California Keeps Driving Up Gas Prices With ‘Layers And Layers’ Of Green Rules And Regs

From THE DAILY CALLER

Daily Caller News Foundation

Nick Pope
Contributor

California’s latest law cracking down on fuel refiners in the state is likely to drive already-high prices at the pump even higher, according to several energy experts.

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed ABX2-1 into law on Oct. 14, empowering state bureaucrats to require refiners to maintain certain inventory levels in an effort to prevent alleged price gouging by energy companies and adding to the list of anti-fossil fuel industry policies and regulations in the state. Along with rules already on the books, the new policy will further squeeze refiners and fuel producers, undermine supply and send prices even higher with the help of other costly rules on the books regulating the fossil fuel industry, according to several energy sector experts.

At about $4.64, California already has the highest per-gallon gas prices of any state in the U.S., according to AAA gas price data. In the week since the bill became law, Phillips 66 announced that it plans to close one of its refineries in the Los Angeles area in 2025, meaning that one of California’s nine refineries and 8% of the state’s available refining capacity will be closing down, according to the Los Angeles Times. (RELATED: What Has California’s War On Fossil Fuels Actually Accomplished?)

“Price spikes have cost Californians billions of dollars over the years, and we’re not waiting around for the industry to do the right thing — we’re taking action to prevent these price spikes and save consumers money at the pump,” Newsom said upon signing the bill. “Now, the state has the tools to make sure they backfill supplies and plan ahead for maintenance so there aren’t shortages that drive up prices. I’m grateful to our partners in the Senate and Assembly for acting quickly to push this forward and help deliver relief for Californians.”

However, Patrick De Haan, a prominent gas market analyst who writes for GasBuddy, rejects Newsom’s contention that energy companies are ripping off Californians. He instead places most of the blame for the state’s high energy costs at the feet of overzealous regulators and politicians.

“It can’t be understated — it’s not the oil industry ‘screwing you’ in California, it’s hell-bent politicians with layers and layers of costly legislation,” De Haan wrote in an Oct. 15 post to X, formerly Twitter. “It’s more Newsom’s government than anything.”

De Haan also expects other refiners to follow in Phillips 66’s footsteps and close down California refineries in the wake of ABX2-1’s passage, he wrote in a separate post. About 90% of the gasoline consumed in the state is refined at in-state facilities, according to the California Energy Commission, so prices would likely increase in the event of more refinery closures as supply decreases and if all else is held equal. (RELATED: Energy, Business Groups Ask Supreme Court To Stop California From Forcing EVs On The Rest Of America)

“They keep running around talking about how companies are price gouging. In reality, it’s the politicians. You just wonder when people are going to wake up,” Dan Kish, a senior research fellow at the Institute for Energy Research, told the DCNF. “What they’re clearly doing is they want all electric vehicles, and so they’re driving up the cost of gasoline every way they can to do it. They’re making gas more scarce and more expensive, and they hope that this will help ‘nudge,’ as they like to say, people into doing what they want them to do, rather than listen to the citizens.”

Newsom’s office disputes that state policy is primarily responsible for driving up gas prices in the state.

“Gas prices overwhelmingly consist of crude oil costs and industry profits,” a spokesperson for Newsom said in an email to the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Analyses have shown that the legislation last week will save Californians upwards of billions of dollars every year,” the spokesperson continued, further referring the DCNF to Newsom’s remarks at a press conference announcing the new refinery law.

“Also, gas prices are significantly lower this year than in past years — after the Governor signed into law new accountability and transparency tools,” the spokesperson added.

Andy Walz, president of downstream, midstream and chemicals for Chevron, slammed ABX2-1 in an Oct. 8 letter to California lawmakers describing how the bill is likely to increase costs at the pump for consumers in a misguided attempt to prevent supposed price gouging. In the letter, Walz wrote that the new law is evidently political rather than practical, and that it will make gas even more expensive for Californians in the long-run.

