There is no such thing as a climate disaster!
From Tufts University “School of Nutrition Science” and the “weather is not climate” department, comes this inanity dressed up as peer reviewed science.
A forward-looking approach to climate disaster preparation
With flooding and heatwaves on the rise, certain vulnerable communities must learn to expect the unexpected, say researchers.
Vulnerable communities in the Southeastern United States must look to the future, not the past, to prepare for climate disasters, according to researchers at the Feinstein International Center, located at the Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University.
In a recent paper published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, the researchers document substantially higher risk of extreme temperatures and flooding in the Southeast U.S.
The researchers’ work, which was supported by a NASA cooperative grant, also includes a proposed framework to help these communities better prepare for disasters they have not yet experienced but are likely to encounter.
“Disaster planning based on historical events is like driving forward while only looking in the rearview mirror,” says principal investigator Erin Coughlan de Perez, research director at Feinstein and Friedman School associate professor. “Many communities are planning for what they have seen in the past, only slightly worse. They need to be preparing for things they haven’t seen at all.”
While the entire region is at risk for extreme weather events, some communities also have a “high potential for surprise,” say the researchers, who include The Fletcher School graduate students Bethany Tietjen, F20, and Jenna Clark, A21, as well as Amy Jaffe, a non-resident senior fellow at the Climate Policy Lab.
“These are communities where the overall risk has increased over time, but the community hasn’t experienced one of these severe weather events in recent memory,” says Coughlan de Perez. This makes them potentially poorly prepared for future disasters, or “sitting ducks,” according to the researchers’ framework.
Analyzing five counties, researchers found them all to be “sitting ducks” when it comes to an extreme heat event. According to the study, Montgomery County, AL, Yazoo County, MS, Madison Country, TN, Warren County, KY, and Terrebonne Parish, LA, have gotten lucky in recent years and not had significant heatwaves.
“What our models showed is that temperatures have been rising gradually over the years, with one year maybe being really hot, but because the risk has been changing slowly, people living in these communities may not have noticed it,” Coughlan de Perez says.
When it comes to flooding, researchers concluded that Yazoo County is also a “sitting duck.” The other four communities fall into what the researchers call the “living memory” category, meaning there is a recent flooding event that people can remember, which can encourage people to stay prepared for future events. “Flooding events have also increased in frequency during the rainiest months of the year, but not every community has experienced catastrophic flooding,” Coughlan de Perez says.
In what the researchers categorize as “fading memory” communities, a particular weather event has become less frequent, and people barely remember it. “Boston used to have frequent extreme cold snaps in the winter, for example, but that happens less often now,” Coughlan de Perez says. Similarly, in “recent rarity” communities, people might remember a particular weather event—but the likelihood of it happening again is also relatively low.
In their analysis, the authors used large weather models of historical weather events between 1981-2021 to examine the five Southeastern U.S. counties, which were a combination of urban and rural communities. “It’s a roll of the die whether they have experienced extreme weather events yet or not. Extreme heat and flooding are in their futures,” Coughlan de Perez says.
Preparation may include identifying those at greatest risk; setting up accessible cooling centers for those who are homeless or don’t have air conditioning; educating the public about evacuation plans and potential shelters for floods; putting state or local heat protections in place for outdoor workers; establishing communication systems to alert residents to the dangers of high daytime and overnight temperatures or impending floods; and other measures.
The Tufts team is working with the American Red Cross in multiple locations to improve disaster planning, but Coughlan de Perez notes that state and local policies addressing extreme heat and flooding are often limited and need to be developed further.
In the meantime, Coughlan de Perez says, “Our ultimate goal is to provide a framework to help all communities prepare for weather events they may not have experienced before but have a high likelihood of facing in the future.”
This work was supported by a NASA cooperative grant titled “Today’s Risk of Extreme Events” (Agreement 80NSSC22K1706). Complete information on authors, methodology and conflicts of interest is available in the published paper. The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funder.
Journal Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I created this little message, but since there is no intelligent life on this planet, except for myself, I guess it will go unnoticed..
The fundamental problem with Climate Science explained to a 5yr old child
If you would fall off an aircraft at 6km altitude, you would “theoretically” hit the surface at the speed of sound. With “theoretic” we mean if it was just a free fall, without air causing drag. And if there was no air, there would be no speed of sound anyway. But hey, it just a theoretic perspective that could never materialize.
The Greenhouse Effect is such a theoretic perspective! It considers the warming effect of clouds, while ignoring their cooling effect. It considers the warming effect of water vapor, while ignoring its cooling effect. “Theoretically” then the Greenhouse Effect is a 33K. In reality the one can not be without the other, and the “net GHE” is a mere 8K.
The grandiose act of idiocy is in declaring such a theoretic perspective “the truth”, calling all vital additional information “denial”, and building a huge bureaucratic apparatus to research the fictional consequences of such “science”.
If that first paragraph is how you talk to a 5-year-old, good grief. I didn’t bother with the rest of it.
In case that you stumble over the wizard of Oz, ask him if he has a brain to spare…your’s seems to be beyond repair…
But the climate autocracy talks to the public as if we were all 5 year olds.
You have to be a liberal as they have no conception of sarcasm nor have a sense of humor.
I agree. Their eyes would glaze over after the first sentence.
They will push the climate scare ad nauseum because that is ALL they have. They will push it for “the cause” no matter what. Makes me sick.
“I cut your arm off! – It’s only a scratch!”
Smart 5 year old.
Unusually so, meaning non-existent.
What does the speed of sound have to do with falling, with or without an atmosphere?
Excellent question underscoring my introducing phrase.
Your 5yo child would be even more confused by your use of K as the temperature scale.
33K is around -240C as )K is -273.15
Contradicting the climate alarmists presumption that flooding is getting worse and more frequent, is an historical graph of the Hawkesbury-Nepean flooding events (published by the NSW State Emergency Services – SES). They recognise a cyclic pattern with the 1867 flood being by far the worst. The Hawkesbury-Nepean is a major river system located near Sydney, Australia.
You’re not supposed to look into the rear view mirror.
You’re not even supposed to HAVE a rear-view mirror.
Weather History debunks Climate Crisis Alarmism.
Everyone agrees that there has been no change in cyclones for 100 years. Therefore there has been no climate change. You can’t have climate change without a change in cyclones.
Chris Packham has decided that it’s not climate change, it’s “Climate Breakdown”. A helluva lot more scary!
One of the most annoying phrases currently being spouted….
closely followed by Climate Emergency
The mayor of our city had council declare a “Climate Emergency” a couple of years back. No word yet on how many lives have been saved….
Yes, and if it continues to break down, we’ll have none at all.
Ah, the nova replacement for Climate Apocalypse.
Good grief!
Weather determines climate. Climate does not determine weather.
Ignorance and gullibility. A circle of fools, all believing and congratulating each other.
Probably even stupid enough to convince themselves that adding CO2 to air makes it hotter, or that a GHE exists!
We’re all doomed!
“This work was supported by a NASA cooperative grant…”
Well, its outcome was inevitable then, wasn’t it? Can’t afford to lose the funding…
Story Tip
The FT has apiece trying to answer the question which has puzzled Greens everywhere for years. Why are UK electricity prices so high? And how high are they? Here are some clips.
China and India are not members of the IEA. But the agency’s data suggests a similarly stark gap with them as well: UK prices for energy-intensive industries reached $187 per MWh in 2024, compared with $62 per MWh in India, $70 per MWh in China and just $45 per MWh in the US.
The Chinese gap has widened since 2019, when the UK was paying $94 to China’s $56 per MWh.
….a typical British gas-fired power plant emitting 0.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour of electricity produced faces carbon costs of £26.70 per MWh.
….A typical large industrial consumer would pay £178 per MWh for electricity excluding VAT, according to analysis from Cornwall Insight covering 2024-2025. Of this, low carbon levies, including payments for backup power supplies, account for £53 per MWh, and network costs account for £23 per MWh. The Climate Change Levy, a tax aimed at making businesses more energy efficient, accounts for another £8 per MWh of that bill
The UK finds itself between a rock and a hard place. The fact is that moving to intermittent energy sources almost all located in the wrong places means that there are increased costs of various sorts. So called ‘backup’ gas, which is actually the primary generation technology at the moment. Costs of transmission from the north coast of Scotland to the Midlands and South East. Costs of constraint payments. The huge costs of the wind installations themselves, as revealed in the recent bids. The costs imposed by compulsory purchase obligations.
So they start out loading these costs onto the bills of end users. This then results in higher prices, and end users start to behave differently. Like, if they are industrial, they close down, they outsource manufacturing to China, lots of things. If they are consumers they refuse to buy heat pumps and EVs, because owing to the high energy prices they cost more to run than alternatives.
But, the method has one huge advantage. It does hide all these additional costs in lots of different fairly obscure places. You look at your bill, and where are they? Nowhere to be seen.
However, its now becoming clear to energy company management that higher prices are a real problem, and public awareness of the height is rising. So the next proposal is, guess what, lower prices by funding the green transition out of general taxation. Move all green levies onto it, and cut prices. By how much?
Make UK wants the government to remove levies from industrial electricity bills and guarantee manufacturers an electricity price of £56 per MWh. This could mean higher costs for other users or taxpayers.
Could it really mean that? Compare this to the numbers given earlier, 2,000 year old arithmetic will tell you that is a stonking reduction!
What did the UK Government say in response to some of these concerns? Read it, and weep for England:
The government said: “Through our sprint to clean power, we will get off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel markets — protecting business and household finances with clean, homegrown energy that we control.
“We are already bringing energy costs for key UK industries closer in line with other major economies through the British Industry Supercharger — saving businesses £5bn over the next 10 years.”
Written by the guys who are retiring on index linked defined benefit pension schemes. Hang on a second, aren’t these the ones whose surpluses are going to be targeted by the Government in its latest tax raid on pensions, which in turn is necessitated by the tax revenue gap which the latest green subsidy scheme will produce?
No. Because these guys do not have any contributions to be in surplus. Their pensions, unlike the private sector, are paid out of current tax revenue.
Now do you understand what is going on here?
They know why, but they can never admit it.
Short report . “Our electricity costs are already higher than Germany’s but in 10 years they will
be lower – honestly” said an anonymous official.
The problem with good stuff a decade away is that about 20% of the utility-bill-paying people you inform…..know they won’t be around to benefit so they are not very happy to pay for it…
Heat is the one thing that’s missing this summer.
Doubtless, at some point we will get three warm days and a thunderstorm
This week apparently …
‘Spanish plume’ heat blast on the way but with nasty sting in tail
https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/spanish-plume-heat-blast-way-31813584?ruid=95ba4079-f10a-4124-ae41-e6a67e2aa7c1&hx=9a50c0f47d8fbbcfd1c09f6f1d01072f4ada0804aea8e82b1d37b06bd0853380
We need to cower in a corner & pay more taxes so miniprick can save us from ‘Climate Armageddon’.
Fredi at World Weather Attribution needs something to base her next scare story on!
Tufts? It’s a hotbed of climate lunacy. Now retired from there- Dr. William Moomaw (a physical chemist) has hallucinated what he calls “proforestation”- which is a theory that we need to lock up most forest land. No more of that hideous logging! Gotta keep the carbon in the forest to save the planet. Of course he already has a very large wood home in elite Williamstown, in the NW corner of Wokeachusetts. And there is a housing shortage in the state. But he actually argues it’s better to build with concrete! His proforestation fantasy is a huge challenge to good forestry. He was actually put on a committee the state established- The Climate Smart Forestry Committee- which concluded that forestry work should cut much lighter and much less often. They could have put me on that committee with 50 years experience- but no, because they would have feared me for knowing too much about good forestry- which requires cutting trees- sometimes heavily.
See, when you take the weather. and get it all cranked up on carbon, it makes it thirsty and crazy, and liable to do anything. That’s where the Climate Disasters come in.
This is your weather: THIS is your weather on Carbon. Any questions?
Yeah, that was a stupid commercial. They showed a raw egg and said this is your brain. Then they showed an egg frying in a fry pan and said this is your brain on drugs. Who knew they were talking about the brains of climate scientists?
They propose setting up cooling centres. How will they be powered?
“There is no such thing as a climate disaster!”
The IPCC comes to mind.
6 months ago I had to wear a coat to go outside. Today I only need a tee shirt.
If that’s not proof of rapid temperature change, I don’t know what is!
(Should I donate my coat to Goodwill or is the temperature going to change again?) /sarc
It is garbage “research” like this that results in cuts to NASA’s budget.
I could have saved these guys a lot of money.
Some areas of the country may have had extreme events but not everyone can remember them. Some areas of the country may experience extreme events more severe than they can remember. We are here to help you with what you don’t know you need. It is not helpful to just look to the past that you can’t remember you need to look to the future for what you don’t know is coming. We can help you and it won’t cost you that much cause we are experts.
What a bunch of worthless knuckle draggers.