By Robert Bradley Jr.
“’I’m a businessman. I’ll take the [government green] money, that’s all I care about… I will move heaven and earth to get projects done over here’.” – James Quigley, quoted in Politico ‘s “Power Switch” (below)
In the mid-19th century, Claude-Frédéric Bastiat, a political economist, wrote:
Government is the great fiction through which everyone endeavors to live at the expense of everyone else. Every one is, more or less, for profiting by the labors of others. No one would dare to express such a sentiment; he even hides it from himself.
The Frenchman added:
When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.
Correct. Government does not create wealth; it redistributes it (after a large cut). Who wins and loses? The winners are government, the lobbyists, and the rent-seekers, with concentrated benefits to them and diffused costs for the rest of us. Plunder, Bastiat would say.
—————-
I was reminded of this by a news item reported in Politico‘s “Power Switch” newsletter (August 16, 2023).
“Not all Republicans want to repeal the climate law that turns 1 today,” reported Josh Siegel. “In fact, my colleague Kelsey Tamborrino and I spoke to dozens of people from all corners of the country and discovered that many GOP officials in rural areas are welcoming the billions of dollars in clean energy incentives coming from President Joe Biden’s signature legislation.”
So do you think they found Republicans that feared “climate change” and welcomed “green” energy as cheaper and better? No, the interviewed were financially captured rent-seekers, enjoying a wealth transfer from taxpayers (via Biden) to their pockets. Here is the rest of the story.
In Rogers County, Okla., Republican Commissioner Ron Burrows looks at the Inflation Reduction Act and sees jobs — 1,000 of them to be exact. At least once the Italian giant Enel opens its $1 billion solar manufacturing plant there in 2025.
Burrows is not alone. Other political and economic leaders in Oklahoma, including Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt, are glad to receive the major investments they say they’d never have attracted without the climate law.
“You can imagine being in a small rural community and trying to get economic development to come — it’s a challenge,” said Rosalie Griffith, a board member of the Rural Economic Development of Inola. “But unless you develop, you’re going to die.”
Burrows said Enel’s decision to locate in his tiny town east of Tulsa — population 1,500 — would not have happened without local buy-in. “I just don’t see a company making that sort of investment without some level of comfort that it’s not adversarial, it’s not split,” he said.
By contrast, his local member of Congress — GOP Rep. Josh Brecheen — views the Inflation Reduction Act through the prism of most national Republicans. Brecheen told me he opposes the use of “taxpayer subsidization” to bolster Democrats’ favored green industries and is seeking to repeal the law.
Kelsey and I found that same disconnect between state and local GOP officials in rural areas and their federal representatives across the country.
There’s even a similar, but less dramatic, dynamic unfolding in upstate New York. GOP Rep. Marc Molinaro voted to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act’s clean energy incentives, and that’s made him a top target of Democrats in the 2024 election. His district is one of 18 that voted for Biden but are held by Republicans.
Inflation Reduction Act money catalyzed Canadian company Zinc8 Energy Solutions’ decision to locate a planned battery factory in Molinaro’s purple district. The project is expected to bring up to 500 new jobs to a Hudson Valley region still suffering from the loss of its manufacturing base in the 1990s. That’s exciting James Quigley, a Republican who drives a Tesla and is the supervisor for the town of Ulster, where Zinc8 plans to locate.
“I’m a businessman. I’ll take the money, that’s all I care about,” Quigley said. “I will move heaven and earth to get projects done over here.”
Final Comment
Gosh Josh, what did you really find our here? Are you proud of this? Did you and Kelsey Tamborrino ask the same parties if they liked the federal deficit and inflation? The present level of taxation? The wisdom of the few over the energy verdicts of the masses?
The Wall Street Journal‘s “Bidenomics and the New Political-Subsidy Economy” spoke to this issue:
Money for these subsidies has to come from somewhere, and that means the private economy in higher taxes and more government borrowing…. The IRA [Inflation Reduction Act] is the heart of Bidenomics, which is about creating a new political-subsidy economy. Perhaps all of this will effloresce into a brilliant green future. More likely hundreds of billions in misallocated investment will reduce future productivity gains and translate into slower economic and income growth. Let’s hope President Biden’s subsidies don’t boomerang like pandemic transfer payments, leaving all Americans poorer.
What a waste, what a shame. The next President needs to issue an emergency declaration that the U.S. is out of money and cease all subsidies of the Inflation Reduction Act in order to pause wind, solar, and battery subsidies. Ratepayers and taxpayers will be thankful.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
To paraphrase Maggie Thatcher, ‘it only works until you run out of other people’s money.’
Or, as Warren Buffet said in a BH shareholder meeting a few years ago,’the only reason we invest in wind is subsidies and tax credits.’
Or, as DJT said in a recent rally, ‘It’s not the green new deal. It’s the green new steal.’ When (not if) re-elected, he will stop it and a lot of other bad stuff on week one after 1/20/25.
Don’t bet on it.
Already did. For me, a lot. Switched registration to NPA when Repubs nominated unqualified McCain in 2008. Am not a Republican. Became ( after some initial grave doubts, a Trumplican.
Despite his idiosyncrasies he’s vastly more “presidential” than the 3fer.
