Are Climate Nuremberg Trials On The Way?

Reposted From Government Accountability & Oversight

Washington Times: Despite denials, count on Biden-Harris to direct AG to do their scandalous bidding


From the Washington Times:

With a potentially bruising Department of Justice confirmation battles looming, both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris now vigorously deny that they would ever direct their Attorney General to do their political bidding or target specific opponents. This would be unremarkable, had they not promised the opposite with equal vigor – and disturbing specificity – during the 2020 campaign.

CNN reports Biden saying in an interview, “‘I’m not going to be telling them what they have to do and don’t have to do. I’m not going to be saying, ‘Go prosecute A, B or C.’ I’m not going to be telling them. That’s not the role. It’s not my Justice Department, it’s the people’s Justice Department’. … Harris echoed the sentiment of Biden’s remarks on the Department of Justice. ‘We will not tell the Justice Department how to do its job,’ Harris said.”

So pay no attention to their unambiguous promise to weaponize DoJ: “Biden will instruct the Attorney General to” do all manner of things to impose a political agenda or target opponents, including, “(iii) strategically support ongoing plaintiff-driven climate litigation against polluters”.

The latter point of course refers to an expanding litigation campaign by activists and the tort bar to force the progressive’s “climate” agenda on the country, and to enrich themselves through what are in effect taxes paid by consumers, run through massive settlements with energy companies.

The plaintiffs’ team regularly admit that this is an attempt to use the courts as substitute policymaker for an agenda that keeps failing through the democratic process.

Their objectives are to “bring down the fossil fuel companies”, coerce defendants “to the table” and ultimately to enlist them as lobbyists for desired climate policies. That is, the idea is to substitute verdicts for the failure to enact policy by convincing the public.

Things will inevitably get confusing, therefore, should DoJ soon deploy the awesome powers of the federal government to assist political-ally plaintiffs, against perceived enemies of the climate. So consider some facts about this litigation campaign.

First, the Biden-Harris vow revives the plan to federally prosecute the “climate” opposition, as revealed in a 2016 colloquy between Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) of the Senate Judiciary Committee and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

That was shocking. This is even more deplorable given it’s not just a uniquely obsessive senator egging on an AG with a suspect record of politicization; this involves a president and vice president vowing a political hit for political allies, whose clumsily synchronized backpedal only adds to suspicions.

And of course, there is no reason to expect the threat to deploy government in this way is just against whomever they decide is a ‘climate polluter’. The targets will be wide-ranging, as Whitehouse suggested.

I spent two decades with the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a consistently effective opponent of the “climate” agenda which, therefore, found itself the subject of a subpoena campaign in an early, coordinated assault among state, DC and even territorial attorneys general.

That campaign resulted from an infamous call in 2011 by the same activists and tort lawyers for “a single sympathetic attorney general” to go after private parties with investigations, in order to extract records for use by the “climate tort” bar.

Thanks to newly released records, we now know that an ambitious young state AG from California helped organize this coordination between tort bar and law enforcement.

Bringing us to today, with that same ambitious lady having confessed that, if elected Vice President, she will direct the Attorney General of the United States to take over. And also that she would never ever do that.

Washington wouldn’t be The Swamp if the AG who subpoenaed CEI and 100 others, the U.S. Virgin Islands’ Claude Walker, wasn’t recently, quietly installed at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as deputy director of criminal enforcement. Don’t you just love it when a plan comes together?

Biden-Harris ran for office with a very specific, deplorable promise of weaponizing the Department of Justice on behalf of friends’ private civil litigation, to compel fealty to a failed ideological god and punish the heretics.

Soon they will turn to putting a “sympathetic Attorney General” in place. Confirmation hearings must confront this overt promise, generally, and detail this specific scheme by the climate litigation industry to occupy law enforcement offices.

Recall that billionaire activist and major Democratic donor Michael Bloomberg has already “embedded” privately hired attorneys in progressive state AG offices as “Special Assistant Attorneys General” to push this agenda. As the government-transparency group Energy Policy Advocates recently detailed, these mercenaries also were immediately tasked with assisting these private plaintiffs’ suits.

We have learned that this campaign’s lead tort firm has received “grants” of millions of dollars from a charitable foundation, plainly to underwrite its work despite contingency fee agreements promising massive payouts from any settlement. This is seemingly problematic, and not just for the poor optics of double-dipping.

