The Media Are Sheep

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

The Seattle Times, in its usual alarmist fashion, has an article about how the dreaded “rising seas” are forcing the Quinault Nation to move its main town, Taholah.

Seeing that, I decided to take an overview of the claims about Taholah. A Google search for “Taholah rising seas” finds over eighty media claims that “rising seas” are threatening Taholah. Searching “Taholah climate change” finds a bunch more. A Bing search for “Taholah” and “rising seas” yields no less than 1,830 articles. And they’re all singing from the same hymnbook, going on about seawater incursions into the town and raving about how rising sea levels are the cause … but not one of them has taken the time to investigate the facts.

Here’s an overview of where Taholah is located, on the Olympic Peninsula up near the Canadian border, about as far north as Seattle.

Figure 1. Overview of the location of the main town of the Quinault Nation, Taholah

Let me start with the important question. Do the good folks of the Quinault Nation need to move their largest town?

Yes, absolutely they do, but not because of climate change or rising sea levels.

The real reason they need to move? Because when, not if but when the next tsunami comes, it will wipe them off the map. Most of the town is less than sixteen feet (five meters) above sea level.

And curiously, the geological forces that create the tsunamis also mean that the sea level at Taholah isn’t even rising … I’ll return to that in a bit. First, let’s delve into the tsunamis.

Geological evidence shows that the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ), which runs from Northern California to Vancouver Island, Canada, produces large tsunamis that threaten the coasts of Washington, Oregon, British Columbia, and Northern California every four hundred to five hundred years on average. And it’s been a while since the last big one in 1700… we’re coming due. That’s why I said when the tsunami comes, and not if the tsunami comes. It is inevitable. A NOAA article on the question says:

“It has been over 300 years since the 1700 event. In this time, stress has been building between the plates. Evidence suggests it may not be too long before the next great earthquake shakes the region.

We do not know when that will happen. It could be tomorrow, or it could be many years from now.

It could be a magnitude 9.0 “full rip” or a partial rupture (magnitude 8+). Either would have significant impacts.”

Seems to me like a more than adequate reason to move Taholah to higher ground right there, no need for further excuses …

So what is the connection between tsunamis and sea levels? Well, the CSZ is where the Juan de Fuca, Explorer, and Gorda tectonic plates subduct beneath the North American plate. The plates colliding are what creates the earthquakes that generate these monster tsunamis.

And in that ongoing slow collision between plates, the North American plate is continually being forced upwards fast enough that at some Pacific Northwest coastal locations, sea levels are actually falling. Here are the local NOAA tidal stations. Blue arrows show where the sea levels are falling.

Figure 2. Nearest NOAA tidal stations to the Quinault Nation town of Taholah.

Note that of the three stations nearest to Taholah on the coast, two of them show falling sea levels and one shows a rising sea level … here’s the rising sea level at the first station south of Taholah.

Figure 3. NOAA sea level trend, Toke Point, Washington

Now, there’s something interesting about this record. The uncertainty (± 0.71 mm/year) is larger than the trend (0.43 mm/year). And when that happens, statistically we cannot even say whether the sea level is rising or falling—it could be either one.

Next, here’s the falling sea level from Astoria, Oregon, the next tide station south of Toke Point.

Figure 4. NOAA sea level trends, Astoria, Oregon

This record, although it is much longer than the Toke Point record above, shows the same thing—the uncertainty is greater than the trend. So once again, statistically we can’t say if the sea level is rising or falling in Astoria.

We can say, however, that it is highly unlikely (~2.5% chance) that the sea level is rising more than the trend plus the uncertainty, which is 0.15 mm per year. That highly unlikely occurrence is about 15 mm (0.6 inches) per century … be still, my beating heart …

Finally, here’s the Neah Bay record from up at the north tip of the Olympic Peninsula.

Figure 5. NOAA sea level trends, Neah Bay, Washington

Here, the uncertainty is far smaller than the trend, so statistically, we can say that the sea level around Neah Bay is falling due to the land being forced upwards faster than the global rise in sea level.

So given that the sea level isn’t rising around Taholah, why is Taholah seeing water incursions into town?

It’s because they built the town on unconsolidated estuarine silt and soil in the Quinault River delta … and as such soils inevitably do over time, they are compacting and sinking, and taking the town down with them. This is indeed tragic, but it has exactly zero to do with sea level rise.

Figure 6. Closeup of Taholah and the Quinault River delta.

To summarize: South of Taholah, there’s no statistically significant sea level rise or fall, and north of Taholah, the sea level is falling.

This, of course, all means that the dozens and dozens and dozens of articles claiming that Taholah is endangered by rising sea levels are … well … let me call them “ludicrously misinformed” and leave it at that.

And the conclusion from this?

You absolutely cannot trust the modern media to do even the simplest verification of factual claims. And you can’t believe them even if they agree with each other—the media consensus is as meaningless as the so-called “scientific consensus”. Here we have over a hundred articles by various print, online, and tv media from all over the planet, all passionately and forcefully repeating the same easily checked falsehood.

This would have been somewhat acceptable before the internet, but it took me a total of about fifteen minutes to look up the local sea level rise and to learn that Taholah cannot possibly be endangered by sea level rise because the sea level is not rising around Taholah.

In closing, let me say that I wish the good folks of the Quinault Nation all the best in their plans to move to higher ground. Moving a whole town is not an easy thing to do, but as the saying goes, “Needs must when the devil drives” … and a giant tsunami certainly qualifies as a devil in my book.

My very best to everyone, and to all you good media folks out there … do your dang homework, because in 2024 you can be sure that if you don’t, someone else will …

w.

PS: It’s also obvious from these sea level records that there is no acceleration in the rate of sea level rise … but that’s a separate question.

My Usual: When you comment, I implore you to quote the exact words you are discussing. I’m more than happy to defend my words, but I can’t defend your interpretation of my words. Thanks.

Proving Me Wrong: If you wish to prove me wrong, here is how to do it. Hele on!

5 68 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

78 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
abolition man
July 22, 2024 1:39 am

Illuminating post, Willis!
The PNW is one of the most fascinating regions, geologically; with large portions of the state accreted from oceanic basalt island chains colliding with the North American plate as it moves further away from Europe and Africa. Some portions of Washington were formed at the latitude of northern Mexico and trundled north as much as 4,000 km if the paleomagnetism and the Baja-BC Hypothesis are correct.
If only most journalists had even a layman’s understanding of basic science and engineering, but I guess that would interfere with their study of the ever expanding universe of gender identification and the devastations of tribes and nations as our oceans boil away due to climate change!

strativarius
July 22, 2024 2:18 am

“”but not one of them has taken the time to investigate the facts.””

Simply because modern journalism and journalists are hacktivism and hacktivists. People who furnish stories to go with the scary narratives. You can check the articles against this handy PDF

A Rough Guide to
SPOTTING BAD SCIENCE
https://compoundchem.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/A-Rough-Guide-to-Spotting-Bad-Science-20151.pdf

h/t John Robson and CDN

History can tell us a lot

comment image

Reply to  strativarius
July 22, 2024 7:11 am

Your attached guide to bad science is useful, but the most reliable indicator of activist junk science is the assumed requirement, either implicit or explicit, that individuals must sacrifice their economic and/or civil liberties as a consequence of the ‘science’.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  strativarius
July 22, 2024 7:56 am

The book ‘OUTRAGEOUS WAVES’ by Basil Cracknell lists 217 named villages that have disappeared beneath the waves around the coast of England and Scotland during the last two millenia.

He acknowledges that also “there must be a good number that have been lost without trace”.

July 22, 2024 6:12 am

It seems journalism isn’t a well-paying job anymore, and it shows.

c1ue
July 22, 2024 8:40 am

Small correction: the media are not sheep – they are Judas Goats.

SteveZ56
July 22, 2024 8:43 am

Throughout history, civilized people have tended to build towns, cities, or other settlements near the sea or along river banks–even ancient Egypt from circa 3000 BC was built along the Nile delta, and there is evidence of a city called Cahokia that was built at the current site of Saint Louis (at the confluence of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers) during the 12th century, long before the arrival of Columbus.

A seaside town can use the sea as a source of food (fish and edible crustaceans), and a town built along a river can use the fresh water for human consumption and irrigation, as well as trade with other towns along the same river. Taholah was built along the seashore and the banks of a river.

But any town built near a large body of water is subject to flooding, not only from a slow sea level rise over centuries from “climate change”, but more importantly from storm surge, or flash floods from an upstream storm swelling a river, or a possible tsunami from an undersea earthquake, which no one can predict. There is also the possibility of subsidence, if the soil on which the town is built is not stable.

If the people of Taholah want to move to higher ground to protect themselves from a future tsunami, that is a great example of disaster preparedness. They may need to install pumps and pipes to deliver fresh water to the new location. But the next tsunami may be a century away, and the sea level may actually be falling there, so no one should claim that everyone else needs to stop burning fossil fuels to save Taholah.

July 22, 2024 8:55 am

If we take Willis’s article as factual and the Bing search to be of the “rising seas” type….then that seems about the correct ratio in general for climate related articles….about 1800 misrepresentations for every valid one…

I'm not a robot
July 22, 2024 9:06 am

There’s an ironic ‘nother level with the journalist “sheep” metaphor. Besides the herd behavior, they, with much hubris, believe THEY are sheep HERDERS. That is, we are the sheep in their minds.