We’ve reverted back to the original site design

Our design update had so many issues, I’ve decided to revert. Our developer dropped the ball in the site conversion, and many things got broken in the process. Behind the scenes I was fighting multiple problems that you didn’t see, and there were plenty that you did. I’m sorry for that.

Our best laid plans blew up. A giant site with 18 years of content 35,000 posts and 5 million comments plus dozens of custom plugins to make things work the way we wanted aren’t an easy thing to migrate. So many things that have to be just right – and they weren’t

So, everything is back to the way it was on August 27th, when I made the full site backup.

Good news: Your old logins should work, and those of you that are subscribers should have your subscriptions restored.

Bad news: We are going to lose some some posts and comments on them. I can restore the posts, but comments aren’t possible. Again I’m sorry.

Please be patient as we rebuild content. I sincerely apologize for the trouble our visitors and subscribers have had. We certainly didn’t expect this to happen.

My admins and I need to take a break as this has been nearly a 24/7 nightmare since Wednesday Sept 10th. We just want to let things settle for a day or two.

5 39 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

94 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JonasM
September 13, 2025 11:05 am

As a software developer, I get it. Sometimes things take much longer than planned, or even crash and burn.
We’re all here, whether the site stays the same or finally gets migrated.

Rich Davis
September 13, 2025 11:07 am

I’m sure that it’s very disappointing to you, but I’ll dare to speak on behalf of all WUWT-dom in saying that we greatly appreciate this forum of free speech and there’s never cause for you to apologize to us for anything!

Dieter Schultz
Reply to  Anthony Watts
September 13, 2025 11:18 am

That is usually the case… it is so very hard to get projects like this to work.

I’ve seen multi-10s of million dollar project go sideways.

But, from my point of view, I know that 10s of thousand of records seems complex but, with the right tools and skills, that number of records is… not the issue.

Reply to  Anthony Watts
September 13, 2025 11:28 am

“It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed.” — Theodore Roosevelt

Reply to  Anthony Watts
September 13, 2025 5:28 pm

Thank you for reverting.
We were satisfied with the “old” version

Reply to  Anthony Watts
September 14, 2025 6:27 pm

This is the problem with today’s technology. Much of it is a solution looking for a problem. For many years my family and friends would write a list of things we needed to get at the grocery store each week. The list hung on the refrigerator and anybody to add to it or delete items. All they needed was a pen, which was attached to the list.

Now, one has multiple devices to accomplish the same task. No standards. If you forget something you can access your home’s insecure network to look through the camera in the refrigerator to see what we forgot (maybe). Before we had standards; paper and pencil/pen and simple instructions. The list could be copied, added to, have subtractions, fit in a pocket, a purse, or whatever and we wouldn’t forget much.

Now there are no standards and a frenzy to update/upgrade for the sake of getting something we hope for, at the expense of many things we’ve become accustomed to. Technology no longer tries to do the best, fastest, and cheapest when it can promise the stars and spend countless amounts of time being the not-so-good, very slow, and quite expensive. This is the sad state of affairs in Technology today. 🙁

This site is functional, easy to navigate, works on a browser on a PC or a phone. There’s no need to be everything for everybody. Just keep it simple, quick, and cheap.

JD Lunkerman
Reply to  Anthony Watts
September 15, 2025 7:06 am

“Upgrade” has become the scariest word in the english language.

September 13, 2025 11:07 am

Log-in ok👍

mleskovarsocalrrcom
September 13, 2025 11:07 am

Darn, sorry it didn’t go as planned. Thank God for backups. Spent decades in the computer service business and can say you are not alone. Major application changes rarely go as planned no matter who’s doing the work.

September 13, 2025 11:12 am

No problem, personally I prefer the old design.

Reply to  varg
September 13, 2025 11:40 am

Yep, same here. If a technical upgrade is needed, so be it, but “new” isn’t always better.

September 13, 2025 11:12 am

I think the majority of visitors actually welcome the reversal. Maybe because once you get used to a system you dont like changes. The bigger the change usually the more issues. Small incremental changes are often the best policy.

