
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
At least I think that is what author Greg Asner is saying.
My question – why not simply exterminate the bats, if they are such a threat to human health?
Protecting half of the planet is the best way to fight climate change and biodiversity loss – we’ve mapped the key places to do it
September 8, 2020 10.16pm AEST
Greg Asner
Director, Center for Global Discovery and Conservation Science and Professor, Arizona State University…
My research focuses on ecosystems and climate change from regional to global scales. In 2019, I worked with conservation biologist and strategist Eric Dinerstein and 17 colleagues to develop a road map for simultaneously averting a sixth mass extinction and reducing climate change by protecting half of Earth’s terrestrial, freshwater and marine realms by 2030. We called this plan “A Global Deal for Nature.”
…
By setting aside half of Earth’s lands for nature, nations can save our planet’s rich biodiversity, prevent future pandemics and meet the Paris climate target of keeping warming in this century below less than 2.7 degrees F (1.5 degrees C). To meet these goals, 20 countries must contribute disproportionately. Much of the responsibility falls to Russia, the U.S., Brazil, Indonesia, Canada, Australia and China. Why? Because these countries contain massive tracts of land needed to reach the dual goals of reducing climate change and saving biodiversity.
…
But as climate change accelerates, it may scramble those priorities. Staying ahead of the game will require a satellite-driven monitoring system with the capability of tracking real-time land use changes on a global scale. These continuously updated maps would enable dynamic analyses to help sharpen conservation planning and help decision-making.
…
Read more: https://theconversation.com/protecting-half-of-the-planet-is-the-best-way-to-fight-climate-change-and-biodiversity-loss-weve-mapped-the-key-places-to-do-it-144908
I doubt anything we do can completely prevent humans coming into contact with dangerous zoonotic diseases and I don’t really want to exterminate all the bats, but human health first.
Creating and maintaining sterile buffer zones in areas of known risk, and controlling or if absolutely necessary eradicating known disease vector species would do a a lot to help mitigate the problem of humans coming into contact with dangerous new diseases.
As for reducing CO2 emissions, we’d get more value spending billions of dollars on medical research, rather than building new wind farms. Health research would certainly consume a lot less bat habitat, than paving over millions of acres of precious wilderness to build new renewable energy installations.
How do I say “F**k Off” in a manner these moronic f**ks can understand? Do I have to burn down their home/business same as Black Lies Matter does? Drag them out of restaurants same as Black Lies Matter does? Smash the windows out of their cars same as Black Lies Matter does? Give me a clue. What do I have to do to shut these anti-human c**suckers the f**k up. Throw me a bone.
Green dingbats are the problem, worldwide plague been with us for a while now. The AFR and the ABC were the sites of some of the earliest outbreaks
“By setting aside half of Earth’s lands for nature, nations can save our planet’s rich biodiversity…”
Uninhabited area:
USA – 47%
Russia – 55%
Canada – 80%
Brazil – ?
Australia -90%
Indonesia – 87%
China – 67%
Looks like their goal is already pretty much met. How nice that EU countries don’t need to do anything to help.
Rick, I think your numbers are way too low. If you travel across the USA by auto you will see that most of the land is in a natural state or there are a few homes or businesses spread out along the highway. If there is a cabin on 100 acres of woods, is that 99% natural or because it is owned by an individual is that unnatural? What is the resolution used for the calculations? I’ll bet if you went through my subdivision and measured the weeds and other unwanted natural growth in yards and landscaping you would come up with at least 10% untouched, natural land.
Global warming is frying many people’s brains, especially scientists and eco-activists. As for bats, leave them alone and they will leave you alone. Capice?
If we can do anything CHEAPLY to let nature with its virus carriers alone, it’s probably in the direction of leaving the forest alone, by NOT encourage wood burning!
I have a better idea. Leave bats alone. They are hosts for Ebola, SARS, MERS, COVID-19…all the nasty viruses. Don’t catch them, play with them, make them pets, study them, eat them (seriously gross). Just don’t.
Not collecting the virus from the wild, growing it in a lab in the heart of a massive city, and then accidentally letting it escape is a far better way to protect man from bat viruses!
My question – why not simply exterminate the bats, if they are such a threat to human health?
–
Blank disbelief. Multiple levels.
–
It is the virus that is the danger, not the bats.
The bats are merely a vector.
and only one of many. and one that chooses not to interact with us anyway..
–
What next?
Tigers and Lions?
Bears and Polar Bears?
Sharks?
Piranhas?
Mosquitoes?
–
Oysters are a breeding habitat for viruses like Hep A , get rid of oysters?
–
What is it about humans that makes them want to kill as the first and easiest solution anyway?
Bats eating mosquitoes MORE than compensates humans, healthwise, for any loss due to their existence as a disease vector.
Mosquitoes, the deadliest animal on the planet. Wake up, dumb asses.
first breed humans with bats
then exterminate the humans
easy peasy