase II awards range from $6 million to $15 million over a 3-year project period. Phase I applications and Phase II letters of intent are due April 28, and Phase II applications are due May 19. Successful AI models and workflows may be integrated into the American Science Cloud.

In concert with the mission, the DOE, in collaboration with Idaho National Laboratory INL), Argonne National Lab (ANL), Microsoft, and Everstar, used AI mapping to convert a safety analysis document needed as part of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s licensing process.

The team utilized Everstar’s Gordian AI solution, built on the Microsoft Azure platform, to convert the Preliminary Documented Safety Analysis for DOE’s National Reactor Innovation Center’s Generic High Temperature Gas Reactor into sections equivalent to an NRC license application.

The 208-page final document took just a single day to generate using the AI tool, whereas heretofore it took a team of people 4 to 6 weeks to complete the same task. As lagniappe, the AI tool also comprehensively identified missing or incomplete information needed to successfully complete an NRC application.

The next step toward full implementation is for a reviewing agent to evaluate the AI-generated documents against NRC guidance to validate they are ready for formal submittal. The team is also developing a benchmarking rubric to provide a confidence grade for the Gordian AI’s performance.

This project follows an earlier collaboration between INL and Microsoft to deploy an Azure AI-based solution to show how advanced AI models can generate engineering and safety analysis reports.

A recent NRIC study highlighted how AI has the potential to reduce both document development time and regulatory review cycles by up to 50% while also improving accuracy, consistency, and traceability. Using these and other AI tools therefore has the potential to dramatically lower the cost – and shorten the time — for nuclear reactor permitting.

These and other hoped-for breakthroughs come under the auspices of the “Delivering Nuclear Energy That is Faster, Safer, Cheaper Challenge” under the Genesis Mission.

The DOE is using a suite of explainable AI solutions, including surrogate models, agentic workflows, autonomous labs, and digital twins to meet its goal of cutting both timeframes and operational costs for nuclear energy deployment at least by half – for design, licensing, manufacturing, construction, and operation.

Fusion energy is another prime example of how AI can compress timelines. Up till now, developing high-performance computing simulation codes that match real-world observations take weeks or even months to run at the desired level of fidelity.

But by training neural networks on the output of these validated simulations, researchers can produce AI-based models that issue predictions up to tens of thousands of times faster. In sum, AI tools may bring fusion energy much closer to reality than “30 years away.”

According to Gil, some practical applications of the Genesis Mission involve the nation’s electric grids. According to grid operators, 80% to 90% of developer interconnection applications are deficient. Should the DOE Office of Electricity’s AI-agentic framework, now under development, become operational, applicants could identify and correct errors before submitting applications and thus allow interconnection studies to begin up to a year earlier.

Brookhaven National Laboratory is building an AI emulator called Grid FM that can accelerate power flow calculations by a factor of 100. For the Texas transmission grid (ERCOT) there are 2,000 nodes, more than a thousand potential connection points, 4,000 contingencies, and 10 different 24-hour load scenarios at 5-minute increments – adding up to roughly 10 billion power flow simulations. What would take 20 years with conventional methods can be completed using Grid FM in about 2 months.  

Nuclear-related challenges also include several related to nuclear weapons, nuclear energy research, and cleanup and restoration of nuclear reactor sites. Other challenges go far beyond nuclear energy and grid security, including reenvisioning advanced manufacturing and industrial productivity, reimagining construction and operation of buildings, scaling the biotechnology revolution, and securing America’s critical minerals supply.

The Genesis Mission will also address discovering quantum algorithms with AI, realizing quantum systems for discovery, recentering microelectronics in America, securing U.S. leadership in data centers, predicting U.S. water for energy, unleashing subsurface energy assets, designing materials with predictable functionality, achieving AI-driven autonomous laboratories, and accelerating materials discovery, production, and qualification for strategic deterrence.

Like the Artemis mission, the Genesis Mission is part of President Trump’s grand strategy to restore American dominance and stimulate the U.S. economy through a revival of manufacturing and global leadership across the sciences.

While the Artemis mission has captured global attention, Gil promises astounding results from the Genesis Mission, boasting that “We ain’t seen nothing yet!”

Duggan Flanakin is a senior policy analyst at the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow who writes on a wide variety of public policy issues.

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KevinM
April 9, 2026 2:08 pm

“a university engagement effort to rethink STEM education”

Best rethinking has to go back to grade school. Stop pushing kids who don’t like STEM into STEM to make the brochures look more inclusive. Some of those kids have important talents that civilization loses because ‘the agenda’ wanted a mediocre scientist instead of a fantastic HVAC tech.

KevinM
Reply to  KevinM
April 9, 2026 2:09 pm

ie every kid does not need a BS to be their best self. Stop tracking every kid for college.

Reply to  KevinM
April 9, 2026 2:33 pm

To your point, Mike Rowe is one of the most insightful social thinkers out there, with his advocacy and support for kids aspiring to the skilled trades.

Mac
Reply to  KevinM
April 9, 2026 3:28 pm

Australia has schools for trades. I hired a tile contractor and an electrical contractor to work on the house we owned. Both did fairly extensive jobs and the results were excellent. Apprenticeships in the US work to most extent but schools led by instructors in the trades I think would be better.

Reply to  Mac
April 9, 2026 3:58 pm

A problem is that academic institutions often expect instructors to have a high level of academic certification to teach a particular subject, so sometimes you end up with a woke indoctrinated person with very little practical experience.

Also, anyone with a very high level of knowledge and understanding of the reality of practical application, in say an engineering field, can get far better pay doing something other than teaching at an academic institution.

When I was teaching Civil Eng at Uni, the “design” projects in years 3 and 4 always had an outside “consultant” who invented, ran and marked the final projects, with the academics keeping the admin and helping student with things like organisation, calculations etc.. (projects done in teams of 4, often like herding cats !)

I got on well with those consultant guys, often acting as a “devil’s advocate” and throwing in “maybe you could try this” ideas, which the consultant and I would argue about with the students.

Great fun, and great for learning (me included)

April 9, 2026 2:22 pm

Pretty sure that most researchers are using AI where they can already….but anyway, being able to apply for big bucks to mention AI in their papers will surely result in many papers mentioning AI…in a sort of self serving circle of taxpayer funded AI hype….like mentioning climate change in your grant application was once the key to a successful application….

Reply to  DMacKenzie
April 9, 2026 5:01 pm

now use both- AI and climate- a sure winner in grant application!

David Wojick
Reply to  DMacKenzie
April 9, 2026 5:02 pm

Actually there is a huge fight going on regarding how much AI to allow in journal articles and in research. But there is also the field of AI research which Genesis may be targeting. It is all very vague at this point.

Bryan A
April 9, 2026 2:25 pm

If the AI says “Investing in Wind and Solar generation is Bad for Grid Sourced Energy” then I might believe it is 10,000 times faster and better than simply wrong 10,000 times faster.

David Wojick
Reply to  Bryan A
April 9, 2026 5:04 pm

Don’t blame AI. It is trained on left wing writings just like kids are.

Rud Istvan
April 9, 2026 2:27 pm

Sounds utopian, but IMO simply will not work. The reason is IPR, which every research organization wants, but not to share.

I was part of the 1990’s Motorola efforts to create telecomm industry engineering ‘standards’ like Bluetooth, 3G, then 4G, and now 5G, which require pooling IPR into so called SEPs subject to FRAND licensing. Very difficult even with simple fixed non R&D engineering goals that jointly benefit all participants by creating new product markets.

A concrete research example. Some years ago, I spotted a potential immunotherapeutic cancer breakthru (was part of my then job at a private translational medical research company backed by about $200 million in equity). All the potential R&D required (which we would have conducted and funded) was that John’s Hopkins and Mayo pool their underlying background IPR so our proposed research could proceed without infringement. NOPE—even tho had we succeeded, they both would have gotten big royalties. Basic reason was simple. They were both jealous that we rather than they spotted the combination, and neither wanted to relent to the other or share credit.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
April 9, 2026 3:19 pm

Oh, the purity of scientific (what’s in it for me) research, as conducted by manger occupying dogs.

Curious George
Reply to  Rud Istvan
April 9, 2026 5:51 pm

An interesting related fact: Last December, Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (NYSE:DJT) entered the nuclear fusion race after it agreed to buy California-based fusion startup TAE Technologies in a $6-billion merger, creating one of the world’s first publicly traded nuclear fusion companies.

David Wojick
April 9, 2026 3:31 pm

Here is something we sent to the Genesis folks at DOE’e Office of Science:
https://www.cfact.org/2025/12/29/cfact-comments-on-using-ai-to-understand-big-bodies-of-research/

Reply to  David Wojick
April 9, 2026 5:05 pm

Impressive!

Mac
April 9, 2026 3:37 pm

I think involving many universities could work out well as long as the research in various departments are not infected by woke. I was at UCLA years ago during affirmative action which now translates to DEI.I saw students that should never have been admitted in my opinion. For example I read recently that UCLA medical schools dean is a woman who is very much into DEI. The best and brightest should be foremost in any endeavor so vetting needs to be rigorous!

1saveenergy
April 9, 2026 3:44 pm

[“Like the Artemis mission, the Genesis Mission is part of President Trump’s grand strategy to restore American dominance”]

I don’t think the Artemis mission was a Trump strategy !!

Development began in 2011, after Congress directed NASA to replace the retiring Space Shuttle and the cancelled Constellation rockets.

So the development program was well underway before Trump’s 1st term.

6 years later, President Trump signed his Space executive order…on June 30, 2017,

On March 26, 2019, Mike Pence announced that NASA’s Moon landing goal would be accelerated by four years, with a planned landing in 2024.

The NASA team has done a great job. Here’s to a safe splashdown.

April 9, 2026 4:30 pm

Make America Optimistic Again.

Sonicsuns
April 9, 2026 6:45 pm

Some of this is lifted directly from the National Today article:

By democratizing access to advanced computing capabilities, the initiative could unlock new levels of scientific discovery and innovation that benefit the entire country.

The fact that Flanakin couldn’t be bothered to put this into his own words is a sign that he doesn’t really know what he’s talking about.