NCAR Study: Otis Rapid Hurricane Intensification was Not Driven by Climate Change

From the National Center for Atmospheric Research, a breath of fresh air in explaining rapid intensification of hurricanes, without playing the climate blame-game. From the paper: Forecasting these “rapid intensification” events is a challenge, in part because we do not fully understand the science behind rapid intensification.– Anthony


SCIENTISTS FIND TWO WAYS THAT HURRICANES RAPIDLY INTENSIFY

New study may help forecasters better predict dangerous storms

Hurricanes that rapidly intensify for mysterious reasons pose a particularly frightening threat to those in harm’s way. Forecasters have struggled for many years to understand why a seemingly commonplace tropical depression or tropical storm sometimes blows up into a major hurricane, packing catastrophic winds and driving a potentially deadly surge of water toward shore.

Now scientists have shed some light on why this forecasting challenge has been so difficult to overcome: there’s more than one mechanism that causes rapid intensification. New research by scientists at the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) uses the latest computer modeling techniques to identify two entirely different modes of rapid intensification. The findings may lead to better understanding and prediction of these dangerous events. 

“Trying to find the holy grail behind rapid intensification is the wrong approach because there isn’t just one holy grail,” said NCAR scientist Falko Judt, lead author of the new study. “There are at least two different modes or flavors of rapid intensification, and each one has a different set of conditions that must be met in order for the storm to strengthen so quickly.”

One of the modes discussed by Judt and his co-authors occurs when a hurricane intensifies symmetrically, fueled by favorable environmental conditions such as warm surface waters and low wind shear. This type of abrupt strengthening is associated with some of the most destructive storms in history, such as Hurricanes Andrew, Katrina, and Maria. Meteorologists were stunned this week when the winds of Hurricane Otis defied predictions and exploded by 110 miles per hour in just 24 hours, plowing into the west coast of Mexico at category 5 strength.

Judt and his co-authors also identified a second mode of rapid intensification that had previously been overlooked because it doesn’t lead to peak winds reaching such destructive levels. In the case of this mode, the strengthening can be linked to major bursts of thunderstorms far from the storm’s center. These bursts trigger a reconfiguration of the cyclone’s circulation, enabling it to intensify rapidly, reaching category 1 or 2 intensity within a matter of hours.

This second mode is more unexpected because it typically occurs in the face of unfavorable conditions, such as countervailing upper-level winds that shear the storm by blowing the top in a different direction than the bottom.

“Those storms are not as memorable and they’re not as significant,” Judt said. “But forecasters need to be aware that even a storm that’s strongly sheared and asymmetric can undergo a mode of rapid intensification.”

The new study appeared in the Monthly Weather Review, a journal of the American Meteorological Society. It was funded by the U.S. Navy Office of Naval Research and by the U.S. National Science Foundation, which is NCAR’s sponsor. It was co-authored by NCAR scientists Rosimar Rios-Berrios and George Bryan. 

A SERENDIPITOUS FINDING

Rapid intensification occurs when the winds of a tropical cyclone increase by 30 knots (about 35 miles per hour) in a 24-hour period. Judt came across the two modes of rapid intensification when working on an unrelated project.

The discovery emerged after Judt produced a very high-resolution, 40-day computer simulation of the global atmosphere, using the NCAR-based Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS). That simulation, run at the NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputing Center, was designed for an international project comparing the output of leading atmospheric models, which have achieved unprecedented detail because of increasingly powerful supercomputers.

Once Judt produced the model, he was curious to examine storms in the simulation that rapidly intensified. By looking at a number of cases across the world’s ocean basins, he noticed that rapid intensification occurred in two distinct ways. This had not previously been apparent in models, partly because previous simulations captured only individual regions instead of allowing scientists to track a spectrum of hurricanes and typhoons across the world’s oceans.

Judt and his co-authors then combed through actual observations of tropical cyclones and found a number of real-world instances of both modes of rapid intensification. 

“It was kind of a serendipitous finding,” Judt said. “Just by looking at the storms in the simulation and making plots, I realized that storms that rapidly intensify fall into two different camps. One is the canonical mode in which there’s a tropical storm when you go to bed and when you wake up it’s a category 4. But then there’s another mode that goes from a tropical storm to a category 1 or 2, and it fits the definition of rapid intensification. Since nobody has those storms on their radar, that mode of rapid intensification went undetected until I went through the simulation.”

