About 700 million years ago, runaway glaciers covered the entire planet in ice. Harvard researchers modeled the conditions that may have led to this so-called 'snowball Earth'. CREDIT (Image courtesy of NASA)

Claim: Anthropogenic Global Warming Could Lead to a New Ice Age

Essay by Eric Worrall

Never mind that Earth has endured far more warming than today’s world without revisiting the extremes of the ancient past.

Global warming could trigger the next ice age

Earth’s climate control system may cool so hard after warming that it freezes the planet over.

Date:December 21, 2025

Source:University of California – RiversideSummary:Scientists have uncovered a missing feedback in Earth’s carbon cycle that could cause global warming to overshoot into an ice age. As the planet warms, nutrient-rich runoff fuels plankton blooms that bury huge amounts of carbon in the ocean. In low-oxygen conditions, this process can spiral out of control, cooling Earth far beyond its original state. While this won’t save us from modern climate change, it may explain Earth’s most extreme ancient ice ages.

Why Ancient Ice Ages Were So Extreme

Geological records, however, tell a more dramatic story. Evidence shows that some of Earth’s earliest ice ages were so severe that ice and snow covered nearly the entire planet. According to the researchers, this level of freezing cannot be explained by a climate system that simply fine tunes itself.

The Role of Oceans, Nutrients, and Plankton

The newly identified factor involves how carbon is buried in the ocean. As atmospheric CO2 rises and temperatures increase, rainfall carries larger amounts of nutrients such as phosphorus into the sea. These nutrients stimulate the growth of plankton, microscopic organisms that absorb carbon dioxide through photosynthesis.

In warmer conditions, however, this system changes. Increased plankton growth can reduce oxygen levels in the ocean. With less oxygen available, phosphorus is more likely to be released back into the water instead of being permanently buried. This recycled phosphorus fuels even more plankton growth, whose decay further depletes oxygen and keeps nutrients circulating.

A Climate System That Can Overshoot

Rather than gently stabilizing Earth’s temperature, this feedback can drive cooling well past its original starting point. In the team’s computer simulations, the effect was strong enough to trigger an ice age.

As human activity continues to add CO2 to the atmosphere, the planet is expected to keep warming in the near term. The researchers’ model suggests that a cooling rebound will eventually follow. However, this future cooling is likely to be less extreme because higher oxygen levels reduce the strength of the nutrient feedback in the oceans.

Read more: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/12/251221043231.htm

Terrific piece of alarmist writing. After talking about snowball Earth for most of the article, they finally admit near the end that any future ice age overshoot will be less extreme because today’s world has higher oxygen levels in the atmosphere.

But if the current warming trend falters or even flips into a decline, like global temperature declined between 1940 and 1970, see they predicted it. It’s still all our fault.

The following is an episode of the wildly popular “In search of” series, featuring Leonard Nimoy, the actor who played the original Star Trek Doctor Spock.

In Search Of The Coming Ice Age features an impressive lineup of credentialed global cooling scientists, some of whom blamed global cooling on human industrial activity. One of the scientists, Stephen Schneider, who in the In Search Of episode advocated using nuclear reactors to melt the polar ice, shamelessly backflipped into warning people about global warming, which he blamed on human industrial activity. The Wikipedia article on Schneider claims Schneider backflipped in the early 1970s, but if so, why did he appear in the 1978 documentary advocating melting the polar ice caps?

I remembered watching In Search Of The Coming Ice Age as a kid in the late 70s. All the grownups were concerned, there was a lot of ice age alarmism in the media, quotes from concerned scientists, before the show was aired. The adults talked for days after the In Search Of episode aired, about how they would cope with the coming ice age, which everyone expected to happen in the next few decades. Everyone was worried about a how Australia could handle the expected flood of refugees escaping the advancing ice in the Northern Hemisphere, especially refugees from the Soviet Union.

Global Cooling 1940 to 1985
Global cooling 1940 to 1985. Source Wood for trees.

Our memory of the global cooling consensus is likely why anyone my age and older are far more skeptical than younger people. By the 1970s the world had cooled for 30 years, and the year before the In Search Of episode was broadcast, the horror 1977 Blizzard in Buffalo NY which led to the deaths of at least 27 people received worldwide coverage. So why wouldn’t there have been widespread concern about global cooling?