“California’s policy choices have led to a gasoline shortage by driving suppliers away,” Walz wrote. “We have a shortage of incentivizing policy for additional refiners and supply. California, stop making consumer conditions worse.”

The new law for refineries is not the only policy in California that is expected to increase gas prices in the near future.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) will decide after Election Day whether to tighten the state’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), a program that aims to decrease the carbon intensity of transportation fuels in the state, according to Politico. CARB initially estimated that doing so could raise prices at the pump by 47 cents per-gallon, though CARB subsequently walked back that projection.

However, Danny Cullenward, a climate economist at the University of Pennsylvania’s Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, recently published his own analysis projecting that CARB’s forthcoming LCFS decision could actually jack up prices by 65 cents per-gallon in the near future and by 85 cents per-gallon come 2030.  

Additionally, California has a statewide cap-and-trade program that sets a declining limit on major sources of emissions across the state to incentivize corporations to adopt low-emitting green technologies. Walz named California’s cap-and-trade program as one of the most aggressive regulatory schemes in the state that contributed to his company’s August decision to relocate its headquarters to Texas and out of California in an August interview with the DCNF.

“There are two reasons that gas is more expensive in California, and neither of them have to do with price gouging. The first reason, which we’re all very familiar with, is the extra taxes that are added on,” Edward Ring, the director of water and energy policy for the California Policy Center, told the DCNF. “When you take all of the state taxes, fees and programs, you’re going to add another $1.23 to the price of a gallon of gas, and that’s not including the 18 cents a gallon of federal excise tax.”

“Now, the other part, which is worth mentioning, to be fair, is California does have a different formulation that they require for gasoline that does make it a little bit more expensive to refine, but again, that’s not that big a factor,” Ring continued. “If California wants to spare its citizens the high cost of gas, they should maybe figure out how to run the state for a little bit less money, because they’re doing a terrible job anyway, and they could lower these taxes.”

CARB did not respond to a request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 8 votes
Article Rating
67 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gregory Woods
October 24, 2024 2:08 am

“You just wonder when people are going to wake up”

strativarius
Reply to  Gregory Woods
October 24, 2024 4:31 am

Did it occur that people might need waking up?

Bryan A
Reply to  strativarius
October 24, 2024 6:16 am

Too late, the rulers are already “Woke Up”

Reply to  Bryan A
October 24, 2024 9:49 am

Wokeafornia!

Robertvd
Reply to  Gregory Woods
October 24, 2024 11:54 am

What I don’t understand is why illegal immigrants want to pay higher prices for everything. How can California be the promised land for them ?

Reply to  Robertvd
October 24, 2024 1:06 pm

They’ve been promised a bunch of “free” stuff. They won’t be paying.

rtj1211
October 24, 2024 2:11 am

$4.64 a gallon, you think that’s bad? You should come over to the UK – we’re currently around £6.50 a gallon, which is rather above $8. You can understand why we tend to drive cars which do 40-50 miles to the gallon on motorways, rather than gas guzzlers…..

Scissor
Reply to  rtj1211
October 24, 2024 4:25 am

I had an “intermediate” sized rental car reserved in Houston last week, but when I arrived at the counter, approaching midnight, they informed me that all they had left were EV’s and 12 passenger vans.

So, I drove myself out of the rental car facility in a 12 passenger van. Fortunately, parking spaces are bigger in Texas and gasoline is cheaper. I think it was $2.74 a gallon at Costco.

derbrix
Reply to  Scissor
October 24, 2024 6:14 am

Ah yes, fuel prices. For the last several months, each time I fill the 4×4 full size truck up along with the cans for the Outdoor Power Equipment (OPE) with the non ethanol 90 octane gasoline, I have been paying $4.09 gallon. This is in Slocomb, AL which is the closest fuel station to my home in Florida that has the non ethanol fuel.

I have found that the non ethanol fuel greatly improves the OPE working ability and gives more power to the truck and a mile or two to the MPG.

