Essay by Eric Worrall
Following the embarrassment of record coral abundance in their endangered reefs, Aussie academics now claim their reefs are suffering “cryptic” diversity loss.
Coral reefs: How climate change threatens the hidden diversity of marine ecosystems
Published: August 24, 2023 7.22am AEST
Samuel Starko Forrest Research Fellow, The University of Western Australia
Julia K. Baum Professor of Biology, University of Victoria…
As climate change pushes corals beyond their limits, a key question is why different corals vary in their sensitivity to warm waters.
…
Using genomic tools, we identified three distinct types of Porites lobata on Kiritimati. These lineages, which may represent distinct species, are indistinguishable by eye but genetically different.
Such biodiversity is known as “cryptic diversity” or “hidden diversity.” Although cryptic diversity is widespread across corals, its ecological implications remain unclear.
Marine heat waves threaten cryptic diversity
We found that one genetic lineage of Porites was highly sensitive to the heat wave: only 15 per cent of its colonies survived compared to 50-60 per cent in the other lineages. Thus, even in a coral widely considered to be stress tolerant, heat waves can have hidden impacts, threatening diversity that is invisible to the naked eye.
…
Because interbreeding between cryptic lineages and species can offer a potential avenue for future adaptation, losses of genetic diversity could make a bad problem even worse by limiting future adaptation to changing environments.
…
Read more: https://theconversation.com/coral-reefs-how-climate-change-threatens-the-hidden-diversity-of-marine-ecosystems-211007
The abstract of the study;
Marine heatwaves threaten cryptic coral diversity and erode associations among coevolving partners
SAMUEL STARKO HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-9604-9188 , JAMES E. FIFER, DANIELLE C. CLAAR HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0003-2389-111X, SARAH W. DAVIES HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-1620-2278, ROSS CUNNING HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0001-7241-1181, ANDREW C. BAKER HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-7866-2587, AND JULIA K. BAUM HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-9827-1612 Authors Info & Affiliations
SCIENCE ADVANCES
11 Aug 2023
Vol 9, Issue 32Abstract
Climate change–amplified marine heatwaves can drive extensive mortality in foundation species. However, a paucity of longitudinal genomic datasets has impeded understanding of how these rapid selection events alter cryptic genetic structure. Heatwave impacts may be exacerbated in species that engage in obligate symbioses, where the genetics of multiple coevolving taxa may be affected. Here, we tracked the symbiotic associations of reef-building corals for 6 years through a prolonged heatwave, including known survivorship for 79 of 315 colonies. Coral genetics strongly predicted survival of the ubiquitous coral, Porites (massive growth form), with variable survival (15 to 61%) across three morphologically indistinguishable—but genetically distinct—lineages. The heatwave also disrupted strong associations between these coral lineages and their algal symbionts (family Symbiodiniaceae), with symbiotic turnover in some colonies, resulting in reduced specificity across lineages. These results highlight how heatwaves can threaten cryptic genotypes and decouple otherwise tightly coevolved relationships between hosts and symbionts.
Read more: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adf0954
The researchers are suggesting heatwaves are killing corals and symbionts which don’t have heat stress genes, potentially leading to loss of the genetic diversity vital to the future survival of the coral.
In my opinion, the paleo evidence does not support the assertion that observed temporary shifts in genetic abundance are any kind of threat to the world’s coral reefs.
Corals are one of the most ridiculously resilient organisms on the planet. They sailed straight through the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event which killed the dinosaurs. Although adult corals are immobile, coral colonies regularly spawn countless microscopic and highly mobile larvae, through sexual reproduction, which seek out and colonise new sites. No doubt many of those larvae contain mutations or novel genetic combinations, which sometimes assist the larvae in colonising new sites.
Coral’s shield against adversity is their immense genetic diversity, and the mobility of their spawn – neither of which is threatened by temporary shifts in the relative abundance of different genetic alleles.
You may not be interested in cryptic diversity, but cryptic diversity is interested in you.
its just australia, let the damn reef die already
Erm it’s not Australia, Mosh – Kiritimati isn’t even in the same hemisphere as Australia.
Except its growing very well. Near record coral and coverage.
Poor moosh, always the ignorant one.
You know the busybody ecofreak doomsters just can’t help themselves Mosher-
Scientists are intentionally bleaching and ‘cryopreserving’ coral (msn.com)
The irony of burning fossil fuels for all that ‘noble cause’ make work programs is completely lost on them.
Creating imaginary subspecies is a great way to get that extinction rate up to alarmist-approved levels.
How do they get away with publishing such drivel?
Because I have an interest in sea surface temperature (https://www.bomwatch.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GBR_SST-study_Aug05.pdf), I thought the paper may have contained some up-to-date SST data. But it doesn’t.
I tracked some of the supporting citations, and ditto, or should I say zippo, zilch. The warming proposition is actually based on NOAA satellite data and further back I came across a study by one of the Authors (Danielle C. Claar) who undertook a very crude correlation study in which she claimed high-level (1:1) linear correlation between 5-years of observed data vs the same 5-years of NOAA nighttime SST data for grid-cells covering Kiritimati. Then, having established that, based on hind-sight to 1985, the collection of papers enthusiastically declared that “Transformation of coral communities subjected to an unprecedented heatwave is modulated by local disturbance” (Baum et al., Sci. Adv. 9, eabq5615 (2023) 5 April 2023). This paper then backgrounds “how heatwaves can threaten cryptic genotypes and decouple otherwise tightly coevolved relationships between hosts and symbionts”.
Sounds like a nitpick; however, raw correlation (Pearsons) as well as linear regression presume data are free of a common factor that imparts autocorrelation – the prediction of one value within each dataset, by another factor common to both. The common factor in this case is the annual cycle.
As SST is low in winter and warm in summer, datasets move up and down in unison, which grossly inflates correlation of one series with the other. While I don’t have the data, if the cycle were removed there would be no correlation, and their foundation argument would fall apart. They say (on P2) “the coral atoll Kiritimati experienced some of the highest levels of accumulated heat stress ever documented on a coral reef, rivalled only by nearby Jarvis Island during this same time period (49)”. Ref 49 is the Baum et al paper mentioned above.
Cheers,
Dr Bill Johnston
http://www.bomwatch.com.au
Some mysterious phenomenon…
Where are Dana Scully and Fox Mulder when you need them?