Mark Hladik
Reply to  ballynally
September 14, 2025 8:30 am

10^42 dittos!

KevinM
Reply to  ballynally
September 15, 2025 8:17 am

I liked the new look, but I agree I’m on the minority. More importantly, this site hasn’t been so successful due to a look or a software package – it is this successful because of Watts and the writers who post here. Thanks for all the hard work AW.

W U W Nieder
Reply to  ballynally
September 15, 2025 3:44 pm

I prefer the old format !!

Neil Lock
September 13, 2025 11:16 am

Wishful thinking: the green movement ought to do the same, revert. But they are driven by ideology, while WUWT is driven by respect for truth.

Message to self: if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

JonasM
Reply to  Neil Lock
September 13, 2025 11:26 am

The problem with the green movement is that they neglected to create a backup.

KevinM
Reply to  JonasM
September 15, 2025 8:25 am

I wonder how often they regret destroying original data when they think about updating their narrative? I don’t like using “they” and “their” because of the accusatory tone it points at an unspecified other. Here, I’m thinking more like: Many of us find the “recycle bin” features of desktops and email GUIs a nuisance 99% of the time, but that 1% when it saves the gold bars that have dumbly thrown overboard… priceless.

September 13, 2025 11:21 am

Don’t sweat it Anthony, the climate will be just fine without you for a few days I promise.

September 13, 2025 11:29 am

Off topic I know, but just when you thought you couldn’t despise someone more than you already do he sticks his head out from under a rock and does this.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/sick-hockey-stick-climate-fraud-scientist-shares-tweet/

Doug S
Reply to  joe x
September 15, 2025 8:13 am

Thanks for the link Joe, not surprised.

Mario Barbafiera
Reply to  joe x
September 15, 2025 3:34 pm

Will Penn do anything? He should be fired.

Mr.
September 13, 2025 11:38 am

Don’t beat yourselves up too much over derailed system upgrades Anthony.

Lots of government systems are dysfunctional / derailed the moment they’re released escaped and inflicted on us reliant public users.

And we’ve paid $gazillions for these debacles without being offered any kinds of subscription options.

At least they have global warming to blame.

tinny
September 13, 2025 12:00 pm

I preferred this format too. The font was far too big on the new format when read on an iPad.

Derek
Reply to  tinny
September 14, 2025 12:34 pm

That’s interesting that the font was far too big on your iPad since the fonts were way too small on my Android phone.

James Snook
September 13, 2025 12:03 pm

Must have been a nightmare Anthony, but speaking for myself it’s good to have the ‘Home’ tab back. It makes navigating the site much simpler for an old’un of pre-tech vintage.

John Hultquist
September 13, 2025 12:08 pm

You have my sympathy.
I started with Hollerith cards on an IBM 1620. One mis-punch on an 80 column card and my frustrations with computers began. It has never ended.

Mr.
Reply to  John Hultquist
September 13, 2025 12:35 pm

Hollerith cards?

Loooxxury!

We had to chisel binary code in hieroglyphs on to dried out cow pats with our teeth, and then thread them through an abacus to get the computations the application required.

And we counted ourselves lucky –
IBM 1620s hadn’t been inflicted on the unsuspecting public then.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  John Hultquist
September 13, 2025 10:03 pm

Same here; a Mod I CADET, Can’t Add Doesn’t Even Try.

A fantastic machine to learn how computers work deep inside.

Reply to  John Hultquist
September 13, 2025 10:49 pm

Ha….. Because of legacy code, I was still using ForTran only 5 years ago !

Reply to  John Hultquist
September 14, 2025 5:25 am

AT&T’s first ESS 101 PBX used card punched out on a template. Remember Florida’s “hanging chad” election debacle so many years ago? Great fun. At least the EE department at KU had a DEC PDP 8 one could cycle through to find a wrong instruction.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Jim Gorman
September 14, 2025 7:30 am

I later got to play with a CDC 6400, which had an unusual card reader. Most stacked the cards in the reader chute and had a picker plate at the bottom which shoved one at a time through the reader slot, where electrical brushes detected the holes. The CDC reader, IIRC, was horizontal, and there was some kind of sponge rubber cylinder, looked like a roll of toilet paper, which spun around and a vacuum pulled cards off one at a time. Supposedly could read 2000 cards a minute, much faster than the picker plates (and 50 year old memories may misremember details). But it could read anything. Someone brought in a box filled with 750 bloated cards (boxes normally held 2000 cards) from getting soaked in water. The CDC read them no problem; picker plate readers could not have because they were too thick.

One day some social science grad student brought in some survey data. These were the cards where you poke out the choices with a pencil. The operator didn’t know they were special cards with the easy-to-punch holes; the student didn’t know the reader worked by sucking on the cards. I heard it was a veritable blizzard for several seconds until the operator stopped it. No idea how much data was lost.

I try to remember this every time the computer screws up and something goes wrong. Computers just do what they’re told, but at least it can be funny … later.

drednicolson
Reply to  John Hultquist
September 14, 2025 10:03 am

The code that put men on the moon fits on a 2mb floppy disk with room to spare.

Some “smart” cars with 10,000 times that have trouble crossing the street.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  drednicolson
September 14, 2025 6:04 pm

Not a very good comparison. The moon lander code did not make decisions and had very little to do, and I bet was hand-optimized assembler which took months and years to make work.

bo
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
September 15, 2025 11:50 am

It was literally stored on core memory – wires and magnets.

KevinM
Reply to  John Hultquist
September 15, 2025 8:34 am

JH kicked off a thread of “uphill in the snow both ways”, tech warrior edition. My first computer had a “Turbo Button” for when you absolutely needed to run at 10 MHz.

The technology reverie reveals demographics that “the media” has hidden for many years. Climate sceptics are not predominately 18th century Southern cotton farmers or monopolist oil magnate trust fund lichen. At least in Internet forums (yes, there’s a sample selection bias), climate sceptics seem to be middle aged tech workers from all over the world.

rms
September 13, 2025 12:24 pm

No problem. Like many here we have “been there done that!”

Admin
September 13, 2025 3:44 pm

Test post

E. Schaffer
September 13, 2025 3:49 pm

If something is not broken, don’t try to fix it 😉

Reply to  E. Schaffer
September 13, 2025 4:59 pm

The quip should be: If it ain’t broke,…

Editor
September 13, 2025 4:14 pm

Yippeeeee!! And, to make my weekend even better, I found my copy of The Complete Calvin and Hobbes Collection. YAY!
 
Regards,
Bob

September 13, 2025 4:22 pm

No project plan ever survives contact with the enemy.

…or something to that effect. 😉

Bryan A
September 13, 2025 4:48 pm

The one thing I found annoying with the new setup was needing to login daily. Sometimes even after a few hours of inactivity. One day I had logged in 5 times. Never stayed logged in.

David Goeden
September 13, 2025 5:02 pm

Anthony, new or old, WUWT is a great website!

KlimaSkeptic
September 13, 2025 6:00 pm

Thanks Anthony. Personally I do much prefer this format. And appreciate your work in bringing the news, not many media outlets will. Thanks

massieguy
September 13, 2025 6:57 pm

I’m sorry for all the pain, but it’s just fine the way it was/is as far as I’m concerned.

I learned a long time ago the truth in the saying: “Inside every little problem is a big problem waiting to get out.”

September 13, 2025 7:03 pm

Obviously you didn’t have your fingers crossed the right way…
… or not holding your tongue between your teeth correctly.
After many years of writing Fortran computer code, I have found that these things matter. !! 🙂
Have a break from it.. come back when you ready..
We will still be here (did I just hear you groan 😉 )

Tony Tea
September 13, 2025 7:09 pm

Pretend you’re scrapping the monumental waste of money that is Net Zero, and going back to what works.

Jeff Alberts
September 13, 2025 7:36 pm

Seeing if I can post comments..

KevinM
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 15, 2025 8:44 am

Yes, you can.

1 2 3