Bryan A
Reply to  Scissor
October 24, 2024 6:18 am

Not sure where this $4.64 is supposed to be in California. I’m in Sonoma County and we’re paying $5.39 to $5.89 right now.
Nevada (Reno) was $4.59 at Boomtown (near the Ca. State line) and $3.59 in Fernley 36 miles east

JimH in CA
Reply to  Bryan A
October 24, 2024 4:19 pm

For some reason, the Walmart in Linda, CA is at $3.95, about $1 lower than Grass Valley or others north of Sacramento.
Opps it’s now $3.87 today….but it still has 10% ethanol.!

Reply to  rtj1211
October 24, 2024 4:47 am

Are you accounting for US vs Imperial gallon differential size? US Gallon is 3.78 liters and an Imperial gallon is 4.54 Liters. So $4.64 per US gallon is $5.57 per Imperial gallon.

Bryan A
Reply to  D Boss
October 24, 2024 6:19 am

The Impire Strikes Back

Bryan A
Reply to  rtj1211
October 24, 2024 6:20 am

You lot do have high taxes on petrol though

Nicholas Mearing-Smith
Reply to  rtj1211
October 24, 2024 3:50 pm

A US gallon is 3.785 litres, so GBP1.35 per litre equates to USD6.63 per US gallon.

Reply to  rtj1211
October 25, 2024 9:36 am

Is that per Imperial gallon, or US gallon. They are different. However, petrol is more expensive in the UK.

missoulamike
October 24, 2024 2:40 am

Probably going to put a dent in tourism when prospective visitors can’t find gasoline for their vehicles.

Robertvd
Reply to  missoulamike
October 24, 2024 11:56 am

and air planes.

JimH in CA
Reply to  Robertvd
October 24, 2024 4:21 pm

We have been paying $5.99 for 100LL , avgas.
I have a Mogas STC but all CA gas has ethanol in it…not allowed in aircraft tanks.

Reply to  JimH in CA
October 24, 2024 11:04 pm

Could MTBE be used in av gas?

Robertvd
Reply to  missoulamike
October 24, 2024 11:57 am

and ships.

SCInotFI
October 24, 2024 2:50 am

Just hope that the increased migration/Californication of Texas doesn’t happen thanks to this latest by Newsom-gruesome

strativarius
October 24, 2024 2:55 am

It all sounds great and in the case of the UK it’s beginning to dawn on them that all their “good causes” – climate measures like EVs, nanny state healthism (smoking, drinking) etc etc etc are going to lose them a huge amount of revenue. 

EVs have had the easiest of rides when it comes to paying towards the roads and infrastructure – especially so, given that they weigh so much. EVs pay varying rates of VAT on electricity and hitherto no road taxes. ICE cars, on the other hand, pay a huge amount in road taxes and fuel is double taxed; the fuel duty and then VAT on top. The talk is Labour is going to whack up fuel prices in the forthcoming budget by 5p to 7p per litre – increasing the tax take.   

EVs are not selling so the subsidies have to be maintained somehow in an attempt to get people to buy them. One idea is…

“”Drivers of petrol and diesel cars may face higher fuel taxes to prevent the introduction of taxes on electric vehicles
Experts are concerned that pay-per-mile road pricing could discourage people from buying EVs, potentially slowing down the UK’s progress towards achieving net-zero emissions.””
https://www.regit.cars/electric-news/drivers-of-petrol-and-diesel-cars-may-face-higher-fuel-taxes-to-prevent-the-introduction-of-taxes-on-electric-vehicles

They don’t say what happens [financially] when the numbers of ICE cars are whittled down and the Treasury runs out of dosh. Maybe the road maintenance will be free as well as the wind and Sun? None of this has really been thought through at all. That’s the one consistency in the western world; nothing gets thought through. Just follow that narrative.

California price: $4.64 (~£3.48)/gal
UK (pre tax increase): $8.52 (£6.58)/gal

I could handle California prices.

atticman
Reply to  strativarius
October 24, 2024 3:43 am

Strativarius – have you allowed for the US gallon being 20% smaller than the imperial gallon?

strativarius
Reply to  atticman
October 24, 2024 4:30 am

I’d still be quids in – more than comfortably.

David A
Reply to  strativarius
October 24, 2024 5:18 pm

Folks in the states tend to drive far more.

Scissor
Reply to  strativarius
October 24, 2024 4:32 am

Cuba up ahead. Most electricity now is generated is from gasoline powered vehicles.

Reply to  Scissor
October 24, 2024 8:08 am

Cuba’s present leader – doesn’t look like he’s adhering to the austerity measures everyone else is forced to adhere to … looks like one of those well-fed, union goon lawyers we have up here in the states …

Reply to  strativarius
October 24, 2024 4:48 am

I live in a low cost area where petrol is about 134ppl. Being generous to Rachel Reeves, I’ll use $1.30=£1, so that’s 1.742$/litre. That’s about $7.92/imperial gallon and $6.59/US gallon. I do expect prices to increase again because the £ has fallen as we get closer to the Budget tax and spend announcements and oil prices have rebounded on resumed Middle East tensions. Then add that tax announcement on top. I’m going to keep the tank full when I go into town later. But I’ll be filing with diesel which is about 139ppl. Better fuel consumption more than pays for the premium.

strativarius
Reply to  It doesnot add up
October 24, 2024 4:57 am

Do you live on an Asda forecourt?! Joke.

The average in the South East is around £1.45/l

It’s just as well you are expecting prices to rise. They most definitely will. There are public sector pay deals to fund.

Reply to  strativarius
October 24, 2024 6:58 pm

Tip on converting ppl to p/UKgallon: divide by 0.22 is pretty accurate, and easy to do

Thus: 139 x10 /2 = 695, divide by 1.1 is 631.818…

USG is not so easy in your head. There are 3.785412 litres per USG.

October 24, 2024 3:44 am

This has everything to do with government wanting to run
private businesses and nothing to do with anything else.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Steve Case
October 24, 2024 6:31 am

It’s called Command Economics.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 24, 2024 12:42 pm

more properly, Fascism

Reply to  Steve Case
October 24, 2024 10:35 am

Command economics = Fascist State. Fascist State = One Party State.

Robertvd
Reply to  doonman
October 24, 2024 12:15 pm

Never think fascist are right wing. Hitler was a socialist and his party was the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

And yes they lost the war a lot faster because they ran out of petrol. Their army ran on horsepower.

Robertvd
Reply to  Steve Case
October 24, 2024 12:05 pm

This has everything to do with government not wanting to pay so they have to print like there is no tomorrow = inflation.

October 24, 2024 4:39 am

re: “The California Air Resources Board (CARB) will decide after Election Day whether to tighten the state’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), a program that aims to decrease the carbon intensity of transportation fuels

IS THIS NOT the height of insanity?

WHAT are they going to do – LEGISLATE what a gasoline molecule may consist of!!??? Reduce natural gas from CH4 to H4 (or more appropriately: H2) by mandating the removal of individual carbon atoms? INSANITY!

(Now, before ANYONE responds unknowingly, REALIZE that I know ‘gasoline’ consists of varying lengths of hydrocarbons in its consistency. WRT CH4 H2 etc CARB is up against Mother Nature in all this.)

Reply to  _Jim
October 24, 2024 12:44 pm

The LCFS is crazy. There are no low carbon liquid fuels. Methanol, H3COH, is 37.5% carbon whereas iso-octane is 81.4 % carbon. Methanol is readily made from nat. gas. However, it is very poisonous and can’t be used really cold weather due to its low volatility. It is a very powerful solvent and would require solvent-resistance materials for
the fuel system.

Racing cars use methanol since it much less flammable than gasoline.

October 24, 2024 4:42 am

ALSO – we need to see the ‘tax levy’ per gallon of gasoline levied by the state and by the local municipalities (city, county) FOR the various purposes said tax levies were passed, e.g. as ‘bike lanes’, HOV lanes etc.

observa
October 24, 2024 4:43 am

“What they’re clearly doing is they want all electric vehicles, and so they’re driving up the cost of gasoline every way they can to do it.

And there’s a nasty surprise waiting for you down the track when you take their bait stoopids-
(214) US Auto Insurer BANS EV charging in its OWN car parks | MGUY Australia – YouTube

October 24, 2024 5:59 am

Intended functionality.

Bryan A
October 24, 2024 6:15 am

At about $4.64, California already has the highest per-gallon gas prices of any state in the U.S., according to AAA gas price data

Not sure where this $4.64 is supposed to be in California. I’m in Sonoma County and we’re paying $5.39 to $5.89 right now.

Nevada (Reno) was $4.59 at Boomtown (near the Ca. State line) and $3.59 in Fernley 36 miles east

Duane
October 24, 2024 6:41 am

The wealthy elites who fund Democrat politics in CA don’t care about the price of gas. The working class and middle class do. Eventually the latter will figure out that they’re getting screwed by the former, and do something about it at the ballot box. I would have thought that point was passed years ago. But just as Cuba and Haiti rid themselves of their poverty stricken underclass by encouraging them to illegally enter the US, CA seems to be purposely trying to rid themselves of their population of Republican voters who have been moving to red states. The problem for CA is that as more and more GOP votes leak out, the increasingly leftward voting public will eventually run out of other people’s money.

Reply to  Duane
October 24, 2024 10:44 am

They’ve already run out of other peoples money. Newsom started as Governor with a 90 Billion dollar surplus, the result of overtaxing by Jerry Brown. States should not have surpluses as a function of good government.

Now, thanks only to Newsom’s pen, the State has a 78 billion dollar deficit. States should not have deficits as a function of good government.

But don’t worry. California is a fast food workers paradise, who’s skilled workers who place hamburgers in bags must make $20/ hour.

October 24, 2024 7:23 am

The link is to a California state breakdown of a gallon of gas cost to user.

There are a number fixed government costs adding up to $1.44 a gallon.

https://www.energy.ca.gov/estimated-gasoline-price-breakdown-and-margins

Dr. Bob
October 24, 2024 8:07 am

Stillwater Associates has a very excellent breakdown of gasoline and diesel prices accurately reflecting all the costs and fees associated with production, distribution, and sale of fuels.

California Taxes & Fees on the Rise | Stillwater Associates

comment image

The chart shows that about 40% of fuel cost is crude oil, and California is totally against production of lower cost CA crude favoring to import crude from other countries rather than use San Jaquin Vally crude. At $1.98/gal cost, this dominates the price of fuel but nothing can be done about it. In actuality, inflation correction of crude back to 1980 shows it is really only about $30/bbl which is where it has been for decades without inflation. So, no price gauging there.
Refining gasoline in CA is a tricky business as there are multiple formulations that have to be produced to satisfy county by county differences in fuel properties. This is insane but it is CA, so it is normal.
California AB32 Global Warming Act adds more cost to fuel by making refiners pay for GHG emissions of fuels. The current goal is a 20% reduction in GHG emissions from fuel by 2030 but changes proposed and to be approved in November will change that to a 30% reduction in GHG emissions creating more demand for so-called renewable fuels which cost 2X that of conventional fuels to produce. The proposed changes to the Low Carbon Fuels Standard will require a 30% reduction in GHG emissions from all fuels by 2030 and 85% by 2045. This will effectively force all fuel to be from “renewable” sources.
Light reading for the night time: Notice of Publice Availability of Modified Text and Availability of Additional Documents and/or Information

The policies the CA State government proposes only add cost to the production of fuels that the state desperately needs. But their goal is to get people out of cars completely by making both fuel and cars too expensive to operate. They are achieving that goal very quickly. Research shows that ever increasing emissions regulations have reduced fuel efficiency by about 20%, that they are contributing to GHG emissions just by regulations themselves.
Good luck to CA in the future as more regulations are proposed to reduce driving (vehicle miles traveled) as a way to reduce traffic issues.

Dr. Bob
Reply to  Dr. Bob
October 24, 2024 8:55 am

For reference, Conventional Gasoline is $2.118 at NYH and $1.936 USGC today per DOE EIA. RBOB (reformulated gasoline for alcohol blending in CA) is $2.188. Hard to say that the refiners are price gouging the public. Wholesale gasoline is what the refiners make and sell so the final price of $4.49/gal is marketing costs and taxes/fees. So, Newsom is doing classic deflection of blame from himself to the refiners and producers of fuels. Pure politics and no facts.

Bryan A
Reply to  Dr. Bob
October 24, 2024 9:39 am

I was about to.say nice chart but it should, if possible, include the cost.associated with oil importation. Those floating tankers don’t cross 8,000 miles of Pacific for free.

Reply to  Bryan A
October 24, 2024 10:53 am

It’s worse than that. California has ingeniously lobbied and was granted permission to buy and ship heavy Alaska Crude to Indonesia in exchange for lighter Indonesian crude to be shipped to California.

So all California oil takes a longer trip than necessary to end users. Because we are “saving the earth”

Guess who controls the Indonesian imports? Yup, the Brown and Getty families.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
October 24, 2024 8:50 am

Getting around cities like Los Angeles by bus isn’t easy but it’s doable with a lot of walking. Little to no rail transportation is available. Commuting from the suburbs and lower cost housing areas is impossible using public transportation. California is a car state and it’s slowly making it impractical and too costly to commute to downtown or any area for work. No wonder people are leaving the state.

October 24, 2024 9:12 am

Someone recently asked me why I like Trump.
My answer was, I don’t like a lot of things about Trump.
But, this election is not about choosing the most likable person.
This election is about voting between two vastly different ideologies.
This election is about voting for the country we want to leave our children and grandchildren.
Trump represents that future and has proven that he can deliver.
He is a patriot to the core.
Trump served his country for 4 years without pay.

The moment when someone says:
“I can’t believe you’re voting for Trump”. I simply reply, “I’m not voting for Trump.”

I am voting for the First Amendment and freedom of speech.
I am voting for the right to speak my opinion and not be censored.
I am voting for secure borders and LEGAL immigration.
I am voting for election integrity to include mandatory voter ID.
I am voting for the Second Amendment and my right to defend my life and my family.
I am voting for the police to be respected and funded once again.
I am voting for law & order and an end to allowing protesters to trespass and burn our cities, destroying innocent small business. (Tim Walz)
I am voting for personal responsibility and the end of the revolving door where criminals are being put back on the street. (Kamala Harris)
I am voting for the next Supreme Court Justice(s) to protect the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
I am voting for a return of our troops from foreign countries and the end to America’s involvement in foreign conflicts.
I am voting for the Electoral College and for the Republic in which we live.
I am voting for the continued appointment of Federal Judges who respect/uphold the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
I am voting for keeping our jobs to remain in America and not be outsourced all over the world – to China, Mexico, Canada, Europe, Asia, etc., and other foreign countries.
I am voting for doing away with all of the freebies given to the illegals and not looking after the needs of the American citizens and homeless veterans.
I am voting for the military & the veterans who fought for this country
I am voting to keep men out of women’s sports and tampons out of boy’s bathrooms (Tim Waltz).
I am voting for peace in the Middle East.
I am voting to fight against human/child trafficking.
I am voting for Freedom of Religion.
I am voting for increased STEM teaching (science, technology, engineering, mathematics), instead of pseudo-scientific indoctrination of our children.
I am voting for the future of my Country.
I am voting for my children and my grandchildren to ensure their freedoms

America is the greatest country in the world.
The reason so many want to immigrate here
Why do a small cabal of extremist Democrats want to change it?

I am not voting for Trump.
I am voting for America.

It is truly amazing how a small, crazed, extremist, socialist/communist, Democrat party cabal, with a weaponized federal government, press, and academia, etc., were able to subvert/brainwash the US people this much, for decades, in the land with the First Amendment 

It shows just how brainwashed most of Americans have been
We need Trump to be elected by a huge landslide to MAGA the US.

The federal government must not be allowed to engage in any activities not specified in the U.S. Constitution. 
That means no NPR, no Education Department, no Endowment for the Arts, no Radio Free Europe, and many other similar activities.
All those activities, if they were to exist, are within the realm and jurisdiction of the Sovereign States.

Reply to  wilpost
October 24, 2024 9:33 am

Well said.

Bryan A
Reply to  wilpost
October 24, 2024 9:41 am

This should be posted on billboards outside every polling place nation wide

Reply to  wilpost
October 24, 2024 10:11 am

I believe Trump will win in a landslide and bring along both houses of Congress.

Bryan A
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 24, 2024 2:45 pm

Your lips to the ears of any with the power to evoke change

Reply to  Bryan A
October 24, 2024 5:09 pm

I suspect here in Wokeachusetts, there’ll be mass suicide when Trump wins.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 24, 2024 3:06 pm

nice dream to tine you over for the next two weeks

Reply to  AndyHce
October 24, 2024 5:10 pm

Looks like I’ll be having bad dreams for a while since my “domestic partner”, Elizabeth, is likely to “pass” tonight from Alzheimer’s.

Reply to  wilpost
October 24, 2024 1:17 pm

Reply to  wilpost
October 24, 2024 1:21 pm

wilpost, very well said.

October 24, 2024 9:48 am

“empowering state bureaucrats to require refiners to maintain certain inventory levels”

But the state can’t prevent the refiners from shutting down, right?

October 24, 2024 10:23 am

People always wonder why California Oil prices are so high, but they never report on who owns the oil businesses.

When you actually look you find that the Brown family, the Newsom’s and the Getty’s all have controlling interests.

After all, the largest oil importer into California is Ecuador, that huge oil producing nation controlled by Getty Oil. And then that is followed by Indonesia, controlled by the Browns.

When you want to get richer, you pass laws restricting commodities that you control. California imports NO refined gasoline from other states.

Then you claim it’s because you are an environmentalist saving the planet.

California is a one party state, so don’t look for anything to change soon.

Dale Mullen
October 24, 2024 11:25 am

Yesterday, I paid ~$6.00 Canadian per U.S. gallon here in Yarmouth, N.S. Maybe California residents are not paying so much afterall, when compared to the outrageous prices elsewhere.

Reply to  Dale Mullen
October 24, 2024 3:08 pm

Those high prices, where ever they exist, are politically imposed.

Bob
October 24, 2024 12:22 pm

When you look up crappy government in the dictionary it has a picture of California.

observa
October 24, 2024 7:19 pm

I get the feeling industry has had enough of all the climate changer BS and is beginning to tell it like it is-

The mining company boss behind one of the nation’s biggest green-energy projects says Australian governments may need to guarantee offtake at premiums well above current prices to achieve emissions reduction targets.

Evolution Mining executive chairman Jake Klein said the “inconvenient truth” about the energy transition was the question over who would pick up the bill for big-ticket renewables projects.

The gold and copper producer has put a $7bn price tag on converting its Mt Rawdon mine in Queensland to a pumped hydro storage project that would help keep the lights on at night for about two millions homes under ambitious green energy targets.

Mr Klein said taxpayers would need to foot the bill for the project to go ahead or the government would need to provide some guarantee on even higher prices for renewables power.
Evolution Mining boss questions who pays for green projects as it ponders Queensland hydro plan | The Australian
(paywalled The Australian Business Review 24/10/2024)