Another study in the science genre of: The Bleedin’ Obvious
A real study in frontiers in Conservation Science, determines that gorillas drink more water when it’s hot.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Conserv. Sci., 10 March 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2022.738820
Introduction
Water has numerous essential roles for animals, such as being a medium for chemical reactions to occur, a transporter of metabolic and waste products, a lubricant and shock absorber (Robbins, 1983; Jéquier and Constant, 2010). In addition, water plays a vital role in thermoregulation (National Research Council, 2003; Mitchell et al., 2009; Jéquier and Constant, 2010; Withers et al., 2016). Maintaining water balance is a major homeostatic objective and critical for growth, reproduction and survival (Karasov and del Rio, 2020). Water requirements are influenced by several factors, such as climatic conditions, diet and metabolic rates (Robbins, 1983; Jéquier and Constant, 2010; Karasov and del Rio, 2020).
Terrestrial animals gain water from food (preformed water), metabolic water resulting from the oxidation of macronutrients and through drinking water (Robbins, 1983; Jéquier and Constant, 2010). Most animals rely on free-standing water sources, but some are able to obtain most of their water needs from metabolic and preformed water (Withers et al., 2016). Understanding how animals obtain and use water is particularly important in the face of climate change, as increasing global temperatures and more extreme weather events are predicted to influence water availability and can have a negative impact on animals’ ability to maintain homeostasis (Hetem et al., 2014; Fuller et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019).
Increasing temperature leads to the increased need for evaporative cooling, particularly in endotherms, which requires water (National Research Council, 2003; Withers et al., 2016; Mitchell et al., 2018; Karasov and del Rio, 2020). To compensate for increased water loss when temperatures are high, animals often increase the amount of water consumption (Adams and Hayes, 2008; Dias et al., 2014; Harris et al., 2015; Mella et al., 2019; Chaves et al., 2021). Animals may also increase water drinking during dry periods, which coincide with the times of highest temperature in some areas (Harris et al., 2015; Mella et al., 2019). In addition, the water content of foods may be lower during times of low rainfall and so animals may need to supplement water intake with drinking (Fuller et al., 2016). Animals may also prioritize water rich foods to supplement preformed water intake during periods of low rainfall (Ciani et al., 2001; Sato et al., 2014).
Decreased water availability has been shown to drive increased mortality rates in several species (Cayton and Haddad, 2018; Riddell et al., 2019; Young et al., 2019; Campos et al., 2020). In contrast, rainforest dwelling species may obtain most or all of their water requirements from their diet (Karasov and del Rio, 2020). However, increasing temperatures may lead to increased water drinking as a means to thermoregulate and avoid dehydration (Dias et al., 2014; Chaves et al., 2021). Monitoring changes in water drinking behavior can serve as an early warning indicator of the impacts of climate change as the duration of dry spells and temperatures increase.
A considerable proportion of primate species (22%; 134 of 604) are predicted to be vulnerable to the impacts of drought (Zhang et al., 2019). Moreover, primate habitats are predicted to experience 10% more warming than the global mean increase in temperature, with 86% of primate species likely to experience increases of over 3°C in maximum temperatures by 2050 (Graham et al., 2016; Carvalho et al., 2019). Higher elevation regions are also experiencing faster increases in temperature than lower elevation ones (Wang et al., 2016). Given the vulnerability of primates to dry spells, it is vital to look for indicators of physiological stress in endangered species, such as changes in the occurrence of water drinking caused by climate change (Chapman et al., 2006; Bernard and Marshall, 2020).
Understanding how endangered mountain gorillas obtain and use water is particularly warranted as they are vulnerable to the risk of extinction for a number of reasons. Only around 1,000 individuals remain in two small isolated mountaintop islands of Uganda, Rwanda, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo over an area of approximately 784 km2 (Eckardt et al., 2019; Granjon et al., 2020). The slow life history of mountain gorillas limits their ability to evolve beneficial adaptions that are better suited to new climatic conditions sufficiently quickly to mitigate the detrimental effects of climate change (Robbins, 2011). Mountain gorillas are also geographically highly restricted due to intense human pressure surrounding their current habitat, such that they cannot disperse to other areas (Robbins, 2011).
Mountain gorillas generally obtain sufficient quantities of water from the vegetation they consume and they rarely drink water (Schaller, 1963). The water content of mountain gorilla foods is high, with most foods comprising between 60 and 90% water (Rothman et al., 2006; Grueter et al., 2016), with little seasonal variation (within-species) in the Virunga Volcanoes (Watts, 1998). Mountain gorilla habitat is characterized by bimodal rainfall distribution (heavier rains in March-May and lighter rains in September-November), with temperature mostly being a function of elevation and showing little seasonal variation (Polansky and Robbins, 2013; Seimon and Phillips, 2015; Diem et al., 2019; Eckardt et al., 2019). Both Uganda and Rwanda are already experiencing the impact of climate change with increasing temperatures and frequencies of extreme weather events (Safari, 2012; McGahey et al., 2013; Tenge et al., 2013; Nsubuga et al., 2014; Nsubuga and Rautenbach, 2018). Mean annual temperature increases of approximately 2.1°C have been recorded over the last 5 decades (McGahey et al., 2013; Nsubuga and Rautenbach, 2018). Future projections indicate that this trend is likely to continue, with increases of 1 to 2.5°C between 2000 and 2050 (Tenge et al., 2013; Nsubuga and Rautenbach, 2018). Furthermore, rainfall has become less seasonal, with both an increase in rainfall over time and increases in the duration of dry spells, trends that are likely to continue in the future (Kizza et al., 2009; McGahey et al., 2013; Diem et al., 2019; Salerno et al., 2019; Ojara et al., 2020).
To investigate if changes in climatic conditions could impact water drinking patterns of mountain gorillas, we examined water drinking behavior between 2010 and 2020 in the two remaining populations of mountain gorillas and correlated this to local maximum temperature and rainfall. We tested the prediction that mountain gorillas drink more often during hotter and drier periods. After observing notable differences in the frequency of water drinking between the two populations, we compared the water content of key foods between the two mountain gorilla populations to see if this could explain differences in their behavior.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcosc.2022.738820/full
Of course to get funding this frame was needed.
Undoubtedly, the direct impact of climate change is likely to be a bigger problem for species living in more arid environments that face reduced access to sufficient quantities of either free-standing sources of water or preformed water (Fuller et al., 2016; Cayton and Haddad, 2018; Mitchell et al., 2018; Wessling et al., 2018; Riddell et al., 2019; Young et al., 2019; Campos et al., 2020). Many avenues of future research into this topic remain to better determine how much of a risk increased temperature poses for the mountain gorillas. However, this study emphasizes that climate change may have negative consequences even for rainforest dwelling mammals that routinely obtain nearly all of their water from dietary items. This may be especially true for endangered species in small isolated populations which are vulnerable to drought and the risk of extinction.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcosc.2022.738820/full
I’ve always wondered why girls in Hawaii wear bikini’s on the beach. You think they’d give me some grant money to go conduct a study?
Call me if you need a colaborer!
Do you need a coauthor for that paper? I’m available.
Will it be hands on?
Do they know they are just props in a larger scheme?
I do hope that the gorillas are properly recycling all their empty plastic water bottles!
The monkeys inhabiting the cities and countryside of the world, and also those writing studies apparently, also drink more water when it’s hot. Occasionally beer too. I didn’t know this was a shocking idea to comprehend.
Gorillas in the Propaganda Mist
These pretzels are making me thirsty.
” Higher Maximum Temperature Increases the Frequency of Water Drinking in Mountain Gorillas ”
In humans too!…
And I suppose that also in dogs and other dry land animals. Got to design a research project to get money to confirm if that is true.
I just completed my own study that shows increasing government research funds produces more demand for funding among “scientists” that cannot make it in the free market.
And it got a 2.4 rating.
This is going beyond ridiculous. People are taking their little piece of the world and associating any changes with AGW. Is it because they want to feel “in” or is it because they know they’ll get noticed?
This is amazing. Gorillas are the first species ever known to drink more often in hotter and drier periods.
Unbelievable.
Please tell me these money grubbing devils didn’t get paid for this. This kind of nonsense needs to stop.
Is that fur? So politically incongruent. Evolve.
roflmao
++++++
Simply incredible for a near infinite number of reasons..
Primary reason being = Wouldn’t their efforts have been better directed discovering why the Human Ape doesn’t do that?
iow: Why do humans float around in a constant state of dehydration when it is one of the main reasons for hypertension and thereafter death from Cardio Vascular Disease – circa 20 million souls per year
Also massively implicated in Obesity## & Diabetes = another 20 or so mill pa
## Basically/simply, almost everyone nowadays confuses the ‘thirsty signal‘ from their tummies as a ‘hungry signal‘
Thus they go eat something rather than drink water, and when that ‘something’ is typically ever more carbohydrate (sugar) what they’re doing is tantamount to suicide.
ho hum
Am sure the big apes in the picture are thinking – Too Many Humans anyway
I would hazard a guess that it is because the Naked Ape evolved to run down, or continuously track a wounded animal, sometimes for days in a dry savanna, with little or no opportunity to even search for scarce water, and when ‘canteens’ had not yet been invented. Those that didn’t have the ability to survive dehydration starved to death instead of dying from cardiovascular complications.
The ‘thirsty signal’ can be satisfied by eating food with a high water content, such as most fruits, but especially citrus fruits. It is also probably better than water alone because some electrolytes are replaced.
This was cribbed from a 5th grade science project right?
There’s the clairvoyancy clause again.
Wasn’t it just last week when the warmunists declared here that trend predictions were never used in climate science?
It’s three more weeks to April 1st, right?
1) Start the Confirmation Bias with a debunked fallacy.
Worthless predictions.
2) pretend to perform science.
Pure bias.
a) measure nothing.
b) presume everything.
c) alleged comparisons are purely subjective assumptions.
d) Allege that perfectly normal behavior is proof of their absurd assumptions.
Reminds me of the common leftist canard that all pictures of polar bear proves they are starving. When they actually find a sick polar bear they make front page news blaming climate change.
Here is where the paper is logically wrong. The authors claim “ more extreme weather events are predicted to influence water availability and can have a negative impact on animals’ ability to maintain homeostasis”
Wrong. The purpose of homeostasis is to control excursions and allow ongoing life. If homeostasis for a particular animal group failed in design, the animals would die and the species would go extinct. The abundance of species right now indicates that homeostasis works fine. Geoff S
next study Do bears sh*t in the woods?
I find this above ,so called study, abysmally stupid
The Bee ????
In other shocking news, people eat more when they are hungry.
A good paper marred by a regrettable and frankly silly link to the climate hysteria.