Essay by Eric Worrall
h/t Krishna Gans, Ron Long – “… In 2024, I found out that I had been spied on by German intelligence for years. Simultaneously, I keep receiving death threats from Antifa …”
‘Anti-Greta’ conservative activist seeks asylum in US over Antifa death threats — with support of Elon Musk
By Emily Crane
Published Oct. 29, 2025, 7:07 a.m. ETA young German activist dubbed the “anti-Greta” is seeking asylum in the United States after being hit with a wave of Antifa death threats over her political views and free speech championing.
Naomi Seibt, 25, recently filed the petition for political asylum — in a move she says was supported by Elon Musk — amid fears she will be killed or be thrown in prison if she returns to her native country.
…
“In 2024, I found out that I had been spied on by German intelligence for years. Simultaneously, I keep receiving death threats from Antifa,” she said.
“I went to the German police, and they told me that they can’t do anything about it as long as I have not actually been raped or killed.”
…
Read more: https://nypost.com/2025/10/29/world-news/naomi-seibt-seeks-asylum-in-us-over-antifa-death-threats-with-support-of-elon-musk/
I once saw Naomi speak in person at a Heartland conference, she’s passionate and committed to the causes she supports.
Tweet from Naomi Seibt;
Naomi isn’t the only European or British person who has accused authorities of abuse of power;
Sir Keir Starmer ‘responsible’ if anything happens to Nigel Farage, claims Reform UK policy chief
Zia Yusuf, Reform UK’s head of policy, told Sky News that the prime minister has “embarked on a campaign with his cabinet to incite violence” against Nigel Farage.
Wednesday 1 October 2025 12:23, UK
Reform UK has accused Sir Keir Starmer of “inciting violence” against Nigel Farage in his speech to the Labour Party conference on Tuesday, and said the prime minister will be “responsible” if anything happens to him.
Speaking to Sky News Breakfast, the party’s policy chief said the prime minister “knows he cannot beat Nigel at the ballot box”, so has instead tried to “demonise him”.
…
The prime minister also said the country must “go into that battle armed, not just with words and condemnation, but with action”.
…
Read more: https://news.sky.com/story/sir-keir-starmer-responsible-if-anything-happens-to-nigel-farage-claims-reform-uk-policy-chief-13442106
President Trump was targeted by violent rhetoric in the leadup to the 2024 election, which may have inspired the multiple assassination attempts. Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a crazy who may have been radicalised by online haters. Nigel Farage has accused UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer of using violent rhetoric, exposing Farage to the risk of assassination.
Naomi Seibt also has a significant profile. I believe Naomi when she suggests German authorities would not lose any sleep if she was murdered by Antifa or Last Generation extremists, or any of the alphabet soup of green radicals which currently infest Europe. I believe her when she says she is at risk of being murdered. Let’s hope her asylum application is processed quickly.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
““I went to the German police, and they told me that they can’t do anything about it as long as I have not actually been raped or killed.””
They certainly could if it’s known who threatened her. And, the German intelligence has no business investigating her unless they can claim she’s done something to justify it.
It’s a shame that Germany and the UK and Australia have gone bonkers over the climate- and of course some American states, like here in Wokeachusetts.
‘Bonkers’ is not quite the right word.
If you Google “Is there a good word for political persecution? It doesn’t come up with any single word.
How ’bout:
“… Germany and the UK and Australia have become orwellian …”
Well, according to goolge AI, AfD is
“” Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV, or Verfassungsschutz), formally designated the entire far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as a “right-wing extremist” organization in May 2025.
This classification followed a three-year investigation and a 1,100-page report that concluded the party’s platform and the statements of its representatives showed sufficient evidence of anti-constitutional endeavors, specifically an “ethnicity- and ancestry-based understanding of the people” that devalues entire population groups, such as those with a migration background from predominantly Muslim countries.”
so I am guessing that when Naomi Seibt was under surveliance it had/has nothing to do with her climate stance, but the question of anti-constitutional behavior of the party she supports.