Similar conditions led to the deaths of 29 people in the 2022 Buffalo blizzard.

Dubious claims there was no global cooling consensus in the 1970s naturally leads people my age to question other alarmist claims – even more so when some alarmists like the people who wrote the article above start resurrecting global cooling claims.

All still our fault of course.

5 5 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
December 22, 2025 2:08 pm

To be geeky, it was Mr Spock.
Y’all get old enough, and the Green Blob has the track record of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Reply to  Tom Halla
December 22, 2025 2:37 pm

The way I see it, they thought it was so important to get the message out about the coming ice age that they beamed down Mr. Spock to play the character “Leonard Nimoy” as narrator.

Bryan A
December 22, 2025 2:15 pm

Not much more than a prediction based on the Earth’s natural cycles over the last 880,000 years.
100,000 years of glaciation followed by 10,000 years of warming. Followed by…
100,000 years of glaciation followed by 10,000 years of warming. Followed by…
100,000 years of glaciation followed by 10,000 years of warming. Followed by…
100,000 years of glaciation followed by 10,000 years of warming. Followed by…
100,000 years of glaciation followed by 10,000 years of warming. Followed by…
100,000 years of glaciation followed by 10,000 years of warming. Followed by…
100,000 years of glaciation followed by 10,000 years of warming. Followed by…
100,000 years of glaciation followed by 10,000 years of warming. Followed by…the next glaciation

KevinM
Reply to  Eric Worrall
December 22, 2025 3:42 pm

Since we weren’t there to see it, we have to take the word of the scientist who read the proxy used to tell us the weather 800,000 years ago.

December 22, 2025 2:20 pm

Glaciation is the inevitable consequence of the precession of Earth’s orbit. The peak solar intensity in the NH has been increasing since around 1700. That warms the oceans in the NH and increases the atmospheric water. The consequence of that is now being observed with new snowfall records being set across the NH every year.

Greenland is already increasing in altitude and the most productive glacier is advancing seaward. So re-glaciation of the NH is already under way. But it is a slow process and probably 200 years before permafrost is advancing south again.

Bryan A
December 22, 2025 2:27 pm

Geological records, however, tell a more dramatic story. Evidence shows that some of Earth’s earliest ice ages were so severe that ice and snow covered nearly the entire planet. According to the researchers, this level of freezing cannot be explained by a climate system that simply fine tunes itself

Of course Snowball Earth has happened in the past. But this was when there was basically a single land mass surrounded by a single ocean. Not 7 basically separate land masses with 5 oceans.

“The last major Snowball Earth event, known as the Marinoan glaciation, ended around 635 million years ago, during the Neoproterozoic Era, with the planet thawing rapidly from its global ice cover, marking a key transition before complex animal life emerged. Before that, the Sturtian glaciation (around 717-660 million years ago) was another significant freeze.”

KevinM
Reply to  Bryan A
December 22, 2025 3:46 pm

Sorry, this is not meant to be snippy, but I read that like: Moving my living room furniture might change the temperature on my couch more than adjusting the thermostat. Why does Earth’s geography affect what the sun is doing to it from 93 million miles away.

Bruce Cobb
December 22, 2025 2:29 pm

Heads they win, tails we lose.

Edward Katz
December 22, 2025 2:31 pm

Not the key word in this study/article: “could”. Yet maybe it “might not” , so the reality is that this is just another example of climate speculation and nothing to worry about, especially since the alarmists are always conjuring up one worst case scenario after the other to try to take governments, industries, businesses and consumers to take some sort of action, undoubtedly costly, to combat a non-problem.

December 22, 2025 2:35 pm

“In the team’s computer simulations, the effect was strong enough to trigger an ice age.”

Oh. Got it. Never mind then.

Bob
December 22, 2025 2:42 pm

These people are really getting desperate, losing is an ugly thing.

KevinM
Reply to  Bob
December 22, 2025 3:49 pm

Per Day After Tomorrow, it takes an ice age to scare New Yorkers. Google says it’s 34F there right now. Brrrrrrrr.

Temperature has to get about 70F warmer to be a problem today.

