Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Politico is worried that restrictions on the transport of Marijuana across state borders is creating distribution network inefficiencies which is helping to drive climate change – by a surprising amount.
An inconvenient truth (about weed)
Federal laws bar cannabis from crossing state lines, driving up the cost — and the emissions — of an industry using indoor grow operations.
By NATALIE FERTIG and GAVIN BADE
08/10/2021 04:30 AM EDT
…
Nationally, 80 percent of cannabis is cultivated indoors with sophisticated lighting and environmental controls designed to maximize the plant’s yield. It’s a setup that can consume up to 2,000 watts of electricity per square meter, 40 times what it takes for leafy greens like lettuce, when grown indoors.
“For being such a ‘green’ industry, there’s some skeletons in the closet,” said Kaitlin Urso, an environmental consultant with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
Despite piecemeal attempts by states and some growers to reduce their power consumption, at least one expert estimates the industry’s footprint already accounts for more than 1 percent of U.S. electricity consumption and continues to rise. Complicating matters further, federal laws also bar the flow of weed over state lines. That requires companies to grow cannabis in each state where they want to do business and deprives them of the scale that makes other industries more efficient.
…
One recent model estimated that Massachusetts’ nascent cannabis industry represented 10 percent of the state’s industrial electricity consumption in 2020. Another study found that growing enough bud for a joint — a gram — consumes as much electricity as driving about 20 miles in a fuel-efficient car. Then there’s the still-vibrant illegal market — where there are no emissionsrules whatsoever — that consumes fossil fuels at an even higher rate, often using standalone generators or stealing power from neighbors to fuel their operations.
…
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/10/weed-cannabis-legalization-energy-503004
Focussing on CO2 emissions from interstate transport seems seems a poor choice of priorities – surely the more pressing problem is all the electricity being used to actually grow the weed?
Mandating that only pure green electricity can be used to grow weed, no cheating by switching to fossil fuel sources if the renewables fail, would buy time to address the problem of distribution network inefficiencies.
With pure green electricity, the indoor weed plants will only receive light when the wind blows or the sun shines, or so long as the battery backup can supply electricity to the grow rooms. And it would be a great test case for moving the entire economy to renewables.
That shouldn’t be a problem right?
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The “best” marijuana are hot, wet female plants oozing from their ripe reproductive organs. A whiff of pollen and they become seeded and significantly less intoxicating,
Clearly these people have never seen an actual grow operation, most of which are required to be indoors, (for security reasons) use immense amounts of electricity, water, chemicals, and even CO2.
More munchies means more spontaneous emissions of hydrocarbon fuel… a factor not considered. LOL America would be one of the slinkiest places on earth if we all consumed marijuana as widely and as intensely as some revenue hungry liberal and conservative libertarians would like us to. Boo marijuana, the stuff will rot your brain. The America public is being doop’d again.
” Rot your Brain” I am too old to be duped by the Legalize Marijuana crap. All my friends (15 people) smoked marijuana in 1972. By 1980, only 5 continued to smoke Marijuana daily. By 1990,only 4 continued to smoke daily, and were the lowest wage earners of the 15, two had problems with psychosis. All 4 had short term memory problems and spend most of their time in front of the TV. By 2000, 4 continued to smoke daily, 3 were in poverty. 2010 3 continued to smoke marijuana and remained in poverty, the other passed away at 47 from sleep apnea. The remaining 10 people who stopped smoking marijuana never had psychosis, are still alive, live vibrant fully integrated lives compared to the chronic marijuana users. How is that for a naturalistic scientific study…. which is no worse than the crap science of the pro-marijuana charlatans. You may say alcohol is just as bad….but I don’t think so. Maybe 8-9% are effected by alcoholism at the most…2-5% will recover. But marijuana thoroughly clocked 1/3 of my friends for life in subtle and insidious ways yet the end result is unmistakable…… a life wasted…dude! Ever hear of a marijuana addict go the NA or get clean and sober…. it just hardly every happens. Are narcotics (Marijuana) legal in China, South Korea, Brazil, India, Vietnam… not on your life… they know they can’t compete in global market place with a obtunded work force….. but America…. we have given up on a work force the competes… we don’t care if they obtunded poorly educated smartphone serfs. Libertinism is anarchy for the rich and the tax hungry.
I mean ‘t stinky, not slinky
Are narcotics (Marijuana) legal in China, South Korea, Brazil, India, Vietnam? Not on your life! They know they can’t compete in global market place with a obtunded work force. Yet in America, it seems we have given up on a work force that competes? Do we as American’s care if our workforce is obtunded and poorly educated smartphone serfs; that is obtunded by marijuana and/or hand held devices. Libertarianism is anarchy for the rich and the tax hungry. I am not sure why liberals and/or conservatives have been so captured by libertarian anarchy and/or leftist anarchy. The former is rooted in greed, the later is rooted 19th century romance drama. It’s time to move on from stupid greed and the drama of anarchy.