Los Angeles Slaps Climate Alarmists with Budget Reality — Cue the Outrage Meltdown

https://laist.com/brief/news/climate-environment/la-mayor-karen-bass-proposed-budget-landmark-climate-action-office

It finally happened. In a world where cities trip over themselves to virtue-signal their carbon neutrality pledges and heat czar appointments, Los Angeles—yes, that Los Angeles—just committed what the climate faithful might call a mortal sin: budget cuts to the climate bureaucracy. The horror!

Mayor Karen Bass’ proposed budget has the audacity to cut funding for the city’s Climate Emergency Mobilization Office. The office’s apparent mission? Mobilizing against an “emergency” so dire, it needed its own bureaucratic silo and, naturally, a “chief heat officer.” That’s not satire. That was a real job.

But now? Eight positions—poof—gone. Including the top-tier post that kept a watchful eye on the sun for its inequitable rays. The backlash has been predictably unhinged, culminating in this gem of a lament:

“Not only did we just go through the worst fires we’ve seen in a long time, but all the environmental justice organizations that are trying to fight climate change consistently in Los Angeles now just got told that this is not as important as the other things we have to pay for.”

https://laist.com/brief/news/climate-environment/la-mayor-karen-bass-proposed-budget-landmark-climate-action-office

Let’s unpack that. They just went through devastating wildfires—and somehow the takeaway is that more money should go to meetings, memos, and public engagement sessions about carbon footprints? No mention, of course, of actually funding more fire crews, equipment, or the management of overgrown fuel loads. Heaven forbid we invest in real firefighting—something that might tangibly prevent homes from burning—instead of subsidizing professional worrywarts whose primary tool is a Google Slides deck.

To be clear, this wasn’t just any office. It was a “landmark” institution, we’re told—because nothing says landmark like a freshly invented bureaucracy built around ideological panic. LAist, ever the reliable bullhorn of climate orthodoxy, wrung its hands:

“The proposed Los Angeles budget cuts could eliminate the city’s first chief heat officer, who focuses on the effects of heat in the city.”

That’s right. The office didn’t just talk about heat—it focused on it. Presumably with intense furrowed brows, graphs, and lots of community listening sessions about “lived heat experiences.”

And the timing? Divine comedy. The article notes these layoffs come despite LA recently experiencing “the worst fires we’ve seen in a long time.” Never mind that wildfire trends in California—when viewed over decades—don’t support the alarmist claims. But nuance doesn’t sell panic, and it certainly doesn’t fund departments.

The ultimate tragedy, according to advocates, is that cutting these positions means LA might not hit its aspirational goals—like becoming carbon-neutral in all buildings. Because there’s nothing more realistic than retrofitting every structure in a sprawling metropolis based on computer models with confidence intervals wide enough to drive a diesel truck through.

The critics are not just disappointed—they’re offended. LAist summarized their mood:

“This is devastating to the movement.”

https://laist.com/brief/news/climate-environment/la-mayor-karen-bass-proposed-budget-landmark-climate-action-office

The “movement,” of course, refers not to any quantifiable success in reducing temperatures (spoiler: there hasn’t been any), but rather to the steady growth of bureaucratic fiefdoms funded by taxpayer dollars under the guise of climate salvation. When those funds are threatened, we’re treated to sanctimonious cries of “injustice.”

And that’s the core irony here: A city whose leadership talks endlessly about “sustainability” suddenly discovers that, economically speaking, its own policies are unsustainable. When ideology meets insolvency, something’s gotta give. And for once, it’s not the taxpayer.

If there’s one silver lining, it’s this: Maybe, just maybe, some of that reclaimed funding will be redirected toward real firefighting capacity—boots on the ground, engines, training, forest management—the kind of thing that actually saves lives when the hills inevitably ignite. Because unlike “climate equity frameworks,” fire doesn’t wait for a task force.

The heat officer may be out of a job. But if LA’s budget office keeps trimming the fat, it might just bring down the fever of institutionalized climate hysteria too.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 31 votes
Article Rating
33 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scarecrow Repair
May 5, 2025 2:19 pm

8 people got fired?

Tom Halla
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
May 5, 2025 2:38 pm

Civil servants? Literally, a construction supervisor in San Jose was caught dealing drugs out of a city vehicle. He was allowed to retire.

Scissor
Reply to  Tom Halla
May 5, 2025 3:59 pm

I heard that about 100,000 federal civil servants are collecting unemployment even though they are “working” for the government.

Rod Evans
Reply to  Scissor
May 6, 2025 12:59 am

That must be an underestimate only 100,000? Surely the number who should be drawing unemployment benefit is equal to the total number of civil servants on payroll….

