Government by Hysteria: The Climate and Covid Hobgoblins Begin to Fade

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

by Tilak Doshi

Former President Ronald Reagan famously said that the nine most terrifying words in the English language are “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”. His point was that Government “help” often leads to worse outcomes for its supposed beneficiaries. Not only have many governments been incredibly inefficient in achieving claimed objectives of helping citizens, but they have often proved to be malicious in intent: the “help” offered has been a cover to stay in power.

Liberal democracies have a limited repertoire of state-sanctioned carrots and sticks, and none of these allow governments to easily trample citizens’ rights enshrined in law such as habeas corpus or the right to trial in a court of law. There are certain norms that apply to government action in modern liberal democracies, and these cannot easily be over-ridden. We call these norms civilised.

Nonetheless, we have witnessed in our lifetimes a new mode of practical politics observed by the great essayist H. L. Mencken. He said, in so many words, that our governments manufacture imaginary hobgoblins – creatures of the mind that can be mischievous, frightening and even dangerous – and then wait for citizens to clamour for safety.

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary

In serving those needs for safety, governments are more likely to get re-elected. Government by hysteria in other words, where fear and alarm are cultivated, then weaponised, for political ends.

Yet exploiting hysteria to govern, with dramatic displays of outrage or emotion, is not without challenges. Hobgoblins cannot bamboozle everyone all the time. Fear and alarm wear out, and truth matters in justifying policies that impact the livelihoods of people.   

The Climate Hobgoblins

Climate hobgoblins have been long in the making. Maurice Strong, a Canadian environmentalist and principal architect of the 1972 Stockholm conference – the first global summit to make the environment the central issue – proclaimed that “If we don’t change, our species will not survive. … Frankly, we may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilisation to collapse.” For mere hobgoblins, this was big stuff. These ones endangered mankind itself.

The threatening features of this genre of hobgoblins went through several permutations. It started with Paul Ehrlich’s famine and war through over-population and the Club of Rome’s prediction of inevitable resource scarcity. It then morphed into global cooling during the 1970s, before finally settling for global warming (now called ‘climate change’) due to effects of greenhouse gases. The focus is on the trace gas carbon dioxide mainly emitted by humans combusting fuels for industry, cooking, heating, cooling and transport.

The story is that the CO2 hobgoblins are the control knob of climate and, by extension, our cataclysmic future, a theory spread via the panic of a Swedish school drop-out who deleted her predictive tweet about the end of the world by 2023. Along with the Swede Greta Thunberg (now a campaigner for Palestinian rights) are the assorted ‘climate scientists’ who have conjured up the climate hobgoblins with their global warming ‘hockey stick’ charts and their pseudoscientific climate models duly adopted by the UN’s IPCC.  

Lionel Shriver captures the climate hobgoblins’ mischievousness well:

They take temperature readings at Heathrow airport. They refuse to cite less distressing satellite readings. They attribute single weather events to climate change without supporting data. They play on the fact that up close, all natural disasters seem like the worst ever. They suppress good news, such as the recovery of the Great Barrier Reef and the fact that hurricanes have not grown more frequent – only reporting the ’hottest July on record’ without noting when the ‘record’ goes back only to 1940.

The work of the climate hobgoblins has stoked up the climate hysteria which is amplified by the mass media on almost daily basis. The deluge of catastrophic predictions regarding climate change and its consequences has reached everyone on the planet. One has only to cite the frequent hyperbolic pronouncements by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who never tires of reminding his global audience of the “climate emergency”: it is “a code red for humanity. The alarm bells are deafening, and the evidence is irrefutable”; the “era of global boiling has arrived”, and so on ad nauseam.

John Clauser, a 2022 Nobel prize laureate in physics, finds climate alarmism “a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people”. He continues:

Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, agencies and environmentalists.

The COVID-19 Hobgoblins

If the climate hobgoblins were long in the making, the Covid variety were anything but. The first reports of COVID-19 emerged in late December 2019, when an outbreak of an unidentified form of pneumonia was reported in Wuhan, China. The World Health Organisation (WHO) and the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began reporting on the outbreak in January 2020 with individual cases reported in Thailand and elsewhere.

By March 2020, the World Health Organisation (WHO) had declared COVID-19 a global health emergency and named the virus “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2”. It was also in March that WHO officially declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. In the early stages of the spread in infection, countries around the world took different approaches to manage COVID-19 and reduce the spread of the virus. Most countries adopted more or less strict lockdowns (encompassing stay-at-home orders, curfews, quarantines, cordons sanitaires and similar societal restrictions) with the significant exception of Sweden which undertook limited targeted measures such as protecting the elderly and the infirm. Strict lockdowns were precluded by insufficient state capacity in the poorer countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

The British Prime Minister Boris Johnson spoke of common sense, ‘herd immunity’ and protecting the vulnerable. He initially rejected banning mass gatherings or imposing social distancing rules. Then, an unpublished alarmist March 16th report by Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London warned of 510,000 deaths in the country if the country did not immediately adopt a suppression strategy. On March 23rd, the UK Government reversed course and imposed one of Europe’s strictest lockdowns. For the US, the professor had predicted 2.2 million deaths absent similar government controls, and there too, Ferguson’s fearful predictions of mass deaths helped move the US federal government into lockdown mode. 

Unlike climate change models that predict outcomes over a period of decades, however, it takes only days and weeks for epidemiological model forecasts to be falsified by data. Furthermore, by including all extreme weather (whether heavy snowfalls or heatwaves, droughts or floods) as results of an all-encompassing ‘climate change’, nothing could be disproven.  

But the COVID-19 hobgoblins could not provide cover for Professor Ferguson’s hysterical conjectures. Thus, by March 25th, Ferguson’s predicted half a million fatalities in the UK was adjusted downward to “unlikely to exceed 20,000”, a reduction by a factor of 25. This drastic reduction could not be credibly explained by UK’s lockdown measures which had been imposed only two days previously, before any such measures could possibly have had enough time to work.

The Corruption of Science

While the climate and COVID-19 hobgoblins may be of different genres, they share much in common. They share striking parallels in the corruption of science, with the use of models whether they be of a bogus global warming hockey-stick or runaway epidemiological fatality predictions. This inordinate dependence on speculative, not-fit-for-purpose models betray the lack of transparency and groupthink, which involves the suppression of sceptics who question the imaginary hobgoblins. 

A recent victim of the groupthink censorship is the highly eminent public health specialist Dr Jay Bhattacharya who co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration which criticised the wholesale adoption of rigid lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nominated by President Trump as the next head of the National Institutes of Health, he has undergone four years of censorship, blacklisting and vilification. Dr John Clauser, who disputes the ‘climate crisis’ narrative, was similarly cancelled. He was disinvited by the IMF from a talk he was supposed to deliver and was subject to hit pieces in the mainstream media.

In the early days of the COVID-19 lockdown in the UK, former Supreme Court Justice Jonathan Sumption denounced the country’s “hysterical slide into a police state. … An irrational overreaction driven by fear”. He went on to masterfully describe the role of hysteria in politics:

The real problem is that when human societies lose their freedom, it’s not usually because tyrants have taken it away. It’s usually because people willingly surrender their freedom in return for protection against some external threat. And the threat is usually a real threat but usually exaggerated. That’s what I fear we are seeing now. The pressure on politicians has come from the public. They want action. They don’t pause to ask whether the action will work. They don’t ask themselves whether the cost will be worth paying. They want action anyway. And anyone who has studied history will recognise here the classic symptoms of collective hysteria. Hysteria is infectious. We are working ourselves up into a lather in which we exaggerate the threat and stop asking ourselves whether the cure may be worse than the disease.

Hobgoblins Fade, People Wake Up

Much as people want protection from imaginary hobgoblins and their perceived threats, when governments turn tyrannical and pursue policies which cost far more than they benefit, people eventually undergo a process of disillusionment with a yearning for meaningful change. Regimes in power in turn double down on hysteria and panic-driven policies to keep the hobgoblins at bay. This causes even further impoverishment and alienation among larger sections of the population.

