@Aoc follower goes berserk in town hall. Claims we “have to eat babies” to survive climate change

See update below.

If you ever needed proof that liberalism has become a mental illness, you need only watch this.

If you can’t see the video in the Twitter post, here is the link to YouTube.

UPDATE: It seems this was a stunt:

The trolling stunt was a street performance of a passage from Jonathan Swifts satire “A Modest Proposal“:

I do therefore humbly offer it to publick consideration, that of the hundred and twenty thousand children, already computed, twenty thousand may be reserved for breed, whereof only one fourth part to be males; which is more than we allow to sheep, black cattle, or swine, and my reason is, that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage, a circumstance not much regarded by our savages, therefore, one male will be sufficient to serve four females. That the remaining hundred thousand may, at a year old, be offered in sale to the persons of quality and fortune, through the kingdom, always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump, and fat for a good table. A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for friends, and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt, will be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 3, 2019 5:54 pm

“We have to eat babies to survive climate change”

Better to eat them than let NASA scare the hell out of them.


Reply to  Chaamjamal
October 3, 2019 5:59 pm
Bryan A
Reply to  David Middleton
October 4, 2019 9:19 am

Any time the ___ch gets caught with her pants down saying or being associated with someone saying something totally outrageous…
It’s just a Stunt … or … I was only joking
Is this truly how we want our sitting Senators to act and project themselves?

Reply to  Bryan A
October 5, 2019 8:14 pm

“UPDATE: It seems this was a stunt:”

No schist !

It’s a bit sad that anyone, in their eagerness to attack AOC or climate alarmists, is prepared to believe this was for real but I think this outstanding performance finally disproves the claim that you cannot parody climate alarmists. I’ve often said that myself, but we’ve been proved wrong.

It’s not easy and this woman is probably the only person in the world to successfully pull it off. Her performance deserves an Oscar.

Reply to  Greg
October 6, 2019 9:00 pm

The woman in question did a great job. As to AOC, I am definitely no fan of hers but feel she handled it well. If she was in the dark that this was a stunt, then to immediately go on the defense and talk about ‘babies being eaten’ would have made her an enabler. AOC tried to answer with an encouraging topic, while trying to calm the woman down. And the comment about “even if we bombed Russia, we would still have too many people….”!

Brad Keyes
Reply to  Greg
October 17, 2019 7:47 am

Yeah, she set out to Jonathan Swiftboat AOC and wound up Jonathan Swiftboating skeptics as well with her Poe-faced, plaintive eco-Scando persona. I hope she gets a TV deal.

Was her accent an imposture? That was my first thought, not because it was badly done, but because it was just too perfectly-suited to the character. The kind of thing you couldn’t make up… unless you did.

She failed to Fool Me, but there’s no shame in that. I probably enjoyed it all the more for knowing I was witnessing art, not psychosis.

Reply to  Chaamjamal
October 3, 2019 6:27 pm

But veal is out of the question.

Reply to  Scissor
October 4, 2019 2:08 am

Ha ha ha

Reply to  Scissor
October 4, 2019 5:34 am

The vegans will be eat only seeds?

Adrian Mann
Reply to  Scissor
October 6, 2019 2:31 pm

Come to Hungary. We got veal. Lots of veal. Eat veal every day if you want. In every restaurant.
And why not?

Hot under the collar
Reply to  Chaamjamal
October 3, 2019 8:14 pm

I can’t help feeling that this was a sick hoax, she had a T shirt already printed, but only took her jacket off so you could see what it said when she started ranting. At least I hope it was a hoax rather than someone even more crazy than AOC!

Reply to  Hot under the collar
October 3, 2019 9:10 pm

The problem for AOC is she didn’t say “no, we’re not going to eat babies.” She answered it calmly as if was a serious question that wasn’t simply absurd.

In 1988 Dukakis had that infamous moment after they asked him whether he’d be for the death penalty for a brutal killer of his wife, and he stood there cold faced, saying “no” and talking about statistics.

In some sense this was like a Dukakis moment for AOC, because she couldn’t say the obvious: no to eating babies.

Reply to  Eric Simpson
October 4, 2019 1:17 am

Which would make it close to being a perfect troll, if that’s indeed what it was.

Jimmy Haigh
Reply to  Hot under the collar
October 3, 2019 9:17 pm

That’s what I first thought. Surely she can’t be serious? Surely?

Reply to  Jimmy Haigh
October 3, 2019 10:56 pm

These days it’s hard to distinguish satire from ordinary, everyday insanity.

Reply to  MarkG
October 4, 2019 10:53 am

Insanity thrives when there isn’t any satire.

“Satire is a technique employed by writers to expose and criticize foolishness and corruption of an individual or a society by using humor, irony, exaggeration or ridicule.”

Satire exposes insanity.
Gore Vidal: If satire is to be effective, the audience must be aware of the thing satirized.

Michael S. Kelly LS, BSA Ret.
Reply to  Jimmy Haigh
October 4, 2019 6:33 am

It’s a parody. And don’t call her Shirley.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Michael S. Kelly LS, BSA Ret.
October 4, 2019 7:39 am


Reply to  Jimmy Haigh
October 4, 2019 6:40 am

It’s called an inversion. Reality and parody have switched places.

Reply to  huls
October 4, 2019 11:22 am

I hear Dilbert said that it is an inversion, so it must be true.

Reply to  huls
October 4, 2019 3:17 pm

Inversion of the Body Snatchers?

Wesley Horton
Reply to  Hot under the collar
October 3, 2019 9:55 pm

That was the impression that I got, was that she was deliberately making a parody of AOC. She was really “hamming it up” and hopefully she, (AOC) got the message that she was coming across as a fool.

Reply to  Wesley Horton
October 4, 2019 5:15 am

I agree. Someone punking AOC. Not real. That’s my opinion.

Reply to  Hot under the collar
October 4, 2019 5:55 am

I think it’s creation of the LaRouchePAC. Here’s an interview with a guy in the same T-shirt taking orders for Thanksgiving.


Reply to  icisil
October 4, 2019 6:48 am

Yeah, I think the lady asking the questions may be the same person in the above video. Good one.

Reply to  icisil
October 4, 2019 9:20 am

I don’t use Twitter but this one’s pretty funny. comment image

Reply to  Chaamjamal
October 3, 2019 8:44 pm

I think the woman is either insane or mentally retarded.

If she could read, she should read this, but its unlikely she would understand it.


The sad truth is that if we are hysterical enough to take on all these “solutions” to combat climate change we will indeed starve .
“More than a billion people suffer from energy poverty around the world and plans proposed by the Democratic candidates for the party’s nomination for President, like various version of the Green New Deal, would bring poverty and death for millions in the United States.”