We have also learned of “climate” plaintiff Rhode Island – home of Sen. Whitehouse – confessing that their goal in is to obtain a “sustainable funding stream” because the legislature would not pass the taxes required to finance left-wing spending ambitions.

The Biden-Harris vow to order their Attorney General to enlist the Department of Justice in this troubling campaign is scandalous. The Attorney General confirmation hearings must elicit from the nominee an unambiguous condemnation and disavowal of such thuggery.

Chris Horner is an attorney in Washington, DC and member of the board of the public interest law firm Government Accountability & Oversight, P.C.

4.6 15 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 6, 2021 6:02 am

Does that include the hapless grid operators also?

U.K. Power Grid Creaks at Risk of Blackouts (

Reply to  ResourceGuy
January 6, 2021 9:23 am

Failure to carry out the demands of our new masters will be prosecutable.
Regardless of whether or not the demands are even possible.

Reply to  MarkW
January 6, 2021 5:35 pm

Similar to the mandate to use cellulosic ethanol.

Reply to  MarkW
January 6, 2021 8:00 pm

Look at that law being proposed in the state of New York where the government can decide if there is a need to incarcerate ill people during an outbreak, for the safety of the rest of the population. That is super scary legislation, imo.

Reply to  ResourceGuy
January 6, 2021 10:12 am

Secession will be more likely.

Trying to Play Nice
Reply to  Luke
January 6, 2021 3:45 pm

Based on today’s events, I would think secession or civil war will be likely if the Democrats try to push their Marxist agenda too hard. Thank God that President Trump and the Senate filled so many judicial openings with reasonable judges.

Reply to  ResourceGuy
January 6, 2021 7:57 pm

Look at this story about current conditions in China. At 2:55 in the video it shows police removing a coal burning stove from a home because of the new laws put in place by the government. At the same time China is experiencing a massive and deep cold wave across most of their nation over the last 2 weeks. This cold pattern may hang in place for some time. …

January 6, 2021 6:36 am

I have to ask: The entire article gives me reason to believe that “extortion” is from “tort”, and these “tort lawyers” are openly admitting intent to “extort”?
Cannot this be taken to court on behalf of the people targeted for extortion, namely the taxpayer?

Reply to  paranoid goy
January 6, 2021 8:23 am

Not trying to be sarcastic, but apparently only Leftists and non-citizens have standing in the corrupt courts now. Not even the President of the United States, not members of legislatures, not candidates for office suing over a stolen election seem to have standing, so it doesn’t matter what evidence they want to present. The court will cancel an evidentiary hearing and then dismiss the case for LACK OF EVIDENCE ….but illegal aliens breaching our borders and unlawful combatants captured on a battlefield in Afghanistan or Iraq DO have standing in U.S. courts. It might help for anyone wishing to bring suit in a U.S. court to set off in IED or a car bomb or set a business on fire first or dress in the latest BLM and Antifa fashion and wave the flag of your favorite foreign banana republic to gain standing.

January 6, 2021 6:51 am

If alarmists launch such a broad legal assault, it would probably backfire on them, since “The Science” is not necessarily on their side, or in their pocket, as some of them seem to believe. It would force a public debate on “The Science” that the alarmist side may very well lose, at least in the eyes of the public, who’s generally not inclined to believe that climate issues are an emergency, or even a real problem, after decades of unsubstantiated claims and falsified predictions.
The fact that for years alarmists have been avoiding public debate speaks for itself. You don’t avoid a public debate if you think that you’re in a position to crush your opponents.

This famous, historic “Scientific – Political” trial comes to mind:

Walter Horsting
Reply to  dagpaz
January 6, 2021 7:15 am

Not with MSM lies on Climate Change and their advocacy….

Reply to  Walter Horsting
January 7, 2021 4:09 am

and gurgle fk- u-over- book and twats n utoob censoring everything as well

Pat Frank
Reply to  dagpaz
January 6, 2021 7:20 am

When the legal fix is in, science won’t matter.

They’ll be show trials, with plenty of consensus climatologists on hand to hotly testify against the defendants at the bar, including against any scientists who dispute (or disprove), the IPCC position.

The court will accept the testimony of the AGW people as climate canon. Everything else will be dismissed as lies, propaganda, or, at best, mistakes.

