Happy Halloween

Climate Change Fueled Witch Hunts… Then and Now

First published at the CO2 Coalition website.

https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/29/climate-change-fueled-witch-hunts-then-and-now/

Gregory Wrightstone

European witch hunts of the 15th to 17th centuries targeted witches that were thought to be responsible for epidemics and crop failures related to declining temperatures of the Little Ice Age. A belief that evil humans were negatively affecting the climate and weather patterns was the “consensus” opinion of that time. How eerily similar is that notion to the the current oft-repeated mantra that Man’s actions are controlling the climate and leading to catastrophic consequences?

The first extensive European witch hunts coincided with plunging temperatures as the continent transitioned away from the beneficial warmth of the Medieval Warm Period (850 to 1250 AD). Increasing cold that began in the 13th century ushered in nearly five centuries of advancing mountain glaciers and prolonged periods of rainy or cool weather. This time of naturally driven climate change was accompanied by crop failure, hunger, rising prices and epidemics.


Large systematic witch hunts began in the 1430s and were advanced later in the century by an Alsatian Dominican friar and papal Inquisitor named Heinrich Kramer. At Kramer’s urging, Pope Innocence VIII issued an encyclical enshrining the persecution and eradication of weather-changing witches through this papal edict. The worst of the Inquisition’s abuses and later systemic witch hunts were, in part, empowered by this decree.

This initial period of cooler temperatures and failing crops continued through the first couple of decades of the 16th century, when a slight warming was accompanied by improvements in harvests. Clearly, the pogrom against the weather-changing witches had been successful!

Unfortunately for the people of the Late Middle Ages, the forty years or so of slight warming gave ground to a more severe bout of cooling. The summer of 1560 brought a return of coldness and wetness that led to severe decline in harvest, crop failure and increases in infant mortality and epidemics. Bear in mind that this was an agrarian subsistence culture, nearly totally dependent on the yearly harvest to survive. One bad harvest could be tolerated, but back-to-back failures would cause horrific consequences, and indeed they did.

Of course, the people’s misfortunes were attributed to weather-changing witches who had triggered the death-dealing weather, most often in the form of cold, rain, frost and devastating hailstorms. Horrific atrocities were alleged of the witches, including Franconian witches who “confessed” to flying through the air to spread an ointment made of children’s fat in order to cause a killing frost. Across the continent of Europe, from the 15th to the 17th centuries there were likely many tens of thousands of supposed witches burnt at the stake, many of these old women living without husbands on the margins of society.

The worst of the witch hunts occurred during the bitter cold from 1560 to about 1680. The frenzy of killing culminated in the killing of 63 witches in the German territory of Wiesensteig in the year 1563 alone. Across Europe, though, the numbers of witches continued to increase and peaked at more than 500 per year in the mid-1600s. Most were burned at the stake; others were hung.

 The end of the witch hunts and killings tie closely to the beginning of our current warming trend at the close of the 17th century. That warming trend started more than 300 years ago and continues in fits and starts to this day.

In the Late Middle Ages, a large segment of the population actually believed that evil people could negatively affect the climate. It appears that we haven’t learned the lessons of the 16th century and the dangers of stirring unfounded fears concerning changes to our climate. Perhaps in the not-too-distant future we will have the benefit of hindsight and realize that people like Al Gore and Dr. Michael Mann were the Heinrich Kramers of the early 21st century, trying to convince us all that we can control the uncontrollable — the natural cycles of the Sun and Earth that are operating today, just as they have for many millions of years.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
4.9 35 votes
Article Rating
88 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sara
October 31, 2021 10:32 am

Witches, bitches – there’s always a goat to turn into a scapegoat, isn’t there?

How very medieval Hoomans are becoming….

IanE
Reply to  Sara
October 31, 2021 12:24 pm

Strange that TPTB haven’t yet spotted Wee Krankie for what she is: Greta should be counted into that grouping also!

Of course, one can (with difficulty) take humans out of the medieval, but taking the medieval out of humans is an altogether much harder task.

To bed B
October 31, 2021 12:42 pm

The only parallel with Climate Change is the academic merit of this.

It was heretical to believe in witches, canon law for over 1000 years. Protestism brought back a belief in witches. It was rife in the pre-Christian Roman Empire, or Roman Warm Period. It was frowned upon before the start of the MWP. Women were harassed as heretics if they claimed to be witches. The recommended punishment was a good talking to.

“One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact” could better apply to history than science. Kramer was a kook whose book had some influence among secular leaders but was condemned by the Catholic authorities. It had influence because of drug use rather than weather, possibly related to westher according to the ergot theory of the Salem witch trials. Evidence for this? The test for someone being bewitched was mixing the victims urine with water given to a dog to drink and see if it becomes bewitched. There are other examples from the small number of documented trials and persecution that points to a problem with drugs (Kepler’s mum).

I was relief teacher in a class where a teacher taught that the Catholic Church tried to convince Columbus that was world flat. Complete fiction made up by a fairytale writer in 1828. I’ve come across twice the question in quizzes on which country’s entire population was condemned to death by the Spanish Inquisition, including The Chase UK. The answer is none. It’s a silly hoax like the flat Earth myth. The witch hunt tales are not complete fiction but exaggerations, such as finding a single book by someone who was ostracized by the Catholic Church with the book condemned and pretending that it was mainstream.

Reply to  To bed B
October 31, 2021 1:37 pm

True or not? Reports are that written records were made of all German witch trials (by whatever the peoples whose decendents are today’s main Germans were called back then), those records still exist, and that those records record about 50,000 executions).

To bed B
Reply to  AndyHce
October 31, 2021 5:07 pm

References? It’ll be a book written in 1972. Strangely, not much written about it before hand. The Salem witch trials were written about in 1692, the year of the trials.

Reply to  To bed B
October 31, 2021 9:09 pm

I heard it in a video about the relationship between European witch persecutions and the climate of that period. I don’t recall whether or not a source was provided except that it was said the numbers came from an examination of city/town/village/ court records by historians.

John Tillman
Reply to  To bed B
November 1, 2021 12:09 pm

Witches were condemned before the Reformation.

In 1441, Eleanor Cobham, second wife of Duke Humphrey (of Oxford library fame), youngest brother of King Henry V, was convicted of witchcraft against his nephew King Henry VI. She was condemned to public penance, followed by exile and life imprisonment.

To bed B
Reply to  John Tillman
November 2, 2021 1:39 am

It was for treason. Her accomplices got worse punishment. Her’s were “The sources give no tangible indication of the eventual decision of punishment of life in prison. However, there is a letter of warrant from the king dated January 19, 1442 and subsequent records of her imprisonment. She was remanded to the custody of Sir Thomas Stanley, who held the title of King of Mann and constable of Chester Castle. An allowance was given of one hundred marks per annum to live on and she could have a few servants. Her imprisonment began in Chester Castle where she remained for a year and a half. Orders were given for her to be taken to Kenilworth and later she was moved to the Isle of Mann. In March 1449, Eleanor was incarcerated in Beaumaris Castle, where she died on July 7, 1452. Presumably she was buried in the parish church there.”

They made a prediction “The men she consulted were Thomas Southwell, her personal physician and a canon of St. Stephen’s, Westminster and Roger Bolingbroke, principal of St. Andrew’s Hall, Oxford. Both of them had excellent reputations. These experts predicted King Henry VI would suffer a serious illness, endangering his life in the summer of 1441. Rumors of this patently unwise prediction began to spread in London, eventually reaching the court.”

You can see that it was assumed that there was an intention to poison the king.

“Witchcraft was not necessarily considered a crime under temporal law at the time. As long as no one was harmed, the courts would look the other way. However, harmful forms of witchcraft would be investigated by the Church, as it was considered heresy. “

It seems that she had procured a potion “in an effort to help her conceive and bear Gloucester an heir.” and denied that she intended to poison the king.

Do you see the parallels with climate science?

John Tillman
Reply to  To bed B
November 2, 2021 8:04 am

She was convicted of sorcery against the king, but got off easily. Her accomplices were convicted of treasonous necromancy. One died in the Tower, another was hanged, drawn and quartered, while the third was burned at the stake.

These were witchcraft convictions and punishment, as well as treason.

To bed B
Reply to  John Tillman
November 2, 2021 9:50 pm

She was convicted of treason. If it wasn’t assumed that she was part of a conspiracy to kill him (or harm) him, it was not a crime.

John Tillman
Reply to  To bed B
November 2, 2021 9:18 am

The Late Medieval Roman Catholic Church definitely condemned witchcraft.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malleus_Maleficarum

The author of the 1487 “Hammer of Witches” was a German Dominican Inquisitor.

The papal bull Summis desiderantes, published by Innocent VIII in 1484, acknowledges the existence of witches, and explicitly empowers the Inquisition to prosecute witches and sorcerers. The bull aimed to reaffirm the jurisdiction of Kramer, who was denied authority as an Inquisitor in Germany.

Luther, born in 1483, didn’t post his theses until 1517.

To bed B
Reply to  John Tillman
November 2, 2021 11:21 pm

read the ‘controversies’ section.

Read the Bull. Its not persecuting someone for “Oculus reparo”. Its for what could be achieved by drugs or disease vectors. If you read about tempestarii, you might see why people would spread disease among cattle. Real issues that Kramer was forbidden to deal with because of his zealousness.

On the other hand, you have
“Pope Gregory XV (1621) declared that persons who had made a pact with the devil or practiced black magic which caused the death of another should be arrested and condemned to death by the secular court. However, one must remember that the Church also strived to prevent witch-hysteria or crazed witch-hunts, like those in colonial Salem: For example, Pope Nicholas I (866) prohibited the use of torture in obtaining confessions, although it was permitted by civil law and common judicial practice. Pope Gregory VII (1080) forbade accused witches to be put to death for supposedly causing storms or crop failures. Pope Alexander IV (1258) restricted the Inquisition to investigating only those cases of witchcraft which were clearly linked with charges of heresy. ”

You were never harassed for turning someone into a newt.

John Tillman
Reply to  To bed B
November 3, 2021 2:35 pm

Which proves my point that witchcraft was recognized before the Reformation.

Sara
October 31, 2021 5:01 pm

It is high time to bring in Screamin’ Jay Hawkins doing his utterly delightful song “I Put A Spell On You”.

Happy Hallowe’en and don’t eat the green goo!!!!

Tom Abbott
October 31, 2021 6:33 pm

So how many people considered themselves to be real witches back in this time period?

Were there a lot of practicing witches during this time, or was it just convenient for those doing the k!lling to claim anyone they k!lled was a witch?

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 31, 2021 9:29 pm

I’m not a historian but my impression for a long time has been that Wicca is a nature religion long predating Christianity. As competition to the Catholic church it was banned and persecuted. It, of course, had nothing to do with the beliefs or practices projected on it by the church, especially in relation to doing people harm or causing bad weather.

The label witch was mostly likely applied by the catholic church as a convenient way to refer to people who practiced that religion, but that is just my guess. “Witch” is in the English translation of the bible but may well not be a reasonable translation of whatever word(s) were in the original languages.

November 1, 2021 6:04 am

When visiting my brother who lived in Dunning, Perthshire my chilrean knew when we were almost there when passing this monument

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maggie_Wall

Which was part of this dark period of history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch_trials_in_early_modern_Scotland