Guest essay by Gregory Wrightstone
European witch hunts of the 15th to 17th centuries targeted witches that were thought to be responsible for epidemics and crop failures related to declining temperatures of the Little Ice Age. A belief that evil humans were negatively affecting the climate and weather patterns was the “consensus” opinion of that time. How eerily similar is that notion to the current oft-repeated mantra that Man’s actions are controlling the climate and leading to catastrophic consequences?
The first extensive European witch hunts coincided with plunging temperatures as the continent transitioned away from the beneficial warmth of the Medieval Warm Period (850 to 1250 AD). Increasing cold that began in the 13th century ushered in nearly five centuries of advancing mountain glaciers and prolonged periods of rainy or cool weather. This time of naturally-driven climate change was accompanied by crop failure, hunger, rising prices, epidemics and mass depopulation.
Large systematic witch hunts began in the 1430s and were advanced later in the century by an Alsatian Dominican friar and papal Inquisitor named Heinrich Kramer. At Kramer’s urging, Pope Innocence VIII issued an encyclical enshrining the persecution and eradication of weather-changing witches through this papal edict. The worst of the Inquisition’s abuses and later systemic witch hunts were, in part, empowered by this decree.
The summer of 1560 brought a return of coldness and wetness that led to severe decline in harvest, crop failure and increases in infant mortality and epidemics.

Bear in mind that this was an agrarian subsistence culture, nearly totally dependent on the yearly harvest to survive. One bad harvest could be tolerated, but back-to-back failures would cause horrific consequences and, indeed, they did. Of course, the people’s misfortunes were attributed to weather-changing witches who had triggered the death-dealing weather, most often in the form of cold, rain, frost and devastating hailstorms. Horrific atrocities were alleged of the witches, including Franconian witches who “confessed” to flying through the air to spread an ointment made of children’s fat in order to cause a killing frost.
Across the continent of Europe, from the 15th to the 17th centuries there were likely many tens of thousands of supposed witches burnt at the stake, many of these old women living without husbands on the margins of society.

The worst of the witch hunts occurred during the bitter cold from 1560 to about 1680. The frenzy of killing culminated in the killing of 63 witches in the German territory of Wiesensteig in the year 1563 alone. Across Europe, though, the numbers of witches continued to increase and peaked at more than 500 per year in the mid-1600s. Most were burned at the stake; others were hung.

The end of the witch hunts and killings tie closely to the beginning of our current warming trend at the close of the 17th century. That warming trend started more than 300 years ago and continues in fits and starts to this day.
Gregory Wrightstone is a geologist and the Executive Director of the CO2 Coalition in Arlington Virginia. He is bestselling author of Inconvenient Facts: The Science that Al Gore doesn’t want you to know.
References:
Pfister (2007) Witch Hunts: Strategies of European Societies in Coping with Exogenous Shocks in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries
Behringer (1999) Climatic change and witch-hunting: the impact of the Little Ice Age on mentalities.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Like Just Stop Oil, the urge to “do something” is common.
The inclination to excessively worry is a widespread psychological trait, typically linked to concerns about matters that are outside one’s ability to influence. In the present era, individuals who are smarter are adept at leveraging this understanding to their advantage.
However, the individuals who are very very smart, or crafty and sly, who are running with the climate change scam are increasingly calling for the silencing and punishment of those who criticized their actions and/or pointed out the errors in the narrative.
It’s a little late for Halloween – but put on a black pointy hat, for we are the modern version of those who were scapegoated in the past. And to be fair to those in the past with the flaming torches and pitchforks, they were in the midst of a real climate disaster with crop failures, disease and pestilence – and with no clue about what was going on.
The climate change judge and jury, on the other hand, knows that the narrative is a flimsy cover for their political ambitions.
And convenient of the author to neglect to mention that the worst period of witch burning happened under protestant control.
And I have seen analysis of the Spanish Inquisition, that found that they considered any witches brought before them to be a mental disease issue and they weren’t responsible for their actions.
Protestant burnings, especially in the US, were just based on heresay and lynching, without any real trial.
In fact, the original Inquisition was set up to provide a tribual to end the lynchings that were going on.
This article mentions Pope Innocence VIII’s part in supporting the burnings. The Reformation only began in 1517 with Luther’s “Theses”. I’m not a religious scholar, so how long did it take to spread through Europe.
I think we are about ready to have another Luther turn back the nonsense of climate indulgences (carbon offsets).
PCman999, protestant? I hope you are not covering for the Catholic Inquisition, who burned Giordano Bruno at the stake in 1600? The sentence was for heresy, for supporting others who said the Earth was in orbit around the Sun.
