‘Our Long National Nightmare is Over’ – (open thread)

USA! USA! USA!

5 27 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

238 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 20, 2025 9:54 am

Yeahhhhhh!!!

Yabbababbadoooo!!!!

Now it is time to clean up the damage while the sedition democrat party slinks away in their treasonous actions while the repairs are underway.

Rebuild the Middle Class, the Oil drilling, the mining and a new Industrial base.

Bring back part of the offshore economy to home in America.

Reply to  Sunsettommy
January 20, 2025 12:04 pm

In about 30 minutes President Trump is going to sit down in front of about 20,000 people and is going to start signing Executive Orders in front of them while on television, and I assume he will talk about each one.

This ought to be real interesting! I think he has about 200 EO’s to sign, although I don’t know if he is going to sign them all today. But maybe he will. He’s not the kind of guy who puts things off for too long.

One of Trump’s EO’s is going to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

I’m calling it the Gulf of America from now on. 🙂

Giving_Cat
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 12:12 pm

Gulf of the Americas? Let’s not be greedy.

Reply to  Giving_Cat
January 20, 2025 12:26 pm

Gulf of the Americas (plural)?
OK … but I don’t think it’s necessary.
That’s the only EO I know of that I wonder about.

Loren Wilson
Reply to  Giving_Cat
January 20, 2025 12:43 pm

Geographically, the Gulf of Mexico is entirely within North America. The Caribbean sea extends down into South America.

Giving_Cat
Reply to  Loren Wilson
January 20, 2025 12:50 pm

By golly you are correct. Okay, Gulf of North America Demarcated.

TR M
Reply to  Giving_Cat
January 20, 2025 4:06 pm

But that’s long so let’s just go by the acronym “GONAD” LOL

Giving_Cat
Reply to  TR M
January 20, 2025 5:50 pm

It’s almost as if I was waiting for the straight line.

KevinM
Reply to  TR M
January 21, 2025 12:36 pm

That would make Florida the …

Rich
Reply to  Loren Wilson
January 20, 2025 6:53 pm

There is already a Gulf of California. So, if the GOM is renamed, it should be called the Gulf of Texas!!

Arthur Jackson
Reply to  Giving_Cat
January 20, 2025 5:39 pm

Gulf of Amerigo! Amerigo Vespucci, named after a man, not America a woman. Naming continents is sexist.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 1:40 pm

Trump has been delayed. He is just now arriving at the arena where he will sign his Executive Orders.

TR M
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 4:04 pm

“Gulf of La Merica” 😉

MarkW
Reply to  Sunsettommy
January 20, 2025 12:54 pm

In 2020, there were rumors that Trump was going to issue blanket pardons to those who were associated with him.
When asked about this, then president elect Biden declared that such blanket pardons were unconscionable and would make the US a laughingstock amongst the nations. He also pledged that he would never do such a thing.

Trump didn’t, Biden just did.

Reply to  MarkW
January 20, 2025 2:19 pm

Unknown territory there – the only precedent for blanket preemptive pardons is Nixon, and nobody really cared enough to challenge that one. If there is a desire to pursue anything with these people, the concept will certainly face a SCOTUS review. If it’s NOT pursued, the flip side is that they can’t take the 5th, and any perjury arising from their testimony is a new crime not covered by the pardon.

Reply to  Tony_G
January 20, 2025 4:22 pm

Yeah, two or maybe three of the death row prisoners whose sentences were commuted said they didn’t want that. It made proving their “innocence” easier if they were on death row, apparently.

Reply to  MarkW
January 20, 2025 3:39 pm

That is the socialist way, attribute their anti-(fit your choice of descriptor) to smear their opposition and then do as they please.

Reply to  Sunsettommy
January 20, 2025 5:43 pm

Story tip:

Trump just withdrew the United States from the World Health Organization.

CD in Wisconsin
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 2:31 am

Trump orders US exit from the World Health Organization | Reuters

“NEW YORK, Jan 20 (Reuters) – The United States will leave the World Health Organization, President Donald Trump said on Monday, saying the global health agency had mishandled the COVID-19 pandemic and other international health crises.

Trump said the WHO had failed to act independently from the “inappropriate political influence of WHO member states” and required “unfairly onerous payments” from the U.S. that were disproportionate to the sums provided by other, larger countries, such as China.

World Health ripped us off, everybody rips off the United States. It’s not going to happen anymore,” Trump said at the signing of an executive order on the withdrawal, shortly after his inauguration to a second term.”

**************

Don’t stop at the WHO. Pull us out of the World Meteorological Organization as well.

Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
January 21, 2025 4:03 am

Trump said China has 1.4 billion people and pays the WHO about $39 million per year, while the US has about 350 million people and pays the WHO $500 million per year. Trump doesn’t think that is fair, and he doesn’t like the fact that the WHO carries the Chicom’s water.

CD in Wisconsin
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 8:10 am

$500 million sounds like a lot of money for the WHO to lose. I’m wondering if the other member states will make up for the loss of U.S. funding. Can’t find how much we pay the WMO in annual dues. Like I said however, pull us out of it.

J Boles
January 20, 2025 9:56 am

Drill baby! yes, need more fossil fuels, more fairness, more freedom, and push back on leftist oppression. I hope the USA and the world have learned a lesson from the last 4 years, and do better going forward.

Reply to  J Boles
January 20, 2025 11:49 am

Trump signed an Executive Order declaring a National Energy Crisis a little while ago.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 12:49 pm

And , CPB1 is off . Poor illegals reported to be crying .

Scissor
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
January 20, 2025 1:50 pm

Boo-hoo, I hope they can begin reforming the problems that make them so sad.

January 20, 2025 10:10 am

This should be considered one of the happiest days for America. As of today, the Green New Deal and the EV mandate are history (although not yet the Paris Agreement).

Josualdo
Reply to  Douglas Pollock
January 20, 2025 10:34 am

IIRC, which is diffy, the Paris thing and all like these anr progressively non-binding and mostly non-saying-a-thing and I’m-not-signing-that. But then, after looking at these, they all went into the trash can for me – they’d take too much space in the paper bin.

Reply to  Douglas Pollock
January 20, 2025 11:59 am

Not really, sadly. Trump can’t do it alone.

The climate scam-renewable wind and solar spending in the Inflation Reduction Act will need to be rescinded by the GOP-run Congress in a reconciliation bill sent to President Trump before the waste of GND will be undone.

Duane
Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
January 20, 2025 12:35 pm

Patience, Grasshopper! Congress can’t move as fast as a President on his inauguration day.

First things first, which is to confirm all of Trump’s senior level appointments. Majority Leader Thune said he’s doing just that. It is believed that first up will be Marco Rubio at State, which is considered the senior most cabinet position. The other cabinet appointees have already gone through committee hearings and can be expected to get Senate confirmation in the first few days.

In the meantime Senate and House leaders have been working on reconciliation bills that will accomplish much of what is needed legislatively.

However, I am still of the opinion that the Senate filibuster must be reformed to allow a simple majority vote after substantial Senate debate, which is what the Senate did for most of its history until perverted into requiring a 60 vote margin for any significant legislation. Can the Dems come back and use that against us? Sure … but the best means of keeping Dems out of control of the Senate and House is to accomplish what Trump promised to do this year. If that happens, it will be a very long time before Dems are in a position again to abuse the American voting public.

Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
January 20, 2025 2:28 pm

There are plenty of signs the Congress doesn’t plan to go along. I think Trump is better tuned to how things work than he was in 2017.

Reply to  Douglas Pollock
January 20, 2025 1:12 pm

“(although not yet the Paris Agreement).”

It was reported a few minutes ago that Trump is going to cancel the Paris Climate Agreement.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 7:24 pm

EV mandate scrapped ! 🙂

People can buy what the want to buy. 🙂

Rivian can still make its EV using Biden’s loan/grift… but very few will buy it.

Reply to  bnice2000
January 20, 2025 8:00 pm

There’s quite a few Rivians on the streets here in Fort Lauderdale, parts of which are a deep blue enclave within deep red Florida.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  bnice2000
January 20, 2025 10:10 pm

EV mandate scrapped ! “

Now, do you think Musky will allow him to do that ?

Reply to  Anthony Banton
January 21, 2025 2:11 am

Musk doesn’t need a mandate for Teslas.

He also believes in a free and open market.

Its been done.. Executive order signed.

Reply to  Anthony Banton
January 21, 2025 4:07 am

It’s done. Musk had no objection as far as I can tell. It doesn’t matter anyway because it’s done.

So, now, when you buy an electric car, the government won’t be handing you a $7,500 check.

I suspect this will result in even fewer EV’s being sold.

John Endicott
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 9:22 am

Not quite yet. The $7,500 is a tax credit and thus part of the tax code, it’ll require an act of congress to eliminate. California’s waiver that enables them to set the “ Zero Emissions Vehicles regulations” however, is on the chopping block thanks to Trumps EOs. His EOs also put a halt to the spending of money for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure and the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure programs while agencies conduct a review of their policies.

John Endicott
Reply to  Anthony Banton
January 21, 2025 9:11 am

Musk is fine with it. As Musk said when Trump first proposed the idea “A surprising number of people think that Tesla survives on subsidies. That is true of our competitors, but not of Tesla”. Musk has also said “I think we should get rid of all credits” when asked about eliminating the Federal Tax Credit. (note: in 2018 enough Tesla’s were sold to trigger the elimination of that Credit for Tesla, and in 2020, while Tesla’s were no longer eligible for the Credit, Tesla posted its first fully profitable year.)

TL/DR: Musk, by all accounts, is onboard with the elimination of the “EV mandate”.

Reply to  Douglas Pollock
January 20, 2025 1:32 pm

The Dog Days are Over!

(Described as: the bittersweet release from adversity, and the anxious liberation that follows)

January 20, 2025 10:11 am

“Liberation Day” !
Let’s take heart, skeptics of climate alarm. It’s time now to stop conceding the core claim that “warming” should be expected down here from incremental CO2, CH4, N2O and other radiatively active non-condensing gases. There was never a good scientific reason all along to suppose so – most certainly not to any significant or harmful extent.

Reply to  David Dibbell
January 20, 2025 11:53 am

“stop conceding the core claim”

Absolutely! The Climate Alarmists have not even established the feedback basics for connecting CO2 to Earth’s temperatures or weather.

They have a long way to go, and we shouldn’t let them think otherwise.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 1:17 pm

I stop conceding the core claim several years ago.

bobpjones
Reply to  David Dibbell
January 20, 2025 1:36 pm

Now, that’s something he said in his speech. He said something about legislation outlawing the suppression of free speech. The thought struck me, could scientists use that against publishers etc. who block publications and sack scientists for presenting valid papers/views contrary to the climate scam narrative?

KevinM
Reply to  bobpjones
January 21, 2025 12:46 pm

“legislation outlawing the suppression of free speech.”
Sounds important. Maybe we should add a free speech amendment to the US constitution.

Reply to  David Dibbell
January 20, 2025 4:33 pm

Warming, it’s what comes after an ice age.

January 20, 2025 10:15 am

The best Trump has ever done was to prevent Hillary and Kamala from becoming president.

Reply to  doonman
January 20, 2025 10:45 am

That was good, yes, but the best thing he did was put Constitutionalist (rather than biased left or right judges) on SCOTUS.

TR M
Reply to  Gunga Din
January 20, 2025 5:25 pm

Screwed up with Amy & Roberts

Reply to  TR M
January 20, 2025 5:59 pm

GW Bush nominated Roberts.
I’ve problem with Amy Coney Barrett.

Reply to  Gunga Din
January 20, 2025 6:52 pm

Dang!
Should be, “I’ve NO problem with Amy Coney Barrett.”

John Endicott
Reply to  TR M
January 21, 2025 9:26 am

Roberts was GW’s screw-up.

While Amy isn’t 100% on the right side of things, she’s there enough of the time that I don’t have any particular problem with her.

Reply to  John Endicott
January 22, 2025 1:15 pm

As long as she remains a Constitutionalist, I’ve no problem with her.
While most things the Left has tried to is Unconstitutional, some thing the Right tries is also.
Judging by the Law of The Land will help get us back to governing by The Law of the Land.

Reply to  doonman
January 20, 2025 2:29 pm

He deserves medals for that, perhaps his face on Mt. Rushmore. Now let’s see him follow up on those campaign promises.

Plus Project 2025. Let’s do that, too.

Derg
January 20, 2025 10:17 am

Finally some sanity. Geez Biden even pardoned his family…I wonder what they were involved in.

in politics his entire life and is a multimillionaire many times over. Government pays!

Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 10:56 am

Is granting immunity a pardon?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Gunga Din
January 21, 2025 1:55 pm

Constitution does not grant the President the power of assigning immunity.

Due process declares presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Pardon is for persons who committed an offense (crime) against the federal government.

Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:

“and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States”

So those pardons are Constitutionally invalid, much as the back to 2014 for Hunter.

Reprieves are commutation of punishments currently served. Changing a death penalty to life is a reprieve.

Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 11:52 am

Pardon??

Image from a few days ago, not sure how much extra to add…

Seems Biden was mates with a lot of criminals. 😉

Pardons
R_G
Reply to  bnice2000
January 20, 2025 12:16 pm

It is a slippery slope step. If those pardons are not overturned USA is on the way to become lawless country.

Scissor
Reply to  R_G
January 20, 2025 12:23 pm

Pardon me!

Reply to  Scissor
January 20, 2025 1:11 pm

Pardon all of us

Reply to  wilpost
January 20, 2025 4:39 pm

The Supreme Court has to get involved in this. He could’ve pardoned anyone who votes democrat. If he had a mind, that thought might have crossed it.

…. and, BTW, Just because I dislike him intensely, I’m not making light of the man’s illness. I think it became more exposed because of the antics of his senior-abusing wife.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  philincalifornia
January 21, 2025 1:56 pm

You beat me to the concept of pre-emptively pardoning all Democrats.

Arthur Jackson
Reply to  Scissor
January 20, 2025 5:44 pm

you weren’t pardoned?

rbabcock
Reply to  R_G
January 20, 2025 12:32 pm

No, not really. They will still investigate the people and those pardoned have to still testify without 5th amendment rights. If they refuse to testify they can be arrested for obstruction and if they lie, for perjury. Plus all those involved and not under a pardon will get convicted and go to the big house as well as rat on everyone under a pardon.

All it does is keep them out of jail, but not protected from other things.

MarkW
Reply to  rbabcock
January 20, 2025 1:01 pm

Presidential pardons don’t cover state crimes or protect from civil actions.

Reply to  rbabcock
January 20, 2025 4:42 pm

I’ve heard conflicting reports from legal analysts on Liz Cheney and her alleged witness tampering. Anyone know any more? Doesn’t being pardoned mean that Joe’s handlers knew she was guilty of something?

Reply to  philincalifornia
January 21, 2025 4:15 am

“Doesn’t being pardoned mean that Joe’s handlers knew she was guilty of something?”

That’s the way it looks to me.

I think the Republicans are probably going to investigate the January 6 investigation.

We may not be able to put ole Liz in jail now, but we can sure humiliate her by making her underhanded actions public.

The Biden administration corruption should be the subject of investigations. People need to know what was really going on behind the curtain, so they don’t ever vote for radical Democrats again.

Reply to  philincalifornia
January 21, 2025 7:32 am

In 1915 SCOTUS declared that accepting a pardon is a imputation of guilt, but a few recent lower court writing have questioned it.

Reply to  R_G
January 20, 2025 12:43 pm

These pre-emptive pardons are a huge black marks against the people receiving them.

They are sort of being told that Biden knows they are guilty.. (which is probably true)

I find it bizarre that pre-emptive pardons can even be allowed.

MarkW
Reply to  bnice2000
January 20, 2025 1:03 pm

The problem with dis-allowing pre-emptive pardons, is that all the DA has to do is wait till the president is out of office before charging them.

Reply to  bnice2000
January 20, 2025 9:09 pm

If Hunter, Liz Cheney, Fauci and the others are truly innocent, why do they even need pardons? Is this not an admission of their guilt?

Reply to  Graemethecat
January 21, 2025 6:36 am

Is this not an admission of their guilt?

I don’t remember which one, but I was just reading a statement yesterday from one of them who said exactly that. He also said that he wouldn’t accept one for exactly that reason. (spoiler: he accepted it)

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Graemethecat
January 21, 2025 1:58 pm

The excuse offered by Biden is to make them immune from lawfare.

Reply to  bnice2000
January 21, 2025 4:18 am

“These pre-emptive pardons are a huge black marks against the people receiving them.”

That’s what Trump said, too. He said he could have pardoned his family and even himself, but if he had done so, it would make all look guilty of something, and Trump said he didn’t think he would be the 47th president, had he done so.

Reply to  R_G
January 20, 2025 12:45 pm

From Legal.com (I I didn’t copy the whole thing.)
pardon
1) v. to use the executive power of a Governor or President to forgive a person convicted of a crime, thus removing any remaining penalties or punishments and preventing any new prosecution of the person for the crime for which the pardon was given. A pardon strikes the conviction from the books as if it had never occurred, and the convicted person is treated as innocent. Sometimes pardons are given to an older rehabilitated person long after the sentence has been served to clear his/her record.

governmental immunity
n. the doctrine from English common law that no governmental body can be sued unless it gives permission. This protection resulted in terrible injustices, since public hospitals, government drivers and other employees could be negligent with impunity (free) from judgment. The Federal Tort Claims Act and state waivers of immunity (with specific claims systems) have negated this rule, which stemmed from the days when kings set prerogatives.

immunity
n. exemption from penalties, payments or legal requirements, granted by authorities or statutes. Generally there are three types of immunity at law: a) a promise not to prosecute for a crime in exchange for information or testimony in a criminal matter, granted by the prosecutors, a judge, a grand jury or an investigating legislative committee; b) public officials’ protection from liability for their decisions (like a city manager or member of a public hospital board); c) governmental (or sovereign) immunity, which protects government agencies from lawsuits unless the government agreed to be sued; d) diplomatic immunity which excuses foreign ambassadors from most U.S. criminal laws.

Biden didn’t issue “immunities”. He issued pardons.
The Constitution does not give the President the power is issue immunity from prosecution.

Reply to  Gunga Din
January 20, 2025 6:55 pm

To clarify what I meant, Biden did issue immunities but they were disguised as pardons.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Gunga Din
January 21, 2025 1:59 pm

Spot on.

MarkW
Reply to  R_G
January 20, 2025 1:00 pm

There is no mechanism to overturn a presidential pardon. The supreme court has ruled that the president’s pardon power is unlimited. The only thing a pardon doesn’t cover is future crimes.

Reply to  MarkW
January 20, 2025 1:06 pm

Did they rule that the President can issue Immunity?
Issue pardons, yes. But Biden issued Immunities disguised as pardons.

Reply to  MarkW
January 20, 2025 1:12 pm

Didn’t Hunter’s pardon extend into the future from the date pardon was written?

MarkW
Reply to  mkelly
January 20, 2025 3:34 pm

No, it only extended to the day the pardon was signed.

Reply to  mkelly
January 20, 2025 5:23 pm

If I’m not mistaken, it made him immune from other prosecutions for any other crimes he’s committed going back 10 years.
(Maybe now we’ll find out who’s cocaine it was that was found in the White House?)

Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 11:58 am

“Geez Biden even pardoned his family”

Did he? I just did a search and no family members were included in the list of these latest pardons. I was specifically looking for whether Joe had pardoned his brother or other relatives but didn’t see any reference. Some reporter a little while ago mentioned family pardons but I’m not sure what he was referring to..

Biden “pardoned” people today who haven’t even been charged with a crime. I don’t see how that’s legal. How can you be pardoned for a non-existent crime?

If Joe Biden didn’t pardon his brother and wife and other relatives, then he made a big mistake, because his brother is hip-deep in influence-selling corruption, just like Hunter.

Scissor
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 12:07 pm

Just minutes before leaving office, Joe Biden announced a set of sweeping pre-emptive pardons to members of his family, including his two brothers and his sister, after some on the right suggested the they should face prosecution.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/biden-issues-pre-emptive-pardons-members-family-one-final-acts-preside-rcna188409

AlanJ
Reply to  Scissor
January 20, 2025 12:50 pm

Exactly everyone saw this coming after Trump’s first term established that most limits on executive power are just gentleman’s handshake agreements. This is now the new norm and it’s a cat that can’t be put bag in the bag.

Scissor
Reply to  AlanJ
January 20, 2025 1:18 pm

FDR issued 307 EOs/year to Trump’s 55. In terms of this metric, Trump is #14 or 15 (so far).

AlanJ
Reply to  Scissor
January 20, 2025 2:01 pm

My characterization of Trump as someone who broke presidential norms has little to do with the number of executive orders he issued. He used the office in ways that other presidents have dared not (not because they weren’t tempted, but because they understood the consequences). Trump made little secret of his disdain for norms and his view of them as shackles to be broken and cast aside rather than vital checks against executive overreach. This behavior is a big part of his appeal to his supporters.

Scissor
Reply to  AlanJ
January 20, 2025 3:11 pm

I think I know what you mean. Trump didn’t start or escalate wars. No blow was found lying around in his Whitehouse and as far as we know, he didn’t engage in oral sex in the Oval office.

Trump pardoned 144 people in his first term. Biden pardoned over 8000.

AlanJ
Reply to  Scissor
January 20, 2025 3:33 pm

“Past presidents were impeached and made history by violating some norms of the office but Trump does it so casually and incessantly that I can’t even remember specifics” may not be the strong argument you think it is.

Derg
Reply to  AlanJ
January 20, 2025 3:21 pm

Put down the crack pipe. You thought Biden didn’t have dementia…lol

AlanJ
Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 3:57 pm

I thought Biden was too old to be president and I think Trump is too old to be president.

Reply to  AlanJ
January 20, 2025 5:35 pm

Discrimination against old people based solely on age is called ageism. By admission, you are an ageist.

Was George Burns too old to tell jokes? If not, why not? He was older than dirt and still was funny.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  doonman
January 20, 2025 10:16 pm

True, but then why is it OK to be used against Biden ?

AlanJ
Reply to  doonman
January 21, 2025 6:16 am

Fair point. What I mean is: Trump’s age and health should be as concerning as Biden’s.

KevinM
Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 12:59 pm

Does Trump have dementia?
Seem unlikely based on behavior.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  AlanJ
January 20, 2025 10:15 pm

At 78 years and seven months, Donald Trump is the oldest president in US history on inauguration day.

Reply to  Anthony Banton
January 21, 2025 2:13 am

Trump is also one of the cognitively active Presidents.. evah !!

The total opposite of the previous puppet.

Derg
Reply to  Anthony Banton
January 21, 2025 4:24 am

He doesn’t have dementia like Joe. How long were you ignoring Joe’s 😉

Reply to  Anthony Banton
January 21, 2025 4:25 am

So?

I bet you couldn’t keep up with Trump if you tried.

Trump went all day with one engagement after another in to the late night.

This morning, the White House reporter said the light in Trump’s residence was on when the reporter arrived at the White House at 5am.

Trump would run you ragged.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 7:34 am

This is all these two lamers can muster against POTUS #47.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 3:18 pm

So?”

Just what I said.
A plain and simple fact.

But you have to turn it into a supposed comparison with me.
How very droll of you.
Oh, and how do you know me so well?
That you know how much stamina I have.
Get a life and calm down.
Instead of making such a bald statement of fact into a personal comparison, that you cannot have any idea of.
Not big or clever as we say here.

Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 4:24 am

You can’t see the difference between the two men?

Derg
Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 4:25 am

He has dementia…you ignored it for 4 years.

MarkW
Reply to  AlanJ
January 20, 2025 3:36 pm

Translation, I can’t actually name anything Trump has done wrong, but the party assures me that Trump is evil, therefore he must have done something bad.

Scissor
Reply to  MarkW
January 20, 2025 4:08 pm

Specifics? We don’t need no stinkin specifics.

Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 4:23 am

“He [Trump] used the office in ways that other presidents have dared not”

Got any examples of this behavior?

AlanJ
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 6:31 am

Of course. It is surprising that you do not, since you seem to support him and these are things his base cites as positive qualities. Trump flouted presidential norms around conflicts of interest and public disclosure, attempted to use political pressure to persecute the families of his political opponents, attempted to diminish the independence of the justice department to use it as a political weapon and to personally intervene in investigatory cases, attempted to undermine the American election system in a bid to cling to power, including directing his vice president to commit illegal acts, and on and on. He tries to directly profit from his presidency by merchandising and brand deals (he created a cryptocurrency pump and dump scheme in the days leading up to inauguration). He also leveraged the presidential pardon power to an extent never before seen (but soon to always-be-seen) in the presidency, by offering pardons as quid pro quo.

Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 7:52 am

The usual Marx Stream Media bullshit from LiarJ.

Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 11:36 am

Trump BIDEN flouted presidential norms around conflicts of interest and public disclosure, his whole presidency was build on corruption.

Biden used political pressure to persecute his political opponents,

Biden, and family used “pay to interview” to massively increase their personal wealth,

Biden totally destroyed the independence of the justice department to use it as a political weapon against his enemies.

Biden undermined the American election system using fake postal votes,

Biden couldn’t get his vice president to anything except make word-salad gibberish…

KevinM
Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 1:02 pm

A list of possible bad things, but contains no actual examples of who-what-where-when or why.

KevinM
Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 12:57 pm

He used the office in ways that other presidents have dared not” requires one example for clarity

AlanJ
Reply to  KevinM
January 21, 2025 1:59 pm

Trump demanded that his vice president unlawfully overturn the results of the 2020 election. There is a concrete example for you to mull over.

MarkW
Reply to  AlanJ
January 20, 2025 3:35 pm

Fascinating how whatever Trump does is evil, regardless of how many times DemonRats have done the same thing in the past.

AlanJ
Reply to  MarkW
January 21, 2025 6:34 am

The attempt to normalize by the right Trump’s behavior as “typical president stuff” is extremely troubling. He is an autocratic demagogue with fascist beliefs, this is not normal stuff.

Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 7:54 am

Do they pay you to write this tripe?

Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 11:38 am

Someone really needs to get used to the fact that ..

TRUMP won every facet of the 2024 election 🙂

And no, Trump is not an autocrat or a fascists… ie.. he is not a Democrat.

paul courtney
Reply to  AlanJ
January 20, 2025 4:23 pm

Mr. J: Whether “everyone” (a lie) saw it coming is not relevant. We do understand your need to deflect from the horror show your boy Joe brought.

Reply to  paul courtney
January 21, 2025 6:29 am

If “everyone saw it coming”, that means “everyone” knew Biden was lying when he said he wouldn’t do it (re: preemptive pardons).

Reply to  AlanJ
January 20, 2025 4:39 pm

LiarJ is up to his usual trix.

Reply to  Scissor
January 20, 2025 1:18 pm

Thanks for that Info.

Joe Biden is a real snake. No morals, no ethics. Criminally Selfish, to the detriment of all of us.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 6:00 pm

A total sleaze bag, comes to mind

Simon
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 9:47 pm

I’ll be curious to know Tom what you think of Trump pardoning the Jan 6 criminals, including the proud boys and some who assaulted police?

Derg
Reply to  Simon
January 21, 2025 1:47 am

Still waiting for you to acknowledge you were bamboozled over collusion. Noe run along and find that pee per tape.

Simon
Reply to  Derg
January 21, 2025 6:21 am

Boring sad man.

Derg
Reply to  Simon
January 21, 2025 10:40 am

Hey you are the one lying…cuck indeed

Simon
Reply to  Derg
January 21, 2025 11:29 am

Never mentioned the pee tape. It’s you that has it on your brain. I just pointed out that many of Trumps team had “unhealthy” “unpatriotic” “sneaky” dealings with the Russians. Shall I list them?

KevinM
Reply to  Simon
January 21, 2025 2:00 pm

Yes please. I heard people implying DT was doing something with the Russian continuously for more than 10 years without ever hearing anyone say specifically what he did.
“What did Trump do with the Russians?”
“Collude.”
“Collude to do what?”
I don’t know what he did.

Simon
Reply to  KevinM
January 21, 2025 2:27 pm

Sure…. There is loads. So much it beggers belief that it has all just been washed away.

“Paul Manafort either admitted guilt or was convicted of: illegal foreign lobbying on behalf of pro-Russian Ukrainian politicians (Manafort had, in fact, been working illegally as an unregistered agent for pro-Russian interests since 2006), money laundering, tax fraud, lying to investigators, and lying under oath before a grand jury concerning his contact with a Russian associate during the 2016 campaign.

Rick Gates pled guilty to one count of conspiracy against the United States, as well as one count of making false statements to the FBI and to the Special Counsel about his status as a foreign agent for Ukraine (he was working together with Manafort on behalf of pro-Russian politicians).”

“George Papadopoulos was convicted of lying to investigators about his contacts with two Russian nationals and a professor connected to Russia. Papadopoulos lied about having discussions with them regarding the dirt the Russians claimed to have on Hillary Clinton, as well as about Papadopoulos’s attempts to plan a Trump campaign trip to Russia.”

And there is so much more…..

Simon
Reply to  KevinM
January 22, 2025 10:01 am

You seem to have gone quiet. Did you want a list of the other traitors working with Trump and details of how they betrayed their country?

Reply to  Simon
January 21, 2025 2:19 am

You mean the total FIT-UP that was the Jan 6 scam ?

Where they were led through the corridors but guards ?

Who defended themselves against police brutality ?

In a normal, unbiased trial, they would not be criminals.

Why did Biden “pardon” the people on the far-left Jan 6 committee…

Did he know they had committed a grave injustice. ?

Reply to  Simon
January 21, 2025 4:32 am

I don’t know all the details of this particular pardon, but Trump said he wasn’t going to pardon anyone involved in violence at the Capitol Building.

Trump is pardoning people who the Biden administration railroaded into jail just because they were present on that day. For those people, I’m am thoroughly on board with Trump’s pardon.

Simon
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 6:04 am

It seems he did pardon those who attacked police…

https://apnews.com/article/capitol-jan-6-pardons-trump-justice-department-8ce8b2a8f8cb602d5eaf85ac7b969606

I just don’t get how he can say he is for law and order, then set these people free.

AlanJ
Reply to  Simon
January 21, 2025 6:46 am

Expect this to be thoroughly ignored.

Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 12:09 pm

Not ignored.

I’ll quote from it directly

Casting the rioters as “patriots” and “hostages,” Trump has claimed they were unfairly treated by the Justice Department, which also charged him with federal crimes in two cases he contends were politically motivated. Trump said the pardons will end “a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years” and begin “a process of national reconciliation.”

Reply to  Simon
January 21, 2025 11:46 am

Yet Biden lets murderers, rapists and all sorts of other scumbags free. 8064 of them…

Jan 6 destroyed nothing, all they did was question a very dubious election result. they are purely political prisoners, not criminals.

The real criminals are those of the Jan 6 committee, that is why Biden had to issue a pre-emptive pardon.

It should have been BIDEN that pardoned the Jan 6 protestors.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 12:52 pm

Hunter Biden was actually convicted of crimes.
As unethical and self serving as his pardon (for just those convictions) was, he could do it.
But the immunity stuff for him, his family and many others needs to go SCOTUS.

Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 1:08 pm

Biden pardoned Biden, Inc., with 10% for the Big Guy, capping 12 years or more of grifting and grafting.

This means any President and his family and friends can be “on the take”, for four or eight years and get rich, and at the last minute, the President gives all a pardon.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

This smells like pardon overreach to me.
This will create a new category of criminality by the political in-crowd that is above the law, that “gets a free pass”
THIS MUST NOT STAND.
This is beyond crazy
I am sure this will be challenged in court.

Reply to  wilpost
January 21, 2025 4:35 am

It’s definitely pardon overreach.

I don’t know what can be done about it legally, though.

Americans should stop electing corrupt Democrats to political office. That would be a good start.

AlanJ
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 6:50 am

Do you think Trump over-reached with pardons in his first term?

Reply to  AlanJ
January 21, 2025 12:11 pm

Trump: 200 pardons.. vs

Biden: 8064 pardons…

Now who do you think has “over -reached” ! 😉

Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 5:27 pm

Pardoning people that have not been charged or convicted of any crime is disingenuous.

Worse, it shows that Biden was aware that criminal activity was taking place, otherwise why would he do it?

Tom Halla
January 20, 2025 10:26 am

Undoing Biden and his Green New Deal lite first, then go back and undo much of what Carter, LBJ, and Nixon did. Then start thinking about FDR.

Scissor
Reply to  Tom Halla
January 20, 2025 12:10 pm

I’m looking for fraud vitiating everything he did.

Reply to  Scissor
January 20, 2025 2:31 pm

Biden is mentally unfit to serve. How is his signature legally valid for anything?

Reply to  More Soylent Green!
January 20, 2025 4:51 pm

They would have had to invoke the 25th Amendment. If they had succeeded, no prizes for guessing who would have cackled her way, toasted into the Oval Office. Think of that as a bullet that missed us all.

TR M
Reply to  Tom Halla
January 20, 2025 4:11 pm

Keep going until you undo what Woodrow Wilson did (FED, income tax)

Josualdo
January 20, 2025 10:30 am

Congratulations!

John Hultquist
January 20, 2025 10:32 am

Slàinte Mhaith to the Nation, him, his, and All Y’all 🤠

MR166
January 20, 2025 10:47 am

As an senior senior citizen I have listened to quite a few presidential speeches. This was by far and away the best that I have ever heard. Ronald Regan was great but the country was in much better shape when he was elected. President Trump will determine if the US remains a viable country or not. Our enemies are deeply entrenched in the system.

Reply to  MR166
January 20, 2025 1:35 pm

The sane, not woke, not DEI, not green Democrats are finally flocking to Trump.
Trump will be like an FDR for private enterprise to MAGA.
The Panama Canal clique must be shaking, because Trump will be taking away their cash cow.
Idiot Carter gave our Panama Canal away and patriot Trump is taking it back

Reply to  wilpost
January 21, 2025 4:38 am

Trump is going to revive the Monroe Doctrine. And not a moment too soon.

Henry Pool
January 20, 2025 10:47 am

I like him. But I am afraid that there are powers beyond his control which will force us into WW3.

Mr.
Reply to  Henry Pool
January 20, 2025 11:06 am

Things have changed a lot since the WW days Henry.

Subversive strategies by ideologues can now render nations to the level of mendicant states.

The enemies of enlightened, productive, prosperous, FREE societies are now the likes of the WEF, the UN, “Progressive” political parties, and of course the beholden mainstream media.

Their “long march through the institutions” will take quite a bit of coordinated effort around the world to undo.

Reply to  Mr.
January 20, 2025 11:12 am

Yeah. I’m with you on that. You have to pry their fingers off the levers of power one by one.

Duane
Reply to  Mr.
January 20, 2025 12:40 pm

Unfortunately, people are all to anxious to declare the end of war as a form of international policy. WW One was named “The War to End All Wars” … and didn’t. WW Two resulted in creating the United Nations as the supposed secret to ending all wars … and the second half of the 20th century and first quarter of the 21st century proved the lie to that assumption.

I truly believe that President Trump will seek to avoid wars … but he has no control over the PRC, or Russia, or Iran, or DPRK. He can dissuade them, certainly, but sometimes insanity prevails on the other side.

Let’s hope it doesn’t.

ethical voter
Reply to  Henry Pool
January 20, 2025 11:32 am

The best deterent to war is great strength. I think Trump understands this. I am hopeful.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ethical voter
January 21, 2025 2:07 pm

That and unpredictability, which Trump has a lot of.

Reply to  Henry Pool
January 20, 2025 12:06 pm

Putin and Xi currently have no interest in provoking Trump.
They are both certainly in a Wait and See approach now.
Except for going full nuclear option where no one wins, neither China nor Russia has the conventional military forces necessary to seriously challenge the US and not get their asses whacked badly.

Iran is badly damaged and exposed now from Israeli strikes on its air defense systems. SAM Systems that Russia can’t afford to send replacements because of its own Ukraine war losses. and China won’t help them do to fear of sanctions.

That leaves Crazy Kim-boy. And he’s watching his best troops get slaughtered by Ukraine in Kursk region.

Duane
Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
January 20, 2025 12:43 pm

Putin and Xi have plenty of interest in destroying the United States of America as a significant competitor to their pretensions at dominating the world. Don’t kid yourself for a moment. Either dictator can come to a point when they don’t care if they provoke nuclear annihilation and economic destruction, when they are on the verge of failing. The old saying goes that a bear is most dangerous when he’s wounded.

What we have to do is build a stronger more capable military force, use our economic strength to prevail, and if necessary, be prepared to win a war.

Reply to  Duane
January 20, 2025 12:52 pm

Desire to achieve something and the rational recognition of (in)ability to do so through conventional military force means are two different things.

Why both Putin and Xi have been leveraging asymmetric, hidden warfare for years on the US.

I believe both Putin and Xi are both rational actors acting in what they perceive as their own best interests.

MarkW
Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
January 20, 2025 3:41 pm

The KGB excelled at funding terrorist/rebel groups to undermine and eventually overthrow those who oppose them.
Putin was the last leader of the KGB before it was allegedly disbanded.

Reply to  Duane
January 20, 2025 1:40 pm

Europe is a weak state, not a useful ally for the US
Russia is a strong state, a very useful ally for China

Reply to  Duane
January 20, 2025 2:33 pm

Their intentions have not changed. They will just wait until another Democrat gets elected. They play the long game.

Reply to  Henry Pool
January 20, 2025 1:33 pm

Relax, Henry. Trump has it all under control. There won’t be a World War III, while Trump is in office.

Putin needs a ceasefire. China is not so eager to go to bat for Russia now. Iran is a Paper Tiger that may be experiencing Regime Change in the near future. Don’t think the Iranian People are not paying attention. All they need is a strong signal from Trump that he has the back of the Iranian resistance, and these people will come out into the streets. They are fed up with the Mad Mullah dictators.

North Korea is not a threat. They are sending troops to fight in Ukraine but that’s just because Putin is paying them to do so ($2000 per month, per soldier, is what I heard). The North Korean troops are not doing very well in Ukraine.

North Korean troops fighting in Ukraine just shows the weakness of Putin. He has to bring in outside forces to bolster Russian troops.

Putin wants a ceasefire. He needs one to regroup and rebuild, and he will sit tight and see how things work out after Trump leaves office. Maybe another Joe Biden will get elected (please, God NO!) and then Putin can resume his attempted conquest of Ukraine. And then again, Putin might die in the meantime, and it might be a whole new ballgame for Russia. Putin’s successor may not want to pursue a horrendous war.

Anyway, I think we are safe for at least four years.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 5:10 pm

Seems like everyone wants a ceasefire except Zelenskyy and the nitwits in charge of the UK. No NATO in Ukraine, and Putin is close to having everything he wants in Ukraine and we’ll see where Odessa goes, I guess.

The Military Summary, a daily look at the front lines on YouTube is a good place to see how that’s going.

Reply to  philincalifornia
January 20, 2025 5:41 pm

Trump said about five minutes ago that Zelenskyy wanted to make a deal.

Trump said he wasn’t sure Putin wanted to make a deal, but he should make a deal, because the Ukraine war was destroying Russia. Trump said he has not talked to Putin about it yet.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 20, 2025 7:52 pm

I only just got to the speech. I’m not surprised Zelenskyy wants to make a deal now. Trump probably told him what his alternatives are. Putin has always said that he wanted to negotiate but he’s had to conquer all the territory he has now at the expense of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian and Russian lives. No NATO in Ukraine is where the line is, I think. I’m not sure about Odessa. I know a lot about the Dombas, on the ground, because my best friend’s wife is from the border. What a tragedy.

Reply to  philincalifornia
January 21, 2025 4:49 am

Trump said last night that the Russians have had about one million troops killed since the beginning of the war, and Ukraine has had about 750,000 Ukrainian troops killed.

Just think about this horrendous cost. A million Russian mothers and families, and 750,000 Ukraine mothers and families crying for their lost child.

It is a tragedy for all concerned.

It’s time for the killing to stop.

Putin, in making a deal, is going to have to appear to the Russian people to be dealing from a position of strength, so Trump will have to make a deal that satisfies Putin’s desire not to be seen as the loser in the war.

Putin will have to put up objections at first, to show his “strength”, and then he will make a deal, imo.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 6:53 am

After the Kiev Coup in 2014, the Ukraine Armed Forces, UAF, attacked the Dombass and other east Ukraine areas, and killed and seriously wounded tens of thousands of Russian-speaking people from 2014 to 2022, who did not want to be ruled by the Russia-hating, AZOV clique installed in Kiev.
Russia aided the “separatists” to prevent them from being overrun and slaughtered.
UN observers wrote monthly reports, but they were filed away in Geneva.
.
Major things have changed since the Kursk incursion on Aug 6, 2024, not in Ukraine’s favor, including its severe lack of available fighters for its already depleted armed services, which is losing about 1200 to 1600 killed and seriously wounded every day, plus 250 to 400 in Kursk every day, leading to a Kursk total of 53,000, as of Jan 19, 2025, and counting.
.
Russia, has been gaining more and more Ukraine territory every day, and is slowly rolling back the nonsensical incursions in the Kursk, Bryansk and Balgorod Regions.
.
Russia has liberated about 63% of the territory in the Kursk Region temporarily occupied by the Ukraine’s military. 
This equates to 801 sq. km retaken out of the 1,268 sq. km seized by Kiev’s forces after its August 2024 incursion.
.
This in addition to
1) the destruction of defensible fortifications and
2) the destructive of NATO-provided equipment and ammunition, and
3) Ukraine losing many thousands of sq. km. of territory.
.
Ukraine population under Kiev rule has shrunk to about 25 million, of which 10.7 million are pensioned.
.
Where would fighting-age people come from?
No wonder Zelensky wants a deal
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/about-half-of-ukraine-population-left-their-country

Reply to  philincalifornia
January 21, 2025 7:37 am

Zelensky knows the gravy train isn’t going to deliver anymore ca$h.

January 20, 2025 11:11 am

Or is a new national nightmare of an entirely different character just beginning?

As empty as a politicians promise….

Guys. I hope it goes as you hope it will…

Derg
Reply to  Leo Smith
January 20, 2025 11:27 am

It can’t get any worse. Biden was the most inept President ever.

MR166
Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 11:54 am

Biden was not president and did not call the shots. He was senile from day one and was controlled by the few. They just proved over and over again that if you want to know what the left is doing just listen to what they accuse the Right of doing.

Reply to  MR166
January 20, 2025 12:59 pm

He was inept precisely because he wasn’t calling the shots. He was just signing whatever his unaccountable staff put in front of him with the full authority of his office, then reading about it from a teleprompter before being shuffled off to his nap.
And No one could take those most important car keys away from the senile President until noon today.

Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
January 21, 2025 5:04 am

I do think the Afghanistan debacle was solely Joe Biden’s call. Even Biden’s own people were objecting to the way he wanted to do it, but Joe wanted out as soon as possible and damn the consequences. Just the way he mistreated South Vietnam. He threw them to the wolves without a second thought.

Joe Biden is an appeaser of Dictators when it comes right down to it. He’s been doing it all his life. He could do it in his sleep. It’s a knee-jerk, cut-and-run attitude, that all appeasers have.

Rich
Reply to  MR166
January 20, 2025 7:18 pm

Reminds me of the Star Trek episode “Patterns of Force”! Look it up!

Reply to  MR166
January 20, 2025 7:30 pm

Biden => PINO !!

Scissor
Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 1:28 pm

As much as he tried to move in, Biden couldn’t sniff Carrie Underwood’s hair today.

Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 1:44 pm

Biden told Speaker Johnson, almost all of the EOs were not signed by him.
They were issued in his name.
Biden is so senile, he does not even know how much he got screwed by his Deep State handlers.

Reply to  wilpost
January 20, 2025 6:15 pm

Those evil doers did not want to invoke article 25, because they had a useful idiot for signatures.

Remember, Biden just wandering away from a G-7 group picture, and then the whole group moving to where Biden stood.

I wonder how many insiders knew about his mental feebleness.
It must have been hundreds.

Reply to  wilpost
January 20, 2025 9:19 pm

No one who saw Biden’s confusion and empty gaze during the debate with Trump could ever dispute his cognitive decline.

TR M
Reply to  Derg
January 20, 2025 4:14 pm

Woodrow Wilson (FED, income tax) was much worse. Biden is a close second.

Reply to  TR M
January 21, 2025 5:09 am

That would be a good discussion. Who’s worse, Wilson or Biden?

John Endicott
Reply to  Derg
January 21, 2025 9:58 am

At least Carter can rest in peace knowing that he outlived being the worst president ever thanks to Biden getting into office.

ethical voter
January 20, 2025 11:39 am

47 is a massive shift to the right but much farther to go. Also a massive blow to the insane, leftish climate fantasy. Again, much more to do but a great beginning.

rbabcock
January 20, 2025 12:25 pm

Popcorn time as soon as the DOJ people get confirmed. Trump’s trip to California will be especially entertaining. They will make Federal aid dependent on California changing their water policies and clean up the forests. Plus he won’t mince words about how bad Newsom is.

Scissor
Reply to  rbabcock
January 20, 2025 1:30 pm

You misspelled “Newscum.”

Reply to  Scissor
January 21, 2025 5:10 am

That’s the Trump spelling. 🙂

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 1:12 pm

Mine too

Reply to  rbabcock
January 20, 2025 2:24 pm

At the very least, for states and cities that pour money into supporting and protecting illegal immigrants in violation of the immigration laws (“Sanctuary” places), that amount of money should be subtracted from any Fed dollars they would have gotten.

Reply to  rbabcock
January 21, 2025 5:14 am

I think a few Republican congresscritters were advocating for withholding funds from California until California cleans up its act, but I don’t think Trump is going to go down that road. Putting pressure on Newsom this way would just hurt the people in California, and I don’t think Trump wants to appear as Scrooge to the people of California. Trump will fund the rebuilding. And, of course, he will have a lot to say about how we got here and who is responsible.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 1:22 pm

Trump should insist pretty-boy Newscum, a family relation of Pelosi, and the vacationing Mayor resign, before getting any federal money.

Then set up a monitoring group to make sure the money actually goes to victims, without skimming and grifting and grafting, as is usually the case.

Both are unfit for duty and millions of Californians would rejoice to be finally getting rid of them, and may show enough backbone to get rid of some other incompetents as well

A California U-turn would be nice

January 20, 2025 12:59 pm

It does seem that the international climate and alternative energy movement, such as it is, must now be holed below the waterline. It always has been largely driven by the English speaking countries, and with flat out repudiation by the US of just about the whole agenda its hard to see anyone else taking up that role.

The next COPs are supposed to have 50,000 attendees. We’ll see. If China and the US don’t attend, and India uses its attendance as a way of blocking everything, can the show really go on much longer? Five years from now we may be looking back, shaking our heads, and, like Canadians every spring looking back at winter, wondering did that really happen? Did we really go through that?

Scissor
Reply to  michel
January 20, 2025 4:12 pm

It’s going to be easier to get a hotel room in Belém.

January 20, 2025 1:01 pm

Story tip:

It has just been reported on Fox News that President Trump will withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement again.

Bigus Macus
January 20, 2025 1:13 pm

“From the ashes, a fire shall be woken. A light from the shadow shall spring. Renewed shall be blade that was broken. The crownless again shall be king.” LOTR

January 20, 2025 1:16 pm

DEEP STATE GEARING UP: Nearly Half of Federal Employees in the Swamp Plan to Resist Trump, Poll Finds

Reply to  Ollie
January 20, 2025 1:47 pm

The unemployment rate will increase

MarkW
Reply to  wilpost
January 20, 2025 3:48 pm

The president doesn’t have the authority to fire most federal employees. The government unions will also fight tooth and nail to prevent any firings.

Scissor
Reply to  MarkW
January 20, 2025 4:28 pm

There are a lot of boomers retiring. Many don’t need to be replaced. Also, I’m seeing federal employees coming into the office about 1 day per week now. Some I’ve only seen at our Christmas party and summer picnic.

Take away remote work and many will quit. Then don’t replace them all.

Reply to  MarkW
January 20, 2025 5:14 pm

Musk has a track record of pruning dead wood.

Reply to  philincalifornia
January 21, 2025 7:07 am

80% of dead wood was trimmed at Tweeter
X is now much bigger, plus runs on only 20% of the (upgraded) staff

OweninGA
Reply to  MarkW
January 20, 2025 6:06 pm

Insubordination is not protected under the contract. If an order is issued with a deadline and not executed, that is a firing offense. If the union rep gets too boisterous, a field office in Barrow Alaska can be his next stop. He can get lots of company there too.

Reply to  OweninGA
January 21, 2025 5:32 am

“Insubordination is not protected under the contract.”

Trump says Musk is going to have about 20 employees whose sole job will be to go to the various federal agencies covered by Trump’s Executive Orders, and make sure that the bureaucrats there implement Trump’s EO’s immediately.

Trump says he has to do that because sometimes bureaucrats, left to their own devices, take way too much time in implementing changes. So Trump is going to send someone to look over the bureaucrats’ shoulders. 🙂

Reply to  MarkW
January 21, 2025 7:04 am

He will invoke a national emergency related to the Democrat deficit spending, the US going broke

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Ollie
January 20, 2025 1:59 pm

DOGE em !

Reply to  Ollie
January 20, 2025 8:43 pm

Fire them all!

Reagan did to PATCO and that solved the problem.

Reply to  Ollie
January 21, 2025 7:03 am

Planning is one step, doing it is quite another, especially with:

1) a hiring freeze,
2) no more screwing around unsupervised at home collecting a paycheck,
3) DOGE cost cutting and firing regime all over the bloated federal bureaucracy.
4) With mandates gone, and subsidies cut, and windmills gone, tens of thousands of federal and state employees not needed

Bob
January 20, 2025 1:19 pm

Time to get to work.

Steve Haner
January 20, 2025 1:26 pm

https://x.com/ChristieFERC/status/1881440195213660358

One of the things DJT must have signed today….a very interesting and positive choice.

bobpjones
January 20, 2025 1:30 pm

Us Brits, stood on the other side of the pond, and watched your newest president rip apart all that has been going wrong for the last ten years or so (if not longer).

To smack down the woke, and climate crisis aficionados in his acceptance speech was courageous, and so uplifting, what a spirit!

So, as we turn round and shuffle back to our lives. With the glow of US prosperity shining over our shoulders, highlighting the dark times we have ahead, under an unimaginative, incompetent and far left Labour Party.

Hoping we don’t fall into the abyss of abject poverty we wish the US well, looks like you’ve got some exciting, and hopefully prosperous times ahead.

Well done.

vertex11
Reply to  bobpjones
January 20, 2025 2:00 pm

Thank you for your beautiful and gracious words. Long live the Anglo-American special relationship! May our blessings inspire liberty throughout the world.

Reply to  bobpjones
January 20, 2025 5:18 pm

Best of luck Bob. Sir Stalin seems to be well beyond hated by many. Maybe it won’t be long now, and Musk seems to have a way of making things happen.

Reply to  bobpjones
January 21, 2025 5:37 am

I think Trump and Nigel will be getting together soon. 🙂

Trump is already voicing concerns over the future ambassador to the U.S. He thinks the current candidate is a Chinese stooge, and Trump doesn’t want him representing the UK.

So, that means Trump and UK’s leadership are at odds, and I think they will be the losers if they start up an argument with Trump.

Trump will make them look silly, and make Nigel look like a better choice.

Reply to  bobpjones
January 21, 2025 5:40 am

“Us Brits, stood on the other side of the pond, and watched your newest president rip apart all that has been going wrong for the last ten years or so (if not longer).”

As did we all, including Joe Biden who was sitting right behind Trump while Trump excoriated Biden’s leadership over the last four years. Trump didn’t say Biden’s name, but we all knew who he was talking about.

Biden should have been humiliated. I don’t know if he is capable of that, though..

bobpjones
Reply to  Tom Abbott
January 21, 2025 5:48 am

He probably can’t remember being president.

Editor
January 20, 2025 1:43 pm

Paris is gone!!

Scissor
Reply to  Andy May
January 20, 2025 4:48 pm

Will anyone miss this?

Reply to  Scissor
January 21, 2025 12:03 am

This must rank as one of the peak moments of the insanity of the Biden era: an obviously male transvestite fetishist in a senior role in the Government.

I genuinely don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

Reply to  Graemethecat
January 21, 2025 5:43 am

I just shake my head.

January 20, 2025 2:25 pm

Has anyone seen any condemnation of the guillotine protestors brought today?

Reply to  Tony_G
January 20, 2025 5:24 pm

Those people are such nitwits, they did it in Malcolm X Park. Malcolm X made a famous and accurate quote “Beware of white liberals”.

Scissor
Reply to  Tony_G
January 20, 2025 5:44 pm

Test it on Adam Schiff. If it doesn’t work on him, then it wouldn’t work on anyone.

Reply to  Scissor
January 21, 2025 5:48 am

I think Schiff is described as “pencil neck” by some people.

I describe Schiff as the biggest liar in Congress. And that’s saying something!

California voters decided it was a good idea to elect this liar to the U.S. Senate. That just goes to show what political propaganda can do: It can turn a bald-faced liar into a good guy in some people’s minds.

January 20, 2025 2:26 pm

We’ll see. I don’t put that much stock in politicians.

It sounds like Trump II doesn’t plan to build a wall (actually, it was always a fence), doesn’t plan to deport every illegal alien and they aren’t going to protect our jobs from H1-B visas.

Reply to  More Soylent Green!
January 21, 2025 12:06 am

That’s funny: it seems the wall is currently under construction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SH9Zyv-Tws0

Reply to  Graemethecat
January 21, 2025 5:55 am

The Border Czar, Homan, said if you are here illegally, you are on his radar. Homan says the criminals and lunatics will be the first to be deported, but if you are just here illegally, you shouldn’t get too comfortable.

As for H1-B visas, anything can be abused. These visas are a positive for businesses, but they should be restricted to bringing in expertise that is not available in the United States. If the expertise is available in the U.S., then that’s where you go to hire.

Trump favors these visas but says they will make sure that Americans are not hurt by them. So, time will tell.

TR M
January 20, 2025 4:03 pm

“Lock her up” … One month later … “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons. They’re good people”

Will something get done this time? I don’t like to allow myself “hope” as it’s a sucker’s bet but I like the group he has nominated. We’ll see shortly.

Verified by MonsterInsights