Climate Alarmists Respond to the Global Warming Pause

Essay by Eric Worrall

The oceans swallowed my global warming? Desperate butt covering from alarmists who are facing increasingly embarrassing questions about the failure of the world to end.

14 July 2022  16:41

Factcheck: No, global warming has not ‘paused’ over the past eight years

A decade ago, many in the climate community were fixated on an apparent “pause” in rising global surface temperatures. So many studies were published on the so-called “hiatus” that scientists jokedthat the journal Nature Climate Change should be renamed Nature Hiatus. 

However, after a decade or so of slower-than-average warming, rapid temperature rise returned in 2015-16 and global temperatures have since remained quite warm. The last eight years are the warmest eight years since records began in the mid-1800s.

While the hiatus debate generated a lot of useful research on short-term temperature variability, it is clear now that it was a small variation on a relentlessly upward trend in temperatures.

But nearly a decade later, talk of a “pause” has re-emerged among climate sceptics, with columnist Melanie Phillips claiming in the Times this week that, “contrary to the dogma which holds that a rise in carbon dioxide inescapably heats up the atmosphere, global temperature has embarrassingly flatlined for more than seven years even as CO2 levels have risen”.

This falsehood appears to be sourced from a blog post by long-time climate sceptic Christopher Monckton, which claims to highlight the lack of a trend in global temperatures over the past eight years.

In a rebuttal letter to the Times, Prof Richard Betts – head of climate impacts research at the Met Office Hadley Centre and University of Exeter – points out that it is “fully expected that there will be peaks of particularly high temperatures followed by a few less hot years before the next new record year”.

In fact, the last eight years have been unusually warm – even warmer than expected given the long-term rate of temperature increases – with global temperatures exceeding 1.2C above pre-industrial levels. The temperature record is replete with short-term periods of slower or more rapid warming than average, driven by natural variability on top of the warming from human emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. 

There is no evidence that the past eight years were in any way unusual and the hype around – and obvious end of – the prior “pause” should provide a cautionary tale about overinterpreting year-to-year variability today.

…

Human-emitted greenhouse gases trap extra heat in the atmosphere. While some of this heat warms the Earth’s surface, the vast majority – around of 93% – goes into the oceans. Only 1% or so accumulates in the atmosphere and the remainder ends up warming the land and melting ice. 

…

Most years set a new record for ocean heat content, reflecting the continued trapping of heat by greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The figure below shows that annual OHC estimates between 1950 and present for both the upper 700m (light blue) and 700m-2000m (dark blue) depths of the ocean.

…

Read more: https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-no-global-warming-has-not-paused-over-the-past-eight-years/

Lord Moncton apparently stirred the hive by publishing a few articles on the growing pause, like this article from three weeks ago.

His article on the last 6 years are entertaining because, where’s the warming? Wasn’t there supposed to be a hockey stick or something? Oh yeah, it disappeared into the ocean depths, allegedly.

The last 172 years, since 1850, temperatures have risen a little. Except for that period between the 1940s to 1970s, when the drop in global temperature triggered climate scientists like Stephen Schneider to suggest we should use nuclear reactors to melt the polar ice, to prevent an ice age. Schneider later claimed he’d made a mistake, and went on to become a global warming activist.

But that context doesn’t stop in 1850.

Looking before 1850, there were notable warm periods during the last few thousand years, like the medieval warm period, Roman Warm Period and Minoan Warm Period, which look suspiciously like our current modern warm period, except back then people didn’t drive automobiles.

Going back further, 9000-5000 years ago, during the Holocene Optimum, the sea level was around 2m higher than today, so it was probably pretty warm back then as well.

20,000 years ago, much of the world was covered by massive ice sheets.

Three million years ago, the world was so warm Antarctica was mostly ice free – until the onset of the Quaternary glaciation, which we are still enduring today. To put the Quaternary Glaciation into context, the Quaternary is one of only five comparable great cold periods which have been identified over the last two billion years.

55 million years ago was the Palaeocene – Eocene thermal maximum, an extremely warm period of such abundance our primate ancestors spread throughout much of the world.

When you take a more complete look at the context, rather than the limited 172 year / 0.0000086% of climate history Carbon Brief seems to want you to focus on, there is nothing unusually warm about today’s global temperatures. Even if further global warming does occur, if those little primate ancestors with walnut size brains could manage to thrive in the Palaeocene – Eocene thermal maximum, I’m pretty sure we could figure out how to cope with a small fraction of the warming they enjoyed.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.8 63 votes
Article Rating
471 Comments
Scissor
July 21, 2022 10:02 am

Whatever happens, they make something up, like “safe and effective.”

Tom Halla
July 21, 2022 10:06 am

What got me involved in following climate change was the attempt with MBH98 to make the LIA and Medieval Warm period go away, and pretend all climate change is anthropogenic. Mann has still not retracted that atrocity.

JCM
July 21, 2022 10:16 am

Dennis says we’re in another “hiatus”, in Dessler’s ECS & Cloud Feedback symposium at this point in the video, posted earlier in April 2022. Nobody argued. It is being discussed by the academics and it’s widely acknowledged.

https://youtu.be/aQznFJ9eVrk?t=2187

July 21, 2022 10:23 am

 Except for that period between the 1940s to 1970s, when the drop in global temperature …
_____________________________________________________________

A simple plot of the January-December Annual Mean from GISTEMP LOTI shows that Temperature also dropped from about 1880 to 1910 which is never explained.

Richard M
July 21, 2022 10:26 am

Fact checkers seem to always leave out important … facts.

What about the PDO shift in 2014? It completely explains the warming that led to the “rapid temperature rise”. Since then there’s been a 7 year cooling trend of nearly 0.2 C / decade. We are already returning back to the situation prior to 2014 and with the AMO about ready to change into its cool phase, the cooling will only accelerate.

comment image

Matt G
July 21, 2022 10:28 am

The only difference between the two pauses has been the strong El Nino in 2015 and data manipulation of global temperature sets like GISS, HADCRUT4 and RSS trying to hide the decline.
https://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/uah6/from:1998/to:2015/plot/uah6/from:2016/plot/uah6-land/from:1998/to:2015/trend/plot/uah6/from:2016/trend

July 21, 2022 10:28 am

It might not be a pause…it might be topping out of the Modern Warming Period and a beginning of a return to Little Ice Age type climate….climate changes…none of us alive today will see the next bottom…..call it the Modern Cool Period beginning soon.

July 21, 2022 10:37 am

Monckton is a data mining fraud.
He hurts the cause of climate realists.
The UAH data begin in 1979.
He truncates data he does not like
to create meaningless short term trends.

“The (UAH) linear warming trend since January, 1979 still stands at +0.13 C/decade (+0.11 C/decade over the global-averaged oceans, and +0.18 C/decade over global-averaged land).”

Monckton cherry picks short term trends because he is biased.

There have been many short term flat trends since the latest
global warming trend began during the 1690s (coldest decade
of the Maunder Minimum period)

There was even a significant global cooling trend from 1940 to 1975,
which has since been “revised away”

Not one of those short term flat trends or the 1940 to 1975 global cooling
had an ability to predict the climate changes that followed. Global warming
continued even after the 1940 to 1975 cooling trend. Those trends were
meaningless variations within a longer term warming trend.

July 21, 2022 10:46 am

global temperatures have since remained quite warm

the last eight years have been unusually warm

Where is this spot that has been unusually warm for eight years?
I would like to plan an annual holiday there to get away from a miserable “quite warm” Dublin.

ResourceGuy
July 21, 2022 10:46 am

In the previous pause it took time to build up the alarmist narrative and get the science community to respond and issue statements. In the current pause, the dismissive response is pre-packaged without the science community.

CD in Wisconsin
July 21, 2022 10:46 am

“……with global temperatures exceeding 1.2C above pre-industrial levels.”

***************

Ignoring the Little Ice Age seems to be an ongoing and favorite tactic among the CAGW alarmists. It is far too inconvenient to admit we’ve been coming out of one since the 19th Century. What is the Earth’s climate supposed to do while coming out of the LIA?

Thought control and propagandizing like this is absolutely vital to maintaining the CAGW narrative as a smokescreen for the power and money to drive political and eco-activist agendas in environmentalism and politics. The alarmists are going to have a real problem on their hands if and when the Earth’s climate goes into a serious cooling period in the future.

July 21, 2022 10:53 am

Cripes, it’s difficult to keep up with what that ‘rebuttal’ is trying to say…
First we read this…

“the last eight years have been unusually warm – even warmer than expected”

Then we get this…

“There is no evidence that the past eight years were in any way unusual”

He doesn’t actually seem to rebut what Lord Monckton points out either. Monckton points out that the globe hasn’t heated over the last 7 years or so, and the ‘rebuttal’ simply says this isn’t unexpected, so he actually seems to agree.

Oh, Monckton doesn’t ‘claim’ there’s been no warming over the last 7 years or so, he’s simply making an observation.

The professor seems to be going out of his way to avoid using certain words.
E.g… “a few less hot years”
Why not just say ‘cooler’?

I wonder if alarmists like the professor get lessons on what language to use, what words to avoid, that sort of thing.

ResourceGuy
July 21, 2022 10:55 am

The Climate Agenda Media Industrial Complex better package a lot more denial-of-thinking assaults because I don’t think a super El Nino is going to save them this time.

July 21, 2022 11:14 am

Eric, do you never get embarrassed publishing that GISP2 chart?

For well over a decade now it’s been pointed out, probably hundreds if not thousands of times, that the GIPS2 data stop around 1855, not 2000, as claimed (again) on the chart title.

So it misses out on the entire modern period of warming.

To Eric and ‘skeptics’ in general: is this really the best you can come up with?

jeff corbin
July 21, 2022 11:16 am

“Global warming” was the popular vernacular in the media prior to the “The Pause” after the deep minimum of the 23rd cycle which ended 2009-2010. Soon after, there was a terminology shift from “Global Warming” to “Climate Change” in the popular media. In the “global warming” days the risk was related to increasing temperatures. Since 2010, anthropomorphic climate change has become the center of the hermeneutic for interpreting all extreme weather events and anything else wrong with world. The movement departed it’s weak science and launched it self, fully leveraged by people who have no common cause with truth, into a full fledged propaganda campaign of revolution. The movement is impervious to the facts of of logic, because they know what the problem is… it’s us! If we are the problem, then there is a reason to control us, disenfranchise us, (the global masses) because the threat is ever imminent and pervasive. It was always a political movement with a bit of science, now it is a revolution.

July 21, 2022 11:21 am

Rough estimates (climate reconstructions) of pre-1850 local climates in the era of nearly 100% natural causes of climate change, can not be used to explain the long term effect of a manmade +50% CO2 increase since 1850.

rbabcock
July 21, 2022 11:22 am

If Greenland is the bellwether, the trend is toward cold. We are at the bottom of the melt curve and from here on out, melting will slow and turn to accumulation around 4 to 5 weeks from now. If you look at where we stand compared to averages not a lot of melting has happened to date, and if you look at the snow forecast for the next week over the island, not a lot of melting will happen short term.

So at NASA’s estimate of 350GT = 1mm of sea level, it looks like Greenland all by itself will take out 1.25mm this season (Sept – Aug). Throw in the Southern Hemisphere has been really cold this winter season including high snowfall totals, things are going to get dicey here.

July 21, 2022 11:33 am

However, after a decade or so of slower-than-average warming, rapid temperature rise returned in 2015-16 and global temperatures have since remained quite warm. The last eight years are the warmest eight years since records began in the mid-1800s.

never forget Hansen predicted “business-as-usual” temps would rise by around 2 degrees by now, as opposed to the half-degree we actually got

July 21, 2022 11:38 am

Fact check the fact check of the fact check. That is the problem. No. The problem is that accepted “science” requires demonstrable proof not model projections (from models known to not represent the empirical real data. Showing demonstrable cause and effect is hard, requiring a lot of data and a lot of effort. And unbiased researchers not researchers on the payroll.

Duane
July 21, 2022 11:55 am

So all that carbon “goes into the oceans” – so whaddya spose happens to all that carbon in the oceans? Does it heat the oceans?

Hmm, what do all those trillions of tons of carbonate-based sea life do, both the living critters and their long dead ancestors? Oh, now I remember, they form coral reefs and coral-based “sands” that cover much of the sea bottom and islands in the tropical zones. And others get eaten by animals higher up the food chain .. while still gazillions of tons (about 5% of the total mass of the Earth’s crust) of that carbon get turned into limestone.

July 21, 2022 11:57 am

I’ve pointed this out before, even if the pauses/slowdowns are temporary, each one is causing the secular trend to continue diverging from the models. Each 10 or 15 year pause just means that the temperature would have to surge impossibly fast just to catch up to the predictions. So we have a really slow rebound from the LIA that neither agriculture nor the biosphere will have any trouble with.

Carlo, Monte
July 21, 2022 12:16 pm

The trendologists won’t like this one, prepare for more whining.

Editor
July 21, 2022 12:29 pm

The Global Average Surface Temperature of Earth still has not risen to the expected Earth-like Temperature of 15°C. We are still at 14.9xxxx maybe.

AlanJ
July 21, 2022 12:52 pm

If one is careful enough in the selection of one’s time periods, one could say the entire observed modern warming period is nothing more than a series of pauses and coolings.

comment image

Quite remarkable. This present pause is surely going to be the warmest of all the pauses until the next one.

July 21, 2022 1:07 pm

Hausfather makes the claim for the graph of the Berkley Earth temp data:
“this chart highlights a distinct acceleration in the rate of surface temperature change after the 1970s”
I checked some of the numbers on the chart and decided to have a bit of fun.
I took two 40 year periods:
1904 to 1944 (Before our CO2 emissions were supposed to be making much of a difference) and 1981-2021 (end of 70s to present day, when our emissions are supposed to be burning the earth to a crisp)

1904 to 1944
-0.20 deg – 0.51 deg
temp change = 0.71 deg

1981 to 2021
0.67 deg – 1.21 deg
temp change = 0.54 deg

If Zeke wants to pick the 1970s (handily low temps) as his starting point to prove we are accelerating towards thermageddon, I can pick the starting points of other periods to demonstrate the opposite. In other words, the whole eco-zealotry is just cherry picked rubbish.

BTW before you all pile on, don’t get too carried away with the method behind my calculations – it was just for a bit of a giggle.

1 2 3