A Line-By-Line Response to Greta Thunberg’s UN Speech

A climate skeptic answers the fiery rhetoric of the Left’s star climate alarmist

Greta Thunberg speaking at the U.N. 09/23/19

Opinion by JACQUES VOORHEES (from his Facebook page)

Note: Greta’s speech is reprinted below. Her quotes are in italic, mine follow each quote. If it turns out there were errors in transcription—as seems likely—I’ll try to update with corrections. I apologize for the snarky tone, but if a 17-year-old can dish it out, I think she can take it.

“My message is that we’ll be watching you. This is all wrong, I shouldn’t be up here, I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean.”

So in your first paragraph you confess that what you’re doing is wrong, and you shouldn’t be doing it. You note you should be back home and in school. OK, so far we’re 100% in agreement. Next?

“Yet, you all come to us young people for hope, how dare you?”

Not sure where you’re getting your information. No sentient adult goes to young people “for hope,” whether they’ve been “dared” to or otherwise. Normally, when adults consider young people like yourself, the operative word is “despair.” And if you’re unfamiliar with that word, it means “absence of hope.”

“You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words…”

Wow, you must have had very fragile dreams, and an even more precarious childhood, if mere empty words could steal them. Even words loaded with meaning shouldn’t be able to take down someone’s dreams that easily, if the dreams are even a little bit deeply held. But empty words? Greta, you need to find better dreams and cling to them with more determination. As for your stolen childhood, this makes me suspect you didn’t exactly win the lottery when it comes to parents, did you? Just sayin’.

“…and yet I’m one of the lucky ones. People are suffering, people are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing.”

OK, sounds like someone’s been playing too much of the computer video game Civilization. Yes, in Sid Meier’s Civilization VI people are suffering, people are dying, and entire ecosystems are collapsing. Meanwhile back in reality, none of that is occurring. Well, none of it that is caused by human emissions of carbon dioxide at least. Greta, try to spend a few hours each day actually off your computer, so you can experience the world as it really is, not as your scary online world, and your handlers, are convincing you it must be.

“We are in the beginning of a mass extinction…”

Now it seems you’ve fallen into a time machine which has transported you back to the Yucatan Peninsula, sixty-five million years ago, when the comet was about to annihilate the dinosaurs. Either that or someone is doing a very good job of filling your head with utter nonsense. Shame on them, for scaring the socks off you. There is no evidence that we’re at the beginning of a mass extinction–certainly not of any life forms we care about.

“…and all you can talk about is money and fairytales of eternal economic growth. How dare you?”

Um, did your speechwriter not know the audience you’d be addressing today? You’re speaking to diplomats in the United Nations General Assembly. There is probably no group of people on Earth less interested in economic growth than these folks. They don’t really care about money, either, as they’re all on generous expense accounts and—thanks to diplomatic immunity—can park anywhere they want in Manhattan without worrying about being ticketed or towed. First rule of public speaking: Know your audience.

“For more than 30 years the science has been crystal-clear.”

Did you bother to look at any of that science? Thirty years ago they were saying Manhattan would be under water by now. Most every prediction so called “climate scientists” have made during the past thirty years has failed to come true. This is not science being crystal-clear. It is shamanism being crystal-clear. You need to learn the difference. A science that is not able to make what are called “useful, non-obvious predictions” is not science. It’s religion. And, I’m sorry, but you’ve become ensnared in the climate cult’s terrible clutches.

“How dare you continue to look away and come here saying that you’re doing enough when the politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight.”

Another rule of effective speaking: don’t contradict yourself, especially within a single sentence. If the “politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight,” what exactly are you expecting these UN diplomats to do, beyond what they’re already doing? If the solutions are truly nowhere in sight, you’re certainly not going to get them from this crowd.

“You say you hear us and that you understand the urgency but no matter how sad and angry I am, I do not want to believe that because if you really understood the situation and still kept on failing to act then you would be evil and that I refuse to believe.”

Greta, on this one, best go with “evil.” Again, you’re addressing the core members of the United Nations, arguably the most worthless organization on the planet today. Even if they did believe something was an urgent problem, they’d not have the collective will to do anything about it. Actually, a better description than evil in this case would be “utterly f…..g worthless.” Remember, these are the very folks who commissioned the IPCC itself, and told it to make reports…every six years. You’d think if the world was about to end, reports of it happening could be slightly more frequent.