It seems a bit of a stretch to make an issue out of it worth discussing here.
The criminal behavior and harasment by Anti-Fa or other organizations or people should be condemed and of course are illegal and IMHO are a worthwhile topic of discussion here!
“so I am guessing that when Naomi Seibt was under surveliance it had/has nothing to do with her climate stance, but the question of anti-constitutional behavior of the party she supports.”
It may have had something to do with her Party affiliation, but it probably had something to do with her position on human-caused climate change, too, as the Gestapo thinks it is anti-German to challenge the human-caused climate change meme.
bingo!
This is rubbish.
The polizei presume guilt before innocence.
If anything the GRUNE (German cops) are the worst extremists of all.
Having been shut in one of their crappy cells for hours for something I hadn’t done convinced me of the fascist tendencies of their Polizei for ever, never mind their shitty border forces that stop people randomly hours on the side of the road without even the slightest justification.
You probably know that the Gestapo was dissolved with the fall of the DDR,
To the best of my knowledge the Verfassungsschutz has a very limited scope and manpower and so far there is not a single climate related case they where involved with published, so maybe you are just wrong her (and as I said they seem to have already a perfect legitimate reason to put N. Seibt under surveillance based in her AFD support, they do not need two reasons and I guess they might shy away from the additional paperwork)
BTW, just supporting an unconstitutional organization in Germany and the resulting surveillance might not suffice as reason for an asylum in the US.
The German government has all but declared that any active disagreement with the ruling party is unacceptable behavior.
There seems to be a solid misunderstanding about which state organs are involved in Seibt’s complain.
The government asked the Verfassungsschutz to investigate AFD, which apparently also put Seibt under surveillance and concluded AFD to be an unconstitutional behavior, which is a legal not legislative question (aka the government was not involved in the observation or classification)
Neither the police nor the Gestapo was involved, the later is from a different country (I misspoke earlier, DDR had STASI, Gestapo is the NAZI equivalent).
Grant it. Now.
Listen to the Dems howl!
Listen to the German politicians howl.
They will be offended that the United States thinks it is necessary to grant asylum to one of their citizens, implying that the German government is doing something illegal and/or underhanded. Which they are. But they won’t like the world seeing such a controversy.
Yes, give her asylum. She is in danger if she goes back to Germany. German politicians are endangering their own citizens to the point that the citizen wants to escape Germany.
Yes, I don’t think the German politicians are going to enjoy this situation. They won’t like this view of themselves.
Authoritarian Germany. This, from the left-leaning side of the German political spectrum.
Many millions of German immigrants are already here from previous waves to get out of Germany, and Einstein could relate to the thuggery in the streets.
A few years ago a German couple was seeking asylum because the German government wanted to jail them for homeschooling their own child.
Biden of course, sent them back.
That is why a number of Germans have decided to move to a quieter part of Russia.
It goes farther back, even to the middle 19th century when half of my ancestry came over. Unfortunately the other half came from the British Isles, so it took lots of education.
But anyone who saw the speech knows that the Russia Today commentator was lying.
(Yes, I know he’s moved to another mysteriously funded channel since Russia was blocked when they invaded Ukraine).
Still, there’s a sucker born every minute. Especially among those who think they have discovered a new Messiah.
It’s why the 1st Commandment was placed 1st.
Okay, but beware of public transportation (NYC, DC, Charlotte, Chicago), American universities (for a lot of reasons), rooftops, line of sight hunting stands, narco boat docks, federal building entrances, and agenda science fests. I would suggest some safe places but those would then be targeted by the violent groups that supposedly have ‘no command structure.’
The American Boy Scout motto is (was) ; “Be prepared”. That is the best advice.
Guam is pretty safe as far as U.S. is concerned, though there is the threat of it capsizing.
Nothing says being anti-fascist quite like threatening to murder someone who disagrees with you.