Idiots who claimed to be Catholic Christians, idiots who claimed to be Protestant Christians. The reality is that it was usually the mobs and/or secular authorities murdering people not religious leaders of either stripe. It’s a stupid argument, completely irrelevant to current times. Please stop.
I mostly agree, but I’d replace ‘secular authorities’ with ‘petty officers of the ruling mafia shaking down the populace’.
Remember, the property of the “witch” was transferred to those who found and relieved her of sin.
Always follow the money; the morals, as you say, are interchangeable.
Like Just Stop Oil, the urge to “do something” is common.
I see that JSO has started another 3-week campaign of disruption in London so as to bring an end to the fossil fuels era in the UK. They are engaging in the usual slow-march road blocking routines.
I guess CO2 and fossil fuels are the evil witches these days. After all these centuries, we humans still haven’t gotten over the need to engage in witch hunts and go after those we perceive to be the source of our problems, even without proper evidence. Climate scientists these days who toe the CAGW party line are the high priests and priestesses of this new religion. BURN THE WITCHES!!
We humans still have a long way to go before we learn not behave this way.
The witch hunters are more reasonable in that the cause for suspicion (bad weather) precedes their witch identification.
In the case if JSO, weather is getting better and anyway, historically, a warmer climate preceded a rise in atmospheric CO2.
True. Unfortunately unlike most people who do nothing when they don’t know what to do (“a self correcting action”), politicians do all sorts of ill thought-out things when they don’t know what to do. After all, it’s not their money they’re spending…
Monty Python identified the climate alarmists long ago
Burn her….!
Did she turn you into a newt, strativarius?
Regards,
Bob
I got better, Bob!
He got better.
Polly!
Well, Polly in the hotel Fawlty Towers TV series and John Cleese’s wife at the time.
Oh, you don’t think the witches caused the bad weather! You’re a witch denier! 🙂
Burn them at the stake, too!
Interesting. The first and last witches in Britain were hung in Exeter, Devon.
https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/dark-history-exeter-first-last-1609485
Just 2 months ago Exeter University started offering a master’s degree in magic and the occult
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/oct/04/exeter-university-masters-degree-magic-occult
Not one mile away from the first and last hanging and Exeter University is none other than the HQ of our beloved Met office
https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/357907/view
Just saying…
tonyb
“Decolonisation, the exploration of alternative epistemologies, feminism, and anti-racism are at the core of this programme.”
“how its relationship with the natural world can bring new perspectives to climate breakdown”
Of course they would work in all the current things. A degree in “magic and occult science” – so, Ghostbusters?
with students able to complete their dissertation through a performance work
So they cast spells for their degree?
The end of the article also mentions a “Psychedeleic studies” degree.
The Dark Ages are back.
A masters in magic and the occult?
Tell me, is higher education “free” or substantially free in the UK? I can’t see enough people spending their own money for an advanced degree in magic and the occult.
Its certainly not Free and Exeter is a very well regarded University. They also have a climate chair endowed by the Met Office and I believe Richard Betts hangs out there.
Quite why anyone would waste a penny on this sort of degree is completely beyond me.
It might be a chick magnet.
You are assuming that humans are rational.
Sounds like Exeter is trying to compete with Hogwarts.
Student loans. Same target market for both products.
IIRC, at one stage they had the highest number of staff that were also with the IPCC, in the world. !
They got rid of their chemistry department some years ago.
Witchcraft, magic and alchemy go together very well.
If you’re Interested in driving off miasmata I have developed a small phlogiston container that incorporates a small flint and steel into its structure for igniting the element in order to burn off harmful air! For only an ounce or two of silver you too can own one of these miraculous devices!
Be forewarned, it can be dangerous to use in close proximity to your body! If your clothing is full of grease or other flammable compounds, or you are standing in the midst of your own, personal miasma, spontaneous human combustion may be the result!!
Those are inflammatory claims!
Funny how the burning of the last witch coincided with the end of the cold period.
I guess they finally found the one responsible.
Had their models been better they could have found that one first and spared all the other innocent women. Oh well, breaking eggs to make a cake, or something.
Clearly the burning of witches eventually added enough CO2 to the atmosphere to warm the climate and bring an end to the cold period.
And also added to the Urban Heat Island effect…
Or all that extra CO2 from the burnings …
The Devil was the source of the power. Witches were only the servants of that power.
I’ve been saying for years that, if you believe in witches, then anything bad that happens must be due to witchcraft. But at WUWT we know better…
We certainly do, it’s all down to the evil pixies and goblins.
Hmmm, you must be talking about Greta and Kerry.
I stand corrected…
You left out the trolls.
This is for anyone who may be doubting their faith in the new religion
Great art- blend of genre , philosophy…
According to the first figure, temperature was dropping for several hundred years when the Church began witch hunts around 1400. As the witches were killed off temperature continued to drop but more slowly then began to rise around 1700. At that point, the Church authorities observed that it was getting warmer and decided enough witches had been killed to correct the problem. The wisdom of the authorities was cemented as temperature thereafter rose to a more accommodating levels. Clearly, the witch hunts were successful. There is an obvious clear correlation between witch hunts and temperature is there not?
As to carbon dioxide, despite efforts to control it, temperatures continue to rise. Perhaps the Pope should be encouraged to reinstate witch hunts?
The Earth is still in a 2.56 million-year ice age named the Quaternary glaciation, in a warmer but still cold interglacial period. Twenty percent of the land is either permafrost or covered by glaciers.
The temperature the IPCC considers pre-industrial is the end of the Little Ice Age when it was still quite cold.
About 4.6 million people die every year from cold-related causes compared with 500,000 that die from heat-related causes every year.
Our bodies constrict their blood vessels when it is cold to conserve heat and this raises the blood pressure causing more heart attacks and strokes during the cooler months.
‘Global, regional and national burden of mortality associated with nonoptimal ambient temperatures from 2000 to 2019: a three-stage modelling study’
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(21)00081-4/fulltext
Well scvblwzq, you are talking facts. What’s facts got to do with CO2 “theory?”Still looks like witches to me.
Twenty percent of the land is either permafrost or covered by glaciers.
Are you sure? Certainly Canada and Russia, but I think you’d need to include Antarctica to to get up to 20%.
Aren’t enough climate scientists and politicians already on that bandwagon?
What does Attenburghee et al. want?
“”five centuries of advancing mountain glaciers and prolonged periods of rainy or cool weather. …. accompanied by crop failure, hunger, rising prices, epidemics and mass depopulation.””
Well, he managed to repel those supporting Bellamy, to retain his elevated position at the top of the heap! Sacrifices had to be made by some!
I used to drive past the memorial to Maggie Wall when visiting my brother in Dunning. Although there is some doubt as to whether she was in fact burnt the memorial is a reminder of those hard times. Picture from Wikipedia
This is a singularly idiotic posting for WUWT. It’s doubtful if the illiterate and unschooled European societies of the 15th to 17th centuries even recognized such a thing as a climate that could change over the span of lifetimes, much less one that could be caused by post-menopausal crones. God’s dissatisfaction was more likely to be the cause of early frosts or excessive rain. Noah’s universal flood and the drowning of the Pharaoh’s army in the Red Sea are examples. Europe at that time wasn’t any more agrarian than it is today. No one can survive without the products of agriculture, even if this fact is routinely ignored.
Hanging and immolation at the stake were church-approved procedures for old ladies of a lower caste that creeped people out and had no one to defend them. Both Roman Catholics and Protestants followed the practice. Connecting this custom with climate change is silly.
“”illiterate and unschooled European societies of the 15th to 17th centuries even recognized such a thing as a climate””
Yes, nobody kept any records whatsoever and Galileo used a jam jar
Records? When people were born and died was recorded. But tell me of the weather on the date of truly significant events. What was the temperature in Wittenburg, Saxony-Anhalt on October 31, 1517 when Martin Luther began the Reformation by nailing his 95 theses on the door of All Saints Church? High and low will be fine, Centigrade or Fahrenheit. The conditions during such an important event must have been carefully documented for posterity and easily found by you.
Or May 30, 1431 in Rouen, Normandy, French heroine Jeanne d’Arc was broiled by the English. There might actually be a written description somewhere of the weather there that day but its unlikely that a record of the previous or following week exists. Surely you can find it if anyone can. Please advise us if the crowd around the flames wore rain gear or T-shirts on that sad day.
T shirts in 1431?
Quaint ideas you have over there
Well, what was the weather on that day?
Most likely if they had them they would have been Tea-shirts. Specifically to be worn for.afternoon tea
General Custer,
Wednesday, October 31, 1517;
Overcast, cold, dry blustery.
The thermoscope water froze the nights before, making low temp below freezing & the high (differential) simply a guess.
Experts of the time were forced to utilize prior measurement standards;
Daytime temp was recorded as: ‘cold as a (typical) witches tit’.
Night time low was recalled as: ‘cold as a mean, petite, witches tit’.
Link, please.
Martin Luthers ‘housekeepers’ diary. Roughly translated from swiss:
When the master returned, tack hammer in his red and scabbed hand, it surprised me very much at his retort. “It is cold out there, colder than the tit of a small and angry witch”.
Matilda Grosvinner was Luthers housekeeper for 38 years.
Link?
translated from swiss
You’ll need to buy an indulgence for that blasphemous fiction.
Matilda (the housekeeper) was fluent in German and Italian, but she could only write in the swiss form; a combination of Romansh/Latin. She was from Graubunden (Grisons for you non Swiss) and she was educated there. (She actually returned there after Luther died). Her diary is in kept in the Kirchner museum in Davos.
He’s pulling your leg, October was a warm month, coming as it did at the end of a 9 month long hot drought period across Europe and England.
Link?
🙂
You callin’ me a liar?
☺
Actually you can probably look it up online – it’s the 1516-17 drought, overshadowed by the 1540 drought which was hotter and drier. Oddly enough there is a lot of historical data online.
It was cold….
If it was warm, Luther would have said:
‘It is rather balmy for the season, like a fat witches tit.’
Actually Jeanne D’arc was captured by French citizens. During the siege of Compiègne in 1430, she was captured by Burgundian forces and subsequently sold to their English allies.
A bit more history for you
Joan of Arc arrived at Orléans as part of a relief force. She was accompanied by 100 men-at-arms and 400 Scottish archers. Legend has it that she marched into the city to the sound of Scottish bagpipes playing “Hey Tuttie Tatie” (you might recognise it as the tune to “Scots Wha Hae”).
And it was SO cold, the English burned her to keep warm.
Love the pipes!
News arrived in today’s Germany of Burgundian Bishop Cochon, literally Swine, who burned her TWICE believing she was supernatural. That was the end of France’s subservience to England and the impetus for the Council of Florence, the Renaissance.
What nonsense. Were careful records made of all possible related events for each vigilante hanging of blacks in the sourthern US?
Well, by that time, you could read about the weather in the newspapers.
October 31st 1517, not sure about the morning but the afternoon was warm and dry, around 13°C I believe. As for May 30th, 1431 most of the onlookers wore armour, but the light rain in the morning had dried out and was about 11.5-12°C at midafternoon. You want more?
Before the widespread use of fossil fuels, hard weather always meant hard times, which in turn resulted in the scapegoating of people at the margin of societal acceptance.
I wouldn’t go too hard on Christians though – I recall reading that our ‘noble savage’ ancestors were adept at human sacrifice to ensure sufficient rainfall and/or to make the sun come up in the East.
A completely factless fabrication. You’re just making that all up, except for human sacrifice. Current morality finds it disgusting but the “noble savages” thought they were doing the right thing, just as many of the “global warming” priesthood and their parishioners do. Greta Thunberg probably believes in her little Swedish heart everything she says.
Is Greta’s heart actually “little”, or did you just make that up? 🙂
Well, in defence of the ‘ghost of the greasy grass river’, Greta really isn’t very big in fact she’s really quite short. So chances are he’s probably not too far off.
I expect spectators were quietly thinking “this is so wrong, but better them than me”.
The Aztec and Inca Empires were bloodbaths of staggering proportions. When I first read about the scale of human sacrifice South of what became USA, I though no that cannot be so. Where did they get all the victims? I’ll never know the truth because history is so corrupt, but scholarship on the subject from 1600-2000 says bad, bad things happened on the the ziggurats.
That so-called American culture that Columbus later stumbled upon, actually brought the most bestial savagery from Canaan . Columbus first smelled cannibalism near an island, Satanazia on his map, the soldiers thought they landed in Hell, not Cipango. Peruvian DNA from Syria, Canaan :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracas_culture
That level of human sacrifice, cannibalism spread all over the Mediterranean, and Spain., and to central America. Incredible how archaeologists covered up the South West Asian evidence!
Dammit sweety, didn’t I tell you to keep taking the medication?
The Woke way to say it is cannibalism is a matter of taste.
Remember Long John Silver of Treasure Island? Anglicized from the French Langue Jeaune – yellow tongue, the cannibals favorite morsel. Silver had been a cannibal.
Think of all the heart transplants the Aztecs missed out on..
“God’s dissatisfaction was more likely to be the cause of early frosts or excessive rain.”
_______________________________________________________
The Anasazis and Europeans had real problems with climate. Today we don’t, it’s made up out of whole cloth. CO2 should cause some warming and probably has. What’s made up is the claim that it’s a problem. Anyone disputing that warmer weather is a problem becomes the target of a 21st century witch hunt.
The reason for the witch hunt is a means to political power. Exhibit A is the persecution of Donald Trump. He stands in their way. So do various other people who are marginalized by censorship and loss of position. When the power grab is complete, “Climate Change” will be erased from media reporting and slowly expunged from history.
The reason that there aren’t any problems with climate today is because humans, capable of learning, have found ways to deal with the climate where they live. Residents of Anatuvak Pass, Alaska wear parkas with fur ruffs and insulated boots, live in small, well-insulated cabins and eat lots of greasy food. Those in Phoenix, AZ, a town that would have a population of maybe a thousand in the absence of AC, can happily live there with artificial cooling. Problems with climate are the basics of existence in the natural world. Except maybe in San Diego.
Why would DT not embrace AGW and keep power? He had time.
Well, there’s no evidence that Donald Trump’s stance on AGW had anything to do with the election.
Trump is not a dishonest person, contrary to how the radical left portrays him. But then, the radical Left portrays every Republican as being dishonest. That’s their game.
20% of ‘witches’ who were burnt were men, not women.
And most ‘witches’ were accused by women, not men. It was actually ageism, not gender bias.
Witchcraft: Eight Myths and Misconceptions | English Heritage (english-heritage.org.uk)
The Romans and Byzantines kept very good weather records as did the monasteries and the large manors. They were perfectly well aware of weather and climate as they were very attuned to it because of the ever present threat of drought or famine.
I would say that judging by the idiots I have seen today walking round in T shirts and shorts as the gales and rain lashes them in a 8degree C temperature, that people in the past were more aware of their natural environment than many people today.
An illiterate on the northern edge of the Roman empire would, as we are today, be very much conscious of the weather despite the lack of predictive television broadcasts. His view of the climate would be one of an annual progression of seasons, as it had always been and continues to this day. There was no climate science at that time and no reason to believe that observable changes over extended times could occur. If there was any climate record keeping its input would have been so inaccurate as to be useless as well as having no practical application. Present day analysis of the climate from that era is based not on human records but the records of plant life and geology. There is no scientific record of weather on any particular day or other short time span.
While those people were illiterate they were not ignorant. Being much closer to the natural world around them than all but a handful of moderns, including laboratory-bound scientists, they were well aware of the vagaries of their environment.
https://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/nilef-20070319.html
Oh, what a surprise, that link has been deleted by NASA. No matter, there’s still the Wayback Machine …
https://web.archive.org/web/20230526232554/https://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/nilef-20070319.html
“Since the time of the pharaohs, the water levels of the Nile were accurately measured, since they were critically important for agriculture and the preservation of temples in Egypt, These records are highly accurate and were obtained directly, making them a rare and unique resource for climatologists to peer back in time. [] A similarly accurate record exists for auroral activity during the same time period in northern Europe and the Far East.”.
Not weather, maybe, but given those accurate ancient records it’s hard to believe that there would not have been any weather recording. Incidentally, those ancient records are definitely climate records.
Here is the headline from the link:
NASA Finds Sun-Climate Connection in Old Nile Records
03.19.07
The article casts doubt on CO2 being the control knob of Earth’s temperatures and climate, so NASA deletes the article.
NASA also deleted this webpage showing that the U.S. regional chart does NOT correlate with the bogus, bastardized “global” Hockey Stick chart.
The bogus Hockey Stick chart shows the temperatures getting hotter and hotter, decade after decade. A real scary scenario. But the U.S. regional chart does not show this scary temperature increase, instead it shows that today is no warmer than in the recent past. Other regional charts from around the world show the same temperature proile as the U.S. regional chart. None of the regional charts resembles the bogus Hockey Stick chart profile.
NASA obviously doesn’t want us knowing this.
It’s interesting. I noticed another case of correlation. Yet here, we know the cause supposedly. I’m surprised everyone is buying into this so diligently. Everyone, that is, except Mr. Custer.
And yet they invented/discovered/created:
Should I carry on?
You forgot the invention of sarcasm!
Sorry you lost me at golf. Waste of bloody time and money.
The witches and their conjurer helpers are apparently in the majority (97%) today. Talk of trials for the good people are trending.
5 days ago I commented on this thread:
Los Angeles Times Misrepresents California Central Valley “Weather” as “Climate” • Watts Up With That?
It seems relevant. so I quote myself now (October 29, 2023 1:57 am):
What sort of replies (if any) did you get?
Just a long quote of the Holy Grail witch scene.
I was trying to be humourous so quoting Monty Python seemed like an appropriate response.
There is more to the soup! Old Testament on witches :
“Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.” in the oldest Biblical code, given in Exodus 22:18, ordains capital
punishment for a specific class of sorcerors called “mekashshefim.” According to the Jewish Encyclopedia (New York & London 1905; Isidore Singer et aI., editors) in an article on “Witchcraft,” this instance of “witch” in Old Testament language refers specifically to drug-pushers. W.R. Smith, as cited in this entry, argues that the root “kashaf’ means to “use magical appliances, or drugs.” This interpretation receives some support from the fact that the Septuagint, an early Greek translation of the Old Testament, translates this verb as “farmaka,” and that the belief in the use of drugs or herbs is very old.
Then Shakespeare (in the middle of the LIA)
Song of the Witches: “Double, double toil and trouble” (from Macbeth)
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn and caldron bubble.
Fillet of a fenny snake,
In the caldron boil and bake;
Eye of newt and toe of frog,
Wool of bat and tongue of dog,
Adder’s fork and blind-worm’s sting,
Lizard’s leg and howlet’s wing,
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn and caldron bubble.
Cool it with a baboon’s blood,
Then the charm is firm and good.
And today the mob goes after Big Pharma – a vaxx witch hunt!
It may actually be a mistranslation of a very similar word used for ‘poisoner’ which might make more sense as the early church had no problems with magic or its practicioners.
…the early church had no problems with magic or its practicioners.
Well, I think actually they did. Luke records church administrator Phillip’s encounter with a man named Simon who practiced magic in Samaria. (Acts ch 8) Phillip must have been convincing, because Simon was baptized and continued to hang around. But when Peter and John came to follow up Phillip’s opening, Simon saw a chance to make a buck. He offered Peter money to get Peter to share his power.
Peter’s response was pretty strong. I think one modern translation has it, “To hell with you and your money!” (That would be the Phillips translation, but I have too many Phillips here already.)
A few chapters down the road, Paul runs into a magician named Bar-Jesus. That encounter did not go well for the magician either.
Not to belabor the point, but again (Acts ch 19) we find people claiming supernatural powers attempting to use those powers to personal advantage. Seven brothers attempted an exorcism which failed spectacularly.
A century ago, I think Sir William Ramsay devoted significant space to discussing the problem the first Christians had distinguishing themselves from the widespread
economic ‘magic.’ Google “The Bearing of Recent Discoveries….”
You’ll notice, I trust, that I made no mention of conditions on my post. You have noted that the early church had no problem with practitioners unless they started causing trouble. If they weren’t causing trouble, they were tolerated.
It sounds like the recipe for a well-known brand of hamburger…
The Double Whopper!
One of the critiques I heard of Shakespeare was that his plots were redundant, and he used a lot of cliches. I guess the criticizer didn’t know that Shakespeare was the originator of those plots and cliches.
Right on! He is believed to have coined more new words than anyone else in history. Of these, “bubble” is just one example.
Shakespeare was loose with the grammar rules. For example, Ophelia’s “Woe is me” is not correct. Linking verbs require their predicate nouns to be in the nominative case. But if you said the correct “Woe is I,” you’d be laughed out of English class.
I like watching old movies. In one movie, a character knocked on a door. The resident answered, “Who is there?” The knocker replied, “It is I.” Nowadays, most would say the incorrect, “It is me.”
The “me” generation is really destroying the language. You hear things like, “Me and John went to the store.” You rarely hear the correct, “John and I went to the store.” I was taught that you show politeness by placing yourself last. But that isn’t true of the “Me, Me, Me,” generation.
Let’s examine this scientifically, logically and rationally. Greta wants to end Global Warming. That would bring cold and crop failures. Therefore, Greta is a witch.
Is she also made of wood?
Yes, but does she float ?
Yes, but she won’t fly!
So the Doom Pixie is really a witch.
Its a good thing more volcanoes are erupting currently.Tossing in virgins helps the earth with sustainability. Just think of it as a two for one return. Fighting climate change and forcing planned parenthood all at once. Whats not for a leftist to like?
We have a relatively inexpensive means of quickly reducing the earth’s global mean temperature available to us, if we decide we want to use it. (Emphasis on relatively inexpensive.)
It is called solar geo-engineering through solar radiation modification (SRM). The concept is to inject 80 million tons of sulfur dioxide annually into the stratosphere thus blocking a portion of the sun’s energy from reaching the earth’s surface.
SRM could produce a reduction of 2C in GMT in less than a decade, mabe even as quickly as in five years, thus returning our climate to that of the Little Ice Age (LIA) which occurred between about 1400 and about 1750.
But there is this problem, you see. We could expect the unrestricted use of SRM to produce unwanted side effects such as crop failures and an increaded risk of cold weather deaths. SRM might even result in a resumption of the acid rain problems which have been solved by reducing SO2 pollution from our manufacturing and power producing industries.
Regardless of those risks, SRM is easily accomplished relatively speaking, assuming that we can find the 200 billion dollars (or so) annually needed to fund it.
In addition to the risk of an increased number of crop failures, what would happen if a return to a climate like that of the Little Ice Age produced more extreme weather events such as stronger hurricanes and more frequent and powerful tornados?
If these kinds of things began happening as a direct consequence of the SRM-induced return of a latter-day Little Ice Age, would we then see a repeat of the witch hunts of the 15th to 17th centuries?
Obviously not. Worse weather would be the overwhelming evidential clue that we were not putting enough stuff into the atmosphere. Double down!
It might be cheaper to hire otherwise unemployed people to stand around with a 1.5 m2 board on a long pole. Have a group of them stand around where you need them for a few hours at a time.
Then you need a couple of watchers for each to make sure measurerers are not sitting down on the job.
Then you need a couple of watchers for each watcher to make sure watchers are not sitting down on the job. Oh no… there’s another Shakespeare quote here, but I’m not going to watch the watchmen.
Hey, I think we’ve just come up with a workable Green Jobs initiative! Someone go tell AOC!
These people are dangerously serious about modifying the Earth’s climate. There is no evidence CO2 is doing what climate alarmists claim it is doing, yet these people are so delusional that they think they need to take action to cool the Earth’s climate.
We have some *seriously* deluded people in postions of power.
The article below is a very good explanation of the thinking on this subject going on in official government circles.
These people are crazy!
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/13/what-is-solar-geoengineering-sunlight-reflection-risks-and-benefits.html
“One option for an aerosol is sulfur dioxide, the cooling effects of which are well known from volcanic eruptions. The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, for instance, spewed thousands of tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, causing global temperatures to drop temporarily by about 1 degree Fahrenheit, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.”
end excerpt
https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1997/fs113-97/
The Cataclysmic 1991 Eruption of Mount Pinatubo, Philippines
Nearly 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide were injected into the stratosphere in Pinatubo’s 1991 eruptions, and dispersal of this gas cloud around the world caused global temperatures to drop temporarily (1991 through 1993) by about 1°F (0.5°C).”
end excerpt
Mount Pinatubo put 20 million tons of SO2 into the atmosphere which amounted to a temperature decrease of about 0.5C.
The Climate Changers want to put 80 million tons of CO2 in the atmosphere annually.
SO2
Pinatubo basically ended our bases in the Philippines. After the eruption the Air Force just packed their bags and left Clark. The Navy tried to clean up the Cubi runway. However, when the Philippines increased the rent, even the Navy left.
“There is no evidence” The (adjusted) temperature records plus CO2 correlations might not be honest evidence but are evidence for people who want them to be. No need to post a plot of pirates versus cell phones to prove radio waves cause piracy or whatever. AGW proponents know that many AGW opponents think the data is crap and the correlation is coincidental but for them it counts as evidence.
“but for them it counts as evidence”
It has to count as evidence because that’s all the climate alarmists have. Otherwise, they wouldn’t have anything to talk about.
In Spain, there were very few witch killings as the Inquisition protected innocent citizens and demanded evidence, not just testimony. And if the Inquisition trial resulted in a conviction there was no financial gain for the accusers, removing the incentive.
Then, Spain had (and has) better weather, so less incentive to find scapegoats.
Between the 16th and 19th centuries, the Spanish Inquisition carried out 125,000 proceedings, that resulted in 59 convictions, although fewer were killed because the proceedings took so long that some of them had died of natural death by the time they were convicted. In Italy, there were 36, and in Portugal, 4. Over that time in Northern and Central Europe 50,000 women were put to death due to convictions by civilian tribunals.
So much for having a black legend.
A modern inquisition would protect skeptics, as we are being condemned in the public view without a right to defend or appeal.
Whoever is interested. There is a 2017 study on witch trials where the bad-weather hypothesis doesn’t fare too well. It rests more on religious and economic issues.
Leeson & Russ, 2017
Story Tip..
Interesting paper.. Net Zero will cause warming. 🙂
A ‘Major Surprise’ Nature Study Finds Phasing Out Fossil Fuels Will Lead To Decades Of Warming (notrickszone.com)
UAH out for October… +0.93. (from +0.90
Australia down to +0.62C (from +1.17)
Let the CO2 witch hunt continue ! 😉
But first look at the maps for the last 6 months and see if you can see where the main warming has been.
It’s hanged, not hung.
Good catch.
Why does this keep popping up. The myths about witches is history’s climate change.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malleus_Maleficarum
It was made canonical law that accusing somebody of being a witch was heretical more than 500 years earlier.
Anybody with this amount of knowledge in history would know that persecution of witches was a Protestant thing, and it’s extent was exaggerated. Now read the above again.
A figure of 9 million witches executed was made up in the 1950s. Even the figures of 30 to 50,0000 are the result of taking dubious claims from Protestant Scotland, for example, and extrapolating to Catholic areas with no documented cases.
The Inquisition did not push for charges of heresy (or pretending to be a witch). It was set up because people were being unfairly convicted of heresy by secular rulers. The Spanish Inquisition differed in that it was controlled by the monarch.
Its been my bugbear since I came across a teacher wasting a week’s worth of science lessons pushing such propaganda. That Christopher Columbus showed the Church that that the world was not flat, in particular (pseudo history made up by a fairytale writer almost 200 years ago when the truth is that the Church taught that the world was a globe since St Bede).
I’ve come across a question on The Chaser asking which country was condemned in its entirety for heresy by the Spanish Inquisition. The answer should have been none. It’s an historical hoax based on one letter known to be a forgery.
I’ve come across a “strange but true historical fact” that Pope Gregory IX declared black cats satanic, wiping them out from Europe which led to more rats and the Black Death being more destructive. They later backtracked a little as Pope Gregory’s bull condemned initiation rituals, one of which was to have the initiated kiss the butt of a statue of a black cat. They still insisted that a misunderstanding back then (as if only 21st C readers would take their time to read things through properly) led to all black cats being wiped out. Even that part is completely fabricated. The Black Death killed as many in areas of Europe, Asia and North Africa that would not have taken any notice of a Catholic Bull.
I find it strange that WUWT is a stickler for science to be done correctly and honestly, but not so much when it comes to history.
Behringer (2004). Witches and Witch-hunts: a Global History. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 54–55.
Something that I found looking for a reference to the Catholic Church forbidding persecution of witches and it returning with Protestantism, not bad weather.
You can imagine how AI will reinforce the dooming as it trawls the internet for the ‘truth’ and is regurgitated by the stinkers in residence-
Australian academics apologise for false AI-generated allegations against big four consultancy firms | KPMG | The Guardian
Just another computer generated Cook-up.
History repeats, except now the witches are sceptics
See, the witch burning worked. They burned witches and the world warmed. As our politicians are so acutely aware, fantasy problems are so much easier to solve than real ones. We gave everyone the jab, locked the population down, everyone caught covid and the disease faded into the background. Accolades all around. All it took to beat Zika virus was a good round of news media hysteria. The H1N1 pandemic was defeated by a totally ineffective vaccine that was so efficacious that it worked in countries where it wasn’t even used. Y2K was defeated by a good bout of hand wringing. The world was handily saved from drowning in plastic by banning plastic straws in jurisdictions where plastic pollution was not an issue. A series of really scary documentaries dealt a death blow to coral collapse. Non fantasy problems such as slavery, collapse of various fresh and salt water fisheries, the rise of homelessness, failed states and the misery they perpetuate, sectarian violence, and other real issues have proven a little more recalcitrant. No wonder our leaders prefer to address fantasy problems
The “Encyclical” referred to by Gregory Wightstone was, in fact, a Bull. This is what the article about Innocent VIII on Wikipedia says about the Bull.
The bull was written in response to the request of Dominican Heinrich Kramer for explicit authority to prosecute witchcraft in Germany, after he was refused assistance by the local ecclesiastical authorities, who disputed his authority to work in their dioceses. Some scholars view the bull as “clearly political”, motivated by jurisdictional disputes between the local German Catholic priests and clerics from the Office of the Inquisition who answered more directly to the pope.
Nonetheless, the bull failed to ensure that Kramer obtained the support he had hoped for, causing him to retire and to compile his views on witchcraft into his book Malleus Maleficarum, which was published in 1487. Kramer would later claim that witchcraft was to blame for bad weather. Both the papal letter appended to the work and the supposed endorsement of Cologne University for it are problematic. The letter of Innocent VIII is not an approval of the book to which it was appended, but rather a charge to inquisitors to investigate diabolical sorcery and a warning to those who might impede them in their duty, that is, a papal letter in the by then conventional tradition established by John XXII and other popes through Eugenius IV and Nicholas V (1447–55).
(My emphasis)
As to why this article is published today on WUWT, I am a bit puzzled. It says nothing new. This has all been said before. Note that the sources used in the article are from 1999 and 2007.
Halloween?