University of Washington

The world of climate modeling is complex, requiring an enormous amount of coordination and collaboration to produce. Models feed on mountains of different inputs to run simulations of what a future world might look like, and can be so big — in some cases, lines of code in the millions — they take days or weeks to run. Building these models can be challenging, but getting them right is critical for us to see where climate change is taking us, and importantly, what we might do about it.
A study in Geophysical Research Letters evaluates 40 recent climate models focusing on sea ice — the relatively thin layer of ice that forms on the surface of the ocean — around Antarctica. The study was coordinated and produced to inform the next Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, due out in 2021.
All the models projected decreases in the aerial coverage of Antarctic sea ice over the 21st century under different greenhouse gas emission scenarios, but the amount of loss varied considerably between the emissions scenarios.
“I am really fascinated by Antarctic sea ice, which the models have struggled more with than Arctic sea ice,” said lead author Lettie Roach, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Washington. “Not as many people are living near the Antarctic and there haven’t been as many measurements made in the Antarctic, making it hard to understand the recent changes in sea ice that we’ve observed through satellites.”
The models are known as coupled climate models, meaning they incorporate atmospheric, ocean, terrestrial and sea ice models to project what the future holds for our climate system. We are all familiar with the story of soon-to-be ice-free summers in the Arctic and the implications that may have on global trade. But what’s driving change around Antarctic sea ice and what’s expected in the future is less clear.
This study’s assessment of Antarctic sea ice in the new climate models is among the first.
“This project arose from a couple of workshops that were polar climate centered, but no one was leading an Antarctic sea ice group,” said Roach. “I put my hand up and said I would do it. The opportunity to lead something like this was fun, and I’m grateful to collaborators across many institutions for co-creating this work.”
The Antarctic is characterized by extremes. The highest winds, largest glaciers and fastest ocean currents are all found there, and getting a handle on Antarctic sea ice, which annually grows and shrinks six-fold, is critically important. To put that into perspective, that area is roughly the size of Russia.
The icy parts of our planet — known as the cryosphere — have an enormous effect on regulating the global climate. By improving the simulation of Antarctic sea ice in models, scientists can increase their understanding of the climate system globally and how it will change over time. Better sea ice models also shed light on dynamics at play in the Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica, which is a major component of our southern hemisphere.
“The previous generation of models was released around 2012,” says Roach. “We’ve been looking at all the new models released, and we are seeing improvements overall. The new simulations compare better to observations than we have seen before. There is a tightening up of model projections between this generation and the previous, and that is very good news.”
###
Co-authors of the recent study are Cecilia Bitz at the UW; Jakob Dörr at the University of Bergen; Caroline Holmes at the British Antarctic Survey; François Massonnet at Universite Catholique de Louvain; Edward Blockley at the U.K. Met Office; Dirk Notz at the University of Hamburg; Thomas Rackow at the Alfred Wegener Institute in Germany; Marilyn Raphael at the University of California, Los Angeles; Siobhan O’Farrell at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia; and David Bailey at Hamilton College in New York state. Funders of the research included the National Science Foundation and NOAA.
“All the models projected decreases in the aerial coverage of Antarctic sea ice over the 21st century under different greenhouse gas emission scenarios, …” Apparently, they didn’t just use RCP 8.5. I wonder if they tells us which RCP gave the results closest to reality?
I just remember, that in the Antarctic CO2 causes cooling 😀
Carbon dioxide has an unexpected effect in Antarctica
And whar the models are telling the authors ?
Cooling causes seaice lost ?
Discussion here at WUWT
“Building these models can be challenging, but getting them right is critical for us to see where climate change is taking us, and importantly, what we might do about it.”
Too bad they haven’t come close yet.
“put my hand up”, as in ‘teacher, may I?”.
That is, of course, the assumption that critical team leaderships go begging for want of qualified leaders?
No application for employment.
No list of recommendations.
No support from officials or people in power.
No haranguing decision makers.
Riiigght…
“what’s driving change around Antarctic sea ice and what’s expected in the future is less clear”, well, that is a good admission that one does not know.
However, “The models are known as coupled climate models, meaning they incorporate atmospheric, ocean, terrestrial and sea ice models to project what the future holds for our climate system. as an overriding statement fails to recognize that the snow and ice levels predicted by coupled climate models are not their only failing.
That ‘I don’t know’ extends to far more and greater atmosphere relationships.
“The opportunity to lead something like this was fun.” And I will continue to get funding provided I get the “right” answers.
The current Antarctic Sea Ice Extent since the 26th May 2020 has been larger than the 1979-1990 Average. Many recent years have been better than the 1979-1990 Average despite 2016-2018 being lower. The 2001-2010 and the 2011-2019 averages are both better than the 1979-1990 Average. It recovered nicely from the 2017 record low.
The Arctic Sea Ice Extent has generally declined over the last 30 years or more. The earths tilt/wobble can create the see-saw of a cooling Antarctic when the Arctic is warmer. Air & sea weather patterns could be localised or part of the see-saw. The orbit, sun activity and global forcings (eg. SO2, Ozone, CO2?), if any, would affect both N&S poles to a similar amount. Geological and volcanic activity is generally localised so Arctic volcanoes wouldn’t affect the Antarctic (and Antarctic volcanoes don’t affect the Arctic). So the difference in results and behaviour of the 2 poles need to be explained with less influence from CO2. Why is it so? Blindly changing model parameters until you like the result is a lottery driven by bias not science, so it proves nothing. Changing climate observations based on climate models is very risky (eg. land temps, ocean temps, Satellite measured MSL, tree rings). GIGO.
What can be certain is the climate models do not sufficiently explain the observations but many scientists don’t like to admit mistakes or inadequacies of research. Reanalysis, changing reference periods and not comparing long range forecasts with real data makes it harder to evaluate the quality of the models. Making more models and averaging the results is not being more scientific. It would be slightly better to use the models that are closer to reality. It would be best to find empirical data to verify the parameter values and their uncertainty.
https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/
So the oceans are getting lower – right ???? – lol