How robots could limit the environmental impact of offshore windfarms

Wind turbines require frequent maintenance – a job that can pose dangers for human operators and produces a significant carbon footprint. Peter Dargatz/Pixabay

David Flynn, Heriot-Watt University

Spending on global offshore renewable energy infrastructure over the next ten years is expected to reach over US$16 billion (£11.3bn). This involves creating an extra 2.5 million kilometres of global submarine cables by 2030.

To lay and secure these cables against ocean currents involves ploughing the seabed and dumping rocks and concrete “mattresses” to serve as a base for the cables – procedures which are highly disruptive to the marine ecosystem that so many creatures call home.

Installing windfarms offshore requires many such high-impact procedures, which are often undertaken with little consideration of their effects on the delicately balanced ocean environment – which over 3 billion people rely on for their food and livelihoods.

Human activities, including building renewable energy infrastructure, have affected over 40% of the ocean’s surface, creating dead ocean zones devoid of oxygen, algae blooms that harm marine species and a devastating loss of biodiversity.

If we continue down this path, the predicted green-tech revolution risks causing an unprecedented level of damage to the world’s oceans. The new generation of renewable energy producers must assess their long-term impact on the ocean environment to evaluate how sustainable their supply chains and practices really are.

As the UN begins its decade of Ocean Resilience this year, the role that autonomous technologies can play in supporting the marine environment continues to gain recognition. We can’t expect to implement sustainable technology without first instilling environmentally conscious practices within the renewable energy sector itself. That’s where robotics comes in.

The cost of maintenance

About 80% of the cost of maintaining offshore windfarms is spent on sending people to carry out inspections and repairs via helicopter, maintaining support vehicles, such as boats, and building offshore platforms to house turbine workers. All of these rack up carbon emissions. Not only that, offshore inspectors also need to work at risky heights and in confined spaces, both of which are dangerous.

A red boat approaches a wind turbine at sea
Turbine maintenance is costly, dangerous and not friendly to the environment. Anette Bjerg/Pixabay

However, a unified team of humans, robots and AI working together could maintain this infrastructure with significantly less impact on the environment and better safety for humans. These teams might include humans working remotely with multi-robot teams of autonomous aerial and underwater vehicles, as well as with crawling or land-based robots.

Transformative tech

Robotics can help humans interact with complex, vulnerable environments without harming them. Robots that use non-contact methods of sensing, such as radar and sonar, can interact with ocean infrastructure and its surrounding environment without causing any disruption or damage.

Even more advanced sensing technology known as low-frequency sonar – sound-based technology inspired by the signals used by dolphins to communicate – makes it possible to inspect structures such as subsea infrastructure and submarine cables in the ocean without damaging the surrounding environment.

By deploying low-frequency sonar technology using autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) – robots that drive themselves – we can better understand how structures such as underwater cables are interacting with the environment. We can also help avoid issues like biofouling, where microorganisms, plants, algae or small animals accumulate on surfaces of cables. A bio-fouled cable can grow heavy, potentially distorting its outer protective layers and decreasing its useful life span. AUVs can monitor and clean these cables safely.

A yellow submarine vehicle is mounted on a stand on land
Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) have numerous applications when it comes to maintaining and repairing turbines out at sea. Zil/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

Above the surface

Robots can provide help above the water, too. When wind turbine blades reach the end of their useful lives, they are often burned or thrown into landfill. This directly counteracts the “circular economy” approach – advocating for waste prevention and reuse of as many materials as possible – that’s central to achieving technological sustainability. Instead, we can use robots to repair, repurpose or recycle degrading blades, reducing unnecessary waste.

Using drones fitted with advanced radar sensing technology, we can now see defects in the turbines as they begin to develop. Instead of using field support vessels to transport turbine inspectors offshore – costing around £250,000 a day – using robot assistants to keep updated on turbine maintenance saves time, money and risk.

A drone is silhouetted against a sunset, with the sea beneath
Drones can provide a low-energy stand-in for humans when turbines need assessing for damage. Aaron Burden/Unsplash, CC BY

As well as cutting the financial and carbon cost of turbine maintenance, robots can minimise the inherent risks to humans working in these unpredictable environments while also working more symbiotically with the environment. By deploying resident robots to inspect and maintain offshore renewable infrastructure, energy companies could initially reduce the number of people working in dangerous offshore roles. In time, we could even reach a point of autonomous operation – where human operators remain onshore and connect remotely to offshore robotics systems.

AI is another key component in building sustainable energy systems. For example, artificially intelligent programs can help energy companies plan how to safely disassemble turbines and bring them safely back to shore. Following their arrival onshore, turbines can be taken to “smart” factories that use a combination of robotics and AI to identify which of its parts can be reused.

Working in these teams, we can develop a robust, sustainable circular economy for the offshore renewable energy sector.

David Flynn, Professor, Embedded Intelligence in Energy Systems, Heriot-Watt University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
1.4 10 votes
Article Rating
77 Comments
Ferdberple
May 23, 2021 10:08 am

So much for the green jobs promised to laid off XL pipeline workers. Drones and robots will get them.

Latitude
May 23, 2021 10:15 am

…and the costs just keep going up and up and up

Spetzer86
May 23, 2021 10:29 am

Robotics and salt water / storms / high winds go so well together that I can’t imagine anything wrong with this position.

Teddy Lee
May 23, 2021 10:32 am

A cost reduction measure?..???

May 23, 2021 10:52 am

after self-driving cars became an expensive train-wreck, we look forward to ‘self driving windmills’

Dare I ask who or what was in charge of the Ever Green Given recently
Enquiring Minds etc…
Quote: (random search result)
How did it get stuck? It turns out strong winds, dust storms and massive ships don’t mix”

Aha, the windmills will be fine – No Dust Storms you see…. <taps nose>

It is not looking good is it, esp after folks shelled out £20 to watch a pre-recorded video, at a certain given time, on the interweb.
Glastonbury Fail

(I may have been in the area at the time, still am in fact, but nothing to do with me. I was listening Twitch. At least Bezos can still organise a rave)

TonyL
May 23, 2021 10:53 am

Fantastic!
“we can use robots to repair, repurpose or recycle degrading blades, reducing unnecessary waste.”
Apparently, robots know how to do things that we do not. We have no idea how to recycle those massive turbine blades. As of now they go into specially designed landfills. But no problem, just put a robot on the job.

More Magic!
“artificially intelligent programs can help energy companies plan how to safely disassemble turbines”
and
“a combination of robotics and AI to identify which of its parts can be reused.”

All this fantastic use of robotics and AI to do mundane things we can not do ourselves.

It makes me wonder how we ever pulled off the Industrial Revolution.

On the other hand:
The new generations coming up are singularly helpless. It seems they cannot keep their noses out of their phones long enough to learn how to do even the simplest things. As these generations come of age, robotics and AI will be needed to do everything from checking the air and changing the oil to making the coffee.

Drake
May 23, 2021 10:56 am

Your posting of articles from “The Conversation” sent me to vie that site. What a load of leftist crapola. I especially like their subtitle, “Academic rigor, journalistic flair”. No academic rigor to be found. At least not to the standards of even COMMENTORS at WUWT, Simon, griff, etc. excepted.

May 23, 2021 11:02 am

This is ignorantly foolish academic speculation.
Per EIA 2021, the LCOE of offshore wind is ~3.7x that of onshore wind. Easily googled official estimate.

Back in 2015 at Climate Etc I posted ‘True Cost of Wind’ (still easily available via the search bar there). That year EIA said onshore wind was competitive with CCGT, with both at about $90/MWh LCOE.

Turns out that was grossly and deliberately, yet ‘officially’, misleading because of fine print ‘new or should have known’ negligently false assumptions. The most egregious was both having 30 year capital lives. That is deliberate ‘gross negligence’; CCGT has an easily verified manufacturer’s warranty for 40 years, while larger capacity onshore wind usually doesn’t make 20 years because of axial bearing failure from unavoidable wobble caused by wind speeds varying with height. That is why AW posted just a couple of days ago on dynamiting some to salvage spare parts to patch others up.

When we crunched corrected EIA numbers using then wind ERCOT penetration (~10%) for the extra transmission costs, CCGT had an LCOE of ~$57/MWh while onshore wind was ~$147/MWh. About 2.5x. Now if offshore is 3.7x onshore, then it is over 9x hopelessly uneconomic compared to CCGT—robotic maintenance could never bail it out.

Olen
May 23, 2021 11:04 am

In the category of having to destroy it to save it.

Rory Forbes
May 23, 2021 11:09 am

I have an even better “secret” formula to reduce costs …

… stop building the bloody things and use all those materials for something useful. Or better still, leave them unused until we find something we actually need.

John K. Sutherland.
May 23, 2021 11:21 am

2.5 million kilometers of heavy copper conductor! I don’t have to guess what that will do for the price of copper. What a waste, for such an intermittent supply of electricity.

May 23, 2021 11:52 am

As some WUWT wag commented on AW’s dynamiting wind turbines post:
A way to save on wind turbine maintenance:

  1. Build turbines.
  2. Build 100% CCGT backup.
  3. Dynamite turbines.
  4. Run CCGT 24/7.

For extra savings, skip steps 1 and 3.

May 23, 2021 11:53 am

comment imagecomment image

Bruce Cobb
May 23, 2021 12:13 pm

Offshore windfarms; the only thing dumber than land-based windfarms.

fretslider
May 23, 2021 12:15 pm

Get out of the way hom sap, robots don’t need lunch breaks and they don’t get sick.

They don’t breathe….

ResourceGuy
May 23, 2021 12:17 pm

Offshore wind will be the dinosaurs of renewables very soon. The next 30% drop in utility scale solar costs will bury them. But that means much more wind power on the East Coast anyway because lobbyists and politicos will make it happen….with your money.

ResourceGuy
May 23, 2021 12:19 pm

Maybe offshore wind will increase the shark population while thinning the bird population and surfers.

B Clarke
May 23, 2021 12:28 pm

Already we can inspect pipe lines cables with autonomous vehicles, thats not a big deal , but can they fix broken foundations /pipes ,unlikely, this sounds to me like a begging bowl to research something they allready know is 40 years away at the least, inspection is completely different to fixing big infrastructure, $$$$$££££££. Please.

May 23, 2021 12:51 pm

“Human activities, including building renewable energy infrastructure, have affected over 40% of the ocean’s surface…”

I wonder if the embedded intelligence of the Illustrious Professor of Embedded Intelligence enables him to understand the magnitude of “40% of the ocean’s surface” and the veracity of all the biological stuff (facts, indeed!…) he refers to… I guess that embedded intelligence is no match for natural stupidity…

max
May 23, 2021 12:53 pm

So the imaginary green power supply machines can be maintained by imaginary autonomous robots? The Jetsons never had it this good!

dk_
May 23, 2021 1:42 pm

Funny. Green robots don’t pollute.
An unordered list of why this is a failure out the gate:

  • Uses non-existent system technology. Parts may exist, but integration and deployment take immense investment of time x money.
  • Devices cited in the example take all of their manufacture and operational costs from fossil fuels.
  • Devices cited in the example also have lifecycle operational and disposal impacts that are not considered friendly to the environment nor carbon-free
  • Devices cited in the article similar to what are available today are remote-controlled by human operators, with carbon and environmental impacts increasing geometrically with distance.
  • Autonomous experimental devices similar to the examples are unreliable (see self-driving car examples posted over the last week in media and WUWT). The best are prohibitively large for this application.
  • Author assumes professions like lineman and rigger can ever be replaced by human beings. There is no large structure construction automation.
  • Author is not aware that large structures or seaborne devices are almost always demolished or destructively removed from site, or scuttled at sea. An economical, portable, modular, wind turbine assembly, capable of working from a barge or set in the ocean, is farther away than their prophesied end of the earth, by which time it will become obvious that windpower is more economically destructive than combustion of dirty coal, and the earth won’t have ended, afterall.

Short version: count the “coulds” and “mays” in the article. The author is tentatively writing bad fiction without a background in how anything is actually done. An homily for the climate cult, and nonsense to anyone more than a half wit.
I may give the author’s and any cited authotities background a go. I’ve been finding a disturging number of fake engineers among those lately.

dk_
May 23, 2021 1:51 pm

Robots don’t pollute, how funny.

The author is an engineer(?) in charge of a program (EU >38 MIllion) trying to sell development of such systems through his university professorship. He doesn’t really know how to do much of any of the parts of this, but tries to sell the idea that it can be done, never having actually produced much of anything quite as complex himself.
A head of a department, looking for investment? What could possibly go wrong?
Appears in the Conversation, so we know what it is worth.

walt
May 23, 2021 2:40 pm

What is wrong with building in sensors to continuously monitor the windmill turbine and other components. That provides real time data and reveals how performance changes with time.

wsbriggs
May 23, 2021 2:58 pm

Hilarious! Virtually any subsurface autonomous vehicle worth using was developed for, wait for it… the oil and gas industry. I suspect that O&G use over 90% of the fit-for-purpose AVs on the planet. They lay pipelines, connectors, place seismometers, flatten placement locations, find dropped tools (not pocket hammers mind you), and a huge number of other tasks of great difficulty in depths up to 1500 m, some of them deeper.

May 23, 2021 3:59 pm

The Climate Alarmists are just beginning to notice that these ‘renewable’ energy sources like wind-turbines and solar panels need a lot of costly maintenance and do not last long without it. As a result they are proposing that absolutely free-of-cost robots will do the work like recycling blades that no one else can yet do, and do it perfectly at no cost. The robots also will need no maintenance according to the Alarmists.
All we have to do is pay for all their nonsense.