Marc Morano writes:
Hi Charles,
Here is full 3 hour climate summit video. Many of the commenters at WUWT are asking if you posted full video. Here is full video of his talk. Probably 35 min and it includes my 25 min talk and Alex Newman as well.
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/spro-challenging-climate-claims
It might be my browser, but the video fails to load and gives an error message.
It works fine on my browser. I’m using Firefox.
Try right-clicking on the link, select open in new tab or new window.
Story Tip
From today’s Telegraph:
So much for cheap wind power. And this is before the expense of installing and burning enough gas to make the thing usable.
Any rational government would realize that the game is up and just stop with this nonsense.
Now come along michel, it was ‘only’ a 66% uplift the industry wanted 70% but, well we have to keep this ‘cheap’ wind energy cheap don’t you know….. 😉
“Any rational government would realize that the game is up and just stop with this nonsense.”
Something theocracies aren’t good at.
Yes I had troubled too loading and exiting. But I know already what we are dealing with. We are dealing with forces disguised as politicians or “ concerned “ scientists that are engaged in treason and seditious acts to replace our constitutional republic ( US based) with an authoritarian central world government. Not: maybe ,or sort of, not conspiracy theory- that is in fact what is happening.
Whistling past the graveyard is no help. No amount of discussing or debating the actual “ science” of the subject is going to change that reality. One year till the US presidential election when we will find out if their is hope for our great republic( and the world). Yes it is that serious now.
Cap did a nice summary, with graphics, of this talk if you want a short version:
https://electroverse.info/nobel-prize-winner-slams-climate-alarm-thanksgiving-arctic-blast-sun-hush/
Cloud cover hypotheses of climate change are certainly viable. The problem is that they don’t have sufficient supporting evidence yet, as our measurements of cloud cover remain very unsatisfactory. As such, they lack the power to convince.
But if I had to delve into climatology I would say the sunlight ,cloud cover ,black body vs reflectivity theory is a good one. I’ve always been fascinated by ice ages ( and it’s a somewhat scary titanic force -unstoppable and life altering in the extreme ) since I was in 6 th grade and we had a intro to science and physics section.
I was lucky and had a brilliant and dedicated teacher- objective and a true professor of the scientific method. He also understood how important an understanding of physics is for layman too.
Now, instead of climate physics we have climate psychics.
Some of us had it back then as well. The maths teacher at my secondary school was a climate zealot – he gave a whole series of talks about the dangers of fossil fuels and how they were causing the imminent ice age. Made quite an impression.on me at that age, started looking at ice ages and completely ignored the rest of his rhetoric. His mistake? My secondary school was a grammar school and they still taught the scientific method and critical thinking; his empty, unsupported narrative gained no traction with any of us.