An excellent presentation from David Siegel
May 25: This is a new, updated video after getting feedback on the previous videos. This is by far the best climate video I have ever made. It’s a 40-minute class on climate science.
http://www.climatecurious.com/
But there is increasingly little doubt that human-caused warming is heating ocean-surface temperatures, which fuel big storms. The result appears to be stronger hurricanes.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/29/another-monster-hurricane-season-looms-we-dawdle-climate-change/
I’m pretty sure the quantum physics of the CO2 Molecule will debunk that claim. Any physicist in cross-examination will be able to destroy that claim, or they can simply show Jim Steele’s or David Seigel’s video. This whole house of cards relies on the jet stream keeping clouds from forming over the oceans and the oceans to continue to warm. Once the PDO or other ocean oscillation changes that, temperatures will start falling again.
Hi David Segal
Many thanks for the great presentation.
I have been particularly concerned about the fact the CO2 is pretty well saturated at ~400ppm in its warming effect. This immediately leads to the devastating result for alarmists that any CO2 Global temperature effect from now on is an entirely non-existent problem.
I wish we could get this point across to the policy makers who are busy undermining and self-harming the economies of the Western world for no good reason, except possibly for the geopolitical benefits to Russia and China.
I too have been looking at this amazing deception for some15+ years.
You may find this graphic helpful I hope so.
Other posts on my site https://edmhdotme.wordpress.com may also be useful for you.
I was surprised that you did not mention the short term ~50 year effects that might be expected from changes in current Solar activity
I many thanks for the great effort
Very well done.
I think clouds, which are condensed matter, do far more in the retention of thermal energy in the atmosphere. than H20 vapor by orders of magnitude. They also reflect the input significantly. Add the two together and you have a major key to atmospheric and global warming.
Anyone who is trying to make a skeptical case ought to stop saying things like “It is getting warmer, and no one really disputes that”, or any words to that effect.
Plenty of people dispute it.
Saying it is getting warmer without providing prior context is highly misleading, and is all anyone convinced by warmistas of imminent Armageddon needs to hear. They will stop listening at that point and tune everything else out. Besides for that, to make a blanket statement that Earth is warming is arguably false, because of several things not said.
Where is it warming? Not everywhere, and in some places it is cooling.
Over what time period? One can find evidence of warming in some spots and at some time scales, but the opposite, cooling, at other spots and other time scales.
I only got a couple of minutes into the video and had to stop to make this comment, because by this point…the point of saying it is warming and no one really disputes that…it is already wrong.