Posted by Leslie Eastman
“The Wildlife Service failed to rely on the best scientific and commercial data available when making its designation as required by law and therefore made inaccurate and arbitrary assumptions about the current and future status of the species.”
If Legal Insurrection were ever to have a mascot, it might have to be the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard.
Thanks to long-time reader Danelle, we have been following the creature’s endangered species status since 2011, when the Obama administration was poised to place it under protected status. It appeared to be part of a larger Obama administration effort to choke the nation’s oil production capabilities one permit at a time, as the lizard likes to make its home in lands rich in fossil fuels.
For over a year, that threat was hanging over the heads of the Texas petroleum industry before (in a rare display of sanity and reason) the US Fish and Wildlife Service denied the request.
This July, the Biden administration resurrected the request for such a listing and targeted the important oil-producing region of the Permian Basin with this action.
Now, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has just announced that his office is suing the U.S. Department of the Interior, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Biden administration officials for the declaration.
In his lawsuit, Paxton cited the successful voluntary efforts that have gone into successfully protecting this species in the region.
…Paxton said the defendants unlawfully classified the lizard as endangered in violation of the Endangered Species Act.
“The Wildlife Service failed to rely on the best scientific and commercial data available when making its designation as required by law and therefore made inaccurate and arbitrary assumptions about the current and future status of the species,” Paxton said in a statement.
“Further, the regulation classifying the dunes sagebrush lizard as endangered did not take into consideration the ongoing voluntary conservation efforts already in place at a local and state level. Because of this, the federal government’s action would unduly undermine vital economic development in the Permian Basin, subjecting Texas industries and private landowners to regulatory uncertainty and ambiguity about what they can do with their own land,” Paxton said.
Paxton had notified the Biden Administration in late July the listing violated the Endangered Species Act and he would sue if it was not reversed. The lawsuit asks the court to find the agencies acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act and the ESA.
Paxton also accused the Fish and Wildlife Service of intentionally being vague about the areas to be protected in this economically critical region.
The dunes sagebrush lizard, measuring just 2.5 inches long, inhabits roughly 4 percent of the 86,000-square-mile Permian Basin, which stretches across Texas and New Mexico, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service. In Texas, the species has been identified in Andrews, Crane, Gaines, Ward, and Winkler counties.
The endangered listing mandates that oil and gas companies avoid areas where the dunes sagebrush lizard resides, but the Fish and Wildlife Service has not yet identified those specific regions as it continues to gather data. Depending on the severity of the violation, companies that violate this rule could face fines of up to $50,000 and potential prison time.
Paxton’s office criticized the Fish and Wildlife Service for not identifying the areas where the lizard resides, leaving operators and landowners in limbo about how they can use their land.
Any real science the bureaucrats in the Biden administration might use is purely coincidental.
Frankly, I hypothesize that the dunes sagebrush lizard is about as in danger of going extinct as a species as our planet is from “global warming” due to man-made carbon dioxide from fossil fuel production.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It is as much green lawfare as the infamous Delta Smelt. Claim some endangered species inhabits some area you wish to influence, and enjoin away.
When did green lawfare get started? Was it after NEPA?
I think it dates from the 1960’s, with the rise of the environmentalist movement. It got worse under Nixon, whose domestic policies had so many “unintended consequences” I almost think it was deliberate nihilism.
There are quite a few laws that court actions use, but this one is the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
Story tip: A truck full of lithium-ion batteries is burning in Los Angeles, shutting down ports and a bridge.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24256161/los-angeles-overturned-truck-battery-fire-lithium-ion-port-bridge-closed
Hottest products on the market.
Ha!
‘Non-Endangered’ sage brush lizard in Permian Basin— shut it all down.
Imaginary threat to ANWR millions of migrating caribou—shut it all down despite caribou success of elevated Alaska Pipeline.
Truly endangered Atlantic right whale—issue offshore wind permits anyway.
Windmills killing California raptors—issue raptor killing exceptions to existing conservation laws.
There might be a pattern here.
Plus, the last California delta smelt was observed over a decade ago, despite a massive delta river ‘census’ trying to prove the opposite. So releasing fresh water to protect a likely extinct and long irrelevant species makes sense—in California.
Just so there is no misunderstanding, I am actually an ardent conservationist, yet long term member of both Ducks and Deer Anonymous. Love hunting (farm deer, grouse, wild turkey) and fishing (trout and small mouth bass in Georgia and Canada). We invest to preserve beloved wildlife. Hate faux conservationism.
Similarly, loggers and foresters are ardent conservationists- despite cutting trees. But the enviro extremists imply we’re all forest destroyers.
Another example of overreach by a dishonest and power hungry shameless government.
It would be interesting to see what the response would be if it was solar panels they were wanting to install. To hell with the critter, it is the planet we are saving.
Interesting!!
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/rare-and-elusive-australian-bird-once-thought-extinct-for-100-years-discovered-by-indigenous-rangers-and-scientists-180985143/
In fact, the Great Sandy Desert “is probably one of the world’s most uninfluenced ecosystems when it comes to industrial-level footprints,”
I am sure somewhere in Australia they are drawing up plans for a “climate friendly” wind farm and solar array….that just how Green Communists think!