Consensus climatologists are incompetent, and so will actually believe the pseudo-science they spout. Their sincerity will be taken as proof for their testimony.

Ian W
Reply to  Pat Frank
January 6, 2021 12:52 pm

The only thing that will beat the lawyers is the weather. You may have noticed the current continual temperature drops:


The Earth’s Temperature
Currently: 57.17°F/13.98°C
Deviation: -0.03°F/-0.02°C
Stations processed last hour: 66816
Last station processed: Goose, Canada
Update time: 2021-01-06 20:44:31 UTC
The Earth would appear to already be below the ‘ideal’ 14degC temperature, Yesterday I posted the same site and it was 13.99degC now it is 0.01degC lower. So following the climate ‘science’ approach of projecting from that change, the world could be 3.65degC colder than it is now in a year’s time. Difficult to get people fired up about global warming if that happened.
(Although I would expect a smooth volte face to Anthropogenic Global Cooling needing to stop the use of fossil fuels to prevent a drop into glacial temperatures)

Last edited 2 years ago by Ian W
Reply to  Ian W
January 6, 2021 5:36 pm

So we still have time to act and save the planet!!!!!!! ( sarc now off)

Reply to  Ian W
January 6, 2021 8:56 pm

That information will be buried by the MSM and social Media. This was never about climate.

Reply to  dagpaz
January 6, 2021 8:21 am

You seem to be under the impression that the courts are honest and ethical. The kangaroo courts that refused to let Trump’s lawyers present any information of fraud would say otherwise.

This country is done, it is over. Emboldened by getting away with fraud in the presidential election, the fraud was now repeated in the Georgia senate election. If you think the Republicans will re-take the house in two years, think again. Fraud will prevent that as well. And since the courts are no longer about justice, the fraud will succeed. President-elect Harris will then add two supreme court justices that will vote the “correct” way every time. In November, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 vote saying governor’s executive orders do not override the Constitution. The 4 dissenting judges said it was an emergency, so it was okay to suspend the Constitution. All the democrats have to do is declare another “emergency”, such as a climate emergency, and then by a 6-5 vote our rights will be suspended.

Once the United States falls to the globalist and Marxists, the rest of the world will be right behind. Things are going to get really bad soon.

Reply to  Wade
January 6, 2021 1:54 pm

Never thought I would see a first family with a porn channel.

Trying to Play Nice
Reply to  Wade
January 6, 2021 4:05 pm

The House is populated based on elections from each of the 435 congressional districts. The Democrats are very successful at getting large blocks of votes from cities which can carry a state-wide election. They are not able to garner the votes from all the outlying districts which primarily vote Republican. That’s why in the 2020 election the Democrats lost seats in the House and will almost certainly lose control in 2022.

Reply to  Trying to Play Nice
January 6, 2021 5:38 pm

I hope is that they screw up things so bad that the repubs regain the house.

Reply to  dagpaz
January 6, 2021 9:26 am

It doesn’t matter whether they win or not, the process is the punishment.
Just being sued over and over again, will drain the resources of most companies and organizations.
And that after all, is the goal.

Reply to  dagpaz
January 6, 2021 9:33 am

If alarmists launch such a broad legal assault, it would probably backfire on them

It won’t backfire, the courts are corrupted.

Reply to  dagpaz
January 6, 2021 11:04 am

Tim Ball won against Michael Mann, didn’t he?
If I remember correctly, he won because the Canadian court asked Mann to present the data that he used as basis for his theory, and for several years, Mann chose not to show this material.
One can only guess why Mann chose to lose this libel suit against Ball. I doubt that was his intention when he filed it.

The burden of proof is on the side that sues, and in this case it would be hard to prove something in court that no one had been able to prove outside the courts.
Judges are not stupid journalists or corrupt editors, and they know that if they fail to do justice, a higher court can overturn their verdict, make them look bad, and hurt their career.

I find it hard to imagine that any prosecutor could prove beyond reasonable doubt that an expert testimony provided by someone like Will Happer, Richard Lindzen, Nir Shaviv, etc. is scientifically invalid.
All that would be required from the defendants is to show that there is a legitimate debate within the scientific community, and that it is acceptable not to side with the alarmists’ point of view and predictions.

[fix your email address to the real one so I don’t have to keep fixing it-mod]

Reply to  dagpaz
January 6, 2021 6:42 pm

We see a glimmer of hope from time to time but the government uses lawfare to break its own citizens. With full backing of the Biden gov (if he wins) the lawfare will include the DOJ, FBI & IRS on all in opposition to its mandates.

Old Retired Guy
January 6, 2021 6:56 am

The only benefit of this is that it will force them to have to prove something, which they haven’t done so far, and will have to respond to all the evidence that shows they are wrong. The risk of a jury trial concerns me, but good attorneys should be able to deal with that.

Coach Springer
Reply to  Old Retired Guy
January 6, 2021 7:24 am

Empirical proof is required in a court of law? Almost never.

Reply to  Old Retired Guy
January 6, 2021 8:08 am

I would not pin any hope on evidence. A morally straight-laced, law-abiding, unbiased, learned lawyer and his team could present the evidence plain as day and incontrovertible but activist judges will simply force a certain outcome regardless. The courts would act more like courts in post-WWI Germany where it’s just a chance for a predetermined conclusion to build up its legal clout. Evidence is irrelevant unless it supports the predetermined conclusion.

Reply to  Old Retired Guy
January 6, 2021 9:28 am

When you control what evidence is being presented, it’s easy to win.
Only court recognized “experts” will be allowed to testify. Skeptics will not be allowed a place at this table.

Eric Vieira
Reply to  Old Retired Guy
January 7, 2021 1:01 am

What is the chance of finding a “good attorney” who knows that when he defends the “wrong cause”, his career gets terminated? When a system is rigged, choosing the “right side ” means survival… exactly what happened in Germany during the 30’s…

January 6, 2021 6:59 am

A Nuremberg Trial for the climatenazis? I am all for it! Swift conviction and immediate hanging for all lie spewing climatards.

Reply to  2hotel9
January 6, 2021 8:57 am

In a fair trial that would be great but if these trials happen they will be the polar opposite of fair and the victims won’t be climatenazis. The victims will be scientists and others who didn’t sell their integrity for a seat on the gravy train.

Reply to  2hotel9
January 6, 2021 2:03 pm

I am not comfortable with the comparison to the Nuremberg Trials.
The NTs were actually for people who had committed horrible crimes.
A better comparison is the Moscow Trials of the 1930s where Stalin had his enemies executed for crimes they might commit.

Michael in Dublin
January 6, 2021 6:59 am

Corruption in politics including the US in nothing new. What is most shameful in not the existence of corruption – it will always be around – but how shameless the perpetrators are and with no fear of consequences. It becomes especially scary for the ordinary citizen when the courts are corrupt.

David Kamakaris
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
January 6, 2021 7:05 am

“how shameless the perpetrators are and with no fear of consequences.”

After witnessing yesterday’s Georgia run-off election, it’s about to get a lot worse.

Reply to  Michael in Dublin
January 6, 2021 9:36 am

Corruption in politics including the US in nothing new

It’s nothing new, what is new is the vast expansion of it.

Harry Passfield
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
January 6, 2021 11:32 am

Can you imagine how Hunter Biden feels now? His dad, the Big Guy, is now the POTUS and Hunter has a free ticket to all the corruption he can handle, knowing full well, that at the end of his father’s term (in a few months?) he will get a Presidential pardon to absolve him of everything.
There are too many Manchurian Candidates about to take power in the USA.

Reply to  Harry Passfield
January 6, 2021 5:14 pm

There’s a significant chance of an overdose in which case a pardon does him no good.

Ed Zuiderwijk
January 6, 2021 7:09 am

There is a solution. But it is in French. ‘Aux armes citoyens / formez vos bataillons ‘

Ian W
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
January 6, 2021 1:04 pm

Which looks like it might be happening – but without the guillotines

January 6, 2021 7:17 am

Meanwhile, the Iberian Peninsula had, this night, the lowest registered temperature Evahhh: -34.1 C (-29.38 F)

Coach Springer
January 6, 2021 7:26 am

Yes (regrettably). Next question.

And remember, the outcome in a Nuremberg trial isn’t in question.

CD in Wisconsin
January 6, 2021 7:30 am

As I write this, it appears that both of the Senate seats for Georgia will go to the Democrats. With VP-elect Harris casting a tie-breaking vote in situations where a vote on a bill follows party lines in the Senate, the Democrats can likely do whatever they want.

Thus, we have a situation where The State and the climate-religion become one in violation of the U.S. Constitution. With no one in a position of significant power or influence having taken on the challenge of exposing it as as a type of religion, there is nothing to stop the The State from repeating the history of the Salem Witch Trials or Nuremberg trials as the post above suggests. Let the witch hunts begin.

One might think that we as a species have psychologically evolved enough and have become enlightened enough to where we are beyond the point that something like this could happen again after over 400 years. You might very well be wrong. Lysenkoism….science is just an instrument that now serves The State. I pray that I am wrong about all this, but I fear I won’t be.

Richard Page
Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
January 6, 2021 2:11 pm

After the first one or maybe two, those businesses that are able to will shift their offices and assets out of the USA and to a more hospitable country. It will be pretty bad for everyone by that point, I should imagine.

Reply to  Richard Page
January 6, 2021 7:46 pm

Not just businesses. If you have an above average income, you will need to start working on ways to protect your income for the coming tax increases. The Democrats claim that they are only going to tax the wealthy, but that’s a lie. In order to get the kind of money they need, they are going to have to tax deep into the middle class.
You can also expect attempts to raid retirement funds. After all it’s not fair that some people have enough money to retire, while others don’t.

Pat Frank
Reply to  Richard Page
January 6, 2021 9:33 pm

When the US falls, there will be no more hospitable countries. Progressives or tyrants are in charge everywhere. Businesses will probably locate where the cronyism is most profitable to management.

Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
January 6, 2021 5:20 pm

I fear you are correct also.

I see an immediate boost to security and eventually a wall going up around the Capitol Building.

January 6, 2021 7:49 am

Prosecute and convict anyone who opposes climate change. They have been talking about that for sometime. Now they may be in a position to do it. Dictatorship and abuse.

January 6, 2021 8:36 am

Most WUWT readers might already know there are “ExxonKnew”-style global warming damages lawsuits currently filed in the U.S., but might not be aware of how many. By my count, there are 23 of them, the majority of them being handled by just one single law firm with possibly suspect ties to one of the central promulgators of the almost 30 year-old false accusation that skeptic climate scientists are paid fossil fuel industry money to lie.

January 6, 2021 9:17 am

Not only did they promise to prosecute those they disagreed with during the campaign, prosecuting political dissent was standard procedure during the Obama administration. With no complaints for Slow Joe.

January 6, 2021 9:21 am

Now that the Democrats control the Senate, confirmation hearings are no longer relevant.
They can and will confirm anyone the administration wants.

Ian W
Reply to  MarkW
January 6, 2021 1:08 pm

Not quite true, the democrat minority in the Senate managed to stall a lot of Trump’s appointees for the entire presidential term. However, it would take application to ‘resist’ that the Republicans have not shown in the past.

Reply to  Ian W
January 6, 2021 6:03 pm

That’s because for most of Trump’s term, the Republicans let them.

The Democrats will change the rules to expedite hearings and votes.

January 6, 2021 9:23 am

“I’m not going to be telling them what they have to do and don’t have to do. I’m not going to be saying, ‘Go prosecute A, B or C.’”

They can technically keep that promise, as observed: “Soon they will turn to putting a “sympathetic Attorney General” in place.”

No need to tell DOJ what to do if the person in charge of it wants to do the same.

Reply to  TonyG
January 6, 2021 10:37 am

Exactly. Loyal sycophants know what the boss wants done and know they will be rewarded and protected. It is called plausible deniability and is used often by politicians especially on the left such as the Clintons and the 0. Doesn’t seem to work so well for conservatives though. The corruption of investigative agencies and the judiciary becomes more obvious daily. I recall Nixon was denounced for having an “enemies list” but Mad Maxine blabbed about the 0 compiling such a database with impunity. Blackmail is the currency in the swamp; And media bias is counterfeit currency.

January 6, 2021 9:29 am

Why bother w/trials? OK, keeping lawyers paid, but the uncooperative hoi polloi will simply be “cancelled”.

Reply to  beng135
January 6, 2021 5:26 pm

In China, even billionaires are disappeared on a regular basis.

One would think that Dorsey and Zuckerberg would know this but they must think they are untouchable given their relationships with the deep state. We shall see.

Reply to  Scissor
January 6, 2021 6:05 pm

Useful idiots always believe that the incoming tyrants will be grateful.
The reality is that the useful idiots are often the first ones disposed of.
They have already demonstrated that they are willing to attack those in power if the price is right.

Eric Vieira
Reply to  Scissor
January 7, 2021 1:14 am

That’s exactly what happened after the islamic revolution in Iran. The left wing activists who helped to make the revolution happen… were the first to get hanged…

Peta of Newark
January 6, 2021 9:43 am

Groan, the old Executive Function crashed again…
….Should have minded you all of this a few days ago

Joseph Zorzin
January 6, 2021 11:44 am

Meanwhile, Massachusetts just passed the most radical “green” bill in the nation:

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 6, 2021 6:07 pm

With the Democrats in full control of the Federal government, when Massachusetts hits a financial wall due to their green grandstanding, the feds will step in to bankroll them.
Can’t let socialism appear to be a failure. Not so long as their are still taxpayers who haven’t been fully fleeced yet.

January 6, 2021 12:35 pm

There are two political strategies that the defendants and skeptics in general must use.
1. We must not allow the alarmists to blame climate change on the the fossil fuel producers. We must shift the blame to the end user. In general the neo marxists are looking for victims they can lead against a perpetrator. We must make the victims the perpetrators.

2. Closely related to the above. We must hold leaders accountable to the laws they create. Actively campaign against any judge or lawyer who owns an ICE car or boat, has a holiday house or fly overseas for a holiday.

Reply to  Waza
January 6, 2021 5:27 pm

Good points.

Mike Dubrasich
Reply to  Waza
January 6, 2021 5:41 pm

The long knives are coming. The Left gained power by lying, cheating, and stealing. They know it; everybody knows it. Now they will consolidate with the most ruthless means available. Don’t think that the oil companies are the only target. They are coming for you. Your “strategies” will not protect you. The debate is over. The dogs are unchained.

January 6, 2021 1:51 pm

Yes, climate Nuremberg trials are likely. Never underestimate the absurdity and tyranny of Leftists. History is our guide.

January 6, 2021 3:53 pm

Time for an industry wide shutdown. No power, no fuel. 30 day demonstration of the future (or past, if you prefer) should be sufficient to make the general public realise the long term consequences of maintaining the current course.

Reply to  Murph
January 6, 2021 6:08 pm

The only problem with this strategy is that the government will declare an economic emergency and seize every shutdown company so that it can be re-opened with new, more compliant management.

Bro. Steve
January 6, 2021 4:25 pm

I don’t know what motivates a guy like this. But I do wonder if his percentage of a trillion dollar company has crossed his mind. “The love of money is the root of all evil.” (1 Tim 6:10)

Patrick MJD
January 6, 2021 4:26 pm

After the COVID-19 scare and the coming COVID-21 scare (Id say sometime in February/March), the climate which hunt will begin in earnest. The next 4 years are going to be interesting for the USA under Biden (Who won’t be PotUS for long IMO) and the world. But what is being ignored in the media is the tensions between the US, Taiwan and China in the Taiwan straights.

Pat Frank
Reply to  Patrick MJD
January 6, 2021 9:39 pm

Biden is China’s man in DC. He’ll probably go easy, possibly withdraw the US Navy, and say something like, ‘It’s time for us to face reality.’ Taiwan will be left in the wind.

January 6, 2021 6:11 pm

If Biden wins then every heresy will be on trial. Everyone who will dare to disagree with the left’s owners (media, tech, CIA+lawfare, med-mafia (pharma on top)) will be “re-educated”. The excuse will vary depending on their needs but climate will be one.

January 6, 2021 8:19 pm

Yes, maybe. We’re in for a rough next two years (elections then) at least. Get defensive economically if you can.

Reply to  eck
January 7, 2021 11:17 am

It will be longer than 2 years. Even if the Republicans are able to over come the cheating, they won’t have enough votes to overcome president Harris’ vetos. So everything passed in the first 2 years will remain for at least the next 2.

January 7, 2021 12:24 pm

For those Americans that haven’t figured it out yet. We no longer live in a representative Republic. The United States is now an Oligarchy and under such a system the Constitution is nothing but an old scrap of parchment. Under such a system there are no limits on the punitive actions the elite can take against those they believe threaten their power and wealth.

So as for the question the answer is YES if it serves the purpose of our rulers.

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights