Every watt you get for free, from sun or wind, is one you don’t need to get from the Middle East. Sort of simple. A lesson the third world countries are picking up on. And who gains from this, China, making solar panels at K-mart prices.
A clever genius is behind this plan, I think.
It really is sad how this lie keeps getting repeated over and over again.
Wind and solar result in little if any savings in terms of fossil fuels.
The reason is simple, much like the morons who keep pushing the above myth.
Actual fossil fuel plants need to be kept in warm to hot standby so that they can take over on short notice when wind and solar fail. Which they do quite frequently.
In the third world, what does it mean to be reliable? Many areas have no power at all. So having 10 hours of solar power a day, that’s reliable. And distribution problems are only a problem if you plan to distribute the power.
Putting first world constraints on third world power, that is your problem.
My 5 year old van system, with 2x175W panels and a 100 Ah battery, paid for itself in two years. Now it’s free.
That’s interesting. I had a 100 W panel on a trailer RV with smaller batteries which was useful for utilities without motors. They must be much better now, suggest you get in touch with Wooden Boat Magazine which has had a few articles on electric boats which they have found are only useful for certain limited operations. They are interested and open minded about such boats.
In comparison “President Donald Trump on Wednesday said it’s “not possible” for the federal government to fund Medicare, Medicaid and child care costs, arguing that it should be up to the states to “take care” of those programs while the federal government focuses on military spending.”
So which is more hopeless spending money on child care and health benefits or on bombing innocent civilians back to stone age? I know which one I would prefer to spend money on. And which should be the goal of the government.
Breaking>>> Story Tip –
There is speculation that Lee Zeldin current Administrator at the EPA has been mentioned in discussions about potential cabinet shifts. Reports indicate President Trump has privately considered or discussed replacing Attorney General Pam Bondi with Zeldin.
Zeldin IMO has been a standout in the Trump administration, he will be sorely missed at the EPA if he is confirmed as the new AG.
The Iran War Reveals Who Is Living In A Fantasy World
From THE MANHATTAN CONTRARIAN
Whether you like it or hate it, the war in Iran has definitely had the effect of exposing some of the ridiculous fantasies in the world to a serious dose of reality.
Consider the UK. After implementing an expansive welfare state in the latter 20th century (e.g., free health care for all!), the UK since 2000 has gone all-in on the idea of an energy system free of hydrocarbon fuels. The 2008 Climate Change Act — passed with an overwhelming majority including support from all major political parties — committed the UK to 80% reduction in carbon emissions by 2050. That mandate was then amended in 2019 to make the legally-binding target for 2050 what is known as “net zero” carbon emissions. That change got passed essentially unanimously in Parliament, without even a recorded vote.
Here in the 21st century, the UK has pursued its net zero fantasy with a vengeance. Wind turbines and solar panels now cover the countryside. Many power plants that use coal or other fossil fuels have been closed. Perhaps most important, the UK has banned essentially all exploration for and development of fossil fuel energy within its own borders, including offshore in territorial waters. Although there are large shale-gas formations beneath the UK, the practice of “fracking” to exploit them has been subject to a moratorium since 2019, and the current Labour government has vowed to make that moratorium permanent. The current government has also not issued any new licenses for drilling for oil or gas in the North Sea, and says it will continue that policy, although a small amount of drilling continues under pre-existing licenses.
The logic of these policies appears simple: carbon emissions damage the environment, and after all, we can get all the energy we need from the free and abundant wind and sun.
Into this mix has dropped the Iran war, and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Maybe things were not as simple as they had seemed.
In the past few days, a serious shortage of aviation fuel has arisen in the UK. The shortage is not limited to the UK, but apparently is particularly acute in that country. From the Daily Mail today:
[The] Iran war has continued to wreak havoc on the aviation industry, and the UK could soon be experiencing a jet fuel shortage. The last known shipment of jet fuel to Britain from the Middle East is expected to arrive within 48 hours amid alarm over shortages within a week. Data providers Kpler and Vortexa say the consignment on the Libyan-flagged Maetiga vessel is expected to reach the UK from Saudi Arabia on Thursday. The blockage of the Strait of Hormuz due to the ongoing conflict means no other cargoes heading to the UK from the region can be seen on the water, they added.
What, you mean the wind and sun aren’t going to work to fly the airplanes? It’s almost impossible to believe how naive and detached from reality these people are. The wind and sun are also not going to work to run industry, agriculture, or ground transportation. And for that matter, they are not going to work to provide continuous, reliable electricity, which is the only type of electricity worth having. But the immediate crunch is hitting the aviation fuel business.
President Trump reacted with a message that you may have seen, telling the UK and other European countries to “Go get your own oil.”:
They have been living in a fantasy world, where the U.S. defense umbrella has meant that they never have had to face reality. If this turns out to be the event that breaks the net zero nonsense, so much the better.
Share this:
Like this: