United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) Covers-up UN failures by Blaming Climate Change!

By Jim Steele

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, responsible for providing humanitarian and developmental aid to children worldwide, is covering-up its abject failures by telling “heart-wrenching stories” that support the UN’s climate crisis propaganda. For example, a UNICEF study recently and deceptively announced from 2016 to 2021, “Weather disasters caused by climate change displaced 43 million children.”

UNICEF’s study focused on 4 climate related disasters finding “ninety-five percent of those displacements were caused by floods and storms.”  They further paved the way for future cover-ups by projecting, “Floods linked to overflowing rivers could spark 96 million child displacements in the next 30 years.” 

But climate changed has not caused more flooding! In fact overall, flooding has decreased!

Wasko (2019) reported, “Despite more sites around the world presenting increases in rainfall extremes than decreases, the opposite is true for flood magnitudes, with more sites exhibiting decreases rather than increases in flooding.” From the attached illustration, graphic (C), reveals the total area inundated by flooding has decreased over the past 2 decades despite rising CO2. Based on that and other contradictory statistics, Wasko concluded, “changes in rainfall may not be very well related to changes in flooding.” 

While floods are the largest threat to human habitat around the world, exposure to floods is not evenly distributed. From the attached illustration, graphic (A) shows the people of China, India and southeast Asia are the most vulnerable to flooding, in part due to their extremely large populations. China, India, and the Philippines alone experienced nearly 23 million displacements in six years. Furthermore, when we examine the locations where people are most exposed to flood danger and compare the locations experiencing increased precipitation trends, graphic (B), most of the children being displaced are not living in regions of increased precipitation.

So, the first question any critical thinker must ask is, why are there 43 million displaced children where rains and floods are less common?

One reason is poorer populations are more likely to move into flood prone habitat because that land is less coveted by the wealthy who don’t want their infrastructure exposed to natural flooding. Furthermore, the fertility of natural flood plains is advantageous for marginal farmers and fresh water is also more accessible. However, poorer populations are less likely to afford the costs of building adequate drainage and flood control infrastructure. Thus, people in flood plains are most susceptible to disaster when the inevitable flooding recurs. But such inevitable flooding has not deterred a growing population forced to live nearer natural danger.

While the total global population increased by 18.6% from 2000 to 2015,

the number of people living in observed inundated areas increased by 34.1%. Between 2000 and 2015, 58–86 million people, (or 23%–30% of the total flood-exposed population) were newly residing in inundated areas.  Yet only 13% of international disaster funds are allocated to preparedness, mitigation and adaptation.

If UNICEF truly wants to protect the world’s children from the tragedies of flooding displacement, then UNICEF should be working to alleviate families from being forced to live in natural flood plains, or help them build the needed infrastructure to adapt. And UNICEF must stop trying to cover-up their failures by blaming a climate crisis. But it seems most governments are indeed blaming a non-existent climate crisis on their worthless policies that do very little to solve the people’s real problems.

4.9 17 votes
Article Rating
28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 10, 2023 10:22 pm

Repeat it enough and people will believe it according to Joseph Goebbels.

Bruce P
Reply to  DMacKenzie
October 11, 2023 5:18 am

Goebbels was just repeating what he learned from Edward Bernays, coiner of the word “propaganda” for Woodrow Wilson’s Committee for Public Information. Progressives in Italy, Germany and the US all sing from the same hymnal.

Pro tip aside: never use Google Bard or Chat GPT etc. for anything ever. The search engine that tracks your key words is bad enough, now they have access to your entire internal thought processes. THERE IS NO NEW INFORMATION in AI, only some kind of conglomeration of what is on the internet. Add to that the programmed-in biases of the Google “do no evil unless it helps the Democrats” team and you have pure propaganda customized to you!

Apparently, it is not bad enough to addict innocents to fake socialization on social media sites. At least there, some of the time some of the comments are not from robots. Now they want to addict us to 100% fake socialization <i>using what looks like actual social interaction</i>. If there is anything more evil than this without actual weaponry, I can’t imagine it.

Bob
Reply to  Bruce P
October 11, 2023 11:38 am

For the life of me I can’t understand why more people aren’t concerned about where AI gets it’s information.

strativarius
October 11, 2023 12:10 am

Breaking news…

Massive fire destroys up to 1,200 cars in multi-storey car park at Luton Airport
The furious blaze broke out at a newly built multi-storey car park beside the airport’s Terminal 2 building, when a car on the third level burst into flames just before 9pm yesterday.
https://metro.co.uk/2023/10/11/luton-airport-car-park-fire-flights-suspended-firefighters-hospital-19643477/

Sounds like an EV

Reply to  strativarius
October 11, 2023 1:18 am

Marshmallows.

Reply to  HotScot
October 11, 2023 5:27 pm

Not in lithium exothermic emissions!

atticman
October 11, 2023 1:20 am

Story tip:- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-67075159

What’s the betting an EV started all this?

Reply to  atticman
October 11, 2023 2:40 am

It’s said, a Diesel seems to have startet the fire.
Who will believe it ?

Reply to  Krishna Gans
October 11, 2023 3:48 am

Most likely an electrical fault in that case. Diesel Range Rover apparently, not the most reliable of vehicles

Reply to  Ben Vorlich
October 11, 2023 5:36 pm

I doubt an electrical fire of carpet, seating and plastics is hot enough to ignite nearby EVs.
It would require a can of gasoline in the back seat to get flames that reach feet to the next car.

October 11, 2023 3:01 am

The UN is well past it’s sell by date – it’s stuffed with self serving shills, spending your money on their pet virtue signalling projects
Despite decades and billions of funding to save the children, save the poor, save the planet etc, all they’ve achieved is to make a few elites very rich and create a few more elites
The world would be a better, safer, more equitable place without these globalist shills (UN, WHO, WEF, IMF, WTO etc)

Reply to  Energywise
October 11, 2023 4:04 am

You left out IPCC.

Reply to  Oldseadog
October 11, 2023 4:58 am

It’s covered by UN

MarkW
Reply to  Energywise
October 11, 2023 8:29 am

The UN may have been a good idea, but it has NEVER lived up to the promises of it’s creators.

Trying to stop future wars is a good idea, however something like the UN was the worst way to go about it.

rah
October 11, 2023 4:01 am

“Climate Change” serves as an excuse for many failures in many different ways. It is getting to be right up there with the race card.

October 11, 2023 4:55 am

“If UNICEF truly wants to protect the world’s children from the tragedies of flooding displacement, then UNICEF should be working to alleviate families from being forced to live in natural flood plains, or help them build the needed infrastructure to adapt.”

It could also help families with birth control.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 11, 2023 5:00 am

The UN is not interested in helping anyone out of strife or poverty, there’s no money to be made if there is no global poverty
Like cancer research – a cure would be very, very costly to big pharma

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 11, 2023 8:30 am

Birth control has never slowed population growth.
The only way to do that is to help the populations become wealthy.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 11, 2023 12:25 pm

The Industrial Revolution has been responsible for lifting most of the world’s poorest out of poverty. The UN were not responsible for any aspect of the Industrial Revolution, but they are instrumental in trying to roll back all that humans have achieved.

Tom Halla
October 11, 2023 6:19 am

The UN was one of Franklin Roosevelt’s worst ideas.

MarkW
Reply to  Tom Halla
October 11, 2023 8:31 am

Did he have any good ones?

rah
Reply to  MarkW
October 11, 2023 9:10 am

I am no great fan of socialists, but give the Devil his due.

FDR

Began mobilization and refitting of the US military well before the US entered the war despite heavy opposition from isolationists.

Despite heavy political opposition he back Britian to the hilt during her darkest hour.

Sent three ships full of surplus arms to GB after their Army lost most of their arms at Dunkirk.

Fifty old four stacker Destroyers for 100 year leases on bases.

Lend Lease when Britain ran out of ready cash to pay for the arms.

Appointed Frank Knox, a republican, as Sec. of the Navy.

Having Marshal and King heading their respective services and generally treating the US military with a light touch and letting the Generals and Admirals run the war instead of trying to play general himself or having a bunch of whizkids advise him.

When he did step in, it was generally to good effect. Forcing Marshal to carryout Torch instead of allowing him to try a cross channel invasion in France before the US forces were ready. And stepping in during the Guadalcanal campaign to ensure that despite the Europe first policy, the effort at Guadalcanal would get priority for supplies and support until the island was secured.

No doubt FDR made mistakes but overall he was a very effective war time president.

IMO the single greatest mistake FDR made during the war was allowing New Dealers and Union heads too much power in the mobilization of US industry during the war. Truman, who would later become his VP, was a leading figure in pushing that crap as a congressman.

MarkW
October 11, 2023 8:23 am

Is there any UN agency that actually succeeds at it’s appointed task?

October 11, 2023 10:04 am

Also, when the UN claims these children were “displaced,” are they meaning permanent migration to another area, or is it simply escape from transient flooding, only to return to the same places?

I am displaced M-F when I leave home to go to work.

Bob
October 11, 2023 11:35 am

Very nice Jim. In my view the UN is completely worthless. I take that back it is worse than worthless because they waste billions/trillions of dollars that other worthwhile organizations could spend productively.

October 11, 2023 12:19 pm

UNICEF, the UN and the WHO did absolutely nothing about the severe disruption, and in some cases abandonment, of all the major childhood vaccination programmes because of the ‘importance’ rolling out experimental ‘vaccines’ with the primary intent of protecting the elderly. The overriding experience of medicine over the last 150 years is that focusing on childhood health is the best way to increase life expectancy. The two other pillars that underpin extended life expectancy are abundant and affordable food and energy. In fact these last two are probably more instrumental in increasing the chances of children surviving childhood. The major global vaccine programmes have not quite returned to where they were which means there should be a measurable increase in child mortality, and with the UN endorsed push to make cheep food and energy unaffordable this can only get worse.

One person who should take a large responsibility for the damage done to the health of children globally was Anaradha Gupte. At the start of the WHO declared pandemic she stated “Without equitable access to #COVID19 vaccines – something that #COVAX is built to ensure – the pandemic will continue to rage. After all, in a highly interconnected world, no one is safe unless everyone is safe.” She is, or was the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. This impossible to achieve slogan ended up being repeated globally:
UNHCR (UN Refugee Agency): “Statement: No-one is safe until everyone is safe – why we need a global response to COVID-19”
WHO: “No one is safe from COVID-19 until everyone is safe.”
UN: “No one is safe, until everyone is”
GAVI: “No one is safe until everyone is safe”
USGLC: “FACT SHEET: No One Is Safe Until Everyone Is Safe”
And…The FT/Euro News/Education International/ ‘No one is safe until everyone is safe’

The UN, WHO, WEF are not meritocracies. The large body of knowledge, including the best medical knowledge, that humanity uses to live and prosper was derived from meritocracy.

Walter Sobchak
October 12, 2023 8:25 am

The UN is a den of thieves, tyrants, and terrorists.

UN out US. US out of UN

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  Walter Sobchak
October 12, 2023 8:26 am

Where is the bloody edit button?

UN out of US. US out of UN