By Vijay Jayaraj
As a boy growing up beside India’s railway lines, I found magic in the metallic thunder of passing trains. Now and then, freight cars piled high with black coal would roll by. That same evening, our lights would flicker out.
There, I’d sit still in the hush of a powerless night, staring into the warm dark, wondering why electricity was so elusive. Hours earlier, the answer had clattered past: coal, in plain sight, yet out of reach.
At the time, India lacked its currently extensive coal mining and power generation facilities. Today, however, coal is the backbone of energy production, supplying over 70% of India’s electricity. The dark evenings of my childhood have been brightened.
Other developing countries have learned from China and India how coal jump-starts economies and lifts millions from poverty. Now, they too line up for their share of the fuel that sparked the Industrial Revolution.
Global coal production reached an all-time high of nearly 9 billion metric tons in 2024. Chinese and Indian output continued to grow, and Indonesia set export records.
India is on track to burn twice as much coal as the U.S. and Europe put together – possibly within the year – while China has already surged ahead, consuming 30% more coal than every other nation combined.
Growing by almost 12% in 2024, India’s production is projected to climb to over 1 billion metric tons in 2025 – a harvest that would exceed America’s peak in 2008.
This week, Adani Power invested $2 billion in a 1,500 megawatt, ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plant in India’s state of Uttar Pradesh to supply one of the most densely populated regions in the world.
Coal shipments to Southeast Asia are on a steady climb, with nations like Vietnam and the Philippines leading the demand. Annual imports across the region are projected to grow nearly 3%.
Rising production of South American crude steel will increase demand for metallurgical coal, which is converted to the coke required to make steel from iron. The continent produced 3.7 million metric tons of steel in March, up 6.5 percent from a year earlier, with Brazil contributing nearly 80% of the total.
With African energy production on the rise, South Africa remains the continent’s largest coal producer and consumer. State power utility Eskom uses coal to generate more than 70% of its electricity and recently added 800 megawatts of capacity to help stabilize the power grid.
Zambia and Zimbabwe are restarting coal-fired plants and advancing new coal projects to improve their energy security amidst power crises. Zambia’s largest coal mine, Maamba Collieries, is slated for an expansion.
Even the U.K. government, while still parading its “net zero” credentials, is, nonetheless, procuring coking coal to keep British Steel alive in Scunthorpe. The U.K. may import the fuel from Japan or Australia, presumably because mining coal from Britain’s indigenous deposits is more scandalous than the hypocrisy of its absurd climate policy.
In the U.S., President Trump has prioritized coal under a new executive order, fast-tracking projects like Warrior Met’s Blue Creek mine in Alabama, which will boost metallurgical coal output by 60% for export markets. Additionally, the U.S. approved the expansion of the Spring Creek Mine in Montana, enabling nearly 40 million tons of coal to be mined over the next 16 years.
The global coal-fired power fleet increased by less than 19 gigawatts in 2024, the lowest net rise in two decades. This is due to retirement of coal plants in Europe and the transition to more modern coal plants in Asia. Coal prices, too, have been sluggish in recent months.
Nevertheless, sustained growth and demand in the existing coal markets of Asia and the emerging markets of Africa and Southeast Asia will continue to propel production and consumption across the world. In 2024, coal accounted for 35% of total power generation globally, the highest among all sources of energy generation.
Coal is expected to dominate the energy sector for at least three more decades, barring a disruption by rapid innovation that would enable its economical displacement. Similarly, the mineral will continue to play a crucial role in iron and steel production absent development of a viable alternative.
Predictions to the contrary are just so much hot air – largely from those most averse to a warming atmosphere.
This commentary was first published at Daily Caller on June 16, 2025.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO₂ Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The great thing about coal reserves and resources is they remain in place for future generations to recall when they have sufficient data to dispel agenda science. Even underground mine fires are limited compared to the extent of the resource. Coal mining has had remarkable rates of productivity gains compared to most sectors also.
“In the U.S., President Trump has prioritized coal”
The last coal power station commissioned in the USA was Sandy Creek, TX in 2013. None are presently under construction, and no-one seems to be planning to build any. Or are they? Who?
The political risk of the Democrats coming back into power is too high.
And also strong competition from GAS.
USA need dispatchable supply…
The only choices for that are COAL, GAS, NUCLEAR and hydro where rainfall and terrain suit.
Wind and solar are just a parasitic load on the grid system, and would not get built without major subsidies and mandated usage.
Agreed. The problem with hydraulic is that there’s very little remaining untapped potential in any OECD nation. The vast majority of such sites are already developed. The only large remaining sites in Canada are the Lower Churchill developments at Muskrat Falls and Gull Island. These projects have been made possible last year by a new power agreement between Newfoundland and Quebec.
BC might still have some hydro site candidates, but SMRs would most likely hit the ground running before BC governments could organize a morning tea meet ‘n greet with all the “stakeholder” groups.
We are headed into a long-lasting natural gas crunch, and prices are already rising even though this is the demand slump season. When companies can save money using coal instead of NG, you will see proposals for new coal plants. In the meanwhile, exports of thermal coal and domestic demand for metallurgical coal will keep coal mines operational.
According to the IEA there are 95 coal mining for export projects underway in 13 countries around the world.
Australia leads the way with 46 projects, almost 50% of the total. Australian politicians dislike using coal for power at home but don’t seem to have a problem with other countries using Australian coal to power their economies.
South Africa comes next in the list with 14 projects, Canada (9) ,Indonesia (6),
Russia (5), US (4) Mongolia (4) Botswana (2) Mozambique (2) Colombia, New Zealand, Poland and Ukraine (1 each)
IEA ‘Coal 2024 Analysis and Forecast to 2027’ ( Dec, 2024)
It also includes democrats at the state level who have not gone away. Approval for new power plants for public utilities occurs at the state level. As long as they are in power, no coal for you!
The Greens in the Democratic Party are like the French Bourbons after the Revolution, who never learned and never forgot.
Trump’s only been in office for 5 months. You seem to feel that the fact he hasn’t turned things around in that time, is proof that he can’t.
For export. The US has gone natural gas. But you knew that and just wanted to be your usual contrarian.
Did you fail to read the word ‘export’, Nick? There are hundreds of new coal power plants under consideration, worldwide. And even we need lots of metallurgical coal.
You will be pleased to know my uncle was president of the World Coal Institute.
https://prabook.com/web/mobile/#!profile/534365
Australia should dig more of it. There’s loads.
A fair request for information.
I have not access.
I grew up where coal and gas were mined (western Pennsylvania) with the help of uncles, cousins, and family friends. Many, including my father, worked in a glass factory (powered by local gas) and we young’uns played on the slag heaps and swam in the not so clean waters. When I told that to a new friend, he said “that explains a lot”.
The east side of PA has anthracite coal. “Peacock coal” is worth an image search. I wonder if such a thing is found in other parts of the world.
Let us return to the Carboniferous Period…..when O2 was 30% of the atmosphere…..and the insects could grow large….like 8 feet long millipedes.
. . . and fires would be more intense.
A five inch long centipede is a nightmare. Lately, tarantula hawk wasps have been getting into the house. Those are bad enough at only 5 centimeters. Hard to kill. Apparently, the sting is among the most painful of any insect. Wouldn’t know from experience, thank goodness. I can only image what having ones two feet long would be like – I don’t think we’d make it as a species.
I remember reading a fun HG Wells story as a kid – Food of the Gods.
Millipedes are not insects… Insects have 6 legs.
Yes, the scorpions and spiders and dragonflies and….all of ’em were HUGE….those were the days my friend….those were the days
I bet Nick can find a reference to a millipede with 6 legs 🥱
Meanwhile here in the US, we’re happy to see that coal production will be going up. That’s the easy part. The hard part will be revamping coal power. Come on Trump. Do your thing. Help bring coal power back. Yes, it will need financial support.
Coal is not going away for multiple good reasons. The developing world especially needs a reliable and cost effective electricity source [which rules out wind & solar]. It also transports and stores easily.
However, not to rain on this coal love-fest, all these coal plants need to have adequate scrubbers etc to remove the heavy metals; sulfur & the like, and have a plan for the fly ash . Burning coal can be one of the dirtiest sources of energy. Just to be clear: you do NOT need to capture the CO2.
CO2 is plant food, not a pollutant.
btw: Here in Arizona we are having another glorious summer day, which is completely consisitent with “climate change”. [I’m sure the weather attribution nuts could hallucinate some number to quantify that assertion. Lol ]
The ‘Grand Canyon State‘, so called, is a vast territory that has most everyone living nowadays in the river valleys (Gila, Verde, Salt, lower Colorado, San Pedro etc.) of the south / Sonoran Desert region — a land unimaginably rich in crucial minerals (‘Copper State‘)*, hydropower (snowpack-fed), and sun-drenched fertile farmland, not to mention the oldest continuously populated urban area (Tucson, at the foot of the Sierra Catalinas) north of Mexican volcanic highlands.
But there’s another equally large part of the State — up over the Mogollon Rim into the high desert of the Colorado Plateau, that looks more like part of “the developing world”. Yet it is also mineral rich — ‘Navajo Coal‘ (mines, railway, Generating Station) extending NE-ward to the petroleum deposits of the 4-corners region & the SE-Utah Uranium mines. The ‘Lake Navajo‘ Reservoir, much larger than Lake Mead (Hoover Dam), was proposed already (NAWAPA) in the early 1960s!
One has to demand an answer, how has it remained poor, despite these immense resources?
Development / production … has been restricted for a half-century now. Isn’t high time to set this aright?
Signed — RLW, a native Arizonan (5th generation on the maternal side; 4th-gen paternal, via the NW-Chihuahua-MX mountains)
*Cf. the recent Supreme Court (SCotUSA) greenlighting of the long-delayed ‘Resolution Mine‘ project near Superior-AZ, promises to become the largest copper mine in world history.
Compared to oil and natural gas, coal is relatively easy to transport and store. As a bonus, OPEC-like entities don’t control coal supplies.
Meanwhile renewable energy proponents play with the numbers to try to convince the public that wind and solar are growing so fast they will soon displace fossil fuels. Except they don’t mention that this growth is based on what the renewable numbers alone were, not renewables as part of the total global energy mix. Sure wind and solar may be growing, but a closer look at the overall energy production worldwide show that fossil fuels are still responsible for 82% of global primary energy generation, while renewables are just adding supplementary power, not supplanting anything. The very fact as the above article points out that the developing world in particular is hugely dependent on coal to keep accelerating their economic growth is just another reminder of how coal, oil and natural gas will still dominate the world’s energy mix, while the climate alarmists continue to be ignored.
Weather dependent, non- dispatchable electricity for utility grids always was, and always will be just “supplementary power”.
Then he* drops the other shoe on the shameless hypocrites.
Brief excerpts —
*VJJ-a-Raj June 19, 2025 The lethal fog of clean-air hypocrisy By Vijay Jayaraj
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/06/the_lethal_fog_of_clean_air_hypocrisy.html