Delingpole interview on the success of polar bear conservation & failed survival models

From Polar Bear Science

Posted on October 28, 2019

Tomorrow I will be giving a public lecture in Paris on polar bear conservation success and the spectacular failure of the polar bear survival models used to scare children senseless.

However, while I was in London a few days ago I spoke with James Delingpole, author and columnist at Breitbart who has recently taken to producing podcast and video interviews.

Chukchi Sea polar bear Arctic_early August 2018_A Khan NSIDC small

Yesterday, he posted a column summarizing our discussion, with a link to the entire podcast: “WATCH: Canadian Professor Lost Her Job for Telling the Truth About ‘Endangered’ Polar Bears.” Read it here.

Also, here is the video of my London lecture:

Advertisements

19 thoughts on “Delingpole interview on the success of polar bear conservation & failed survival models

    • +1

      Susan,
      http://www.cpom.ucl.ac.uk/csopr/seaice

      30-May-19: NRT Service Suspended during Arctic summer (May-Sept). 
Note that sea ice thickness cannot be accurately measured from CryoSat during the Arctic summer period (May-Sept), due to the formation of melt ponds on the sea ice surface. These ponds interfere with the radar signal and measurement method.

      If they can’t get accurate readings may-sept. due to melt ponds, …

      Note: consider doing a TED talk!!!

  1. The truth will eventually out. But it will be a long slow process draining the swamp. Keep up the good work Susan. Your many supporters are with you all the way.

  2. Ironically, they picked the fate of the polar bear as the icon of climate change, but it is their treatment of Dr Crockford which is a much better barometer for what is really happening.

    • +1
      She tells it as it is, that is science. The climate alarmists movement do do want the truth it negatively impacts their story line.
      Peter Ridd, Susan Crockford both scientists are fired and blocked from communicating for being honest.
      Al Gore a none scientist is given a Nobel prize for being dishonest.
      David Attenborough a none scientist and BBC voice over nobody, gets a ship named after him for broadcasting climate change propaganda.
      Go figure, as our American cousins would say.

  3. She was probably sacked for exposing Attenborough for a liar. (His walruses jumping of cliffs BS)

  4. Hello Dr Crockford,

    I have just got your book and look forward to getting into it ASAP. Ta.

    I also had another thought, if matters for this animal were so desperately dire then why do authorities allow them to be shot in their hundreds each year?

    “The Canadian government and conservation groups alike have long held that polar bear hunting in Canada is sustainable.”

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/2019/05/canadian-polar-bear-hunting-may-kill-fittest-animals/

    Confused.

    Jones.

  5. Dontcha just love it when people who watch something on TV or spend a couple of hours or days with binocs watching something, think they know more than someone who is actually spending weeks to months of real time on the issue?

    I don’t think that will change until Hudson’s Bay stops thawing in the Spring – and even then, they’ll say it’s due to global warming or mutating frogs, or something equally ridiculous.

  6. Conversation with an “Alarmist”:

    “They lied to you about Polar Bears, doesn’t that bother you?”

    “They lied to you about floating ice melting causing sea level rise, doesn’t that bother you?”

    “They lied to you about increased hurricane activity in the Atlantic, doesn’t that bother you?”

    “They lied to you about increased tornadoes, doesn’t that bother you?”

    (Responses not shown were simple, “blanked looks”.)

    “Now you tell me what they are telling you is the truth, the science is settled, and it is me who is denying reality!?”

    (Response here is “stop watching FOX News”!)

    You can not have a rational conversation with someone who is irrational.

  7. Unfortunately this kind of academic black balling goes on all the time. Other critical points of contention are being Republican, being too old, and being a Zionist. Also in departments with a high number of students and professors associated with Islamist organizations run with the Muslim Brotherhood, you can be blackballed just for being a Jew. And since there are no protections, no appeals and no rights. Even those in the system who don’t agree will stay silent rather than risk having the system turn on them.

  8. Thank you very much Dr Crockford. You are truly ‘walking towards the fire’. This was expressed so eloquently by Andrew Breitbart and is now posted by Anthony as the maxim at the head of this blog. We are with you and in awe of your example.

  9. Terrible case of mobbing you’ve been subjected to, similar to that endured by Ridd & others. Kudos to you and to GWPF, Delingpole and others for fighting loud-mouthed know-nothings with a dose of pure truth. God how they must hate those darn Ursi Maritimi for failing to starve & face imminent extinction! Maybe the species should be renamed Ursus Maritimus Denialsais.

    When the likes of Mann & Lewandowsky are so concerned that the narrative is crumbling that they resort to bashing someone who dares dissent, you know that both their scientific arguments and their moral compasses are resting on proverbial thin ice.

  10. A really good presentation.

    Perhaps, with Dr Crockford’s permission, Mr. Delingpole could send it to the University of Victoria to show them what they are missing.

Comments are closed.