You cannot hate either Antifa or Keir Starmer enough. What is interesting about Starmer is that he was Director of Public Prosecutions. He’s the one supposed to be upholding the law, not inciting public criminal attack against his political opposition. Does anyone in England still believe this MOFO is still worthy of being PM?
Noone ever thought he is worthy of being anything.
He is the opposite of an Alpha Male.
Just like Merkel that kind of person people start laughing as soon as they leave the room.
People who can never get into any position of relevance because they are so pathetic – and the last place for such small fish to succeed is the sharktank called politics.
If those people still succeed you can be 100% sure that the political process and democracy is only a show.
They are elevated and supported by political parties and, yes, they do make a mockery of democracy. The catch is parties also exist by virtue of democracy. Long story short its in the hands of the voters for better or worse.
And many voters are influenced by the Political News Media Propaganda.
A moron like Kamala Harris got 75 million votes in the last presidential election. In a rational, well-informed world, she would not get any votes.
Violence is the preferred response of those without reason.
I don’t know about that, communists and antifa reason quite well, it seems. Insane people are often very logical and so on-its that the premises are wrong. That said, I’m a reasonable person, as are many…but when reasonable people get pushed too far, they become “unreasonable”-then look out.
“Insane people are often very logical and so on-its that the premises are wrong.”
If the premise is wrong, it can’t be logical.
Logic is simply a sequence of steps. Example would be if the premise is that all red haired people are cannibals, then to stop the cannibals, we must-say for example-kill them. Here’s how we do it…and so on. Faulty premise, but the steps are sequential, so, logical. QED.
I supported Naomi Seibt until about 2 years ago. She had dropped from sight, and I figured she wasn’t doing much anymore. Evidently, I was wrong.
Western Europe is suffering from Suicidal Empathy, wherein they go so far as to sacrifice their own young in a quest to feel pious. Gad Saad video here, a book forthcoming.
This is how far the Green Blob Establishment has sunk. They feel perfectly justified in harassing and terrorizing a slight, young blonde woman for saying things they don’t want to hear.
Maybe someone needs to say about that, “How Dare You!”
Or maybe shout it.
Better do it quick before Greta copyright’s it.
Agreed. The difference between the Green Blob and the SturmAbteilung is undetectible. Antifa and the rest of them ARE what they claim to oppose.
It is past time to take seriously all groups who think government should be in charge of and control more and more of our lives. It is a dangerous idea and can only lead to bad things. Government is necessary but should have a limited role. Government should protect us from other nations, protect us from bad actors in our own nation, enforce reasonable laws, settle differences, make treaties with other nations and that is about it. Most governments in the world including our own have lost their way. It is time for us to take some of the wind out of their sails, legally of course.
The governments first responsibility is to protect the citizens FROM the government.
That’s like believing that pedophile employees in Kindergartens are there to protect children.
No, its the citizens’ responsibility-hence the Bill of Rights, emphasis in this case on admendments 1 and 2.
Attributed to Thomas Jefferson, he stated, “When people fear their government; there is tyranny; when government fears the people there is liberty.”
Another way of putting it was by John Adams. “Fear is the foundation of most governments.”
Nice notion. Can’t see it coming from any present government.
Unfortunate, and unhappily probably correct. In the US case, we’ll have to wait and see; in the previous admin, we were screwed to the damned wall.
‘Most governments in the world including our own have lost their way.’
True. Our Declaration is crystal clear in defining the very limited role of legitimate government:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
We’ve been off the rails for a long time.
At least since Franklin Roosevelt.
Governments derive their just powers from the governed.
“Just powers” is the way it should be, again, see above comment about 1st and 2nd Admendments. Problem is to define “just powers”. Trust not…
Am I understanding here that it is NOT illegal in Germany (and the UK?) to communicate death threats to someone? If I understand the text from the GROK AI website below correctly, it is illegal here in the U.S.
“Yes, communicating death threats is illegal in the United States under both federal and state laws, with only narrow exceptions (e.g., certain forms of artistic expression or hyperbole that a reasonable person wouldn’t interpret as genuine). Here’s a clear breakdown:
Federal Law
******************
If Ms.Seibt is not entitled to her opinions on climate and other issues, it unfortunately shows that we are again seeing the beginning of Europe’s backsliding on the issue of free speech. USVP Vance has lectured Europe once about this already if I recall. It appears he may need to do it again.
The US is NOT in the NATO alliance to defend countries where the respect for free speech rights is in the process of deteriorating. Our NATO allies need to understand this loudly and clearly.
Is there any process in U.S. law or the Constitution to withdraw from a treaty? I am not suggesting we leave NATO here. Just asking out of curiosity.
In most socialist countries, whether or not laws apply depends almost entirely on who the victim and perpetrator are.
“In most
socialistcountries, whether or not laws apply depends almost entirely on who the victim and perpetrator are” Fixed.>> Am I understanding here that it is NOT illegal in Germany (and the UK?) to communicate death threats to someone?
You understand wrong.
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__241.html
Laws,
I was merely asking whether it was illegal or not based on the statement below from the article. I don’t know if Ms. Seibt was actually told that the police could not do anything, but the quote from the article below led me to wonder whether Germany had laws against communicating threats of violence or death to someone.
I am glad to hear that they do have such laws. All civilized nations should.
“I went to the German police, and they told me that they can’t do anything about it as long as I have not actually been raped or killed.”
So, in the case of Ms. Seibt, are the German police not enforcing their own laws?
>> police not enforcing their own laws?
>> All civilized nations should.
Well, I am not sure where you are at, but I observe many examples in different countries, where police overlooks or sometimes even commits small crimes themselves, for example not using turn signals or speeding a small amount.
I can guess when the crime seems harmless enough to the particular police officer, the crime gets a low priority and while maybe the person talking to N. Seibt did not use the proper legal wording, they seem to have told her what will likely happen to her case.. people write strange stuff in the Internet, maybe the real danger was deemed low.
The essence of the First Amendment is that Prior Restraint, such as licenses or permits, or gags while in a crowded theater, are unconstitutional. However, should one engage in libel/slander, attempt to incite riot, make treasonous speeches, or threaten others, they can expect to be charged for the behavior.
What I have never understood is why the Second Amendment isn’t treated similarly. That is Prior Restraint should be prohibited and people should be held accountable for what they do, not what they might do.
A lady who likes being in the headlines, even if she doesn’t have much to say. And finds that in these circles paranoia pays. Remember back in 2020 when Naomi said (via Lord Monckton) that she had been threatened with prosecution by the state of North Rhine Westphalia, and urgently needed money to defend against this threat. Of course, no actual threat could be produced, but folks here duly sent their hard-earned dollars. And of course, there was no prosecution.
‘Of course..’
Stop clutching your pearls, Nick. Here in the so-called land of the free, it’s becoming more and more apparent that our Left has habitually been using the resources of the Federal government to go after those who disagree with them. I see no historical reason to doubt that the German Left is even more inclined to go after their opponents.
Exactly so, Frank. They were the source of the last political violence in Europe in the form of National Socialism.Clearly Nick doesn’t believe anything is a threat until an actual bullet comes through the window and leaves the target dead on the floor.
But you and I are perhaps being too kind to Nick. Given his past expressions of support for global warming, he WANTS people like Naomi to be silenced.
“They were the source of the last political violence in Europe in the form of National Socialism”
That was 80 years ago. Has there been no political violence in Europe since? I vaguely recall a quite horrific episode of violence in Norway some years back by one very determined individual. I don’t recall him being on the Left.
“ Here in the so-called land of the free, it’s becoming more and more apparent that our Left has habitually been using the resources of the Federal government to go after those who disagree with them.”
Well, it is very evident that Mr Trump is doing that. But it is that “land of the free” where Ms Seibt aspires to be.
I guess you somehow missed the Biden administration/fiasco/lawfare/inflation green scams/etc? Do try to pay attention.
what “lawfare” are you referring to?
Which do you think, nimrod? What’s going on now is legal -digging out the swamp. Under Obama and Biden was a whole different story-little old ladies as well as any available conservative, and Trump were targeted illegally and with, in Trump’s case, made up law…and don’t forget the Presecuter in one case-Smith was illegally appointed.
You left out the highly-illegal “Fast and Furious” operation during the Obama administration.
What is it about socialists and there eagerness to accuse others of the things they have been doing.
Well, the FBi is making it safer now at a faster rate instead of tracking and spying on elected members of Congress in the opposing Party.
I think there is going to be a serious effort to impeach Judge Boasberg.
He apparently broke the law when he authorized the spying on U.S. Senate Republicans.
He has been a thorn in Trump’s side for many years. He is the FISA judge that authorized the Obama administration to spy on the Trump campaign during the “Russia, Russia, Russia” Hoax, and did nothing to the FBI agents who presented lies to his court in order to get the authorization.
He has also made numerous ruling against Trump.
But he has screwed up now by illegally authorizing spying on U.S. Senate Republicans.
When you go after innocent people with government resources, it is called lawfare.
The Left wants to claim Trump is practicing lawfare with the prosecution of Democrats, but there’s a difference here in that the Democrats are guilty of crimes, so they should be prosecuted.
And in these cases, the Democrats involved were trying to undermine the Democratic process and attack their political opponents using the power of the federal government. This makes them traitors to their nation, and that includes both President Obama and Biden.
Now, this criminality will be investigated by the Trump Justice Department. The Obama and Biden administrations brought these investigations upon themselves with their criminal activity. Let the chips fall where they may.
I can see how one might come to that conclusion if they read The Guardian or most of the mainstream USA ‘news’ outlets.
Which “our Left” is that?
Because that’s not what’s happening in the USA.
As usual, you are completely wrong.
There was, the reason were 3 videos about climate she published on YT naming the Heartland Institute in her text. It was a Federal Media Agency demanding to delete these videos, can’t explain the legal reasons correctly.
You may translate/read the German Article about here:
https://eike-klima-energie.eu/2020/05/24/deutsche-behoerden-drohen-naomi-seibt-mit-gefaengnisstrafe-wegen-verweigerung/
Would be fine to do some research before you post BS.
Or read that:
https://docslib.org/doc/8202466/frau-naomi-seibt-die-landesanstalt-f%C3%BCr-medien
Worth readig!
“can’t explain the legal reasons correctly.”
No. No-one can. The reason is that she has never shown the content of those letters. All we have is Naomi’s claim, and it is very muddled. What is clear is that there was no prosecution and no fine.
And all we have is your crap….
Unable to read?
The second link will help you to accept it was a court case. Monckton is cited as witness in the document I linked.
“Load more” should be followed, it’s a long one, maybe to long for your understanding??
There seems to have been a court case (docket), but not a prosecution. Naomi is the plaintiff; she initiated it. And all you have there is a very long-winded and rambling statement by Lord Monckton. There is no indication that it got further than that.
The court case was the reaction of Naomi to the video delete order she wouldn’t follow for reasons. And when it didn’t go further, what I don’t know, may be the reason was she won.
She was not prosecuted. She was not fined. She (or rather Monckton) chose to sue the authority for something she took exception to. It was typical Monckton, all full of hot air, going nowhere.
Hey Nick, I read your first sentence, and I was sure you were going to start taking the piss out of Greta.
Thanks for not shocking me right out of my brain on Halloween.
You should do a similar Expose’ on Greta. Maybe you could possibly find one thing she has said that wasn’t a lie.
Greta wasn’t necessarily lying. If she believed it, she wasn’t lying, and no lie detector would ever say she was. She was well trained – like a circus seal – but not well educated. She did not learn to think for herself but only regurgitate what she was told. I feel pity for the kid, and I despise the people who trained her to be a barking seal.
Well, I didn’t say she was lying, but that the things she said were lies. Whether she believed them or not doesn’t make them true.
How dare you Nick!!!
If she was a leftist she would be a shoo in. Not sure he would be willing to help someone who is effective on conservative things. If you do not understand where I might be coming from, you might want to look at all the pedophiles and democrat politicians Trump has pardoned or shortened the sentences of…They are his TRUE ALLIES.
Could you narrow that down to a list of say 5 names? I’ll look them up and their specific cases.
The way the left’s claims about Trump are growing, I expect that by the end of the year, they will be claiming that Trump eats children for breakfast.
On the other hand, I’m seeing some of them walk back the Adolf claims already.
OK, as I thought, the only democrat politician known by ai, I already knew – the weird guy from Chicago who said that voter fraud by the democrats was a time-honored tradition. Otherwise zero.
From perplexity.ai: There is no credible source indicating that any other Democratic politician, aside from Blagojevich, received a Trump pardon up to October 2025.
Why did you post that astonerii ??
“she says she is at risk of being murdered” in Germany.
But, she’s ~8x more lightly to be killed in the USA than Germany
Comparison of the homicide rates between the United States and Germany for 2023.
Homicide Rate (per 100,000 population)
USA = 6.8The U.S. had approximately 22,830 homicides in 2023. (About 79% of these murders involved firearms)
Germany = 0.8 Germany recorded around 686 intentional homicides in 2023, a consistent trend in low rates over the years.
Y’know, I’ve lived in the US all my life, 63 years. Never been in a fight, never been shot or shot at, knifed, mugged… It’s all about the company you keep and the places you live.
Maybe it depends on who’s on the hit list, like Kirk.
To para Ta-Nehisi Coates, We can both condemn the Great Crime of his death, and the malevolence of his life.
That’s only true if you, as most socialists do, define malevolence as opposing the party.
I’m willing to bet that you are unable to come up with a direct source for any malevolent quote from Kirk.
Nobody else has either.
“I’m willing to bet that you are unable to come up with a direct source for any malevolent quote from Kirk.”
Uh, ok:
““There is no separation of church and state. It’s a fabrication. It’s a fiction. It’s not in the Constitution. It’s made up by secular humanists.”
““Kamala Harris seeks to kidnap your child via the trans agenda””
“Large “dedicated” Islamic areas were “a threat to America,””.
He repeated the rape accusations against Yusef Salaam, a member of the exonerated Central Park Five who is now a New York City councilman, calling him a “disgusting pig” who had gotten away with “gang rape.”
““Haiti is legitimately infested with demonic voodoo” that allows practitioners to do “quasi-levitation stuff””
“Haitian migrants “will become your masters” if Trump loses the election.”
The southern border was “the dumping ground of the planet,” he claimed, and a magnet for “the rapists, the thugs, the murderers, fighting-age males.” “They’re coming from across the world, from China, from Russia, from Middle Eastern countries,” he said, “and they’re coming in and they’re coming in and they’re coming in and they’re coming in…”
““Jewish donors,” were the number one funding mechanism of radical open-border, neoliberal, quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits.” Indeed, “the philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.”
“Joe Biden should be “put in prison and/or given the death penalty for crimes against America”
5 minutes worth. Should I go on?
A Debbie Downer with zilch retort. Predictable….
That’s only true if you, as most socialists do, define malevolence as opposing the party.
I’m willing to bet that you are unable to come up with a direct source for any malevolent quote from Kirk.
Nobody else has either.
Do try to avoid the gang shootings in your math-those skew the stats tremendously…so stay out of the ‘hoods. Also read some accurate numbers-about half of all shootings are suicides.
Unless you’re in Canadia, then the gov’t will happily murder you.
This is true? How so? We get no news down here about up there, so what gives? Honest question.
M.A.I.D.
Oh, my-I see. Had to look it up. Barbarism in the name of civilization.
Once you go to government paid health care, it’s the logical next step. Encouraging those who are a drain on medical resources to off themselves as quickly as possible.
George
That data was only the homicide rates for the United States and Germany in 2023, not suicide rates.[ Homicide = Killing of a human being by another human being ]
The suicide Rate (per 100,000 population) is
USA = 14.1
Germany = 12.5
Interesting. I still recommend that you stay out of the ‘hoods, and you should subtract-if you can find honest sources- self defense and other “righteous” shootings. No insult intended; everybody has an axe to grind and alot of stats. are just simply invented wholesaledepending on whose axe.
Those numbers are for obvious suicides, such as a bullet hole. With an estimated opioid overdose deaths around 100,000, almost certainly a significant proportion are people using the opioids for the same mental reasons that people commit suicide. Except that those dying from fentanyl didn’t leave a suicide note and it is difficult to impossible to determine if the overdose was accidental or suicide. Yet, they are all classified as being “accidental.”
The official USA suicide rate (probably a lower-bound) is approaching that of Japan. Yet, none of the suicides in Japan are committed with a gun. That is part culture, but it is also testimony to how easy it is to substitute other methods to commit suicide. Were guns to magically disappear in the USA tomorrow, one could not expect reasonably that suicides would disappear or even shrink significantly if the reasons aren’t addressed.
Most women use poison or drugs to attempt suicide because they don’t want to die. They just want attention. On the other hand, elderly males, particularly with a terminal disease, do want to die to avoid bankrupting the family and to save the wife the agony of watching him waste away before the inevitable comes.
Culture plays a large role in murder rates, particularly at the sub-culture level. That perhaps explains why there is a strong correlation between the murder rate and Black, male teens, but I have been unable to duplicate that correlation for Canada, although some studies suggest that the indigenous population in Canada plays a similar role to that of Blacks in the USA. Los Angeles has a murder rate about twice that of San Diego, despite having identical state and federal gun control laws, and a state preemption law that prevents cities from having gun control laws more restrictive than state laws..
The CDC did a study of how firearm murder rates varied throughout the country at a spatial resolution of what they defined as Health Service Areas. The Black male murder rate was almost 10X that of White males; the average Black male murder rate was higher than highest While male rate/HSA.
Along most of the northern states, the White male firearm murder rate was comparable to the Canadian rate, despite a huge difference in the gun control laws between the USA and Canada. There were large rural areas that had not had a firearm murder in 5 years.
If Naomi stays out of large cities, or at least gang-infested areas of the cities, and doesn’t roam the streets unescorted at night looking to buy drugs, she will probably be at no more risk than walking the streets in London. The highest risk factors are being a Black male between the ages of 14 and 24, and being in a gang.
Note that the USA has many states larger than Germany.
“she will probably be at no more risk than walking the streets in London”
Really !!!
721,215 Street attacks in London last year …
65,215 violence with injury offences,
27,344 sexual offences,
33,752 robberies,
465,085 thefts,
33,491 burglaries
and 96,227 shoplifting reports.
plus
The city saw 101 homicides (11.6 per 100,000).
But that’s city rates, the entire country rates are much lower …
In the 2024/25 reporting year, the overall homicide rate for the UK = 1.2 per 100,000 residents; USA = 6.8, Germany = 0.8 .
Data shows you are more lightly to be murdered in USA than in UK or Germany.
Note that Naomi Seibt has never positioned herself as the “anti-Greta”, that how other people have framed her. She is a climate realist speaking out.
Be careful of what you hope for. Trump will not be President for ever. Under Biden, the FBI put Catholics who attended the Traditional Latin Mass under surveillance. (The TLM is the Mass which all Latin Rite Catholics attended for a thousand years before 1970.) They were regarded as a potential source of terrorism, or something along those lines.
I smell some herding toward business-as-usual here.