Professor: Respected Military Generals Could Convince Climate Skeptics

Row of military ships against marine sunset

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

According to Professor Emeritus Michael Klare, trusted military leaders could “bridge the gap” by convincing climate skeptics.

A military perspective on climate change could bridge the gap between believers and doubters

Michael Klare
Professor Emeritus and Director, Five College Program in Peace and World Security Studies, Hampshire College

February 19, 2020 12.54am AEDT

As experts warn that the world is running out of time to head off severe climate change, discussions of what the U.S. should do about it are split into opposing camps. The scientific-environmental perspective says global warming will cause the planet severe harm without action to slow fossil fuel burning. Those who reject mainstream climate science insist either that warming is not occurring or that it’s not clear human actions are driving it. 

With these two extremes polarizing the American political arena, climate policy has come to a near standstill. But as I argue in my new book,“All Hell Breaking Loose: The Pentagon’s Perspective on Climate Change,” the U.S. armed forces offer a third perspective that could help bridge the gap.

“Changing weather patterns, rising temperatures, and dramatic shifts in rainfall contribute to drought, famine, migration, and resource competition” in Africa, General Thomas D. Waldhauser, then commander of the U.S. Africa Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee in February 2019. “As each group seeks land for its own purposes, violent conflict can ensue.”

The military’s approach to climate change could bridge the divide between believers and doubters. People who assert that protecting endangered habitats and species is trivial next to health and economic problems, and that society has time to tackle whatever threats may develop, might be persuaded to take action when they hear from respected generals and admirals that the nation’s security is at stake.

This is already happening in some communities, such as Norfolk, Virginia, where base commanders and local officials have found common ground in addressing the area’s extreme vulnerability to sea level rise and hurricane-induced flooding.

Read more: https://theconversation.com/a-military-perspective-on-climate-change-could-bridge-the-gap-between-believers-and-doubters-128609

President Obama tried using the military to convince climate skeptics. How did that work out?

After all these years climate activists still don’t get us. Perhaps they judge us by their own followers, they’re still looking for leaders, magic influencers who can bring us into line.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
1 1 vote
Article Rating
168 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JCalvertN(UK)
February 21, 2020 6:58 pm

A lieutenant colonel was vainly rolled out at the Trump impeachment hearings. (“Finkman” – or some name like that.) We know he was a ‘lieutenant colonel’ because he rather imperiously corrected his cross-examiners on this major point of order.
This showed that, if the climate-changers want to convince sceptics, they’ll need to get someone with more clout that a lieutenant colonel.

But then, the cross-examinations could get interesting. . . . “Rear Admiral Finkman, how did you travel from San Diego to this hearing in Washington today . . . aircraft carrier?! . . . what is the carbon footprint of an aircraft carrier? . . . nuclear powered you say? Wonderful! . . . would you recommend this mode of transport to be used by all Americans? . . .”

David S
February 24, 2020 3:11 pm

The military would bring the intimidation factor; Either you believe in climate change or we shoot you.