“New Dark Age Cometh”: Nobel Prize Biochemist Cancelled for Covid-19 Wrongthink

The conference organisers are gutless. They should have told those threatening to quit to make their choice with 48 hours, communicate it them and new participants sought.

This is the only way to handle such unprofessional behaviour. There are many qualified people who are quite capable of holding polite, collegial meetings and respectful interchange.

When he is finally shown to have been correct all along, what will these “children” do? Apologize? They should be sent to finishing school for lessons on decorum.

This episode is one example of a systemic institutional failure to act professionally.

It’s almost like they took a page directly from the Climate Liars playbook.

Why not simply quote, if the discussion starts :
https://consortiumnews.com/2020/10/16/covid-19-the-case-against-herd-immunity/
Marcello Ferrada de Noli has studied Sweden’s response to the virus and advises countries elsewhere to reject the neoliberal model and survive instead.

Marcello Ferrada de Noli is a professor emeritus of epidemiology. Formerly at Karolinska Institute, Sweden, and Harvard Medical School, he chairs Swedish Doctors for Human Rights, or SWEDHR.

Originally published in Spanish warning South America that this new Ikea-wrapped neoliberal concept of democracy, should not be unpacked by countries in Latin-America, Africa and other latitudes. There, a dignified formula for democracy should preclude the Swedish praxis of how – without the participation of the demos (Greek for “people”), those in power exercise the kratos (“rule”) to politically benefit themselves.

Would be a lively discussion, indeed!

As I write this, the reported COVID-19 death toll stands at nearly 225,000 in the U.S. I however cannot help but wonder if many of those deaths are being counted because they died WITH the viral infection as opposed to dying BECAUSE of it. Who is doing the counting? What are the criteria for counting someone as having died OF the virus as opposed to WITH IT?

https://tinyurl.com/y5uf9256

I doubt if anyone is going to question the death toll when this thing as all over and done with. No investigation is likely to be done, especially if Biden wins next month. Maybe I am barking up the wrong tree here. If this is a significant overreaction though, it demonstrates how we humans can easily go into panic and mass hysteria mode from listening to people we perhaps should not be. That goes for the CAGW narrative as well.

I would be interested in knowing what the mortality rate is going to be in the U.S. at the end of this year and how it compares with say 2015-2019.

I hate bullies. It’s never a good idea to back down to them because then they just get emboldened. Better to stand your ground and risk a bloody nose. At least you can maintain some self-respect that way. Lately the Tom Petty song “I won’t back down” has become my mantra.

If this nobel winner (a real one unlike mickeymann) made some mistakes regarding covid, why would this preclude him speaking on his specialty
No one gets everything right just as no one gets everything wrong.
There are brilliant people that comment on here, but on some subjects they seem a little out there, but that is fine as many people feel the same about me.
That is the problem with having an opinion, no matter what it is someone is going to be offended.
Makes it hard at parties, i want to be interesting like anyone else and i have no time for inane small talk, not my thing, so sometimes i stay silent.
That is wrong too.

It just seems like having an opinion is a human right, and that is being taken away

The common denominator that CC and COVID share is their ability to be used as control levers for those seeking to change the system. This COVID consensus, which has Sweden sitting as a negative proof point, having emerged from the other side of the virus without significant economic damage, is demonstrating what we know about CC. It’s all built on lies and hides behind what used to be the truth of science.

I wonder if this was what he got cancelled for?

“Countering the Second Wave with Facts, not Misconceptions”

By: Udi Qimron, Uri Gavish, Eyal Shahar, Michael Levitt

https://www.dropbox.com/s/72hi9jfcqfct1n9/Haaretz-20Jul20_ENGLISH%2012082020%20v3.pdf?dl=0

Some highlights for you:

Pre-immunity. No country has got more than 20% infected before it died out.

In several closed communities that underwent testing, the infection rate was always capped at 20%, which statistically aligns with maximal infection rate in these communities rather than recurring coincidences.

In Sweden the infection rate did not exceed 20% and the percentage of people who survived the epidemic exceeds 99.9% of the population.

In Belgium, the country with the highest population mortality rate, where less than 20% were infected, and more than 99.9% of the population has survived.

Immediate removal of most restrictions on the economy, immediate return to normal life of low-risk population while helping high-risk groups reduce the rate of social contacts is in order.

When total expected deaths from any cause by age as well as totals returns to normal, the pandemic is over. Yes people will still get COVID-19 from the virus and some will be very sick, but statistically, the pandemic will be over. If this Nobel prize winner is off by a few months or even a year, that is not outside of the norm for predictions based on models of pandemics.