Meteorologists have long known that favorable environmental conditions, including very warm surface waters and minimal wind shear, can generate rapid intensification and bring a cyclone to category 4 or 5 strength with sustained winds of 130 mph or higher. In their new paper, Judt and his co-authors referred to that mode of rapid intensification as a marathon because the storm keeps intensifying symmetrically at a moderate pace while the primary vortex steadily amplifies.

Judt described Hurricane Otis as a fast marathon because it intensified symmetrically but at an unusually rapid pace, marked by an 80 mph increase in wind speed during a 12-hour period. 

The study team labeled the other mode of rapid intensification as a sprint because the intensification is extremely quick but generally doesn’t last as long, with storms peaking at category 1 or 2 strength and sustained winds of 110 mph or less. In such cases, explosive bursts of thunderstorms lead to a rearrangement of the cyclone and the emergence of a new center, enabling the storm to become more powerful — even in the face of adverse environmental conditions. 

The paper concludes that the two modes may represent opposite ends of a spectrum, with many cases of rapid intensification falling somewhere in between. For instance, rapid intensification may begin with a chain of discrete events such as a burst of thunderstorms that are characteristic of the sprint mode, but then transition into a more symmetrical mode of intensification that is characteristic of the marathon mode.

A question for future research is why bursts of thunderstorms can cause about 10% of storms in an unconducive environment to rapidly intensify, even though the other 90% do not, Judt said. 

“There could be a mechanism we haven’t discovered yet that would enable us to identify the 10 from the 90,” he said. “My working hypothesis is that it’s random, but it’s important for forecasters to be aware that rapid intensification is a typical process even in an unfavorable environment.”


Note: NCAR is working with NSF and NOAA to develop a next-generation radar, the Airborne Phased Array Radar (APAR) that can revolutionize our ability to understand and ultimately forecast high-impact weather events such as hurricanes. 

4.3 8 votes
Article Rating
20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 31, 2023 6:23 pm

in part because we do not fully understand the science behind rapid intensification

Cyclones are the dominant convective force in Earth’s atmosphere and convection is the dominant factor in Earth’s energy balance and the stability of the climate.

Cyclones can turn day into night and can pull 3C from the surface temperature of oceans they pass over.

How is it all possible to model Earth’s energy balance and climate in any useful way if you do not have a grasp of cycleones.

A while back I worked out that 100 days of cyclone activity redistributes heat equivalent to all the heat gain in the oceans over the past 68 years.

Tom Halla
October 31, 2023 6:44 pm

Sometimes, honestly saying “we don’t know” is the only honest response.

Bob B.
Reply to  Tom Halla
November 1, 2023 4:27 am

Much better than “we don’t know so it must be Climate Change”

Bryan A
October 31, 2023 8:14 pm

Still unsure where they measure Hurricane intensity.
Nullschool map never indicated winds above 68mph at ground level
Ventusky also only showed wind strength of no higher than 81 mph at 10 meters
You had to get to the 10,000′ level to find winds over 110 mph and gusts anywhere near Cat 4

John Hultquist
Reply to  Bryan A
October 31, 2023 8:29 pm

I think it is done remotely — from planes and/or satellite. The issue was discussed in comments here on WUWT when a storm came ashore in Florida. Like many things, this is estimated using a couple of metrics that do not equate to a person standing on a beach with an anemometer.

Bryan A
Reply to  John Hultquist
October 31, 2023 10:29 pm

I’d place my bet on Models.

Reply to  Bryan A
October 31, 2023 8:48 pm

Good question
Assessing Hurricane Intensity Using Satellites
‘The Dvorak technique estimates tropical cyclone intensity using satellite imagery. It was one of the first innovative applications of meteorological satellite imagery, and it is still widely used today at tropical cyclone forecast centres throughout the world (Velden et al. 2006). The Dvorak technique was developed in the early 1970s by Vernon Dvorak and his colleagues at NOAA NESDIS

https://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/resources/docs/DeMaria_Knaff_StarBook2013.pdf

No actual measurements are taken but interestingly they do have error and the intial manual techniques are now ‘automated’
maybe the automated system provides a range of wind speeds and they just pick the highest

Editor
Reply to  Bryan A
November 1, 2023 2:15 am

These wind speeds are based on “Warning Intensity”, ie forecasts.

Often, as in the case of Otis, these are overestimated. Dvorak, for instance, only actually recorded 120 Kts, not the 145 Kts claimed:

http://rammb-data.cira.colostate.edu/tc_realtime/products/storms/2023ep18/dgtldvor/2023ep18_dgtldvor_202310250900.gif

AMSU was even less , around 100 KTs:

http://rammb-data.cira.colostate.edu/tc_realtime/products/storms/2023ep18/amsutspl/2023ep18_amsutspl_202310250600.gif

Editor
Reply to  Bryan A
November 1, 2023 2:26 am

Another factor to be aware of is that satellite wind speeds nowadays are grossly overestimated in comparison with pre-satellite hurricanes, when central pressure is compared.

Before satellites and hurricane hunters, hurricane windspeeds were normally estimated from the known central pressure.

Hurricane Idalia, which hit Florida thsi summer, had central pressure of 949Mb, and estimated wind speeds of 125 mph.
But there are many historical hurricanes with the same central pressure, which had much lower wind speeds, around 100 to 110 mph:

comment image

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2023/09/01/did-idalia-really-have-125-mph-winds/

In stark contrast to Idalia, the Great Miami Hurricane which wiped Miami off the map in 1926, had central pressure of 930Mb, but has the same estimated wind speeds as Idalia, 125 mph

Plainly there is something badly wrong about the way we measure winds now.

John Hultquist
October 31, 2023 8:36 pm

Speaking of winds — or lack thereof, …
The pacific northwest (the BPA energy balancing site) shows a lack of wind for the past 6 days.
It takes a big battery to fill in for the missing wind (called VER on the graph). In the PNW, that battery is hydropower. A little wind is expected Thursday evening.
BPA Balancing Authority Load and Total VER

KevinM
Reply to  John Hultquist
October 31, 2023 8:58 pm

Queue Sterling on the Heartland Institute Climate Round Table podcast. Paraphrase: You know who tried that? Germany. No wind for 7 days and they’re shutting down factories.

October 31, 2023 8:41 pm

This also a classic on weather computer model failure. As it didnt turn out as *predicted*

The NY Times went full Halloween Horror on this

‘Nightmare’ Hurricane Otis Developed in a Flash
despite the hurricane only doing what it always was going to do – but not predicted by their weather computer models

Twelve hours later, it had metastasized into Hurricane Otis, a Category 5 storm that slammed into the coast yesterday with winds of 165 miles per hour. Hurricane experts were shocked.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/26/climate/nightmare-hurricane-otis-developed-in-a-flash.html (paywall)

I suppose this wasnt predicted either
Acapulco ravaged by looting after Hurricane Otis

KevinM
Reply to  Duker
October 31, 2023 9:02 pm

Word choice: “metastasized

Not even correct usage, just reaching for a way to associate weather with emotional nastiness.

me·tas·ta·size /məˈtastəˌsīz/
verb

  1. (of a cancer) spread to other sites in the body by metastasis.
October 31, 2023 9:51 pm

No link to the paper is visible, it is from Science Daily

LINK

October 31, 2023 10:36 pm

Is this effect actually real – how long has it been known about – did hurricanes in the past do it?

Taking them as a real and modern feature, it would/could/easily be explained by the storm passing over something that caused anomalous heating of the water…

  • accumulations of muddy water out in the ocean
  • large algal blooms
  • large and unusual patches of seaweed (Sargassum)

Bursts of thunderstorms on the periphery would come from the storm ‘just missing’ the outfall from a single muddied river.
Or where the Gulf Stream rakes together lots of mud up and along the East Coast so as to create a narrow/concentrated river of mud – say at 100 or 200 miles offshore

IOW The storms suddenly intensify when they ‘suddenly’ come upon a concentrated source of heat energy
Especially that The Ocean is not one pristine lump of crystal clear water (ccw) and is a patchwork of dirt, algae, seaweed, debris from forest fires, escaped sewage, (natural and man-made) oil slicks.

These things all have different heat contents from ccw and when the
storm encounters them, ramps up or down its power output according.

Further complicated by contrails created both by aircraft and shipping
We know, or I hope we know, where all the aircraft flightpaths are – is there any correlation to where they are casting shadows on the water?
Where they do, the storm will ramp down, where they don’t it will ramp back up again

See what I’m seeing….
A denial of ‘ocean erosion’ in the exact same way there is total denial of ‘soil erosion’

sigh – If only we could all be such perfect-in-all-ways, butter-wouldn’t-melt angelic little cherubs: just as climate scientists are

Reply to  Peta of Newark
October 31, 2023 10:46 pm

its 05:45 in the morning, look what I wrote but didn’t realise…
(clock-changing ‘does me in’)

Re: Humongous lump of Crystal Clear Water

Don’t it just ride a coach & horses through the notion of ‘averaging’ – as done by scientists and skeptics alike?

That storms do do what they do (ramp up and down) trashes the usefulness of the average of anything that is real-world, natural and or alive.

Gaia is laughing at the whole damn, self important and childish, lot of us

November 1, 2023 2:05 am

Interesting. Then there’s the obvious fact that right smack in the path of Otis at 100° W as it headed north-northeast was a patch of very warm (31 C, 88 F) water just off the coast of Acapulco as a result of seasonal warming and El Niño. Or as Wikipedia prefers to say, “a combination of a record-warm September for Mexico, an ongoing El Niño, and the influence of Global Warming“. The Wikipedia reviewers never fail to shove in their Global Warming blather even though the global ocean warming trend according to UAH satellite telemetry is a paltry 1.2 C per century or 0.12 C per decade; a trend so small it can’t possibly contribute anything significant to hurricane intensification over the last couple decades.

So it might be the newly discovered influences, but certainly the large area of 31 C ocean that Otis tracked across was a big source of energy. The water temperature is rapidly diminishing now and if it had formed just a week or so later it probably wouldn’t have intensified nearly as much. See the animation at the link below for the last 30 days and pay attention to the area where 100° W longitude intersects with Mexico which is where Acapulco is.

comment image

coraltemp_v3.1_nwcl_20231024.jpg
Duane
November 1, 2023 4:28 am

First of all, the notion of “rapid intensification” is an arbitrary dividing line, which has no qualitative basis in the real world. Yes, some storms intensify faster than others do, due to multiple considerations including the ones cited in this study as well as others (such as the positions of atmospheric highs and lows that tend to steer cyclonic pathways, with or without wind shear).

Mariners and aircraft pilots and farmers and any others who make their living in the outdoor world have always seen a wide variety of storm pathways and rates of intensification that can appear random, and others that are not. Such the common mariner’s understanding of how storms build at sea, or come off the land in constricted waters like the Mediterranean Sea, and for thousands of years mariners have learned how to avoid the worst of the storms more often than not, but not with absolute precision or accuracy.

But just like the notion of a “bomb cyclone” is a trendy arbitrary classification that makes for scary media headlines (sorry – it is just a cyclone, and there are no bombs going off within it), these considerations do not lead to greater understanding. What we know as of today is that it is a combination of known phenomena and utter randomness that puts a given storm of a given size and given strength along a given pathway.

Tom in Florida
November 1, 2023 4:41 am

If you want to truly understand how wind speeds are calculated, use the “Discussion” tab at Weather Underground for each storm. That tab explains how they set the “wind speed.”
What I find from people is that too many believe that the maximum sustained wind speed is all around the center and think the entire circulation is at that speed. Max winds are usually only in a very tiny portion of the eye wall and those speeds fall off rapidly as you go out from the center. The reporting of that maximum speed is so that anyone in the path of that small area can take the necessary precautions. And lastly, most of the extensive damage is from storm surge/rain rather than just wind.

Greg S
November 1, 2023 8:39 am

“A question for future research is why bursts of thunderstorms can cause about 10% of storms in an unconducive environment to rapidly intensify, even though the other 90% do not, Judt said. ”

Chaotic systems.