“The popular idea of cutting our emissions in half in 10 years only gives us a 50% chance of staying below 1.5 degrees and the risk of setting off irreversible chain reactions beyond human control. 50% may be acceptable to you but those numbers do not include tipping points, most feedback loops, additional warming hidden by toxic air pollution, or the aspects of equity and climate justice, they also rely on my generation sucking hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 out of the air with technologies that barely exist. So, a 50% risk is simply not acceptable to us, we who have to live with the consequences.”

Are you aware that you’re quoting alarmist predictions from the very scientists who’ve yet to be right about any of their predictions? Does that not concern you?

“How dare you pretend that this can be sold with just business as usual and some technical solutions with today’s emissions levels that remaining CO2 budgets will be entirely gone within less than 8 and a half years.”

Well, ignoring that the sentence itself is gibberish, what exactly are you wanting anyone to do? You just told us that there are no solutions anywhere in sight. You’re very good at saying what you’re angry about. But we haven’t yet heard the grand plan that will solve everything. If you don’t have it, do you really think these diplomats sitting in front of you do?

“There will not be any solutions or plans presented in line with these figures here today because these numbers are too uncomfortable and you are still not mature enough to tell it like it is.”

Your rhetoric is slipping into the category of deranged, verbal nonsense, but I do find it interesting that you—a seventeen year old—“dares” (if we can borrow your favorite word) to tell an audience of people over twice your age, that they are insufficiently mature. Rarely does insulting your audience achieve desired results, in public speaking. Might be time to consider firing your speech writer.

“You are failing us but the young people are starting to understand your betrayal. The eyes of all future generations are upon you and if you choose to fail us I say we will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now, is where we draw the line the world is waking up and change is coming whether you like it or not.”

Well, if change is coming whether they like it or not, why are you even bothering to give this speech? And by the way, what change is coming? You’ve already confessed there are no solutions in sight. This would seem to suggest change is not coming, at least anytime soon. And as for the eyes of all future generations being on the UN General Assembly, good luck with that. Even the eyes of today’s generation aren’t on anything the UN General Assembly does—much less will be the eyes of all generations unto the end of time. But I’m sure the people you’re addressing right now wish they were that important.

Anyway, Greta, a word of advice. You’re clearly a very upset and angry young lady, with endless dedication to your goals. Rather than hurl hate-filled rhetoric at a room of old folks whom you rightly predict won’t do what you want them to do, why don’t you roll up your sleeves and try to make a difference yourself? I think we can all agree that public speaking is probably not your best contribution to the Cause. Go back to school, take some atmospheric physics, basic chemistry, and geology classes. Maybe dabble with the design of that machine that’s going to suck all the CO2 out of the atmosphere. Trust me, it’s not yet on anyone’s drawing board. You can be the first!

And a bonus. If you truly study this issue that has so captured your attention, pretty soon you’re going to learn that the whole thing is one gigantic hoax, the greatest hoax in human history, being perpetrated by the government-educational-industrial complex. You’re going to learn that pretty much everything that’s been indoctrinated into your head is false. You’re going to learn that real scientists, tens of thousands of them, have already learned this and have gone on record as acknowledging it. You’re going to learn you’re being used by adults to turn you into a propagandist for shamanistic alarmism, and you’re going to realize that because of it, you’ve been the victim of massive child abuse.

When you learn all this, I predict that your present anger is going to look like a calm, tranquil lake compared to how you will feel then. I predict at that point you’ll decide to write your own speech. And no matter who’s in the audience when you give it, I predict it will be scathing.


Ms. Thunberg’s speech at the U.N. – video:

Full transcript:

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/23/763452863/transcript-greta-thunbergs-speech-at-the-u-n-climate-action-summit

3.5 4 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

209 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Serge Wright
September 24, 2019 8:28 pm

Getting people to venture outside to participate in the “warming is bad” meme does have it’s challenges in Sweden.
comment image

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Serge Wright
September 24, 2019 9:10 pm

Look at all that global warming on the ground. Is that a jacket made form man-made fibres? Tut tut tut Greta!

September 24, 2019 9:15 pm

She sure says “how dare you” a lot!

How we do it is that we old people are just very daring.

September 24, 2019 9:17 pm

The children of her generation have the highest standard of living in history. Access to food, shelter, healthcare, education, information. All made possible by abundant cheap energy in the form of fossil fuels. Thunberg seems completely oblivious to this.
And for the hundreds of millions who have yet to benefit from the world’s progress, what would be the quickest and most effective way to lift them out of poverty? Yes, greater access to abundant cheap energy. We have seen this happening in China and India, and hopefully soon other still blighted countries.
Thunberg is a child being used in a most cynical way by politically motivated first world crusaders.
I find this speech and its implications grotesque.

oakwood
Reply to  Ian Rayner
September 25, 2019 1:01 am

Fully agree. Of the 1.2 billion people on Earth who still don’t have electricity in their homes, I wonder how many are supporting her words. Well of course, most of them will never hear them without access to TV, etc.
They will continue to breathe in the fumes from the open fires for cooking and heating, and their children will still not be able to do homework to further their education due to the lack of electric lighting.