Rather than allocating resources and efforts towards protecting the vulnerable from COVID-19 while allowing the rest of the population to carry on with their livelihoods with individuals taking responsibility for safe socialising, most governments imposed top-down, economy-crushing lockdowns followed by mandates and exhortations to wear masks and take vaccinations and endless booster shots. And rather than mitigating real environmental threats such as ensuring water reservoirs are filled and forests are managed to safeguard against fires in California for example, the climate change establishment advocates further ‘decarbonisation’ (read deindustrialisation) to save us from extreme scenarios of global warming.

The triumphant return of Donald Trump as the 47th president of the US was the culmination of that process of disillusionment. The hobgoblins of COVID-19 and climate no longer seemed to hold sway. Rather, more people than not preferred to believe in, and vote for, a leader that dismissed the ‘climate crisis’ as a hoax and who was willing to give succour to those that refused COVID-19 vaccinations despite being threatened with the loss of jobs and ordinary freedoms.

On the first day of his administration, President Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders which promise to end hysteria over fearful narratives. In the areas of energy, environment and the so-called ‘climate crisis’, President Trump has instructed his administration to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord, reopen Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas exploration, temporarily withdraw all areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from offshore wind leasing, review the federal Government’s leasing and permitting practices for wind projects, declare a national energy emergency, stop radical environmentalism by “putting people over fish” to provide water to southern California; and put ‘America First’ in international environmental agreements.

With respect to issues related to COVID-19 and public health, the most consequential move Mr. Trump made in his election campaign was to unite forces with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who initially ran as an independent, and to nominate him as his next Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. On his first day, he issued an executive order to withdraw from the World Health Organisation. He also promised to “reinstate any service members who were unjustly expelled from our military for objecting to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate with full back pay”.

At his 1933 Presidential Inauguration, Franklin D. Roosevelt asserted his firm belief that “the only thing we have to fear is… fear itself”. Imaginary hobgoblins, threatening as they are, do fade away as people realise the truth.

Dr. Tilak K. Doshi is an economist, a former contributor to Forbes, and a member of the CO2 Coalition.

5 22 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

47 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
heme212
January 23, 2025 6:10 pm

what’s that expression? oh yeah

“the enemy gets a vote”

Nick Stokes
January 23, 2025 6:59 pm

“For the US, the professor had predicted 2.2 million deaths absent similar government controls”

Absent controls. But there were controls, and even then 1.2 million deaths. Seems a reasonable prediction.

But the COVID-19 hobgoblins could not provide cover for Professor Ferguson’s hysterical conjectures. Thus, by March 25th, Ferguson’s predicted half a million fatalities in the UK”

Again, absent controls. But controls there were, and 232000 deaths. Not so hysterical.

This was not a hobgoblin. It was a new and very dangerous disease.

HB
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 23, 2025 7:24 pm

How many where from other causes blamed on covid 19 why where there no flu deaths those years
What about the medical panic, for example sottish inquire revealed lots where euthanized certain opiate and barbiturate given together other countries different drugs
Ferguson saying that while breaking lock down to shag his mistress ffs

Nick Stokes
Reply to  HB
January 23, 2025 10:56 pm

Makes no sense.

Scissor
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 24, 2025 7:29 am

He enjoyed the sex.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Scissor
January 24, 2025 12:58 pm

So did Trump.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 23, 2025 7:45 pm

You have it exactly backwards.
The number of deaths was far less than predicted, even though EVERY death was counted as covid.
The disease was NOT very dangerous.
Only the vaccines were dangerous as the numbers clearly prove, especially the HUGE excess death rates among younger people. The British and other countries have incredible statistics.
A bit of personal history.
After three tests, covid was putatively detected in my case in April, 2020. I was ill all of 3 hours, then a bit lethargic for a few days. That’s it. I was 82 then. I have not has ANY illness to keep me from work (I am not retired) SINCE that time.
Was covid the great immunizer, IF you did not take the vaccine?
No one knows, but my family has been unusually healthy for the past four years and my vaccinated students, now numbering in the hundreds, unusually unhealthy.
Anecdotal, but interesting.

Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
January 23, 2025 8:25 pm

Overcounting reflected the fact that hospitals across the country were incentivized to report deaths as Covid because of the reimbursement schedule.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  Ollie
January 24, 2025 7:20 am

Same happened in the UK. Hospitals got more support for dealing with Covid and Covid deaths rose.

littlepeaks
Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
January 23, 2025 9:20 pm

Maybe. But one benefit I had from the COVID pandemic — I always wanted to participate in a health study, and I was chosen to be a guinea pig for the Moderna COVID vaccine trial in 2020. When they revealed whether we got the real deal or the placebo, I found out I actually received the vaccine. The only thing that bothered me — I wanted to read the results of the study, and had to search the internet to find them. BTW, I’m 77 and still bouncing off the walls and bothering everybody. And I’ve had COVID twice — not very sick.

Reply to  littlepeaks
January 24, 2025 1:11 pm

So the vaccine didn’t work as promised.

littlepeaks
Reply to  karlomonte
January 25, 2025 7:09 am

I think the vaccine helped. The first time I got COVID, I was only sick for about 15 minutes, and then I felt “strange” for about 6 days — then all of a sudden I felt better again. And I’m a runner, and I couldn’t run on the treadmill. The second time I got COVID, I did not get the vaccine that year. I saw my doctor and he prescribed Paxlovid. I started feeling better 3 hours after beginning that medicine. And it also got rid of a cold that I had.

Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
January 24, 2025 12:35 am

I caught Covid in 2021, despite being vaccinated. Three days in bed with a mild fever, a loss of taste and smell for a week or two afterwards, and apparently no long term effects. Did the vaccine attenuate the illness? No idea, but it certainly didn’t prevent me from catching it. Compared with influenza, which clobbered me for over two weeks, it was pretty small beer.

Derg
Reply to  Graemethecat
January 24, 2025 12:54 am

Same Covid experience for me and I didn’t get the shot.

CampsieFellow
Reply to  Graemethecat
January 24, 2025 3:12 am

They changed the story. After claiming that we needed to take the medical intervention to protect ourselves and to protect others they dropped that and just said it would make Covid less severe if we got it.

Reply to  Graemethecat
January 24, 2025 10:22 am

My wife got COVID once before the shots and twice after. I did (was forced) to get the shots but never got COVID.

Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
January 24, 2025 10:21 am

You have it exactly backwards.

You could have stopped right there.

Mr.
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 23, 2025 7:46 pm

It was mostly a dangerous infection for us oldies.
But so are the annual flu strains.
And crossing the road. And falling up the garden path.
Amazingly, during the WuFlu era, the annual reported flu deaths dropped off significantly.
What’s up with that?

Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 23, 2025 8:11 pm

Much has been written about the overstatement of the number of deaths due to a variety of reasons, including corrupt ones. However, the real problem was throwing standard Immunology 101 out the window which taught that the proper protocol was to protect the vulnerable and everybody else go about their business. Countries and states that followed this did far better than those with controls. This was pointed out by medical personnel (video was originally banned by YouTube) at least as early as April 2020 who unfortunately were often ignored by politicians.

Erik Magnuson
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 23, 2025 8:54 pm

The very first government control should have been quarantining anybody who came from an area with active Covid infections and monitoring of people who came in before the quarantine was imposed.

Likely the primary cause of the rapid spread of the disease was the Chinese government covering up what was going in Wuhan in late 2019. The WHO was parroting the “no cases of human to human transmission” as late as January 15, 2020.

One of the worst aspect of government controls was keeping people inside, when being outdoors with a modicum of spacing would not have contributed to the spread of the disease and exposure to sunlight would help with vitamin D levels. It was know by late northern hemisphere spring of 2020 that depressed vitamin D levels increased the chances of dying from Covid.

Sweden had minimal controls and ended up with almost no excess deaths.

Alexy Scherbakoff
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 23, 2025 9:29 pm

You don’t realise that the post is about you.
You are the person who accepts the government’s line on everything and argues to support them.
You will never deviate from that thinking.
I have an ex aquaintance who thinks I am scientifically minded. He can’t understand why I didn’t follow the government decree about COVID-19 shots (I won’t call them vaccines). He was so mad about people not taking the vaccine. He wanted to go after them with a machete.
I have zero interest in changing your thinking. Keep posting. We can all do with a laugh.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 24, 2025 12:30 am

The disproof of your assertions was Sweden, which, unlike the UK, instituted modest and rational measures which protected the vulnerable elderly while leaving everyone else to continue their lives as before. The result was a Covid death toll comparable or even slightly lower than that of the UK.

You knew this already, but kept it quiet. Nothing you say is in good faith.

Derg
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 24, 2025 12:52 am

Fauci indeed

cwright
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 24, 2025 3:50 am

Ferguson has a long track record of computer models that massively exaggerated deaths due to various viruses. I don’t know how anyone could take his Covid predictions seriously. His Covid predictions were pretty well guaranteed to also be massively exaggerated.

They were. The data shows that, for each UK lockdown, the deaths had peaked and were already coming down when the lockdowns started. Peer reviewed studies showed that the health benefits of the lockdowns were so small as to be essentially zero – the same for normal face masks. But the catastrophic damage caused by those same lockdowns was huge and the consequences are still with us today. The measures inflicted on children – for whom the Covid threat was extremely small – were obscene. It damaged a whole generation.

Of course, apologists like you will always claim that the huge predicted numbers of deaths did not materialise because of the lockdowns. Fortunately something happened that gave us an opportunity to test the computer models: Omicron.

When Omicron started to emerge it quickly became clear that, despite its scary name, it was a very mild form of Covid. Naturally Ferguson quickly rolled out another junk computer model predicting catastrophic deaths unless the UK government closed down the country again. But something extraordinary happened: this time the UK government, led by Boris Johnson, refused to start another catastrophic lockdown. There were some measures, such as face masks on trains, but no lockdown. So now we had an opportunity to test Ferguson’s predictions. Surprise, surprise – his junk computer model was hopelessly wrong. The deaths from Omicron were far, far lower than predicted by him and the other modellers.

For some time before the model was released, data from other countries was already showing that Omicron was a much milder form of Covid, but the modellers apparently ignored that. Their one intention was to force the government into yet another devastating lockdown.

Overall, the UK government’s response to Covid was driven by a massive corruption of science. World class scientists who pointed out the mistaken policies were silenced and attacked and censored on the likes of Facebook – now, in this new era of Trump, Mark Zuckerburg has openly described how the government was constantly calling Facebook and demanding that any stories they didn’t like be censored. Of course, all of these “conspiracy theories” turned out to be true.

Yes, Nick, the UK government’s response was primarily hysterical, as it is with climate change. The hysteria was a bigger danger than Covid. We are still paying for the damage caused by that hysteria.

In a nutshell, a small group of activist scientists used junk computer models to force governments into actions whose consequences were far worse than the original problem. Does that sound familiar? It should, because that’s exactly what they’re doing with their junk climate models.

Fortunately it seems that Trump understands both threats against the wellbeing of humanity: he is going to take the US out of the corrupt WHO and the Paris Suicide Pact.
Chris

Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 24, 2025 7:43 am

Nick, Nick. The Covid death numbers are as exaggerated as the RCP 8.5 climate scenario is. Everyone who died with a positive , and inappropriate for purpose, random PCR test was lumped into the mix. It was known early on who was at risk and who was not. It was a virus with an unusual degree of transmissibility (as it was designed to be) but not particularly virulent in the mortality sense. It was overhyped, just as the climate non-crisis is, and yet you remain a cheerleader for the actions of government and its virulent overreach. The author is quite correct–in almost every instance one could use as reference, the response of government is far worse than the problem of focus.
Fortunately, the tools are now, perhaps, in place to shine a light on the depredations of the elite and the government they employ against us.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 24, 2025 10:21 am

“Safe and effective”
Nope.

“Protect you”
Nope

Confining people to limited spaces with limited ventilation is not a good idea for dealing with an air borne virus.

Face coverings? Well, the cloth absorbs the droplets and as you breath through the cloth you breath in the virus. In addition, few people did proper handling of those cloth coverings, washing between use, washing hands after handling, etc. It was a false security blanket. It did not protect you.

Face masks? See above. How many people reused the same mask over and over again? How many had the mask properly fitted?

Point in fact: face masks and face coverings to not prevent one from viral infection.
Point in fact: face masks and face coverings do reduce the spread by someone already infected.

Vaccines? In many cases had some level of effectiveness in reducing the severity of the symptoms.

I had the shot and 3 boosters and got Covid 10 days after the last booster. Funny thing is, I got pneumonia 7 weeks after the booster and was in the hospital for a week. I had a pneumonia vaccine 10 months prior. The Covid symptoms lasted a day and were on par with a 24 hour cold. I was just shy of 70 at the time.

So, no. You are wrong on all points.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 24, 2025 2:42 pm

The CDC in the US. showed that the vast number of deaths were those over 55 years of age and rare in those 19 years and younger.

Most people who died were those who had several underlying health problems while others who had none were far less likely to generate their death.

The disease was dangerous to the already sick and older people, but not to people under ago 55.

This indicate that the disease isn’t very dangerous to healthy younger people.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Sunsettommy
January 24, 2025 3:41 pm

Plenty of forgetting here. Pres Trump nearly died from it. So did British PM Boris Johnson, aged 56, and nearly two weeks in intensive care.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 24, 2025 5:14 pm

Trump had an underlying health problem, and he was never that sick as he left the hospital after just 3 days attendance.

Summary:

Infection discovered October 2

Receives medication October 2

The very next day October 3 shows good progress

The very next day October 4 left the hospital to ride in a car temporarily to see people and wave at them

He goes back to the White House October 5

By October 7 he is declared free of COVID from the day before

He was sick for just 3 days no mention of him being near death which is a LIE because I watched the news about in real time.

It appears YOU are the one who has forgotten.

Timeline: History of Trump’s COVID-19 illness
LINK

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Sunsettommy
January 24, 2025 6:51 pm

He was put on oxygen and dexamethasone, and an experimental combination of antiviral drugs not available to the public. That seems pretty sick.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 25, 2025 4:13 pm

Give it up since he had access to some of the best health care in the nation thus will go the extra mile as he is the President at the time.

Meanwhile anyone supposedly very very sick near death as YOU started with wouldn’t be going home within 3 days of admittance.

You are making a total fool of yourself with your pile of utter nonsense from your ass!

LOL.

max
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 26, 2025 8:02 am

Until you consider that hospitals were offered a cash bounty for treating “covid” patients. When it added to profits, EVERY patient became a covid patient.

January 23, 2025 7:03 pm

 It started with Paul Ehrlich’s famine and war through over-population 

_________________________________________________________

The Population Bomb is a 1968 book

Environmentalism started with Rachel Carson’s 1962 Silent Spring. Ten years later DDT was banned and there’s been an uptick in malaria since. The now renamed “Legacy Media” seems to ignore that.

Reply to  Steve Case
January 24, 2025 12:41 am

Ehrlich’s predictions of famine and poverty in the UK are coming true, but as an inevitable result of the Government’s environmental policies like Net Zero rather than ecological collapse.

Reply to  Graemethecat
January 24, 2025 2:07 am

I hear Bob and Midge are releasing a new charity record to bring aid to the UK

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Steve Case
January 24, 2025 10:03 am

It started earlier with a 1950s Club of Rome session where they determined environmentalist activism would be perfect for disrupting countries and economies all in the name of what is now called the One World Order.

HB
January 23, 2025 7:26 pm

The goblin cartoon reminds me of a combination of Gore, Blair and Obama well done

January 23, 2025 7:29 pm

What is meant by “save the world.” The deepest scratch we have made is 12 km out of 6371 km to the center of the Earth, and that was hole a less than 10 cm in diameter. Like the population bomb that came along a few years earlier, ALL predictions were just so much hot air. Gullible people took these scoundrels seriously. The con artists became rich and famous, but never apologized for their mummery. Humanity is NO threat to the world, only to each other.

Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
January 23, 2025 8:29 pm

Yep, language was invented and developed by humans so that they could lie to each other.

CampsieFellow
January 24, 2025 3:07 am

The hobgoblins are currently very active in Scotland. The UK Met Office issued a red warning that strong winds will cause all sorts of problems. People are being advised not to travel. As a result shops and other businesses are closed for the day and all schools in Glasgow have been closed. As I look out through my window it looks a bit breezy but not anything like bad enough to justify closing schools.

Reply to  CampsieFellow
January 24, 2025 7:26 am

As I look out through my window …

About 3 hours ago I checked on the “classic.nullschool.net” (= “ex-Ventusky” ?) website to see how storm Eowyn was progressing.

Attached is a screenshot of the surface winds they were displaying at that time …

Notice that the strongest, “pink” colour, winds were in the seas between Northern Ireland and the Western Isles of Scotland.

Note also how “windy” it then was over most of the North Sea, where many of Britain’s offshore wind turbines are located.

There aren’t many “windows” for people to look out of in either of those “wet and windy” areas.

.

Eowyn is being presented, in some quarters at least, as a “strongest in a generation” storm.

48 hours ago instead of “a perfect storm” there was “a perfectly positioned blocking pattern” that resulted in record low “Wind” contributions to the GB electricity grid (I calculated a 30-minute average of just 217 MW — from an “installed capacity” of around 29,000 MW — for Settlement Period 18 [ 8:30 to 9 AM ] on the morning of the 22nd of January, 86 “Metered” MW from Elexon + 131 “Embedded” MW from NESO).

As they say in Ireland (and possibly elsewhere ?), “If you don’t like the weather right now … well, just wait for 15 minutes …”.

Storm-Eowyn_240125-13h15
Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Mark BLR
January 24, 2025 10:05 am

we have it as 5 minutes as it is bound to change.

Neo
January 24, 2025 6:39 am

Bulk Carrier Paralyzed On Lake Erie As Ice Coverage Exceeds 50-Year Trend
“Lake Erie over 80% ice-covered, freighter …” 

Doug S
January 24, 2025 7:40 am

A good summary, thank you. The Mass Formation has been broken, the cult of Climate Religion has suffered a serious blow. I’d encourage all my Brothers and Sisters of science to repeat on a daily basis that “climate” is a religion and has caused great harm to people and their quality of life. “climate” is also a political tool that has failed spectacularly along with the entire basket of Marxists policies that have infected the Western democracies for decades. “climate” is just another dead end in the evolution of science and knowledge.

Rahx360
January 24, 2025 9:06 am

On the climate scam and problem of disapproving it. If climate becomes hotter we will here that we didn’t do enough. If climate doesn’t heat then the measurements worked. Even when humans have no impact on climate you can’t win this one.

Sparta Nova 4
January 24, 2025 10:09 am

I despise the expression “liberal democracy” as I live in a Constitutional Republic.

Prior to Kennedy, all called the US a republic.

The moniker of democracy was introduced with the intended (my opinion) of associating voters’ minds of the Democrat Party with the country.

Spin forward a few decades and the Liberal/Progressives of the Democrat Party added the “Liberal” to the moniker so as to (in my opinion) of getting voters to associate liberal (aka leftist) policies with the country.

As I view it, Make America Great Again starts with bringing us back to Constitutional Republic.

Edward Katz
January 24, 2025 2:09 pm

Chances are good that these alarmists, whether they are conjuring up climate scares or any other types , stand to profit if governments and/or consumers fall for their drivel. If it’s the former, we can be assured of higher taxes and more unnecessary laws and restrictions. If it’s consumers, they will fall into line by accepting higher prices for products that will provide little or no relief from what’s supposedly threatening the general population.