Mainstream Media Blames Climate Change for Nigeria’s Floods, Ignores Urban Planning Failures

From ClimateREALISM

Mokwa-Google-Earth-SS

Screen capture of the region surrounding Mokwa, Niger State, Nigeria, on Google Earth.By Linnea Lueken

A recent article, written by the Associated Press (AP) and carried by NBC, titled “Floods kill at least 111 as northern Nigeria battles climate change, dry spells and heavy rainfall,” tries to connect climate change for deadly weather disasters in Nigeria. There is little or no such connection. Torrential rainfall following a hard drought can result in flooding, but its unclear whether climate change had any connection to the rainfall or the preceding drought. More importantly, the media reports ignore known urban planning issues that contributed to flooding and greatly worsen flooding when it occurs.

A heavy rain storm in Nigeria caused flooding which reportedly killed at least 111 people in and around the town of Mokwa. AP reports that the “Nigerian Hydrological Services Agency did not immediately say how much rain fell after midnight Thursday in the town of Mokwa in the state of Niger more than 180 miles west of Abuja, the capital of Africa’s most populous nation.”

AP goes on to claim that this part of Nigeria has “been experiencing prolonged dry spells worsened by climate change and excessive rainfall that leads to severe flooding during the brief wet season.”

While the AP insists that climate change is primarily responsible for the tragedy, history and data undermine any such connection. Damaging floods have been common throughout Nigeria’s history. Nigeria has a dry season, during which drought is common, and a wet or rainy season complete, with monsoons and flooding in low lying areas and villages and towns alongside rivers and streams.

In a 2018  BBC article, titled “Why does Nigeria keep flooding?” the authors point in part to a rising trend in average annual rainfall as part of the reason, true. But rising average rainfall doesn’t necessarily mean that individual rain events are more extreme. Hard data on severe rainfall and flooding in Nigeria is sparse. However, plenty of places experiencing increased average annual rainfall have not experienced increased flooding, so what gives in Nigeria?

The BBC explains that Nigeria’s three main hydroelectric dams are partially to blame for downstream flooding, but also that the “uncompleted Zungeru dam, in Niger state, which is part-funded by the Chinese government, is also believed to be affecting areas once free from flooding.”

They go on to quote local experts who said that Nigeria’s population is rapidly expanding, and that with it, urbanization and everything that comes with it is increasing as well, “and the lack of proper town planning can make flooding worse in urban areas.” The BBC quotes one expert as saying that town planning “is very weak.” The BBC continues by saying that rapid development is “almost always unregulated, with people building on floodplains, reducing the surface areas for water to travel, and without constructing drainage systems.”

The BBC reports that people often rebuild in areas that already had disastrous floods, with the same lack of care for water handling.

Flooding is not unprecedented for the area covered by the AP/NBC story, nor should it come as a surprise to anyone. Mokwa, the town devastated by the recent floods, sits a few miles north of the Niger river. Surrounding the bend of the river in that region are interesting features that identify the area as a major floodplain. First, a wide greenbelt along the river hints at the frequent deposit of river sediment well inland in multiple areas. But one will notice something else as well – tendrils of hard greenery which reach north from the belt, one of which appears to terminate in . . . Mokwa.

These are most likely seasonal creek beds that lay at lower elevations in the landscape, which can both be drainage features from the land surrounding them, feeding to the river, but can also become swollen when the river itself overflows. Water from upland, where much of the town infrastructure is, is going to want to flow into that low area. Increased development in and around Mokwa has resulted in more non-permeable ground and surfaces—that is, ground that has been covered in foundations and asphalt or packed earth that water cannot soak into, so it flows on top instead.

It is notable, too, that in another BBC article covering the recent disastrous flood, the locals interviewed did not blame the flooding on climate change or the recent rainfall. BBC says that residents “told BBC News they believed the floodwater was not caused by the heavy rainfall they had experienced,” and that the Mokwa District Head said that the rain could not have been the primary cause of the flooding, because the rain had “subsided” already when the flooding started. Instead, he blames a local reservoir. If water had indeed been released from a local reservoir, the geography indicates the water would flow right through the town to get to the creeks which feed the river.

There is no way to tie this particular flood event to climate change, only a sustained long-term trend would suggest such a connection.

Nigeria has a long history of floods and, as explained in the Queen’s Gazette, “Nigeria’s flooding is mainly human induced with poor urban planning practices and inadequate environmental infrastructure being contributing factors.” Whether or not rainfall is increasing in Nigeria, the easiest and most effective way prevent disastrous flooding from happening again would be to invest in water handling infrastructure, where possible.

“Unlike some natural disasters, rainfall flooding can be controlled with proper planning and provision of necessary infrastructure,” reinforces the Queen’s Gazette. Where improving infrastructure is impossible for one reason or another possible, people should, at a minimum, avoid living in known flood plains, naturally prone to such events, and especially not be rebuilding there in the aftermath of experiencing a flood.

In order to emphasize a speculative climate connection, the AP and NBC completely ignored glaring urban infrastructure issues that other outlets have rightly recognized as being the main factors in Nigeria’s recent floods. Based on the limited data that exists on flooding and drought in the country and across the region, the recent drought and flood were not historically unusual, in fact both conditions are endemic to the country during its dry and wet seasons, meaning there is no climate change “fingerprint” in evidence.

