Washington Post: Google Busted Supporting Climate Heresy

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

According to the Center for Countering Digital Hate, Google is failing to honour their pledge to prevent climate deniersblack magic sympathisers from purchasing advertising space on the Google advertising platform.

Google calls itself greenpure. But it’s still making ad money from climate-change denialpromoting evil

Researchers found Google’s ads on at least 50 posts undermining climate sciencewitch hunting, despite its pledge to ban misinformation

By Cat ZakrzewskiToday at 6:00 a.m. EST

In October, ahead of the U.N. COP 26 climateblack magic summit, Google pledged to stop displaying ads on websites and YouTube videos that promoted climate misinformationevil. But in November and December the company ran ads on at least 50 posts undermining climate sciencewitch hunting, according to new research.

The findings, released Thursday from the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate, highlight the limits of these promises, despite Google citing pressure from advertisers not wanting products to appear alongside content undermining climate sciencewitch hunting when it made the pledge. All 50 of the articles were published after Google’s new policy took effect on Nov. 9, and Google ads remained on the pages as of Wednesday morning. After The Washington Post inquired about these ads, 37 of them were removed as of Wednesday.

The problem isn’t limited to Google. Facebook in November said it was expanding efforts to boost accurate content about climate misinformationwitchcraft. But the research to be released Thursday from the left-leaning group Avaaz shows that between Jan. 1, 2020 and Nov. 11, the company allowed 92 ads containing climate misinformationevil to run. In some instances, the ads remained after Facebook’s fact-checking partners debunked the posts.

“It’s difficult to deny climate changewitchcraft because people can see it’s happening,” said Michael E. Mann, a professor of atmospheric science at Pennsylvania State University. In the face of this consensus, he said, denialism has gotten more sophisticated. “We’re seeing other tactics that have the same end purpose: to prevent us from moving away from fossil fuelsblack magic. … One of those tactics is division.”

Mann said though the most egregious forms of misinformation can probably be detected through automation, more human review is needed from tech platforms to deal with more “subtle” forms of misinformation. He argued climate misinformationwitchcraft is a greater threat than covid-19 misinformation, which companies have invested in combating, because it has the potential to cost more lives than the pandemic.

These social media companies are basically aiding and abetting this effort from bad actors to prevent us from acting from greatest challenge we face as a civilization,” said Mann, the author of “The New ClimateWitchcraft War.”

“ … Tech companies are still allowing climate denierswitch sympathisers to use their platforms to spread misinformation,” Khanna said. “Until that changes, we won’t be able to muster up the public support necessary to solve the climateblack magic crisis.”


Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/12/16/google-climate-change-denial-ads/

Just for fun, try replacing the phrase “climate denial” with “witchcraft” – or to see my version.

The Washington Post article is so anti-intellectual, you only need to substitute a few words and phrases, to convert the Washington Post climate rant into a hysterical anti-witchcraft bulletin which would not have seemed out of place in the 17th century.

5 31 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

108 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
December 16, 2021 10:09 pm

What in the hell is “undermining science”?

Isn’t that what Einstein did?

LdB
Reply to  Doonman
December 16, 2021 10:52 pm

There is no such thing as “undermining science” any actual journalist would have said they were “undermining belief in science”.

AGW is Not Science
Reply to  LdB
December 17, 2021 10:04 am

Translation – “undermining belief in bullshit.”

John Endicott
Reply to  Doonman
December 17, 2021 9:20 am

I’m pretty sure there were 100 scientists that thought so.

AGW is Not Science
Reply to  John Endicott
December 17, 2021 10:06 am

Well, 97 out of 100 – with the other thousands ignored and the 100 very cynically “selected” as supposedly being the only “relevant” ones by the perpetrators of the “survey” which supposedly, but really doesn’t, support overwhelming “consensus.”

AGW is Not Science
Reply to  Doonman
December 17, 2021 10:03 am

They really mean “undermining pseudo-science” – but will never admit THAT.

December 17, 2021 12:21 am

Michael Mann protests his innocence too much

December 17, 2021 1:43 am

Google is being fined $13.54 million in mid-March 2022 if it fails to comply with the Moscow Arbitration Court’s decision ordering it to unblock a Russian TV channel’s YouTube account which it blocked, it says because of sanctions, with no warning. The fine will escalate per day and week.

What happens if D.C. issues climate sanctions?
Is WaPo about to start another Russiagate Climategate, the reverse of the original?

Ed Zuiderwijk
December 17, 2021 1:54 am

The nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate. Housed next to the Ministry for Silly Walks. Only those are funnier.

Glen
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
December 17, 2021 9:44 am

Which is next to an empty cheese shop.

December 17, 2021 4:42 am

“It’s difficult to deny climate change because people can see it’s happening,” said Michael E. Mann

Such statement is unacceptable coming from a university professor, a researcher, or even from an average cultivated person.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Joao Martins
December 17, 2021 6:55 am

Mickey Mann sees hockey sticks. But only after he invents them.

Jeff corbin
December 17, 2021 7:40 am

I have searched using google for controversial studies and analysis regarding the pandemic and climate change and stuff doesn’t show up that I see on other search providers. It looks like censorship but my understanding of the internet is weak.

December 17, 2021 7:52 am

When money talks, unsupportable climate change propaganda walks.

Sean
December 17, 2021 8:00 am

How does climate science argue their position?

It can be summarized just 4 letters STFU.

I’ve seen Peter Gleick and Michael Mann use these four letters in twitter messages.

Google, WaPo, Facebook and other outlets are automating this method of argument.

December 17, 2021 8:13 am

“Center for Countering Digital Hate” – so the way to counter “digital hate” (whatever that really means) is wholesale deplatforming of people with contrary beliefs?

AGW is Not Science
Reply to  TonyG
December 17, 2021 10:15 am

Actually, they are the “Center for Legitimization of Digital Hate,” because they promote the suppression of free speech when they don’t like what’s being said.

Bennie Azul
December 17, 2021 10:20 am

“It’s difficult to deny climate change because people can see it’s happening,” said Michael E. Mann.

Whereas the actual issue “dangerous (Obama) man made climate change” remains undetectable. Far better they dismantle such strawmen and make strawbales for eco houses and let the duplicitous cranks live in them in some godforsaken wilderness.

Wonder how long they would last away from the grid, cars, medicine and modern drainage?