Steve Reddish
September 24, 2019 9:55 pm

Just wondering, Is her level of English proficiency normal for the Swedish?

SR

Ben McIntyre
September 24, 2019 9:58 pm

Well, you are right about one thing. The scientists predictions are indeed wrong. It’s progressing much faster than any of them predicted, because being good scientists, they are quite conservative in their predictions so they can be sure.

Joz Jonlin
September 24, 2019 10:19 pm

I half expected her to hold her breath until she turned bright red while stomping her feet and wringing her hands. Her speech writers didn’t even try to hide the fact that she had speech writers.

It’s possible she will someday understand how much she’s been used as a propaganda piece by people who actually don’t care about her at all because she’s the current expedient tool at hand. If that happens, she’ll realize her life to that point has been a waste and that she was psychologically abused with her parents being the enablers. If she never understands this, it will be an even bigger tragedy for her. I truly pity her for her for the abuse she’s receiving in the service of propaganda.

September 24, 2019 10:32 pm

I feel sorry for her – bad parents, brainwashing, and that.

DavidS
September 24, 2019 11:03 pm

The only people that have stolen her dreams and childhood are her publicity/marketing team and most shamefully her parents.

Richard
September 24, 2019 11:28 pm

When I was insulted a few posts back, being told my logic was not only sophomoric, it was positively Thunbergian, I thought it creative and a bit of a hoot. Now it is dawning on my addled brain that the jab was very unQueensberry. Is this pitiful puppet what I am being compared to? Really? My tender feelings are hurt.

Richard Parker
September 24, 2019 11:35 pm

“Children should be seen and not heard.”

oakwood
September 25, 2019 12:58 am

What did today’s adult population ever do for today’s young generation?
Absolutely nothing!
Well, except for:
– developing the medicines, health care, food supplies and wealth to provide them with the longest life expectancy in human history
– more democracy across the world than ever before
– more gender equality than ever before
– more LGBT equality and understanding than ever before
– budget flights allowing them to travel the world – several times a year – to fill up their social media accounts with photos and videos
– more education opportunities than ever before
– more protected nature reserves across the world than ever before
Well, apart from all of that, absolutely nothing. We can feel we have failed them.

DeanG
September 25, 2019 1:10 am

I always said the U.N. was run by angry, mentally damaged children. I thought I was being metaphorical.

Paul Kolk
September 25, 2019 1:39 am

I did think that Rumpelstiltskin (gender fluid these days…..) was only 16…….. She might mature by 17. Oh well, it was only a thought……..

alan k welch
September 25, 2019 1:49 am

Does Greta ever give real press conferences when scientific questions can be asked? I found a so called press conference in Switzerland in which I learnt she has 2 nice dogs. But I would like to ask her what caused the 130 metre rise in sea level after the last Ice Age. Does she know the sea rose this amount at a rate about 5 times faster than at present for 8000 years. What’s her knowledge of sun spot cycles, precession and Milankovitch cycles. She did say she should be back at school so I agree with her on that account.

Sky King
September 25, 2019 2:05 am

Snarly little teeny bopper that. She would have been an outstanding Hitler Youth I imagine.

leitmotif
September 25, 2019 3:31 am

You are not allowed to criticise Greta in the media. Look what happened to Michael Knowles on Fox News.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/sep/24/fox-news-greta-thunberg-michael-knowles

Susan
September 25, 2019 4:16 am

I hate to say this, but my husband, a maths graduate, heard the speech and was terribly impressed. He does not, of course, believe anything I say on the subject. Greta’s line of oratory does work if only by making people feel guilty for not doing more. It all helps in shifting public opinion towards the alarmists.

I do actually admire her, even though I disagree with her, for her willingness to stand up for something rather than remaining slumped on the sofa with her phone like so many of her age.

Hivemind
Reply to  Susan
September 25, 2019 5:55 am

If she remained slumped on the sofa with her phone, she would do half as much evil.

ghalfrunt
September 25, 2019 4:25 am

Wow! the response is pathetic. Not one actual scientific riposte . No facts. Nothing of worth!
Now this thread has opened up the continued unwarranted abuse of this young person

PATHETIC

Asperger’s does not affect intelligence, it is not a mental illness. Her age group are the ones that will have to deal with what world we leave them. you may want your gas guzzlers, your cheap energy, your freedom to travel as often and far as you desire etc. but you need to realise the consequences of these actions. Resources are not unlimited. Majority of climate scientists agree that we are heading for problems. who should we listen to bloggers or scientific majority?

some choice comments that should cause this thread to be closed –

She would have been an outstanding Hitler Youth
I always said the U.N. was run by angry, mentally damaged children.
I feel sorry for her – bad parents, brainwashing, and that
She’s unstable, brainwashed, misguided, misinformed, undisciplined, being manipulated, rude, disrespectful, horribly wrong and out of control.
The speech is nothing but the ranting and raving of a disturbed and abused child.
Fools, charlatans, and politicians have hired a child of diminished capacity to lead them

Steve Oregon
Reply to  ghalfrunt
September 25, 2019 5:45 am

It’s all very likely true.

Patvann
Reply to  ghalfrunt
September 25, 2019 12:13 pm

Wow…You just made me wanna go fire up the 1000HP ’70 Camaro.

I bet I can get your Saint Greta to smile if I take her for a hot-lap!

Matt G
Reply to  ghalfrunt
September 25, 2019 12:26 pm

Link the scientific evidence that support any of her limited scientific quotes. If it were apparently viewed by the scientific majority then they shouldn’t be hard to find? Science has always been about observations and supporting the hypothesis, never about majority views.

The 50% reduction of CO2 emissions keeping under 1.5c are based on climate models so are not evidence and just guesses not even based on observations.

Continuing the way the planet has been warming in the troposphere, temperatures will be under 1.5c/per century even if humans do nothing.

That does not justify to take urgent climate action even if it was little more, so bringing in alternative energy sources should be at the right time and pace without doing huge damage to people’s lifestyles.

shortus cynicus
Reply to  ghalfrunt
September 25, 2019 11:18 pm

“scientific majority” – thanks’, I’v added it to my list of favorite oxymorons.

Geoffrey Preece
Reply to  ghalfrunt
September 26, 2019 4:18 pm

Good on you ghalfrunt, I think you are absolutely right.

GWB
Reply to  ghalfrunt
September 27, 2019 7:34 am

My, what an aspiring little tyrant you are, ghalfrunt.

David
September 25, 2019 4:27 am

Being a Brit, I am reminded of a character in the ‘Just William’ books by Richmal Crompton which I devoured avidly as a boy…
‘William’ and his gang were always getting into scrapes of one sort or another – and there was this rather posh little girl who hung out with this motley crew, called Violet Elizabeth Bott..
Her ‘go to’ stance if she didn’t get her way, was to say:
‘I’m going to thcream and thcream until I’m thick….’
Remind you of anyone..?

David
September 25, 2019 4:33 am

According to Alan K Welch above – apparently Greta has ‘two nice dogs’..
Has no-one explained to her that keeping ONE dog – never mind two – due to their meat-rich diet – is equivalent to running two Toyota Landcruisers..?
So – Greta Thunberg runs FOUR Toyota Landcruisers – bit inconvenient, wouldn’t you say..?

MJB
September 25, 2019 5:13 am

A good piece but a bit disingenuous in repeatedly characterizing “…[solutions] still nowhere in sight” as if there was no answer proposed or available. It’s not a big leap to interpret “nowhere in sight” as referring to actions to date, not options available. There is no shortage of bad ideas to “solve” the climate “problem”. Greta’s handlers are just clever enough to not have her mention any specifics, to avoid alienating any supporters, who might be bent on specific solutions or scared off by socialist underpinnings.

janice baker
September 25, 2019 5:31 am

Does anyone know who was in the audience?? in the versions I have watched, one gets no idea of the size of the room or the audience. i googled the Summit which is a three day event and for which individuals could sign up. Were there ANY world leaders in the room

Roger Knights
September 25, 2019 5:40 am

Here’s a tuff question for Greta: Should Germany re-start its idled nuclear power plants and shut down its new brown coal power plants?

Follow-up question: Should Japan do likewise?

Hivemind
September 25, 2019 5:52 am

Excuse me, but she’s Saint Thunderbum , not “Ms”. The Ms moniker is reserved for young adult females that are embarrassed about not being married & don’t want to be called Miss anymore.

Sorry about being so pedantic.

Mervyn
September 25, 2019 5:54 am

Am I the only one that recognises eco zealot Greta has psychosis?

Verified by MonsterInsights