Read ” The push for Energy Socialism” Also on WUWT. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/10/03/the-push-for-energy-socialism-in-the-united-states/

Reply to  Roger Surf
October 4, 2019 6:10 am

She was a Troll…with props…note the shirt

Joel Snider
Reply to  What?
October 4, 2019 9:14 am

But a troll parroting their own extremist message.

That’s called an effective troll – not the type you encounter here.

Reply to  Roger Surf
October 4, 2019 6:46 am

I think it was actually a genius marketing strategy for the LaRouchePAC, specifically US Senate candidate Daniel Burke.


Reply to  icisil
October 5, 2019 2:40 am

The trouble is that there are a lot of real mentally ill or not yet fully mentally grown (young children who still believe in Santa Claus) people who really think we ‘re in a climate crisis. They can be brutally fanatic like we see in child soldiers.

This stunt only shows where people like AOC will take us because if she doesn’t do it someone even more extreme will take her place.

Jon-Anders Grannes
Reply to  Chaamjamal
October 3, 2019 10:00 pm

What scares me more is that MSM is not all over this?

Bryan A
Reply to  Chaamjamal
October 3, 2019 10:26 pm

Let her parents start

Jon-Anders Grannes
Reply to  Chaamjamal
October 3, 2019 11:47 pm

Didn’t they just tell us to stop eating red meat? One thing is that I don’t understand them. The question is do they, the bitter resentful, understand themselves? They hate the World so much that anything goes?

Gerry, England
Reply to  Chaamjamal
October 4, 2019 5:46 am

Would we complain if the liberals eat their own and hasten their own extinction?

Reply to  Gerry, England
October 4, 2019 3:18 pm

If it involves sacrifice, socialists always want someone else to do it.

Jon-Anders Grannes
Reply to  Chaamjamal
October 4, 2019 1:25 pm

In Order to survive climate change we all have to lie down and die?

Reply to  Jon-Anders Grannes
October 5, 2019 6:50 am

Yes. Yes, that is what we must do. Don’t you get it?..says the radical pig leftist.

October 3, 2019 6:00 pm

Good grief, what has this climate catastrophe come to? That vocal young women is almost as bright as AOC. Two peas in a pod. I wonder if the backroom manipulators like Gore/Mann et al, are wondering if they have maybe over hyped the CO2 angle being responsible for all climate change. I would be embarrassed to be an alarmist.

Plantation Willie
October 3, 2019 6:03 pm

I wonder if that lady ate her therapist.

Reply to  Plantation Willie
October 3, 2019 6:47 pm

Mental comfort food.

October 3, 2019 6:08 pm
Reply to  cohenite
October 3, 2019 7:08 pm

They have it under control – not.


October 3, 2019 6:12 pm

I can’t find the right words to express how bat s… crazy this has become.

Reply to  Bob Tisdale
October 3, 2019 7:57 pm
Juan Slayton
Reply to  Bob Tisdale
October 3, 2019 8:27 pm

I can find the words but I’m not allowed to use them.

Reply to  Bob Tisdale
October 3, 2019 8:45 pm

Excellent summation.

October 3, 2019 6:14 pm

AOC follower and berserk.
Isn’t that redundant?

October 3, 2019 6:16 pm

Mama, don’t your babies grow up to be babies.

October 3, 2019 6:17 pm

AOC refuses to condemn eating babies!

Duncan Smith
Reply to  ctm
October 3, 2019 7:23 pm


Reply to  ctm
October 3, 2019 7:41 pm

She probably loves babies. Just can’t finish a whole one.

Reply to  philincalifornia
October 4, 2019 1:18 am

OK I think you just won the thread…

Reply to  icisil
October 4, 2019 1:28 pm

Babies, … the other white meat.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  philincalifornia
October 4, 2019 7:42 am

Small for a turkey substitute, big for a chicken replacement.
Holiday ham sized.
Do they come in spiral sliced?

Reply to  philincalifornia
October 4, 2019 11:25 am

I am eagerly awaiting the AOC food critics review saying that they taste just like chicken.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  philincalifornia
October 5, 2019 8:14 pm

That’s an old one, and I was about to post something similar. Still funny though!

Reply to  ctm
October 3, 2019 7:51 pm

That might actually constitute stealing someone’s childhood.

Reply to  Scissor
October 3, 2019 9:18 pm


James Clarke
Reply to  ctm
October 3, 2019 7:51 pm

AOC obviously believes that baby eaters are ‘fine people’! Impeach her!

Bryan A
Reply to  James Clarke
October 3, 2019 10:29 pm

Always Openly Cannibalistic

Reply to  ctm
October 4, 2019 7:52 am
Right-Handed Shark
October 3, 2019 6:28 pm

Don’t look so disturbed, Alexandria.. surely this is the kind of behaviour you wanted? No?

Jon-Anders Grannes
Reply to  Right-Handed Shark
October 3, 2019 10:02 pm

It’s so progressive and with progressive anything goes?

October 3, 2019 6:31 pm

Was she a farcical agent provocateur?

Reply to  Rocketscientist
October 3, 2019 7:41 pm

It sure looked like one big Troll to me. I think she pushed it just a little too far. But authentic or not, nobody in the room uttered a single word in response. Nada. They just sat there nodding their heads to … one of their own.

Reply to  Rocketscientist
October 3, 2019 8:16 pm

I think you are right..a bit of a plant.. making a point using their own stupidity and extrapolating it a bit to its most idiotic conclusion..

Chris Hanley
October 3, 2019 6:33 pm

It’s satire, Jonathan Swift’s Modest Proposal redux.

Craig from Oz
Reply to  Chris Hanley
October 3, 2019 7:49 pm

“I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee or a ragout.”

(from A Modest Proposal – Jonathan Swift)

Well… Looks like after all these years we finally discover who this very knowing American is.

Reply to  Chris Hanley
October 4, 2019 6:31 am

My first thought as well

High Treason
October 3, 2019 6:34 pm

Climate dementia. This is what happens when this sort of hysterical lunacy bubble is not burst earlier-people start coming out with totally insane ideas. Don’t laugh- pagan human sacrifices to the weather gods are a feature of past cultures. Do remember, the human brain is the same today as it was 10,000 years ago. Humans are just as vulnerable to nonsense now as they were in pagan human sacrifice days. Well may we laugh at the absurdities of the past, but are the measures proposed to combat “climate change” any less idiotic than sacrificing virgins in live volcanoes?

October 3, 2019 6:41 pm

I never thought I’d see the day when I’d end up wondering what a United States congresswoman’s position is on whether to eat babies.

David Weber
Reply to  David
October 4, 2019 6:32 am

Doh, didn’t see another “David” in here – I’ll start using my last name so we can tell each other apart 8)

Patrick MJD
October 3, 2019 6:42 pm

Swedish professor, who is she talking about? But that is just absolutely crazy…couple of months left, too must CO2…batsh!t crazy!

Reply to  Patrick MJD
October 4, 2019 1:25 am

She was referring to the Swedish professor who recently suggested cannibalism as a climate solution.

Reply to  icisil
October 4, 2019 8:08 am

Are the Swedes letting loose all their homegrown nutbars in the US this month?

Reply to  Kenji
October 4, 2019 11:01 am

They already released their meatballs (which I’m now wondering are made of).

Bryan A
Reply to  beng135
October 4, 2019 2:20 pm

Swedish meatballs are made of Swedish Meat
The younger the source, the more tender it is

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Patrick MJD
October 4, 2019 1:38 am

There was a story a little while back about eating people to save the planet from climate change.

October 3, 2019 6:43 pm

And I thought I had seen everything. I really did… but I was wrong… and I still haven’t seen EVERYTHING.

Ummm….. that pathetic individual needs help… lots of help… a quiet place with no electronic stuff to disturb her….

Anyone who goes into a panicky wacko rant like that in public has a problem, a real problem, and not something to make fun of, either. She needs help right now…. unless, of course, she was faking it to get attention. And frankly, nothing would surprise me less if attention is the real reason behind that rant.

Next to her, Greta T. makes actual sense of some kind.

Good grief.

Don Bennett
Reply to  Sara
October 4, 2019 6:41 am

Sara, This is what I sent in an email to my friends this morning:
” . . .But the woman that was ranting at AOC’s townhall is mental. And I do feel sorry for her because the global warming fear mongers have driven the poor woman crazy with their dooms day predictions. I was watching Tucker Carlson last evening and at the end of his show they had the clip of the poor woman at the townhall. She was very passionate and I believe she really thinks the planet only has a few months left.
Yes, I do hope the woman gets help because she’s likely to descend into despair and kill herself because she thinks there is no hope. And that’s just sad. But it also makes me madder than hell at the cynical bastards that manipulate people to this end.

AOC and her ilk on the other hand deserve out utter contempt and scorn. Their hysteria over imminent climate/weather doom is what drives these weak souls to despair. And it’s all a scam for money and power.
. . . “

Andy Espersen
October 3, 2019 6:47 pm

Well, yes, of course this case represents mental illness – and that is why I think WUWT should simply not have bothered reporting it. I know a fair bit about human insanity, having worked a lifetime in mental hospitals (while we had them!). I remember a certain number of clinical cases of schizophrenia coming in with delusions about “radio waves”, then (in the 1960s) it became about “television” or “flying saucers” or “moon landings”. Insane people often pick obvious current phenomena to construct an edifice of delusions about – as any psychiatrist will tell you.

Forget about it – it is not worth getting worked up about.

James Clarke
Reply to  Andy Espersen
October 3, 2019 7:39 pm

What revealed to you that this woman suffers from mental illness? Was it her words or how she said them? Her words really weren’t that much different from other climate alarmists, just stated in a slightly more blunt and hysterical way.

The point in sharing this sad scene is so that people can realize that the rhetoric of climate alarmists in general is just as insane and dangerous. The whole climate change movement is an “edifice of delusions”, and the sooner everyone realizes it, the better.

Andy Espersen
Reply to  James Clarke
October 3, 2019 10:03 pm

Excellent question from James Clarke : How does one diagnose schizophrenia? Just what is the difference between the delusions of sane people – and those of insane people? I must admit that without knowing a bit more about this young lady I cannot be 100 per cent sure she is insane. But if she continually expresses such mad opinions with such conviction and vehemence for weeks and cannot accept any arguments to the contrary – then she is mad. The rule of thumb is here that if common sense tells you she is mad – she IS mad. Lunacy was diagnosed by common sense for 100,000 years before the invention of psychiatrists – in civilised countries in a court of law.. About one third of new cases of the illness will recover spontaneously within days or weeks. But if the illness has slow beginnings and establishes itself over weeks rather than over a day or two, her chances of recovery are very slim. Once the illness is chronic it is incurable.

Rod Evans
Reply to  Andy Espersen
October 3, 2019 11:22 pm

Andy, I presume you are talking about AOC, re, the gestation period of insanity? The young disciple putting that extreme Green Socialist anxiety into words “we must eat babies”was just revealing to the wider world, what the end game of this collective climate alarm insanity is. The high priests of the movement are the ones who are insane.

Andy Espersen
Reply to  Rod Evans
October 4, 2019 12:27 am

Rod Evans – I am simply talking about a young person coming down with the illness of schizophrenia (as one per cent of all people in the world will) . Cases vary enormously in their clinical appearance – it is difficult to believe that they can possibly represent the same illness, but that is what Bleuler suggested a hundred years ago. And no convincing arguments exist for him being wrong (irrespective of our psychiatric, diagnostic manual (DSM) now feebly suggesting otherwise).
No, the high priests of the movement are not clinically insane – they are just plain silly and deluded. You can argue that they are mentally disturbed, pathologically anxious, neurotic or whatever – but such conditions are qualitatively different from lunacy.

Steve (Paris)
Reply to  Andy Espersen
October 3, 2019 11:30 pm

Poor lass.

October 3, 2019 6:48 pm

AOC and her staff didn’t seem to quite know what to do with the poor demented thing. Wonder if AOC saw a little of herself there.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  BobM
October 3, 2019 9:37 pm

She’s an AOC creation, plain and simple. If that’s not a wake-up call to AOC, well then she’s beyond reach.

October 3, 2019 6:58 pm

Eating babies is bad for the planet.

Reply to  leitmotif
October 3, 2019 7:24 pm

Eat em, abort em . Tomato, tomahto.

Gregg Eshelman
October 3, 2019 7:00 pm

“There are but two ways of forming an opinion in science. One is the scientific method; the other, the scholastic. One can judge from experiment, or one can blindly accept authority. To the scientific mind, experimental proof is all important and theory is merely a convenience in description, to be junked when it no longer fits. To the academic mind, authority is everything and facts are junked when they do not fit theory laid down by authority.” from “Life-Line” by Robert A. Heinlein August, 1939.

J Mac
October 3, 2019 7:05 pm

C’mon… This can’t be real. If it is, it makes a strong case for involuntary commitment to a psychiatric ward.

October 3, 2019 7:05 pm

But only before the second, third, perhaps fourth trimester.

Human sacrificial rites for social progress. Human sacrificial rites for social justice. Human sacrificial rites for fair weather. Sure, why not.

Reply to  n.n
October 4, 2019 9:51 am

Fourth trimester?
What sort of fractions are you usin’ there?

Reply to  Rocketscientist
October 4, 2019 7:53 pm

It’s the late-late-term abortion (i.e. post-birth child left on a steel slab) that was offered for consideration several trimesters ago.

Reply to  Rocketscientist
October 4, 2019 8:02 pm

It’s also a unit of measure equal to three months. That said, applying Occam’s scalpel leads us to conclude that selective and cannibalized-child have already been normalized for the sake of a liberal society, green lawns, and now fair weather. A logical progression.

Bryan A
Reply to  n.n
October 4, 2019 2:17 pm

Sounds like old Azteca

Reply to  Bryan A
October 5, 2019 8:36 pm

Moloch would be proud.

October 3, 2019 7:07 pm

Perhaps not cannibalism in the conventional sense (i.e. ingestion and digestion), but rather clinical cannibalism or recycled-child under the “planned parenthood” umbrella.

Tom Abbott
October 3, 2019 7:20 pm

It’s not good to agitate the psychos. Sometimes the psychos act out when their mental strain gets to be too much for them to handle, after hearing too many scary science fiction stories about CO2.

CAGW lies have consequences.

James Clarke
October 3, 2019 7:21 pm

It took me about 40 seconds to figure out how the left will spin this, because I am kinda tired and this poor woman is so obviously the product of AOC and the other alarmists. But the obvious is not acceptable to the paradigm, so this woman’s condition must be the fault of evil climate deniers! You see, if you had not taken all of that Big Oil blood money and stopped the necessary actions from being taken 20 years ago (i.e. turning all power over to radical leftists), this distraught woman would now be sleeping peacefully in a care-free socialist Garden-of-Eden utopia. BUT NO! You prevented everything good from happening, and now we are doomed to 3 degrees warming and have to eat our babies!

I don’t know how you climate deniers sleep at night after forcing the world to eat babies! I disgust me!

(Hey! I think I am getting the hang of this post-modern, post-rational world!)

Bryan A
Reply to  James Clarke
October 4, 2019 2:23 pm

You’re definitely getting the “POST” part down
That post was most proper

Jeff Alberts
October 3, 2019 7:23 pm

I don’t see anything to watch.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Anthony Watts
October 3, 2019 8:46 pm

I’m using Chrome. Is that real enough?

I see your lead sentence, and something tries to load, then it goes away. No ad blocker.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Anthony Watts
October 3, 2019 8:49 pm

Looks like it was blocked by DuckDuckGo’s privacy essentials.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
October 3, 2019 10:07 pm
Len Werner
October 3, 2019 7:23 pm

Has anybody considered locking her and Greta in the same room together? That would have to reach a critical mass of something.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Len Werner
October 3, 2019 9:34 pm

Greta and who, the baby-eater?

Greg Cavanagh
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
October 3, 2019 10:07 pm

Hmmmm, Brains…!
How Dare You!

Bryan A
Reply to  Greg Cavanagh
October 4, 2019 2:25 pm

still starving huh

Reply to  Len Werner
October 4, 2019 9:47 am

Greta is probably too old for her, but she does look young for her age, so it might be irresponsible to let her alone with that woman.

October 3, 2019 7:28 pm

At about 40 did she say “bomb Russia?” I every maternity ward in the country puts her picture up.

Krudd Gillard of the Commondebt of Australia
Reply to  Alan
October 3, 2019 8:06 pm

I thought I heard that too.

Good to see Ms Cortez spending time with her constituency.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Alan
October 3, 2019 9:36 pm

She said something to the effect “We could bomb Russia, but it’s not enough, there are too many people.” She really needs to lead by example and leave the planet.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Alan
October 3, 2019 10:10 pm

Yes, she did say bombing Russia is not enough.
Of course, they may not take kindly to it.
I am pretty sure this lady was punking AOC and her crowd.
The worst part was that no one told her to shut up, or contradicted her.
AOC said: “We have more than a few months”….before what?
Before we need to start roasting babies and bombing other countries?

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Nicholas McGinley
October 4, 2019 1:36 am

Now I just noticed that at 1:34 of the clip, AOC gives the lady an obvious wink.

Reply to  Alan
October 4, 2019 6:08 am

she suredid! so its ok to bomb russia eat babies and call everyone inthat room guilty polluters
and not one stood up n either laughed or queried her views?
AOK getting smooth at teflon deflection I see
some real cognitive dissonance there

October 3, 2019 7:31 pm

Mother Nature will only accept those who are totally committed to the cause as a sacrifice. If it happens to be an unhinged leftist feminist(virgin) wacko, so much the better. She could serve the cause well. It would also save her from having to eat the babies that slip by the abortionist.

October 3, 2019 7:39 pm

It’s remarkable how gently AOC “corrected” this obviously disturbed woman’s view as to the excessively short time available to act. She gently corrected the time frame that was off by a couple of orders of magnitude at least. However the suggestion that we may have some time to act is typically met with venom and anger.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  PlanningEngineer
October 3, 2019 10:11 pm

That was my reaction too.
Hardly even a gentle nudge of a pushback.

Craig from Oz
October 3, 2019 7:40 pm

I feel more study is required.

I mean should we eat these babies before or after we steal their dreams and childhood?

October 3, 2019 7:46 pm

… we only have a few months left.

What the hell!? What the hell is WRONG with these Socialists? They’ll say or do ANYTHING to seize control of the world’s Free Markets. Seize control of the means of production.

Gary Pearse
October 3, 2019 7:51 pm

Wow. I’ve expressed concern I have about what all this relentless hysteria created by evil opportunistic political and scientific puppetmasters and fed to our young people and vulnerable adults is going to create as this thing foments and collapses. I’ve often commented on the scourge of the “Climate Blues” that struck climate science researchers of apparent low mental stamina in face of the 18yrs of “The Pause”. This is different. This is is a couple of generations of the population of the West, not a mere few hundred scientists.

The rest of the world basically encourages this craziness in the hope of gleaning hundreds of billions of dollars from the game, but they have embarked on a frenzy of coal fired power to fuel their own economic development and future prosperity. This development will not be stoppable.

It is trivial to predict that nothing is going to stop CO2 from doubling and more before this century is out. I think this immutable fact is the best way to argue against suicidal destruction of the West’s economies. The scientific arguments of sceptics have been sucessfully encapsulated and neutralized by the ‘consensus’. That the rest of the world’s ’emissions’ totally make anything we do about our own pointless is something that can’t be hidden. For better or worse, we find ourselves locked into doing a definitive experiment on CO2 increase and Anthropo global warming or whatever we choose to call it. Frankly I’m looking forward to it. How the psychological health of millions holds up is another matter.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Gary Pearse
October 4, 2019 5:17 am

“It is trivial to predict that nothing is going to stop CO2 from doubling and more before this century is out. I think this immutable fact is the best way to argue against suicidal destruction of the West’s economies.”

I agree. The world cannot/will not prevent CO2 from doubling. So it’s time for plan B: Mitigation for those who fear CO2; and relaxation for those who do not fear CO2.