J Boles
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
May 5, 2025 5:27 pm

They were told to chill out, no sense in getting all steamed up about it.

Mr David Guy-Johnson
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
May 5, 2025 10:27 pm

Ha ha ha

Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
May 6, 2025 12:15 am

8 people got fired?

Doubt it! Probably just assigned to a position.somewhere else in the Bureaucracy.

Ed Zuiderwijk
May 5, 2025 3:20 pm

Why are these climate justice warriors always looking either grim or just ugly?

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
May 5, 2025 3:28 pm

Because they’re ugly on the inside.

Jeff Alberts
May 5, 2025 3:27 pm

Anyone who says “fight climate change” in a serious manner is just a moron.

May 5, 2025 3:39 pm

I expect a “chief heat officer” to deliver a selection of hot sauces.

Roger Bournival
Reply to  Paul Hurley
May 5, 2025 6:38 pm

…or a fastball at 100 MPH.

KevinM
Reply to  Roger Bournival
May 8, 2025 1:57 pm

OMG, Randy Johnson as “chief heat officer”. That would be fantastic.

Editor
May 5, 2025 3:48 pm

Maybe, just maybe, some of that reclaimed funding will be redirected toward real fire protection, like clearing undergrowth away from houses, and planting fire-retardant plants and trees.

Tom Halla
Reply to  Mike Jonas
May 5, 2025 4:05 pm

That would actually be constructive, so the Green Blob will oppose it. Think of all the endangered species weeds that might be cleared!!

Reply to  Mike Jonas
May 5, 2025 10:01 pm

Fire retardant trees???

Reply to  OR For
May 5, 2025 10:35 pm

Yes, See here

Reply to  Redge
May 6, 2025 6:44 am

Total horsepucky. Bigleaf maple, red alder, and service berry grow around here, and they burn like %&*I))_ers in wildfires. You people are supposed to be semi-scientific. Gardening magazines are not a good source of fact regarding fire safety or hazard reduction.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
May 5, 2025 4:41 pm

Oh my, the climate change debacle is coming unwound. What ever will the alarmists do when no one listens to them or cares? They’ll find something else to attack. The Marxists will never let their minions go fallow.

Marty
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
May 6, 2025 12:51 pm

Over the years they went from DDT to over-population to the ozone layer to global warming. My guess is that as global warming winds down, the next great cause will be either micro-plastic or artificial intelligence. But who knows, maybe they will get creative.

KevinM
Reply to  Marty
May 8, 2025 2:00 pm

I wonder whether quotes and data being more accessible by technology hampers an organization’s ability to re-quest itself.

Bruce Cobb
May 5, 2025 4:54 pm

They need a Climate Outrage Mobilization Office. You know, to focus on the outrage.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
May 5, 2025 5:44 pm

Some suggestions:

Climate Outrage Mobilization Mediation Office and DEmonstration Section (COMMODE)

Climate Outrage Mobilization Institute (COMI)

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
May 6, 2025 8:53 am

One of the sub departments?

Climate Outrage Mobilization Institute Center for Action and Litigation (COMICAL)

Edward Katz
May 5, 2025 5:46 pm

This is what more governments at local, state, provincial, regional and national levels should be doing; i.e., quit using taxpayers’ money to prop up climate alarmist bureaus that just want to pass new laws, restrictions and mandates that achieve nothing except to raise living costs. Meanwhile when those same consumers see that all of this has no discernable effect on on preventing the typical weather variations, they wonder who’s actually benefiting from it all because they’re certainly not among them.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Edward Katz
May 6, 2025 8:55 am

Climate alarmist bureaus is a good start.
The quest should continue until all of the nonsense is eliminated and only those that function to serve the people (as opposed to controlling the people) remain.

The primary responsibility of a government is to protect the people from the government.

Mr David Guy-Johnson
May 5, 2025 10:27 pm

Reading that cheered me up immensely

Petey Bird
May 6, 2025 7:17 am

Why didn’t the climate control office turn off the wind during the fire disaster? A good stong rain also would have helped put out the fires. It appears the they are incompetent or malicious. Fire them all

Gilbert K. Arnold
May 6, 2025 8:25 am

Hmmm…. “…computer models with confidence intervals wide enough to drive a diesel truck through.” Would that diesel truck be going straight ahead or sideways (ala “drifting”)?

Mason
Reply to  Gilbert K. Arnold
May 6, 2025 9:21 am

No diesel trucks allowed in California!

Jack Belk
May 6, 2025 11:12 am

The do-nothing agencies, commissions and study groups are nothing but storage areas for useless college degrees. We don’t have enough people to change tires, fight fires and actually get things done.

Bob
May 6, 2025 4:05 pm

As much as it pains me, hats off to the mayor.