Nick Stokes
December 22, 2025 3:09 pm

Dubious claims there was no global cooling consensus in the 1970s”

There was none. It doesn’t help your case to trot out yet again the fake Time cover with a penguin.

KevinM
Reply to  Nick Stokes
December 22, 2025 3:51 pm

Did Time magazine print an Ice Age cover, or is it all garbage?

Hmmm: “A widely circulated image of a Time magazine cover titled “How To Survive The Coming Ice Age” is a digital fabrication. The image is a doctored version of a genuine April 2007 cover which featured a penguin and was headlined “The Global Warming Survival Guide”. 

Looking more…

“Science: Another Ice Age?” (November 13, 1972): This article explored a theory by scientist Emiliani that the Earth’s current warm period was already long and might end soon.
“Another Ice Age?” (June 24, 1974): This story noted a gradual cooling trend in mean global temperature since the 1940s and mentioned telltale signs like persistent ice near Iceland and the southward migration of armadillos. It also noted that this might be a temporary trend.
“WEATHER: The Big Freeze” (January 31, 1977): The headline for this issue was about the impact of a particularly cold American winter in 1976-77, not a coming ice age for the planet. 

Three verified real issues found. Not one but three.

Also: I personally was alive and watched the Nimoy thing when it came out. It ain’t fiction.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  KevinM
December 22, 2025 4:07 pm

“Science: Another Ice Age?”

Well, that isn’t about cooling in coming decades, or even centuries. From the article:

“Thus, Emiliani warns, the present period of “amiable climate,” which has already lasted 12,000 years, may soon come to an end, perhaps within the next 2,000 or 3,000 years.”

So an ice age after that? Not so fast:
In what direction will the earth’s climate then turn? Emiliani refuses to speculate. But if man continues his “interference with climate through deforestation, urban development and pollution,” says Emiliani in typical scientific jargon, “we may soon be confronted with either a runaway glaciation or a runaway deglaciation, both of which would generate unacceptable environmental stresses.””

No consensus there.

antigtiff
December 22, 2025 3:19 pm

It has been about 10000 years since the last real ice age. Since then there has been several dozen warm/cool cycles that are not clockwork – it is 2 or 3 centuries warming and then 2 or 3 centuries of cooling – it is time for cooling and it may have started or it might be another 50 years away,. The cooling would be a return to the Little Ice Age temps – not Snowball Earth…..unless …..unless it is a return to Snowball Earth – no one knows for sure. Lake Titicaca (nice name) is a good source of soil borings from the bottom of the lake which reveal temp history as a different source from the Greenland ice and Antarctic ice borings.

Reply to  antigtiff
December 22, 2025 3:26 pm

Not a cover, but here’s a TIME article from 1974 describing global cooling… https://time.com/archive/6878023/another-ice-age/ … from the article: when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age.
edit: Sorry antig, this was meant for Nick’s comment above yours.

KevinM
December 22, 2025 3:30 pm

“Dubious claims there was no global cooling consensus in the 1970s naturally leads people my age to question other alarmist claims” Same. Told my kids many times when they were younger – watch what happens with this global warming thing.

I listen to podcasts on my morning commute. The last few mornings were a Stuff You Should Know with Josh and Chuck – an episode on Doggerand, the supposedly populated land that once connected England to mainland Europe. The prevailing theory on how it disappeared involved climate change with melting glaciers, land subsiding and sea level rise 30x faster than today’s rate. Josh C called 30x “almost twice as fast”. Never once did either host dare to question how all those glaciers melted when nobody was driving SUVs. It’s not worth writing mail, I like the podcast so good enough.
.

jvcstone
December 22, 2025 3:42 pm

All these darn people warming the planet will be the end of the galaxy, or something like that

observa
December 22, 2025 3:56 pm

The dooming is all encompassing and everywhere around us. Just read the Antarctic bottom water-
Australian Researchers Uncover Fragile Balance Behind Antarctic Bottom Water, a Key Driver of Global Climate – Archyde
There is no escaping the dooming so resistance is futile. Just learn to accept the dooming and let the dooming flow over you. Immerse yourself in the dooming and learn to love the dooming and be at one with the dooming.

Verified by MonsterInsights