Well Trump will get around to getting to America first. That is, after he diverts billions from ukraine and funnels it to his chinese pals waiting by the great Wai-Ling Wall. Jared will make sure.
A mix of TDS and CDS.. how quaint !!
And, of course, a load of total BS.
JBP, serious ask:
Could you go through that slowly, with citations from where you got the information. I can’t get past the diverting of billions from Ukraine ……..
What (TF) are you talking about … ??? Please.
nonsense- I bet he’ll continue to support Ukraine, maybe not as much as Biden- but most Americans, most of our military, and most Republicans want that.
He’ll do better than the other side regarding the green new steal.
Until you run out of other people’s money, by definition, includes going into debt beyond your ability to every pay it back.
“We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle” Sir Winston Spencer Churchill.
Bribe is just another word for scam.
Trump is the only candidate that cannot be bought.
Listen while I play play play play play play play
My Green Tamborrino
So true

Humor – a difficult concept.
One we need more of.
The best way to change outlooks is with humor and ridicule.
PRICELESS!
Story Tip.
Government agencies are being urged to consider imposing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) levies on windmills and solar panels manufacturers.
Because they’re a huge problem to recycle, re-use or dispose of.
Will taxpayers then have to subsidize the disposal costs as well as the production costs?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/these-busted-solar-panels-are-an-early-example-of-a-looming-problem-and-an-opportunity-1.7349406
Why not, they get Shtupped for everything else Wind and Solar
Nothing on God’s green earth is free.
Decomposing is free
Glass and silicon take eons to decompose.
Meanwhile toxic chemicals leach into the air and water.
Humans take months to decompose unless were (enbalmed) filled with toxic chemicals that you don’t want leaching into the ground. But if were disposed of chemical free, our decomposition is free
Mr. You might also mention toxic-site restoration costs.
“Your wind turbine’s on fire again,” the neighbor said in the 5 a.m. call.
Oh my lord, what a gong show this whole renewables rollout & clean-up nonsense is.
Not to this day has even one real-world proof-of-concept assessment site anywhre in the world been commissioned to demonstrate the overall efficacy of wind & solar generation, reliability and transmission.
This happened with built-in lightning arresters.
Hmmm…. I wonder how they do lighting arresters on floaters?
When a solar “farm” was proposed to be built behind my ‘hood, I and my wife sued the company and the town- to force that company to put a significant amount of $$$ in escrow to dismantle it when the time came.
“The customer always pays.”
The Taxpayer always pays.
Kudos to Mr. Bradley for reminding us that there was a time when mainstream economics was actually based on reason.
Withdraw all government tax preferences, subsidies and mandates and all of our global warming/renewable energy problems go away.
Get rid of subsidies. They distort the market.
And the climate will just continue to do what the climate does.
Green subsidies are nothing more than a wealth reduction exercise. There is a period when the few in receipt of the tax payer funding enjoy a warm feeling of success. The next phase is a sense of reality as the Green initiative fails to provide ongoing results and closes down because the grant subsidy has all gone and no wealth has been created.
The deindustrialisation policies of the Left championed by the Greens know no moral limit. They will continue to do these pointless investments until someone actually stops them.
Wealth reduction is true, but include wealth redistribution from the poor and middle class to the elites.
I do not like being lied to. The IPCC and Climate Syndicate have claimed no CO2 measurements prior to 1958. I have not yet verified that claim, but it seems to be from a reliable source.
If true, how can they state the baseline of 1880 at 280 ppm?
There are over a dozen scientists that measured CO2 in the 1800s. I am gathering their papers and have a ton of work left on this project.
Three interesting data are noted.
First, one scientist measure CO2 in 1880 at 290 +/- 3%. The lower end of the tolerance is…. 280 ppm. That, according to data reviewed, shows 1880 was the lowest CO2 concentration in 100 years. I wonder if that played into the decision to use that as the starting point?
Second, the same measurements going back in time show CO2 at 420 ppm in 1820. That is comparable to today.
An anomaly is noted. I have to go back to the IPCC CO2 graph to verify, but it seems WWII did not significantly alter CO2 ppm. How is that possible, if true? The data I’ve collected indicates during WWII the CO2 ppm was nearly as high as today, which makes sense given the war, burning cities, etc. Again, verification is everything, but incomplete.
This is suspiciously looking like another hockey stick scandal.
If all of this pans out, it means this tragedy being reported (the burning wind towers) really is a scam, fraud, and corruption.
Do you have this one of two papers he wrote on this? Cited you know who, not too favorably.
Krogh, A. 1904. The abnormal CO2 – percentage in the air in Greenland and the general relations between atmospheric and oceanic carbonic acid. Meddelser om Grönland. 26(7):409-434.
Went on to earn a Nobel on a related but maybe easier subject. 1939 copy was our ‘bible’ on it.– Krogh, A. 1939. Osmotic Regulation in Aquatic Animals. Cambridge.1965 Dover Reprint. 242pp.
Wang, T. and M. S. Hedrick. 2021. Introduction to the special issue: Comparative physiology and the legacy of August Krogh, 1920–2020. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A:Mol. Integrat. Physiol. 256:110930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.110930
As for WWII, oil ‘pollution’ lasted couple of decades from it and its recovery. A shame to waste it but taught us plenty about the new ‘demon.’
I shall add that to the list.