5 11 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
OldRetiredGuy
June 11, 2025 6:10 pm

What do you expect from our outstanding liberal arts majors coming out of journalism programs? No critical thinking. Generally no math skills. Marginal literacy. But probably has all kinds of DEI cred.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  OldRetiredGuy
June 12, 2025 8:36 am

The Supreme Court adjudicated a case and declared discrimination of a majority person by a minority person is discrimination. It goes both ways.

That ruling will be then end of the Affirmative Action being promoted by DEI activists.

Edward Katz
June 11, 2025 6:28 pm

Let’s not forget that Nigeria’s population is approaching 230 million, and is the sixth most populous nation in the world. In addition, demographers estimate that at current growth rates, the country will reach 477 million by the century’s end. As a result, it’s in much the same position as Pakistan where rapid population growth exceeding 250 million and government tolerance of settlements in low-lying coastal areas was largely blamed for high death tolls caused by storm surges during Indian Ocean tropical storms in recent years. So if governments in the above countries and others facing similar threats haven’t the resolve to institute better land-management practices in agricultural areas and urban zones, they can anticipate more deaths from not only flooding but also crop failures and food shortages regardless of whether the climate changes or not.

Reply to  Edward Katz
June 11, 2025 7:15 pm

EK:
Good points!
Claiming “climate change” is a win-win for a government: first, it seems to let them off the hook of responsibility for poor water infrastructure, and second, keeps alive the fervent hope
of getting climate reparations from the developed world [decreed by COP29 in 2024].

Nice article Lennea!
And I vote to put Ms. Lueken in charge of the recently defunct Climate.gov site. It would soon be a trustworthy source. If that doesn’t work just redirect all its queries to climaterealism.com.

Reply to  Edward Katz
June 12, 2025 12:29 am

Nigeria is grossly mismanaged and plagued with corruption, fraud, waste, abuse and awful violence. It does not have a climate problem but a people problem.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
June 12, 2025 8:37 am

It may have a people problem or may not. It definitely has a government problem.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Edward Katz
June 12, 2025 8:37 am

They will need huge amounts of coal, gas, and oil if they are going to succeed in those much needed improvements.

June 11, 2025 9:08 pm

I’ve noted that whenever the climate alarmists start having problems with their communications, they start changing the words they use, or the meanings of the words. “Mainstream Media” is now “Legacy Media”, in possible recognition that those outlets are no longer mainstream.

June 12, 2025 12:26 am

When every weather condition is used to prove climate change
then no weather conditions can prove climate change.

This logic escapes the climate alarmists because they are totally illogical.

James Snook
June 12, 2025 12:37 am

Urban planning failure, the same as last year in Valencia.

oeman50
June 12, 2025 5:06 am

Torrential rainfall” never occurred before we started emitting CO2.

Oh wait, can you say Noah?

Reply to  oeman50
June 12, 2025 7:36 am

Classic example was the flooding in western Germany and the Low Countries in I believe it was 2021.

As soon as I saw it on my industry news feeds (insurance), I KNEW they would inevitably blame it on “climate change.”

Sure enough, within 24 hours, my prediction was verified.

Meanwhile, there’s facts. Flood records in the area go back some 650 years. And not only has there been FAR WORSE flooding there in the distant past, there were MULTIPLE floods that were A VIRTUAL BLUEPRINT for the most recent episode.

In other words. WEATHER, NOT “CLIMATE CHANGE.”

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  oeman50
June 12, 2025 8:39 am

Maybe using one religion to defeat another is necessary. After all, everything happens according to “God’s Will” so claiming humans can control the weather (or climate) is a counter religion.

Sparta Nova 4
June 12, 2025 8:34 am

The Mississippi River overflows it banks the flood plains have deep water. Houses are destroyed.
The government steps in and gives out tax dollars so they can rebuild on the same lot that got flooded. How stupid is that?

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 12, 2025 8:46 am

Uhmm…the Tennessee Valley Authority and US Army Corps of Engineers have been instrumental in taming much of the Mississippi valley that had catastrophic annual flooding. Sometimes a levee fails and authorities have to decide if they are going to make properties totally uninsurable, therefore abandoned, and no longer taxable, or pay for flood damage. It’s not driven by stupidity but economics.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  DMacKenzie
June 12, 2025 12:31 pm

When they rebuild without any of those mitigations you talked about, that is stupidity.

June 12, 2025 8:42 am

(I hope this paste correctly.)

This isn’t Nigeria but the Ohio River at Cincinnati is still part of the globe.
Here are the top ten crest.
1.80.00 ft on 01-26-1937
2.71.10 ft on 02-14-1884
3.69.90 ft on 04-01-1913
4.69.20 ft on 03-07-1945
5.66.30 ft on 02-15-1883
6.66.20 ft on 03-11-1964
7.65.20 ft on 01-21-1907
8.64.80 ft on 04-18-1948
9.64.70 ft on 03-05-1997
10.63.60 ft on 03-21-1933

It seems to me that if “Climate Change” was causing flooding at an increasing rate, we’d see more recent dates for the the record crest.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Gunga Din
June 12, 2025 9:32 am

30 years is the nova definition of timeframe for climate.
No crests records in the past 28 years?
That sounds like climate change, does it not?

Verified by MonsterInsights