A Line-By-Line Response to Greta Thunberg’s UN Speech

A climate skeptic answers the fiery rhetoric of the Left’s star climate alarmist

Greta Thunberg speaking at the U.N. 09/23/19

Opinion by JACQUES VOORHEES (from his Facebook page)

Note: Greta’s speech is reprinted below. Her quotes are in italic, mine follow each quote. If it turns out there were errors in transcription—as seems likely—I’ll try to update with corrections. I apologize for the snarky tone, but if a 17-year-old can dish it out, I think she can take it.

“My message is that we’ll be watching you. This is all wrong, I shouldn’t be up here, I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean.”

So in your first paragraph you confess that what you’re doing is wrong, and you shouldn’t be doing it. You note you should be back home and in school. OK, so far we’re 100% in agreement. Next?

“Yet, you all come to us young people for hope, how dare you?”

Not sure where you’re getting your information. No sentient adult goes to young people “for hope,” whether they’ve been “dared” to or otherwise. Normally, when adults consider young people like yourself, the operative word is “despair.” And if you’re unfamiliar with that word, it means “absence of hope.”

“You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words…”

Wow, you must have had very fragile dreams, and an even more precarious childhood, if mere empty words could steal them. Even words loaded with meaning shouldn’t be able to take down someone’s dreams that easily, if the dreams are even a little bit deeply held. But empty words? Greta, you need to find better dreams and cling to them with more determination. As for your stolen childhood, this makes me suspect you didn’t exactly win the lottery when it comes to parents, did you? Just sayin’.

“…and yet I’m one of the lucky ones. People are suffering, people are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing.”

OK, sounds like someone’s been playing too much of the computer video game Civilization. Yes, in Sid Meier’s Civilization VI people are suffering, people are dying, and entire ecosystems are collapsing. Meanwhile back in reality, none of that is occurring. Well, none of it that is caused by human emissions of carbon dioxide at least. Greta, try to spend a few hours each day actually off your computer, so you can experience the world as it really is, not as your scary online world, and your handlers, are convincing you it must be.

“We are in the beginning of a mass extinction…”

Now it seems you’ve fallen into a time machine which has transported you back to the Yucatan Peninsula, sixty-five million years ago, when the comet was about to annihilate the dinosaurs. Either that or someone is doing a very good job of filling your head with utter nonsense. Shame on them, for scaring the socks off you. There is no evidence that we’re at the beginning of a mass extinction–certainly not of any life forms we care about.

“…and all you can talk about is money and fairytales of eternal economic growth. How dare you?”

Um, did your speechwriter not know the audience you’d be addressing today? You’re speaking to diplomats in the United Nations General Assembly. There is probably no group of people on Earth less interested in economic growth than these folks. They don’t really care about money, either, as they’re all on generous expense accounts and—thanks to diplomatic immunity—can park anywhere they want in Manhattan without worrying about being ticketed or towed. First rule of public speaking: Know your audience.

“For more than 30 years the science has been crystal-clear.”

Did you bother to look at any of that science? Thirty years ago they were saying Manhattan would be under water by now. Most every prediction so called “climate scientists” have made during the past thirty years has failed to come true. This is not science being crystal-clear. It is shamanism being crystal-clear. You need to learn the difference. A science that is not able to make what are called “useful, non-obvious predictions” is not science. It’s religion. And, I’m sorry, but you’ve become ensnared in the climate cult’s terrible clutches.

“How dare you continue to look away and come here saying that you’re doing enough when the politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight.”

Another rule of effective speaking: don’t contradict yourself, especially within a single sentence. If the “politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight,” what exactly are you expecting these UN diplomats to do, beyond what they’re already doing? If the solutions are truly nowhere in sight, you’re certainly not going to get them from this crowd.

“You say you hear us and that you understand the urgency but no matter how sad and angry I am, I do not want to believe that because if you really understood the situation and still kept on failing to act then you would be evil and that I refuse to believe.”

Greta, on this one, best go with “evil.” Again, you’re addressing the core members of the United Nations, arguably the most worthless organization on the planet today. Even if they did believe something was an urgent problem, they’d not have the collective will to do anything about it. Actually, a better description than evil in this case would be “utterly f…..g worthless.” Remember, these are the very folks who commissioned the IPCC itself, and told it to make reports…every six years. You’d think if the world was about to end, reports of it happening could be slightly more frequent.

“The popular idea of cutting our emissions in half in 10 years only gives us a 50% chance of staying below 1.5 degrees and the risk of setting off irreversible chain reactions beyond human control. 50% may be acceptable to you but those numbers do not include tipping points, most feedback loops, additional warming hidden by toxic air pollution, or the aspects of equity and climate justice, they also rely on my generation sucking hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 out of the air with technologies that barely exist. So, a 50% risk is simply not acceptable to us, we who have to live with the consequences.”

Are you aware that you’re quoting alarmist predictions from the very scientists who’ve yet to be right about any of their predictions? Does that not concern you?

“How dare you pretend that this can be sold with just business as usual and some technical solutions with today’s emissions levels that remaining CO2 budgets will be entirely gone within less than 8 and a half years.”

Well, ignoring that the sentence itself is gibberish, what exactly are you wanting anyone to do? You just told us that there are no solutions anywhere in sight. You’re very good at saying what you’re angry about. But we haven’t yet heard the grand plan that will solve everything. If you don’t have it, do you really think these diplomats sitting in front of you do?

“There will not be any solutions or plans presented in line with these figures here today because these numbers are too uncomfortable and you are still not mature enough to tell it like it is.”

Your rhetoric is slipping into the category of deranged, verbal nonsense, but I do find it interesting that you—a seventeen year old—“dares” (if we can borrow your favorite word) to tell an audience of people over twice your age, that they are insufficiently mature. Rarely does insulting your audience achieve desired results, in public speaking. Might be time to consider firing your speech writer.

“You are failing us but the young people are starting to understand your betrayal. The eyes of all future generations are upon you and if you choose to fail us I say we will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now, is where we draw the line the world is waking up and change is coming whether you like it or not.”

Well, if change is coming whether they like it or not, why are you even bothering to give this speech? And by the way, what change is coming? You’ve already confessed there are no solutions in sight. This would seem to suggest change is not coming, at least anytime soon. And as for the eyes of all future generations being on the UN General Assembly, good luck with that. Even the eyes of today’s generation aren’t on anything the UN General Assembly does—much less will be the eyes of all generations unto the end of time. But I’m sure the people you’re addressing right now wish they were that important.

Anyway, Greta, a word of advice. You’re clearly a very upset and angry young lady, with endless dedication to your goals. Rather than hurl hate-filled rhetoric at a room of old folks whom you rightly predict won’t do what you want them to do, why don’t you roll up your sleeves and try to make a difference yourself? I think we can all agree that public speaking is probably not your best contribution to the Cause. Go back to school, take some atmospheric physics, basic chemistry, and geology classes. Maybe dabble with the design of that machine that’s going to suck all the CO2 out of the atmosphere. Trust me, it’s not yet on anyone’s drawing board. You can be the first!

And a bonus. If you truly study this issue that has so captured your attention, pretty soon you’re going to learn that the whole thing is one gigantic hoax, the greatest hoax in human history, being perpetrated by the government-educational-industrial complex. You’re going to learn that pretty much everything that’s been indoctrinated into your head is false. You’re going to learn that real scientists, tens of thousands of them, have already learned this and have gone on record as acknowledging it. You’re going to learn you’re being used by adults to turn you into a propagandist for shamanistic alarmism, and you’re going to realize that because of it, you’ve been the victim of massive child abuse.

When you learn all this, I predict that your present anger is going to look like a calm, tranquil lake compared to how you will feel then. I predict at that point you’ll decide to write your own speech. And no matter who’s in the audience when you give it, I predict it will be scathing.


Ms. Thunberg’s speech at the U.N. – video:

Full transcript:

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/23/763452863/transcript-greta-thunbergs-speech-at-the-u-n-climate-action-summit

3.5 4 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

209 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andre Lauzon
September 24, 2019 5:01 pm

Antonio Gutteres is just as deranged as she is if he thinks she has a message. Is he unbalanced or is he abusing her, a poor child with dysfunctional parents, just to advance his agenda. At the UN you never know!!!
I cringe thinking what this kid’s future will be.

Gerald Machnee
Reply to  Andre Lauzon
September 24, 2019 5:37 pm

Agreed. There are adults who actually think she knows “science” as one person on Quora replied.
However, I think the worst abusers are the news media who have elevated her and ignore real scientists like Willie Soon, etc.

J Mac
September 24, 2019 5:02 pm

Dang! My whole ecosystem just collapsed! Gonna hafta make another trip to Ecosystems Are Us now… Wait! Maybe I should consult the nearest science illiterate 16 year old high school dropout first?
Yeah – That’s the ticket!

Phil Salmon
September 24, 2019 5:07 pm

Anagrams of Greta Thunberg include:
Grunt Hateberg
Green brat thug

SPM
Reply to  Phil Salmon
September 25, 2019 1:39 am

Sounds fishy to me, Phil.

Get a life.

Mark Gobell
Reply to  Phil Salmon
September 28, 2019 6:08 am

Anagrams of Greta Thunberg include:

Bag Green Truth
The Grunge Brat

TRM
September 24, 2019 5:09 pm

Dear Greta. Since you don’t do school you missed the part on the scientific method. Here you go. No charge, I’m glad to have been able to help you.

What do you do when you can’t follow the science in detail? This applies to all sciences not just climate but I’ll focus on climate science.

Do we “believe” one group or another? No, belief is for religion not science. Do we go with whatever the majority of scientists say? No, consensus is for politics not science.

So what do we follow? Predictions! The scientific method requires them. If you are not making predictions that can be tested you are NOT doing science. See this 1 minute clip for an explanation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7YcimsISUk

Get PREDICTIONS with DATES and temperatures attached to them from both the natural cycles and CO2 groups. Then check up to see if their predictions happen. It is easy for anyone to do and kind of fun. Always copy the URL so you can check the wayback machine if they “clean up” their mistakes.

As far as global warming goes, we are at a great juncture, a true fork in the road. The IPCC projects 0.5-1.0 C increase and the natural cycles scientists predict 0.25-1.0 C decrease over the next 20 years. They can’t both be correct but they both could be wrong.

I will make only one prediction. CO2 will continue to increase by 1-2 PPM yearly over the next 20 years. China and India have said so and that is where it is determined.

Prjindigo
September 24, 2019 5:10 pm

Honestly, just send CPS on her and arrest her parents. What they’re doing may be legal in Europe with the 16-is-legal bit but in the US it’s felony child abuse.

Joe Cool
September 24, 2019 5:18 pm

Read thishttps://standpointmag.co.uk/issues/june-2019/gretas-very-corporate-childrens-crusade/?fbclid=IwAR0EPsvAkNXhVlYrK4PXhpt30EeNhuW6PT1O1oeyGFtjg9drNOFTiwofG_8

Craig from Oz
September 24, 2019 5:18 pm

And while we are on the topic;

“…or the aspects of equity and climate justice…”

So… equity and climate justice are ALSO major concerns? So you are utterly convinced that we are facing an extinction event, but flag ‘equity’ as also being a major corner stone.

And so says the woman who gets to sail across the oceans in a multi million dollar racing yacht. How many other 16 year old kids in the world get to do that. Equity? HOW DARE YOU!

and;

“… my generation sucking hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 out of the air with technologies that barely exist.”

Having established that the older generation is Bad, and that it is going to fall on HER generation to save the world using yet to be developed technology, this same Greta also calls for her generation to ‘strike’ from school. Greta is both actively declaring it will need to be her generation that needs to fix the problem, but refusing to allow her generation to prepare for it. HOW DARE YOU!

Mathman
September 24, 2019 5:23 pm

Checked out the Sun recently? The Sun is emitting less energy these days.
Theories abound, but no explanation predicts mean future solar output.
Ice age, anyone? Maunder Minimum? We need the Sun for Green Energy!
Thunberg for UN Chief. Now!

TonyL
September 24, 2019 5:25 pm

What a waste!
A line by line rebuttal of a stage performance written by true believers and delivered by a child.
As if there was substance to respond to. More wasted space.
Did I read it? NO!
Am I going to read it? NO!
Do I care? NO!
The world has wasted way to much time and effort on this brat and her handlers already.
We here do not need to follow along.

Neville
September 24, 2019 5:30 pm

This software from Tony Heller would certainly help us to quickly check their CAGW data.
Just choose your start date, I wish I had his skills.

https://realclimatescience.com/2019/09/new-video-my-gift-to-climate-alarmists/

Gerald Machnee
September 24, 2019 5:39 pm

Look how bad it is getting in Canada. Three parties are scrambling to see who can make it the worst disaster.
Today:
NDP’s Jagmeet Singh pledges $15B for green jobs, fight against ‘crisis of epic proportion’

How more epic can it get. And the irresponsible media will not question it.

Patrick MJD
September 24, 2019 5:56 pm

The video of her speech was plastered over the SMH website here in Australia yesterday. Comments were open and after 2000+ posted comments the moderator stated that, in his recollection, the article received the most comments he’d evah seen! He also showed the total number of comments received and simply subtracting comments posted worked out to be about 1700 comments not posted. Many of mine were not posted even though none of them were in breach of SMH’s site policy. It was clear the moderators are deliberately not posting contrary comments keeping article comment threads on “message” especially ones about climate change.

The media are in absolute “Love” with Greta. Article after article praising her every word. Everyone seems to be cooing over her.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Patrick MJD
September 25, 2019 5:33 am

you should have read the advertiser online then
heaps of comments and the outright majority were angry and critical and also placed serious questions n rebuttals and they were published;-)) I know cos i threw about 10 in myself to the faithful idiots

BoyfromTottenham
September 24, 2019 5:59 pm

I seem to have read her parents names somewheer, and neither of them are called Thunberg – is Thunberg just her stage name?

Robert W. Turner
September 24, 2019 6:01 pm

It’s like they’re NPCs programmed by aliens to prevent human progress.

Robert W. Turner
September 24, 2019 6:06 pm

I have a serious question, how does a 17 year old even get the chance waste time at the UN?
We’re living in a time of mass delusion.

Ronald Reece
September 24, 2019 6:09 pm

I can relate to Greta..

Growing up in the ’70s, the words of the Climate Alarmists of that time period give me reason to sympathize with her statement, “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words…”..

Steven Mosher
September 24, 2019 6:21 pm

Man skeptics play her all wrong.

ya’ll should know that the best way to handle a kid having a tantrum is to walk away. Her level
of anger is un sustainable

attacking a child isn’t the best approach, even when it is well deserved.

psst, she is scolding them, not you. Their problem, not yours.

ignore it.

LdB
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 24, 2019 6:57 pm

You keep thinking it’s a game and there are sides. It’s eco politics and media beat up there are about 10-15% of the worlds population that give a toss about this stuff. Despite all the noise for the world emissions have increased and will continue to increase for years to come because the majority really don’t care.

Polticians play to the noise until they learn the hard reality at elections which is why there has been increasing election of right wing governments.

The majority don’t need to play the game or have a strategy, life teaches lessons to the extremists soon enough that what they think and what they believe really doesn’t matter.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 24, 2019 6:58 pm

How DARE you!

sycomputing
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 24, 2019 7:24 pm

Man skeptics play her all wrong.

That was my first thought:

“A Line-By-Line Response to Greta Thunberg’s UN Speech”

What is up with that?? Why????

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 24, 2019 8:26 pm

You’re right, Steven. She should be ignored, but the press won’t leave her alone.

Larry in Texas
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 24, 2019 10:43 pm

Mosh, the problem is: the fools at the UN are not ignoring it. And they are the ones who are in cahoots with some of the radical environmentalist groups to try to force everyone else to produce policy solutions that really won’t work.

So given the circumstances, I can ignore the child, but I can’t ignore the after-effects of the child’s temper tantrum speech.

J Mac
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 24, 2019 11:00 pm

You don’t have kids, do you Steven…..
The best way for a parent to handle a child having a tantrum is to isolate them, eg. “Time Out”. If they pull that crap in a store, you leave immediately with them in tow. No treats. Not toys. No cell phone. No internet. No TV. No wifi. Nada. Sit them in the corner until they are ready to apologize for acting sooo very badly badly. Make sure they understand that emotional irrational tantrums are not acceptable in children… or adults.

Patrick MJD
September 24, 2019 6:30 pm

Greta says;

“…they also rely on my generation sucking hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 out of the air…”

I suggest she watches the movie Snowpiercer.

ronk
Reply to  Patrick MJD
September 24, 2019 10:46 pm

might want to try reading ‘Fallen Angels’ by Dr Jerry Pournelle

Grantbfs
September 24, 2019 7:00 pm

Seems as if mass delusion has settled in. Scary times.

Steve O
September 24, 2019 7:07 pm

I used to assume that an adult wrote her speeches. Now I’m not so sure.

Patrick MJD
September 24, 2019 7:51 pm

The people who are fawning after her don’t realise she is 16 and the reasoning part of her brain, the frontal lobes, have not matured and won’t for the best part of 10 more years. So, all in all, this is a childish rant. I am sure however, sales of her mother’s book will have advanced a bit.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Patrick MJD
September 25, 2019 5:36 am

Im not so sure on that
https://www.sott.net/article/420893-Child-hostage-Greta-Thunberg-caught-in-disintegrating-family-and-devilish-covenant-with-her-mother

Greta Thunberg
“I’d rather report her mother to the police than review her book for the newspaper. It’s horrifying reading,” Danish journalist Mikael Jalving has said of the book “Scenes from the heart” about Swedish teenage climate activist and icon Greta Thunberg, penned by her own mother.

michael hart
September 24, 2019 8:08 pm

Her mother represented Sweden in the Eurovision Song Contest.

US readers may not be familiar with the history and significance (or rather, insignificance) of the Eurovision Song Contest. It was, from the first, a vanity project of the European bureaucratic “elite”. While musicians have certainly benefited from wealthy patrons historically, most of the world has largely considered music to be a creative human endeavor with the good being recognized as such in the market place, and the bad never making it into the history books because it is swiftly rejected. It takes a Soviet-Russia level of politics to believe that something good in music is created by governmental fiat rather than human abilities and desires[*]. A child coming from a family steeped in this kind of thinking is a damaged child, and Thunberg should be viewed in this light.

[* When the exception, ABBA, won the Eurovision song contest, I was not yet a teenager. But at the time I still recognized that they were clearly “cheating”: It was widely accepted that the competition was not supposed to include entrants that were actually likely to be popular with the masses. That was not then, and is not now, how the European Project was supposed to operate. It was more about “creating” something good by sheer force of political will, not about selecting something which was produced spontaneously and found to be good. It is also an insight into what the Brexit vote in the UK was really about.]

Patrick MJD
Reply to  michael hart
September 24, 2019 9:08 pm

Suede: Null point. Sweden: Zero points.

The song contest has always been about politics, so more blatantly obvious as it is today, nothing more, nothing less.

I think one of the best “games” on European TV was “It’s a knock out!”.

michael hart
Reply to  Patrick MJD
September 24, 2019 10:19 pm

That was the domestic qualifiers. It was “Jeux sans frontières” when the Continentals were playing 🙂

It also spawned a great song of the same name by Peter Gabriel (with Kate Bush in the vocals)

“Dressing up in costumes, playing silly games
Hiding out in tree-tops shouting out rude names”

Greta and the UN certainly learned that bit off by heart.

Doug S
September 24, 2019 8:15 pm

This is a child and a very effective weapon for the left. I hope the best for this woman as she matures.

Look at her eyes, her pupils in the photos here. They appear to be dilated but under the bright TV lights it is counter intuitive. Bright TV lights will constrict your pupils under normal circumstances. Is it possible that she has been medicated?

Armagh Man
September 24, 2019 8:16 pm

So I suppose Greta giving the good old Chinese, Indians, Indonesians et at a good old tongue-lashing is completely out of the question then, and in their respective countries – just askin’?

Steve Oregon
September 24, 2019 8:18 pm

She’s unstable, brainwashed, misguided, misinformed, undisciplined, being manipulated, rude, disrespectful, horribly wrong and out of control.
Other than that nice kid?

Verified by MonsterInsights