UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
Researchers have shown that human-caused climate change will have important consequences for how volcanic gases interact with the atmosphere.
The researchers, from the University of Cambridge and the UK Met Office, say that large-magnitude eruptions will have greater effects as the climate continues to warm. However, the cooling effects of small- and medium-sized eruptions could shrink by as much as 75%. Since these smaller eruptions are far more frequent, further research is needed to determine whether the net effect will be additional warming or cooling.
Where and when a volcano erupts is not something that we can control, but as the atmosphere warms due to climate change, the plumes of ash and gas emitted by large, but infrequent, volcanic eruptions will rise ever higher. Climate change will also accelerate the transport of volcanic material – in the form of small, shiny droplets called volcanic sulfate aerosols – from the tropics to higher latitudes.
For large eruptions, the combined effect of these phenomena will cause the haze created by volcanic aerosols to block more sunlight from reaching Earth’s surface, ultimately amplifying the temporary cooling caused by volcanic eruptions. The results are reported in the journal Nature Communications.
When Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted in 1991, the effects were felt worldwide. The plume from the eruption – the second largest of the 20th century – reached more than 30 kilometres into the sky, forming a layer of global haze. In 1992, this haze caused global temperatures to drop by as much as 0.5 degrees Celsius. In comparison, human activities have warmed global temperatures by over 1 degree Celsius since 1850. However, the effect of volcanic aerosols only persists for one or two years, while anthropogenic greenhouse gases will affect the climate for centuries.
“Beyond the data we have from recent eruptions like Pinatubo, we can also see the cooling effect of volcanoes going back two thousand years from the information contained in tree rings,” said Dr Thomas Aubry from Cambridge’s Department of Geography, the paper’s first author. “However, we wanted to look at the question from the opposite angle: how could a warming climate affect the cooling from volcanic eruptions?”
Volcanic plumes rise like hot air balloons: they keep rising to a height where they’re naturally buoyant. The Cambridge study looked at how high in the atmosphere these plumes can rise and be transported globally under different warming scenarios.
The researchers used global climate models combined with volcanic plume models to simulate how the aerosols emitted by volcanic eruptions might be affected by climate change.
They found that for large eruptions like Mount Pinatubo, which typically occur once or twice per century, climate change will cause the plumes to rise higher and the aerosols to spread faster over the globe, resulting in a cooling effect amplified by 15%. Changes in ocean temperatures are expected to further amplify the cooling, and the melting of ice sheets is also projected to increase volcanic eruptions frequency and size in places such as Iceland.
However, for moderate-sized eruptions such as the 2011 Nabro eruption in Eritrea, which typically occur on a yearly basis, the effect will be reduced by about 75% under a high-end warming scenario. This is because the height of the tropopause – the boundary between the troposphere and the stratosphere above it – is predicted to increase, making it harder for volcanic plumes to reach the stratosphere. Aerosols from volcanic plumes confined to the troposphere are washed out by precipitation in a matter of weeks, making their climatic impacts relatively minor and much more localised.
“Climate change isn’t something that’s coming – it’s already here, as clearly demonstrated by this week’s IPCC report,” said co-author Dr Anja Schmidt, also from the Department of Geography. “The effects of climate change and some of the feedback loops it can cause are becoming more obvious now. But the climate system is complex: getting a grasp of all these feedback loops is critical to understanding our planet and making accurate climate projections.”
“The new feedback loops between climate and volcanic eruptions that we highlight in this work are currently unaccounted for by IPCC,” said Aubry. “It could shed new light on the evolution of future volcanic influences on climate. Even if volcanoes have a limited influence on climate compared to human greenhouse gas emissions, they are an important part of the system.”
“Due to more frequent and more intense wildfires, as well as other extreme events, the composition of the upper atmosphere is changing in front of our eyes, and so is our understanding of the consequences of these changes,” said Schmidt, who is also affiliated with the Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry. “As we continue to emit greenhouse gases, the way that volcanic emissions interact with the atmosphere will continue to change and it is important to quantify these interactions in order to fully understand climate variability.”
The authors hope to bring together more volcanologists and climate scientists to understand not only the mechanics behind volcanic plume rise and aerosol lifecycle, but also how changes in eruption frequency and magnitude, driven by deglaciation and extreme precipitation, will shape the future climatic effects of volcanic eruptions.
The research was funded by the Royal Society, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, and the UK Natural Environment Research Council.
JOURNAL
Nature Communications
DOI
10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
METHOD OF RESEARCH
Computational simulation/modeling
SUBJECT OF RESEARCH
Not applicable
ARTICLE TITLE
Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions
ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE
11-Aug-2021
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Haha. To paraphrase – “..we don’t know what we’re doing, we don’t know how volcanic emissions behave and we can’t account for any unexpected warming or cooling. However, if we move the goalposts far enough apart, we should be covered for all eventualities..”
I saw the word “simulation” and immediately skipped to the clever comments section. The publication likely has little more than brain fungus to offer.
Got to the 4th sentance and said to myself “This is Eureka Alert BS Isn’t it”?
Sho’nough.
I trained in jungle survival on the slopes of Mt. Pinatubo in 1971. At the time we were told that it was an extinct volcano. Not quite, I guess.
I wonder what it was like to stand on the flat land east of Mt. Pinatubo. That is where Clark Air Base is/was.
“Changes in ocean temperatures are expected to further amplify the cooling, and the melting of ice sheets is also projected to increase volcanic eruptions frequency and size in places such as Iceland.“
Huh?! The ocean amplifies cooling…AND warming at the same time??
Methinks there is a little too much mental gymnastics happening here.
METHOD OF RESEARCH
Computational simulation/modeling
Yeah, that’s not “research”
It’s pretty easy to spot fake / narrative science. The authors tout what will happen, almost to the exclusion of what did happen. All predictive. Little evidence
From the article: “When Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted in 1991, the effects were felt worldwide. The plume from the eruption – the second largest of the 20th century – reached more than 30 kilometres into the sky, forming a layer of global haze. In 1992, this haze caused global temperatures to drop by as much as 0.5 degrees Celsius. In comparison, human activities have warmed global temperatures by over 1 degree Celsius since 1850.”
Current temperatures are 0.5C warmer than 1850, not 1.0C. And there’s no evidence for determining how much of this warming is caused by humans, and how much by Mother Nature.
And note that the Pinatubo eruption reached 30 kilometers high, which is significant. Most eruptions don’t get that high in the atmosphere, and human-caused SO2 does’t get that high, either.
From the article: “Aerosols from volcanic plumes confined to the troposphere are washed out by precipitation in a matter of weeks, making their climatic impacts relatively minor and much more localised.”
Yes, keep that in mind when you hear a Human-caused Global Cooling advocate trying to make a case for SO2 global cooling. The “minor impacts” of aerosols in the lower atmosphere apply to volcanic eruptions and to human-caused SO2.
From the article: ““Climate change isn’t something that’s coming – it’s already here, as clearly demonstrated by this week’s IPCC report,” said co-author Dr Anja Schmidt, also from the Department of Geography. “The effects of climate change and some of the feedback loops it can cause are becoming more obvious now.”
Says you.
Argument by assertion.
The statistics say what you call “becoming more obvious” is just business as usual for Mother Nature.
This is an alarmists seeing what he wants to see, not what is actually there. There is no unprecedented weather. We always seem to be able to find a comparable storm in the past. When will this not be the case? Not yet. The statistics say not yet.