There is no evidence that CO2 adds any net heat to the Earth’s atmosphere. The Climate Doomsters are basing their fears not on evidence but on pure speculation. They shouldn’t let speculation drive them crazy. They should relax like the sane people do.

October 3, 2019 8:05 pm

Are the ‘Yes Men’ still at work? This looks like their style.

Wiliam Haas
October 3, 2019 8:11 pm

AOC has already stated that she was just joking and that anyone who believed her was an idiot. Of course the reality is that climate change is taking place so slowly that it takes networks of very sophisticated sensors, decades to even detect it. If the media did not tell people that the climate was changing, they would never know about it.

Reply to  Wiliam Haas
October 5, 2019 7:03 am

You sir, are correct.

James Clarke
October 3, 2019 8:13 pm

“The scientific arguments of sceptics have been successfully encapsulated and neutralized by the ‘consensus’. ”

If you mean ignored and suppressed, than okay, but the skeptical arguments have not been ‘neutralized’ in a scientific sense at all. The science has always been on the side of the skeptics. If an alarmist mistakenly wanders into a scientific discussion, his inevitable response will be a very unscientific: “Okay, but what if you are wrong? We can’t afford to take that risk!”

The alarmist learned very early own to never debate a climate crisis skeptic on the science. They learned to just call them names and worked to get them silenced, which has been an all-too effective strategy.

Gary Pearse
Reply to  James Clarke
October 3, 2019 8:30 pm

James that’s it precisely. They’ve refused to debate and they’ve remade themselves into a movement that is bypassing science. This thing has momentum. Hence, presenting the fact that we are going ahead with conducting the ever increasing CO2- in- the- atmosphere- experiment regardless of Western plans for decarbonizing which will not result in CO2 reduction. It will only ruin economies that participate.

Reply to  James Clarke
October 3, 2019 10:22 pm

Babies are red meat.

Reply to  accordionsrule
October 4, 2019 6:12 am

are they?
they are pretty much CAFO type critters from playgoup kindy then school i guess;-)
but isnt LongPork…the “other other” white meat??

Jimmy Haigh
October 3, 2019 8:24 pm

Imagine the dilemma: “Must eat babies! Babies are meat!”

J Mac
October 3, 2019 8:43 pm

After another viewing of this video, the term ‘bat shit crazy’ seems sooo inadequate. God save us from this ravening AOC abetted murderous mental madness…..

Brian Valentine
October 3, 2019 9:47 pm

These people call Trump supporters “lunatics” and “Nazis” and a lot more

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Brian Valentine
October 4, 2019 5:21 am

Yeah, but we know who the *real* lunatics and Nazis are, don’t we.

Mickey Reno
October 3, 2019 9:54 pm

Gives a whole new perspective on the term “num num num.”

October 3, 2019 9:57 pm

I had a couple of roast babies last weekend, got ahead of the curve.

Apple sauce and parlsey garnish.

Tasted just like chicken.

I did use charcoal though and am concerned that I am not being carbon neutral.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Dean
October 3, 2019 10:13 pm

Maybe they taste like beef once out of the toddler stage?

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Nicholas McGinley
October 4, 2019 9:40 am

From a co-worker who fought at Iwo Jima ….. flamethrower operator ….
cooked humans smell just like pork .
Could not tolerate the smell of pork . Even after more than 25 years had elapsed .

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
October 4, 2019 9:48 pm

I have heard that pigs are a close match for humans, physiologically speaking.

Steven lonien
October 3, 2019 9:59 pm

This is why such blatant brianwashing occours it protects corrupt republicans .attemting to prevent the stock total l collapse of energy stocks markets dependant on the whims of trump. real mart russian ploy

Steve in Greensboro
October 3, 2019 10:04 pm

CTH is calling the young lady’s performance agitprop. Very well done, if it is.


Reply to  Steve in Greensboro
October 4, 2019 5:49 am

Steve – Yup. It is. In comments above, some have caught on to that here on WUWT. It took me a while to catch on.

My favorite line from over on CTH was “Green New Meal”.

Nicholas McGinley
October 3, 2019 10:19 pm

Here is the guy who started the movement.
He is taking orders for Thanksgiving:

Rod Evans
Reply to  Nicholas McGinley
October 4, 2019 12:38 am

Nicholas, LoL I love the black humour in that. The inclusion of Mark Carney the governor of the BoE in the piece is classic.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Rod Evans
October 4, 2019 1:53 am

This may be genius level trolling of the climate change lunacy.
The interviewer was from a news organization called the Washington Square Post.
The only reference for any organization by that name seems to be the Washington Square branch of the American Legion, post #1212.
Here is their FB page:

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Nicholas McGinley
October 4, 2019 8:06 am

Oh, and for anyone who thinks this is disgusting…I want to remind you that you need to remember to take off the diaper first.

Nicholas McGinley
October 3, 2019 10:22 pm

Serving suggestion:

I think it needs more potatoes.
And a few cloves of garlic.

John of Cloverdale, WA, Australia
October 3, 2019 10:47 pm

Surely this a Monty Python-taking the mickey sketch.
Best laugh I had today.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  John of Cloverdale, WA, Australia
October 5, 2019 8:11 pm

No no, Monty Python would not write crap like that.

October 3, 2019 11:05 pm

LOL lol Ha ha ha ha ha – ja ja ja ja ja ja !

I’m surprised that AOC didn’t just call her crazy, I thought the crazy woman was going to take her top off – LOL lol…


Rod Evans
October 3, 2019 11:14 pm

Hey, throwing virgins into volcanoes to satisfy the gods seems almost modest by comparison to eating babies.
Can’t be long now before the socialists de-industrialisation demands, lead us to the pre industrial mindset. Pointless gestures of supposedly virtuous behaviour will become the accepted rout to world salvation. The climate gods are waiting.
As someone noted earlier, it was disturbing to watch AOC’s response to the “we must eat the babies” idea. Her only criticism wasn’t to denounce the concept, it was just the timescale being advanced that she challenged.
The world will thank the founding fathers for the second amendment.

Mickey Reno
Reply to  Rod Evans
October 4, 2019 7:33 am

Okay, first, let me apologize for getting serious for a moment. But I feel I must.

On the notion that this woman was merely performing agitprop for fun is a fantastic idea, one that I hope is true, and that we see lot’s more of wherever AOC, Bernie, Fauxcahontas and Joe Biden appear on the campaign trail. I meant, what could be more important to know about your presidential nominee than does he/she/ zhe/it have a sense of humor and good judgement?

That said, if the “eat babies” woman was a member of the Lyndon LaRouche cult, it would not do to prematurely dismiss this event as insincere comedy and brilliant satirical performance art. The LaRouchies are certifiable in many instances, and I think it highly possible that this woman needs both our pity and professional help, including some deprogramming style therapy, with the professional psychiatric help being the more important of the two.

I think AOC’s reaction to the batshit crazy lunatic from her audience was appropriate. You could see on her face that she was trying to be calm and not to make an uncomfortable situation into a worse one, which, if the woman is truly deranged, could easily happen if scorned or mocked by the crowd. In the absence of knowledge about the ostensibly crazy woman, prudence is a very good response. AOC has done some of her best work, not coincidentally, with her big mouth shut.

But now that phase of this episode is over. Now is the time for AOC to speak. She should speak to all possibilities of whether the event was a troll, a staged bit of satire, and also if the woman is actually that crazy. I’m sure AOC will not accede to ideas of eating babies, literally, but I think she owes the world (along with Chakrabarti and the Democratic Justice League or whatever they call themselves), an honest statement on whether misanthropy in general is a positive force in the environmental/Green New Deal movement. They all owe us their true opinions about depopulating the planet, as many serious minds in the leftist, Progressive movement have already made clear. Ted Turner, for example, has stated that the carrying capacity of the Earth is half a billion people. How does he propose we get to that number? The misanthropic son of a bitch refuses to elaborate. I’m not afraid Ted will start to murder people. As of yet, I have not heard him call for final solutions. But how does he think his goals will be achieved? Without explicit honesty from him, we should all reasonably fear allowing misanthropists like Ted Turner any more political influence than his wealth already affords him. The same goes for leftist politicians, many of whom seem to be running for the Democratic nomination.

So, Congressbaby AOC, the rather more photogenic pre-Greta phenom of the CAGW debate, the spotlight is on you. And by logical extension, it’s also on your fellow Democrats, many of whom are contending in the Democratic primary field. You all seem to support some level of green new wheeling and dealing. What about depopulating the Earth? Are you pro or are you con? If you’re pro, how do you want to go about it? What have you got for us? SPEAK, I COMMAND YOU!

And finally, what’s the likelihood that any frackin’ pro-Democrat CNN or NBC reporter / moderator will ask THIS question on a televised debate?

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Mickey Reno
October 4, 2019 9:50 pm

She blamed the incident by Lyndon LaRouche people on Trump, of course.
LL is as far from a conservative as one can be.

Robert Beckman
October 3, 2019 11:16 pm

Pretty sure the woman was being satirical and taking AOCs positions to their logical endpoints, and doing so to mock her. That’s consonant with her own beliefs, saying, “ At one point I was concerned there was a woman in crisis & want to ensure we treat the situation compassionately. Let’s not mock or make a spectacle.”

October 3, 2019 11:24 pm

She was a plant. Look at the faces of everyone else in the place. Not a shocked look among them. If AOC was trying to convey that Climate change has everyone scared, all she managed to do was make changers look like lunatics.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  KentB
October 4, 2019 1:34 am

Look at 1:34 in the clip.
AOC gives the lady a wink and a nod, literally.
Just look.

October 3, 2019 11:31 pm

Seems like half the people commenting here think she was acting. I don’t think so, she is just plain crazy.
I have seen crazy people, and she fit’s the bill.


Rod Evans
Reply to  Jon P Peterson
October 4, 2019 12:31 am

Everytime I see AOC, I too, am convinced she is crazy. Sadly that is no barrier to influencing others and making them crazy. Willing supporters always end up reflecting the characteristics of their leader.

Ed Zuiderwijk
October 4, 2019 1:22 am

The only sound response here is the one of roaring laughter.

Andy in Epsom
October 4, 2019 1:23 am

After watching and then reading some of the comments here it does lead me to one conclusion.People here are far to kind and considerate to people like this. It is clear to me that this deranged lunatic will end up attacking others and needs to be removed from society before some poor innocent person/people suffer at her hands.

October 4, 2019 1:27 am

I have a theory about this young girl at the Town Hall with AOC.
She is actually Titania McGrath!
Titania (Comedian and ‘Spiked’ Author, Andrew Doyle) is a “ social justice warrior who promotes identity politics and political correctness” on her twitter account.
McGrath characterises herself as “ a radical intersectionalist poet committed to feminism, social justice and armed peaceful protest”, while her creator describes her as “a militant vegan who thinks she is a better poet than William Shakespeare.”
Doyle has written a book, “Woke: A guide to Social Justice.”
Titania is named after the Queen of the Faeries in “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”.
Doyle’s live comedy show featuring Titania (played by Alice Marshall) debuted at the Edinburgh Fringe on 13 August this year.
Doyle’s twitter account has been closed four times for “hate speech” but on each occasion it reopened it gained scores of thousands of additional followers!
Could this be Titania’s first appearance in the US?
Alternatively the woman is bat crazy.

October 4, 2019 1:52 am

This advice is ok for the normal and sane people but what are the vegans going to do? Maybe they could swap their kids for a few lentils and carrots .

steve case
October 4, 2019 2:48 am

This link works –

Washington Examiner

October 4, 2019 3:11 am

Why would AOC give this lunatic a wink and a nod? It doesn’t make sense. It would be acknowledging the hoax behind the hoax. Like “I get what you’re doing. You’re trolling my scam. You want a piece of this, just like Crazy Bernie, Fauxcohontas, Pete Bootygoose, and the rest.” Unless AOC is really trolling all of us. Now wouldn’t THAT be something? Imagine if AOC announced that her Green New Deal was meant as farcical hyperbole to demonstrate the insanity of AGW. But she won’t, and it isn’t.

I don’t think the woman who wants to eat babies to fight climate change is a plant or a troll. She’s just insane. A little bit more mad than AOC, and possibly a tad less photogenic. But who knows? The baby eater may have a substantial Instagram following, which may be what this is all about. Being famous is more important these days than life itself. Instagram “influencers” can make a lot of money, too. Not so crazy.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  KilgoreHoover
October 4, 2019 7:38 am

Of course it is impossible to know.
The wink may have been some odd sort of tic that AOC has, or maybe she thought she was a paid commenter overdoing the bit they were supposed to perform.
The fact that AOC took no steps to assure her supporters that no one would be eating babies or advocating nuk-a-ler attacks as part of the plan to “fix the climate”, may be the most significant takeaway.
Aside from that, this serves as an excellent illustration of Poe’s Law and it’s applicability to Democratic lunacy in general and climate change alarmism in particular.
No one, not her, her staffers, or supporters, seemed to want to dare to shout this insanity down, contradict it (except in the gentlest way imaginable: We have more than a few month, but only slightly), or really say much of anything…because they are trained to support any jackass thing anyone on their side utters.
And there is no way to discern parody of such unrestrained inanity/insanity.
In fact their is no way to say anything crazier than what these people might come up with on any given day as part of their actual plans.

I think it is clear that the person making the eat babies and bomb Russia crap was acting.
That many here are sure this is exactly what crazy people act like…yes, maybe. Maybe some of them do.
But the audience reaction is how brainwashed sycophants, and mindless head nodders behave, and they were not actors.
For anyone who thinks she must actually be crazy because that is how crazy people act, I ask you, how do actors act when they are portraying crazy people?
Did they use real crazy people in One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest?
It is possible, very easy actually, to fool people.
Harder to convince them they have been fooled, apparently.
If you have trouble believing you were punked, you just proved Mark Twain correct.

October 4, 2019 3:15 am

Don’t eat Turnips. Eat Swedes…

October 4, 2019 4:36 am

This is the height of liberal senility and degradation. I’m so ashamed of what Democrats want to turn the US into.

M__ S__
October 4, 2019 4:47 am

See, this is the kind of mentality we face with climate demagoguery. People who hear and believe the worst fear mongering don’t read WUWT but they still vote

This is why a republic is much superior to a democracy But nothing is idiot proof

October 4, 2019 5:06 am

It was claimed as a trolling by LaRouche.org.


It worked because AOC did not call for anyone to not eat babies. But she did urge “Medicare for all.”


John Bell
October 4, 2019 5:18 am

German accent I believe – I had a German gf come back from Germany a few years ago complaining how in USA we have very few solar panels on roofs but in Germany they have the panels on every roof, but she did not mention how German electricity costs 3X what it costs in the USA, she had mental problems too IMHO.

October 4, 2019 5:30 am

See Jonathan Swift : A Modest Proposal For preventing the Children of Poor People From being a Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and For making them Beneficial to the Publick
Published anonymously in 1729, for obvious reasons, suggesting that the impoverished Irish might ease their economic troubles by selling their children as food to rich gentlemen and ladies.
As someone above pointed out, recipes included….

The biting irony of course might be lost on psychotics….

Homor is actually very good medicine, large doses recommended.

These Extinction Rebels are the unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible!

October 4, 2019 6:07 am

This problem is self correcting…after the “Liberal Insanity Gene” gets consumed out of the gene pool.

Best Troll this year.

October 4, 2019 6:08 am

In case anyone hasn’t realised or is unsure, yes, this was satire.


October 4, 2019 6:12 am

Here’s how to do it:
In a large bowl, stir shortening and water until shortening is melted. Gradually stir in flour and salt until a very soft dough is formed; cover and refrigerate for 1-1/2 hours.
Cut potatoes and rutabagas into 1/8- or 1/4-inch cubes; do not make cubes too large or they will not cook properly. Gently combine ground baby; break into small crumbles. In a large bowl, combine potatoes, rutabagas (aka Swedes), onions, meat mixture and seasonings.
Divide dough into 12 equal portions. On a floured surface, roll out one portion at a time into a 8-in. circle. Mound 1-1/2 to 2 cups filling on half of each circle; dot with 1 teaspoon butter. Moisten edges with water; carefully fold dough over filling and press edges with a fork to seal.
Place on ungreased baking sheets. Cut several slits in top of pasties. If desired, brush with cream or beaten egg. Bake at 350° until golden brown, about 1 hour. Cool on wire racks. Serve hot or cold. Store in the refrigerator.


Tom Higley
October 4, 2019 6:28 am

At first I thought about posting “If only AOC’s parents had eaten their babies”. But the truth is, AOC and her gang are the gift that keeps on giving. Just think of how much entertainment they have provided over the past several years. Please Lord, help her get reelected.

Andy Pattullo
October 4, 2019 7:02 am

This was brilliant. I think it is a prank but it throws the idiocy of the progressives back in their face and it forced AOC to try an respond in a positive sympathetic way to the idea of eating babies while trying to put herself slightly on the other side of the ladies rant by saying there were more than a few months left and it is not beyond hope.

The more press coverage and dissemination this gets the better. People need to understand, as bizarre as this is, it is a very logical extension of the progressive anti-human strategy that is based on the premise that humans are a plague on the earth.

October 4, 2019 7:24 am

Soylent Green! Using babies instead of old people. Much tastier I would think.

Nicholas McGinley
October 4, 2019 8:06 am

Definitely more tender than some leathery dried up old coot.

George Ellis
October 4, 2019 7:54 am

Mainstream media is trying to pin this on Trump followers. Lyndon LaRouche and his group are their own special folks.

October 4, 2019 7:57 am

W.C. Fields was ahead of his time. (from YouTube)

Woman: “Do you like children?”
Fields: “I do if they’re properly cooked.”

And one I remember hearing:

Woman: “And how do you like children, Mr. Fields?”
Fields: “Parboiled”

Reply to  Rod
October 4, 2019 11:26 am

He read Swift, away ahead of the time, and current, then as now.

October 4, 2019 8:00 am

Good morning. I posted something online elsewhere about this. It was actually a prank staged by a group styling themselves LaRouche something-or-other. I had some doubts about it myself and people tracked it to its source. After this prank, and seeing the failed fake blood stunt defeat itself on camera, I am more and more convinced that it isn’t polticis: it is play-acting to get attention.


Have a nice weekend, all of you, especially those in what is now SNOW COUNTRY!!!!!

Joel Snider
Reply to  Sara
October 4, 2019 12:12 pm

I posted above as well – the root being that this is an example of an effective prank – it highlights what the extremist nuts – that is to say university professors – are actually saying.

October 4, 2019 8:05 am

the movie idiocracy turned out to be prophetic. who would have thought that.
Brawndo’s got what plants crave. It’s got electrolytes…….

CD in Wisconsin
October 4, 2019 8:31 am

Oddly enough, Fred Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas (yes, THAT WBC) proposed this idea of eating babies (and each other) a number of years ago. His suggestion that we do this precedes the Swedish one by quite a few years. Phelps’ motivation though was the world-is-doomed and homophobic doctrine of his church rather than climate change. He died in 2014.


The things that people will propose when they are embrace a radical doctrine or succumb to mass hysteria can get pretty strange.

Steve Z
October 4, 2019 8:32 am

This nutcase at AOC’s meeting sounds like that episode of Twilight Zone where aliens presented a book “To Serve Man” which turned out to be a cookbook.

Since you mentioned Jonathan Swift, maybe it’s a political platform for the giants of Brobdignag against Gulliver.

This is bound to make AOC more popular among the baby-killers and cannibals of The Bronx, but what about the other 99% of the voters? Why didn’t she or one of her staffers turn off the mic and have this monster forcibly “escorted” out?

October 4, 2019 9:00 am
October 4, 2019 9:27 am

Tom Steyer smiled while thinking .. “We need to eat the [stergeon] babies”

October 4, 2019 10:09 am

At least it is logically accurate. If we do not eat up our babies, they will have no future!

October 4, 2019 10:34 am

Surprising number of cannibals turning up here, it seems.

They take themselves so seriously, just like the menu, I suppose.

Malthusianism is pervasive, sometimes called zero-sum, sometimes just plain cannibalism.
An unspeakable pursuit of the inedible, without even glimpsing the craziness!

Humor, Irony, works wonders! The bubble is burst!

Reply to  bonbon
October 4, 2019 10:42 am

Only one worry though, so-called Asperge- spectrum people are claimed to take things literally, irony being lost on them (as on many here – too long being brow-beaten by scientism) .

AOC should indeed check if followers are prowling for food!

Now who is Gulliver in all this, I wonder, the land of Lilliput? (Swift again).

john cooknell
October 4, 2019 11:12 am

I went here, where they do eat babies!


October 4, 2019 11:39 am

Thank you for that. I have no college degree, but my ever so educated friends never get it when I refer to “a modest proposal”.

Reply to  TomB
October 5, 2019 6:44 am

Don’t accept dinner invitations!

Richard Cooper
October 4, 2019 12:47 pm

Anyone for a slice of tender young Thun?

Jimmy Calhoun
October 4, 2019 1:53 pm

I remember my first encounter with environmentalists. It was in 1996, and I just got my first job in life working for an oil company.
We were working on this location, getting it ready for the rig when out of nowhere came these people carrying signs and shouting clean water, clean air, stop the work now. They looked and seemed like a bunch of piece loving hippies from back in the seventies just looking for a place to stomp around smoking their pot and wave their signs. Now twenty plus years later, it’s a whole different ball game. Just trying to make a living and feed my family, I seem to run into people like this girl on a weekly basis. They show up at our worksites to shout out things like you’re killing babies destroying the world. I can see the anger in their eyes and fill the danger in their voices. It’s like zombies possess them with their beliefs, which is scary. I hope and pray that we can get a handle on this before terrible things start to happen towards people like me who are just trying to make a living and are firm believers in climate change but that it’s a natural process that has been going on from the beginning of time.

October 4, 2019 2:54 pm

Ms Ocassional Cortex, a top tip for your next lunatic’s anonymous session; the appropriate response to a moonbat extolling the virtues of eating babies and bombing Russia is “no; we don’t, like, need to start eating babies.”

October 4, 2019 3:14 pm

Actually it was a set-up. Check out the Yahoo article. Ms. Ocasio was fooled but so are those who commented. She may be off base about AGW but this is really silly stuff.

Reply to  hornblower
October 4, 2019 7:51 pm

So, clinical cannibalism, including recycled-child, is no longer on the menu? That’s anti-Choice.

October 4, 2019 3:26 pm

“If you ever needed proof that liberalism…”
“UPDATE: It seems this was a stunt”

From AOC:
“Nobody reacted to this lady because this is New York City and Trump plants are amateurs compared to what we deal with on the NYC subway system”

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Nick Stokes
October 4, 2019 9:44 pm

Lyndon LaRouche used to be a member of the Socialist Workers Party.
Then he was a member of the labor party.
For some 40 years, he has been a strident member of the Democratic party.
Not a conservative, not a Trump supporter, not a Republican.
I would expect you would check on something pronounced by someone like AOC, who is in fact completely off base with this comment.
Do not take my word for it, although he has been well known to me for most of my life:

Reply to  Nicholas McGinley
October 4, 2019 10:23 pm

“Not a conservative, not a Trump supporter, not a Republican”
He’s dead now, but his group is no fan of AGW. From their journal EIR:
From their journal EIR:
“The “Greenhouse effect” hoax: a world federalist plot”

And a special report in EIR, edited by Mrs Larouche:
“Global Warming’ Scare Is Population Reduction, Not Science”
with her intro titled
“Defend Mankind from the Satanic Climate-Change Swindle”

Sound familiar? I don’t think this lady came to AOC’s meeting in a spirit of support.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Nick Stokes
October 6, 2019 12:18 am

Evidently not, but this is hardly the same as being a Trump supporter.

Reply to  Nicholas McGinley
October 6, 2019 8:36 am

Lyndon LaRouche made a shift from left to right around 1987-1988, I’m not sure exactly when. He started wearing gloves to contribute to AIDS hysteria. When he did that, he was claiming new ways of transmission were being discovered almost daily or something like that, amnd as part of that he didn’t want to touch anyone he shook hands with.

Nicholas McGinley
Reply to  Nick Stokes
October 4, 2019 9:46 pm

Besides, although is was a prank, the person who spoke up about eating babies was merely expanding on the idea of the Swedish Professor she referred to in the opening of her remarks:

Was he a Trump supporter too?

Reply to  Nick Stokes
October 5, 2019 2:42 am

More than 5million views sure ain’t a nothing burger.

October 4, 2019 6:39 pm

Oh dear, the cartoon of Elmer Fudd singing “Kill the wabbit, kill the wabbit, …” just popped into my head. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yxiv3CBMS4M

Unfortunately, he was singing “Eat the babies, eat the babies, …”.

October 4, 2019 11:07 pm

It’s soylent green for us, armed body guards and Krusty Burgers for them.

October 5, 2019 6:20 am

Promoters of climate hysteria should be trolled like this as often as possible.

October 5, 2019 11:48 am

street performance of a passage from Jonathan Swifts satire
A literary quotation tolerated on WUWT??
Greta Thunberg is right – the world is ending!

October 6, 2019 5:43 am

Shouldn’t this article be retracted now we know this wasn’t an AOC supporter and was a deliberate attempt to troll AOC?


Roger Hill
October 6, 2019 10:52 pm

Not surprised at this. The radical leftist Democrats have gone off the deep end. I have been a lifelong Democrat, but recently decided to change my voter registration to non-partisan/independent. I have been driven out of the party by the crazies, couldn’t take it anymore.
I think this lady who wants us to eat the babies to save the planet is not mentally ill or a troll. She is indeed one of the far leftist AOC type gang. Too bad, the Democrat party of old has died

Lance Luhrquer
October 7, 2019 6:29 pm

Here’s the numbers for determining if you’re going to be able to survive
on ‘infant meals’! https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/births.htm
Looks like a lot of people are going to go hungry at 7 dinners per week!
Looks like we will have to consider eating a lot of animals too, including all
our cute little doggehs & puddy-tats.

Johann Wundersamer
October 13, 2019 8:49 pm

Who ate his own children?


Cronus learned from Gaia and Uranus that he was destined to be overcome by his own sons, just as he had overthrown his father. As a result, although he sired the gods Demeter, Hestia, Hera, Hades and Poseidon by Rhea, he devoured them all as soon as they were born to prevent the prophecy.


October 15, 2019 4:40 am

Dingo Girl.
Bloody hilarious. Best troll ever.

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights