A climate skeptic answers the fiery rhetoric of the Left’s star climate alarmist

Opinion by JACQUES VOORHEES (from his Facebook page)
Note: Greta’s speech is reprinted below. Her quotes are in italic, mine follow each quote. If it turns out there were errors in transcription—as seems likely—I’ll try to update with corrections. I apologize for the snarky tone, but if a 17-year-old can dish it out, I think she can take it.
“My message is that we’ll be watching you. This is all wrong, I shouldn’t be up here, I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean.”
So in your first paragraph you confess that what you’re doing is wrong, and you shouldn’t be doing it. You note you should be back home and in school. OK, so far we’re 100% in agreement. Next?
“Yet, you all come to us young people for hope, how dare you?”
Not sure where you’re getting your information. No sentient adult goes to young people “for hope,” whether they’ve been “dared” to or otherwise. Normally, when adults consider young people like yourself, the operative word is “despair.” And if you’re unfamiliar with that word, it means “absence of hope.”
“You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words…”
Wow, you must have had very fragile dreams, and an even more precarious childhood, if mere empty words could steal them. Even words loaded with meaning shouldn’t be able to take down someone’s dreams that easily, if the dreams are even a little bit deeply held. But empty words? Greta, you need to find better dreams and cling to them with more determination. As for your stolen childhood, this makes me suspect you didn’t exactly win the lottery when it comes to parents, did you? Just sayin’.
“…and yet I’m one of the lucky ones. People are suffering, people are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing.”
OK, sounds like someone’s been playing too much of the computer video game Civilization. Yes, in Sid Meier’s Civilization VI people are suffering, people are dying, and entire ecosystems are collapsing. Meanwhile back in reality, none of that is occurring. Well, none of it that is caused by human emissions of carbon dioxide at least. Greta, try to spend a few hours each day actually off your computer, so you can experience the world as it really is, not as your scary online world, and your handlers, are convincing you it must be.
“We are in the beginning of a mass extinction…”
Now it seems you’ve fallen into a time machine which has transported you back to the Yucatan Peninsula, sixty-five million years ago, when the comet was about to annihilate the dinosaurs. Either that or someone is doing a very good job of filling your head with utter nonsense. Shame on them, for scaring the socks off you. There is no evidence that we’re at the beginning of a mass extinction–certainly not of any life forms we care about.
“…and all you can talk about is money and fairytales of eternal economic growth. How dare you?”
Um, did your speechwriter not know the audience you’d be addressing today? You’re speaking to diplomats in the United Nations General Assembly. There is probably no group of people on Earth less interested in economic growth than these folks. They don’t really care about money, either, as they’re all on generous expense accounts and—thanks to diplomatic immunity—can park anywhere they want in Manhattan without worrying about being ticketed or towed. First rule of public speaking: Know your audience.
“For more than 30 years the science has been crystal-clear.”
Did you bother to look at any of that science? Thirty years ago they were saying Manhattan would be under water by now. Most every prediction so called “climate scientists” have made during the past thirty years has failed to come true. This is not science being crystal-clear. It is shamanism being crystal-clear. You need to learn the difference. A science that is not able to make what are called “useful, non-obvious predictions” is not science. It’s religion. And, I’m sorry, but you’ve become ensnared in the climate cult’s terrible clutches.
“How dare you continue to look away and come here saying that you’re doing enough when the politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight.”
Another rule of effective speaking: don’t contradict yourself, especially within a single sentence. If the “politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight,” what exactly are you expecting these UN diplomats to do, beyond what they’re already doing? If the solutions are truly nowhere in sight, you’re certainly not going to get them from this crowd.
“You say you hear us and that you understand the urgency but no matter how sad and angry I am, I do not want to believe that because if you really understood the situation and still kept on failing to act then you would be evil and that I refuse to believe.”
Greta, on this one, best go with “evil.” Again, you’re addressing the core members of the United Nations, arguably the most worthless organization on the planet today. Even if they did believe something was an urgent problem, they’d not have the collective will to do anything about it. Actually, a better description than evil in this case would be “utterly f…..g worthless.” Remember, these are the very folks who commissioned the IPCC itself, and told it to make reports…every six years. You’d think if the world was about to end, reports of it happening could be slightly more frequent.
“The popular idea of cutting our emissions in half in 10 years only gives us a 50% chance of staying below 1.5 degrees and the risk of setting off irreversible chain reactions beyond human control. 50% may be acceptable to you but those numbers do not include tipping points, most feedback loops, additional warming hidden by toxic air pollution, or the aspects of equity and climate justice, they also rely on my generation sucking hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 out of the air with technologies that barely exist. So, a 50% risk is simply not acceptable to us, we who have to live with the consequences.”
Are you aware that you’re quoting alarmist predictions from the very scientists who’ve yet to be right about any of their predictions? Does that not concern you?
“How dare you pretend that this can be sold with just business as usual and some technical solutions with today’s emissions levels that remaining CO2 budgets will be entirely gone within less than 8 and a half years.”
Well, ignoring that the sentence itself is gibberish, what exactly are you wanting anyone to do? You just told us that there are no solutions anywhere in sight. You’re very good at saying what you’re angry about. But we haven’t yet heard the grand plan that will solve everything. If you don’t have it, do you really think these diplomats sitting in front of you do?
“There will not be any solutions or plans presented in line with these figures here today because these numbers are too uncomfortable and you are still not mature enough to tell it like it is.”
Your rhetoric is slipping into the category of deranged, verbal nonsense, but I do find it interesting that you—a seventeen year old—“dares” (if we can borrow your favorite word) to tell an audience of people over twice your age, that they are insufficiently mature. Rarely does insulting your audience achieve desired results, in public speaking. Might be time to consider firing your speech writer.
“You are failing us but the young people are starting to understand your betrayal. The eyes of all future generations are upon you and if you choose to fail us I say we will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now, is where we draw the line the world is waking up and change is coming whether you like it or not.”
Well, if change is coming whether they like it or not, why are you even bothering to give this speech? And by the way, what change is coming? You’ve already confessed there are no solutions in sight. This would seem to suggest change is not coming, at least anytime soon. And as for the eyes of all future generations being on the UN General Assembly, good luck with that. Even the eyes of today’s generation aren’t on anything the UN General Assembly does—much less will be the eyes of all generations unto the end of time. But I’m sure the people you’re addressing right now wish they were that important.
Anyway, Greta, a word of advice. You’re clearly a very upset and angry young lady, with endless dedication to your goals. Rather than hurl hate-filled rhetoric at a room of old folks whom you rightly predict won’t do what you want them to do, why don’t you roll up your sleeves and try to make a difference yourself? I think we can all agree that public speaking is probably not your best contribution to the Cause. Go back to school, take some atmospheric physics, basic chemistry, and geology classes. Maybe dabble with the design of that machine that’s going to suck all the CO2 out of the atmosphere. Trust me, it’s not yet on anyone’s drawing board. You can be the first!
And a bonus. If you truly study this issue that has so captured your attention, pretty soon you’re going to learn that the whole thing is one gigantic hoax, the greatest hoax in human history, being perpetrated by the government-educational-industrial complex. You’re going to learn that pretty much everything that’s been indoctrinated into your head is false. You’re going to learn that real scientists, tens of thousands of them, have already learned this and have gone on record as acknowledging it. You’re going to learn you’re being used by adults to turn you into a propagandist for shamanistic alarmism, and you’re going to realize that because of it, you’ve been the victim of massive child abuse.
When you learn all this, I predict that your present anger is going to look like a calm, tranquil lake compared to how you will feel then. I predict at that point you’ll decide to write your own speech. And no matter who’s in the audience when you give it, I predict it will be scathing.
Ms. Thunberg’s speech at the U.N. – video:
Full transcript:
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The Thunderbird is getting very angry and unless you agree to her demands, she will do the Grand Stomp-around, and you will be very sorry.
I watched her speech yesterday, watcher her body language, facial expressions and tone and that was my takeaway thought at the end. Just a typical teenager not getting what they want, no demand, and packing a big sad-on an stomping away to her room.
My other takeaway was that she really had no idea what she was saying really meant. I am sure she has no idea what a gigatonne is as well as all the other figures she was quoting. Some other propagandist wrote it.
I pity her. Because when all the fanfare, attention and dare I say “fame” dies she will be discarded and I am confident she is not prepared for that.
I saw a photo of her earlier today standing next to Soros. Now it all makes sense.
If nothing else she should be admired for her courage to stand in front of that particular crowd and say the things she did with a stone face, Regardless of not being correct.
Her stone faced lack of expression is a symptom of her disorder, also known as lack of affect.
She was literally preaching to the choir. The media, academia, the entertainment industry, and large swathes of the world’s population believe the lunacy she was spouting. What exactly was brave about that?
She was not preaching to the choir. She was preaching to us. She was talking in front of the choir because only the choir could give her a global stage. I don’t think that there is any question that those angry eyes were looking right at you and me, although I can’t explain how she could see us through the haze of CO2!
Her mother is an opera star and her dad is an actor….I can tell u this much, I believe both her parents are activist plus her school teachers are as well.
Her friends according to her don’t see any hope in the future. She blames everything on fossil fuels and couldn’t tell you why, just only what she’s been told. If you asked her what was the components the air we breathe
am sure she could not answer you …78%nitrogen
20% oxygen
.03% carbon dioxide
.97 argon
1% water vapor
In general you should occupy 0.38% of the earth’s total atmosphere
Sorry, but I can’t agree. The subject is one of potential apocalypse: either the collapse of the planetary ecosystem according to the left-wing globalists who peddle the story, or the collapse of the industrial and economic system if we attempt to reduce our CO2 emissions as envisaged.
Being wrong in this scenario is flatly unforgivable, no matter how passionately the convictions are held. In fact the passion makes it worse, because it ensures that the convictions will be defended irrespective of whether they survive contact with reality.
The most important thing about Greta Thunberg is mentioned in the article: she’s being used by a grossly cynical and venal agenda as a way to deflect legitimate inspection of its actions. She is not stupid, and will one day realise this.
I feel sorry for her and her family when that day comes.
Goldminor, soros, as in george soros! If so somebody needs to look in to the families finances, I read her mum quit working due to co2 😐. How do they pay the bills?
gold minor
have you a link to that photo?
tonyb
I have checked out the photo and it was photoshopped. It was originally a picture of greta and Gore. Not sure that makes it much better but just for the record the soros photos is false
https://fullfact.org/online/greta-thunberg-george-soros/
Tonyb
Thanks, never thought that it may be phony. I am surprised though at the picture from 2018 as I do not remember hearing her name until just recently. Was this entire sorry episode of presenting a young girl with serious problems as their climate voice planned over a period of several years? That is disgusting to me.
If she is standing next to Soros then she getting paid the be the new “face of climate change”. I wonder if her parent’s livelihood are someway connected solar or wind power.
My personal opinion is that Greta Thunberg needs to go to University on another continent. A very long way away from her parents. She can detox from climate witchcraft there, study domething she is genuinely interested in and generally experience life not at the beck and call of her dodgy mother.
You never know, she might take up mountain biking, learn to dance, drink some champagne and escape from her current straitjacket.
She ain’t gonna get to university if she doesn’t finish high school!
Can you please provide a link to the photo of her with Soros. I’d like to put it up on PSI-Australia
We will not let you get away with it !
Wow , now I’m really scared. So you’re going to put all grown ups in jail ??
Consider that she and her parents are antifa – now read this again with that in mind:
“if you choose to fail us I say we will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now, is where we draw the line the world is waking up and change is coming whether you like it or not.” I think it was Dennis Prager who used the term “chilling”. I would agree. What are they going to do?
Brave man.
My disgust is really aimed at her handlers including her parents who are using her like a puppet.
If she ever realizes this, I hope she acts appropriately.
The good side? The warmists are really getting desperate.
She is robotic.
I was astounded by how her childhood was apparently destroyed or something.. tell that to the child labourers all over the Third World…or those that suffer from gut wrenching poverty and disease still…
White privilege is a word thrown about by liberals to make every white person feel guilty…the irony of course is that the white liberals of this world are the biggest beneficiaries of this privilege
If you don’t stop and do what she wants she is going to hold her breath and turn blue. Isn’t that how all the little kiddies throw a tantrum. For a 16 year old she sure knows how to act like a 10 year old. I would not have been able to stop laughing like we all do at kids, what gets me is the press talking its seriously.
Holding her breath is the only way she can truly be Carbon neutral.
Should be encouraged for all ‘progressives’…..
Well you are certainly right with the charge of child abuse, some people who should know better are using this poor girl who does have a mental medical condition for their own ends. Once she has a complete breakdown and is no longer of any use to them she will be forgotten
For sure, John. Remember how long it took democrats to toss Christine Blasio Ford under the bus when she was no longer any further use?
I think there’s a possibility that she could have become an extreme embarrassment. link
When certain ‘facts’ are required, the left has no lack of volunteers willing to concoct those facts.
Best on which is turned against first…Greta or AOC
Oh, I’m so hoping that a quality candidate from each party, Republican and Democrat, runs against AOC and routs her in 2020 – especially (and more likely, unfortunately) in the Democratic primary. Because she is as big a moron as Greta is, and just about as immature. I’ve read that the people in her district, especially the Queens portion of her district, was fed up with her lack of constituent service even back earlier in the year already. If a seasoned Democrat runs against her in the next primary, AOC could (hopefully) be a one-term wonder.
If we could actually “suck all the CO2 out of the atmosphere,” would that doom all plant life—and by extension all human life. But then, I’ve always viewed Eco-Fascists as first and foremost genocidal.
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/500-scientists-write-u-n-there-is-no-climate-emergency/
‘How dare you?’ is a question she’s clearly never been asked herself.
She’s a common scold, a public nuisance, and she should be treated as such.
Yup.
And now that she has taken on an angry making-hate-faces affect, and turned the corner and from nervous Nellie scold to insulting know-it-all, she is gonna find out that any sympathy or leeway she used to garner will quickly evaporate and be replaced by in-kind replies. She has revealed herself as just another selfish brat, full of herself and wanting everyone to see everything her way and arrange things they way she thinks she would like them to be.
I am 100% sure that she would not like the world as it would be if her wish suddenly became true.
Lucky for her and everyone else that will not happen.
Because most everyone else, especially the people she was addressing, are every bit as selfish as she is.
And what she is asking for amounts to taking away almost everything from almost everyone, and making sure it stays that way.
The fact is, the people on the alarmist side are the ones preventing any real progress on environmental issues, or problems with solutions which are just a matter of attention and money.
Incredibly, they are even the ones against any of the actual CO2-free replacements that exist for a substantial fraction of fossil fuel derived energy, which are of course hydro and nuclear.
It’s hard to believe she’s 16…they did a good job of making her look 10
See above I said same thing, she did everything except threaten to hold her breath.
… but no matter how sad and angry I am …
This is clearly the deep thought of a 10yo … who appears to have been holding her breath till she turns purple. What children and adolescents FAIL to understand is that THEIR emotions are fleeting, ephemeral, and ultimately meaningless. Even worse … emotions cloud judgement … usually at the precise time reason, logic and knowledge are called-for.
This is why children should be allowed to be children. Doing the JOB of childhood, which is to learn and grow whilst doing mostly inconsequential “kid things”. She needs to go on a date … and learn how quickly she’ll bore her date with depressing tirades about the end of the world. That sort of “growth” will suit her well.
A girl with the mind and mental maturity of a 10 year old is a little young to be allowed to go on a date.
Fools, charlatans, and politicians have hired a child of diminished capacity to lead them. Smacks of Elizabeth Barton (1506-1534).
And other fools are paying attention and fawning.
Reminds me of the three young girls who at Lours in France way back,
just looked up at the sky. Soon many others were also looking up at the sky.
We all know what resulted, made Lours famous.
MJE VK5ELL
You used to be able to start a line in Moscow with that trick. Get a few friends, line up in front of a door, wait 10 minutes, and leave. The 100 people who’ve lined up behind you won’t even notice your departure.
Stephen of Cloyes (12 1n 1212)
Nongqawuse (15 in 1856)
Bernadette Soubirous (14 in 1858)
Greta Thunberg (16 in 2019)
See the connection?
No, frankly. What is your point?
They’re all children who wanted other children to follow them and turn the world upside down.
It’s not too strange that you haven’t heard of them. They had little effect on the course of human kind except to be another example of our aberrations.
Her “speech” would have been better if her head spun around and then she projectile vomited. That would’ve been awesome.
Your comment was awesome!
In order to address her abysmal level of education and critical thinking skills, we should compile a reading list for the poor young lady – I suggest, first off:
‘Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds’.
And perhaps some Arthur Conan Doyle, as an introduction to Logic.
Perhaps some Lewis Carroll (Humpty Dumpty) as an introduction to the kind of logic used by the Warmists…
Now I have to clean my computer screen.
+10
ROTFLOL!
Here’s the real problem for poor Greta and the CAGW extremists. Since 1990 co2 levels have increased by about 60 ppm and nearly all that increase has come from China, India and the developing world, while OECD countries emissions have virtually flat-lined.
The kiddies should take their protests to China and the developing world and so called adults should stop abusing very vulnerable children.
Very simple maths and yet nobody seems to understand?
Neville you can take that back to about 1975.. for the past 45 years all of the increase has come from China, India, and the developing world
http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/pics/0713_Fig1.jpg
‘How dare you’ !
India’s emissions are still very low – at only 1.8 tonnes of CO2 per capita. The U.S. is more than 8 times that of India.
More capitas in India.
Climate Concerned India’s Coal Imports Surging
Eric Worrall / 13 hours ago September 18, 2019
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/18/climate-concerned-indias-coal-imports-surging/
ResourceGuy July 31, 2019 at 10:56 am
Meanwhile in India…..
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/india-expects-coal-fired-power-130601073.html
India Green Lights Fossil Fuels, Announces Electrification and Clean Cooking for All Rural Homes by 2022
By Vijay Jayaraj, Master Resource, July 30, 2019
https://www.masterresource.org/india-energy/india-green-lights-fossil-fuels-announces-electrification-and-clean-cooking-for-all-rural-homes-by-2022/
52 coal mines opened in 5 years to fuel power drive
By Sanjay Dutta, The Times of India, Jan 23, 2018 [H/t GWPF]
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/government-opened-52-coal-mines-to-fuel-pm-narendra-modis-electrification-drive/articleshow/67646776.cms
[SEPP Comment: Rural electrification is occurring.]
India ramps up spending on coal exploration as it slashes funds for mine safety
By Sudarshan Varadhan, Reuters, Feb 1, 2019 [H/t GWPF]
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/india-ramps-spending-coal-exploration-164148471.html
Ashok Patel-
What you say is true. But consider this: what if the U.S. reduced it’s per capita emission to the current of level of India. Would that reduction produce any significant reduction in global temperature (using the current models)? Answer: It would not.
As I understand India’s pledge to the Paris Accord, they will not sacrifice economic development to reduce CO2 production (Which I absolutely agree with). So when India has developed to same economic level as the U.S. (and I certainly hope they will), with 8 tons of CO2 per capita, would that increase have any effect on global temperature (again using the current models)? The answer is: Of course it would.
Only the radical greens want the developed and developing world to live like the third world, in complete poverty, to produce some CO2 level that they think will keep the world temperature from raising 2 degree C (or is it 1.5? I can’t keep up).
See Comparision of CO2 emission
Err, your point is (aside from irrelevant)…??
China and India are both populous and in Asia, but there the similarities end. China emits 400-500% more than India which one difference in this field.
Should Asians follow and blindly bundle the US with Canada or the US with Russia, because the latter are all at higher northern latitudes and their inhabitants snow white?
“The kiddies should take their protests to China and the developing world.”
Now that would be fun to watch. And they’d learn something of the realities of life outside the first world coccoon.
PJ O’Rourke wrote a funny paragraph about how any green speaker telling a crowd in India to give up on their desires for cars, A/C, washing machines, etc. would need to be rescued by helicopter.
That’s because these kids are semi numerate at best. I suggest they have their calculators removed and be subject to compulsory use of the slide rule and log tables for all calculations in their schooling. After a year or so they will be thoroughly numerate and their arithmetic skills will have improved dramatically.
I can think of UK politicians who would benefit from this regime.Viz Diane Abbot.
Disagree. While China and India may have surpassed the rest of the world in CO2 emissions, to say that the increase is because of that plays into the hands of the warmunists. Yes, concentrations have increased by 60ppm – but we don’t know with absolute certainty where it came from. If the planet is warming naturally, the ocean burping could easily account for all of that.
I suggest she immediately fly to Great Falls MT and travel to East Glacier to cool off in the fall weather this Friday.
Action Recommended: Make preparations per the instructions
Issued by: Great Falls – MT, US, National Weather Service,
…WINTER STORM WATCH IN EFFECT FROM FRIDAY EVENING THROUGH SUNDAY AFTERNOON… * WHAT…Blizzard conditions possible. Total snow accumulations of 18 to 36 inches, with locally higher amounts in the mountains. Record or near-record cold temperatures in the teens and 20s with wind chills zero to 15 above zero. North to northeast winds 15 to 30 mph with gusts as high as 40 mph. * WHERE…Northern Rockies, Rocky Mountain Front, and adjacent plains of north-central Montana. * WHEN…From Friday evening through Sunday afternoon. * IMPACTS…Extreme impacts possible, including to power infrastructure including power lines resulting in widespread power outages, agricultural interests; outdoor recreational interests including camping and hunting activities; and travel. Widespread significant tree damage is possible with heavy wet snow and strong winds impacting trees with foliage. * ADDITIONAL DETAILS…This early-season winter storm and/or blizzard has the potential to set a new benchmark for snow accumulations, cold temperatures, and resulting impacts for parts of the Northern Rockies and the Rocky Mountain Front. A similar storm in 1934 produced prolific amounts of snow in late September over north-central Montana. An extension and/or expansion of Winter Storm Watches are likely. * CONFIDENCE…High on accumulations, winds, and expected impacts. There is low to moderate confidence on the timing of onset and end of this winter storm event. PRECAUTIONARY/PREPAREDNESS ACTIONS… Monitor the latest forecasts for updates on this situation. && “
I think Great Falls is not in this storm area. Try:
Kalispell, Glacier Park International Airport (KGPI)
This is a warning from the Missoula NWS Office
and all the way down to here in Bozeman by the Weekend…..
https://www.weather.gov/media/tfx/sitreport/sitreport.pdf
The adults who have terrorized and brainwashed this innocent child with their own baseless fears are guilty of child abuse.
Does it qualify as slavery? Probably not .. just an extremely bad parenting. Here a sick child educates her parents.
Doublegoodplus.
It is the child abusers that should be punished. As the earth cools, it will Be Greta that either has to remain in denial or will suddenly realize that she has proclaimed her stupidity to the entire world. How will she face that?
If she’s this angry about nothing, imagine how angry she’ll be if she ever learns the truth. Although, it seems more likely that she’ll end up in jail for eco-terrorism first. We see this all the time where lies are used to indoctrinate youth into ideological causes in order to breed supporters whose ends justify any means which leads to really bad choices.
Self-immolation is more likely.
“50% may be acceptable to you but those numbers do not include tipping points, most feedback loops, additional warming hidden by toxic air pollution, or the aspects of equity and climate justice, they also rely on my generation sucking hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 out of the air with technologies that barely exist.”
The technology does exist, Greta. Plant a tree. You’ll feel better tomorrow morning.
Plant a tree in Sweden, so it can be cut down for biomass fuel to support your country’s ‘carbon neutral’ lie.
Craig, it is interesting that Sweden has fared poorly in the tree management business compared with Finland next door.
The great CO2 sucking mechanism absolutely exists. It is called the tundra or taiga. When ice sheets covered great swathes of the northern hemisphere there were few trees, and CO2 fell to a very low level. This is the opposite of what should happen according to the “CO2 is left over if there are no forests” theory. Ignore that.
When the ice sheets melted the permafrost took over with a few inches of melting in summer. Then the permafrost retreated north a few thousand km and we have only a few million sq km of it left. About 14m.
When it melts, which I hope it does, billions of trees will grow there without us lifting a finger. The birds will replant the entire Arctic. Trees already cover the tundra to a height of one or two feet. If the permafrost melts they will grow rapidly.
Suppose a tree weighs one ton. Half of that is carbon. So at a tree density of one per 5 sq m in an unpopulated region, then after about 100 years the trees will have absorbed over a trillion tons of carbon out of the atmosphere and sequestered it in a vast renewable energy farm. That’s trillion with a T. And that doesn’t count the systematic sequestration of carbon in the root systems and grasses.
Such an amount will pull about 40 years worth of CO2 out of the air at today’s emission rate.
http://www.forestecologynetwork.org/climate_change/sequestration_facts.html
The total stored in boreal forests will certainly reach the current content of 106 tons carbon per acre, or about 18 trillion tons of carbon. Even if we were to continue at today’s rate of emission, the new trees and biomass would absorb 750 years worth of it, resulting in no net increase in the concentration.
You want to suck CO2 out of the air? Melt the permafrost or stand back and let Nature continue to do so as it has for the past 20,000 years.
There is no climate crisis caused by CO2. There isn’t nearly enough of it as things are now.
And all the above figures assume that Antarctica will remain frozen. Toss that into the forest area and see what happens.
15,000 years ago, Sweden was an iceberg !
I’ve planted 100+.
Can I go on living?
Talking of tree planting, when I became a New Zealand citizen, I was gifted a native tree called a Totara. They can grow for 1000 years or more. It is planted north of Wellington, the capital of NZ. If it is left to grow I believe it will absorb more CO2 than I will ever have emitted in my entire life and probably many other people too.
Please St. Greta can I now go to climate heaven?
I haven’t planted any NZ trees – just left it to our mad politician who promised to plant a billion trees, then found there was no land or labour to plant them. So put the first batch of a quarter of a million seedlings through the chipper! You wouldn’t read about it – well, not in our NZ MSM, who are too busy praising Ardern who would not mention global warming to POTUS, but thinks we should concentrate on “wellbeing”!
I’ve got a totara in my garden but have to keep topping it or it would take over. It was a present from a friend that I shouldn’t have accepted. Prickly damned thing.
And in NZ, illegal to cut down once planted.
We have hundreds of totara on our place, but our dumb politicians, who are supposed to espouse the whole fairytale, will not give any carbon credits for them. However, if we planted the whole place in radiata pine, which is harvested in 30 years, we’d get tons. Huh?
Well we live in a country where 12 year olds lead climate strkes and 16 year olds want the vote.
Maybe they’ll legislate for ice cream in schools and nap time after lunch, cars will be banned and everyone will get a scooter.
“Gutfeld on the climate hysteria protests”
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6088841742001/?playlist_id=1040983441001#sp=show-clips
Awesome…
Poor girl will probably end up in a retreat on psychedelic drugs.
The speech is nothing but the ranting and raving of a disturbed and abused child. She has been “groomed” into acting like a deranged lunatic by people who should be taking care of her. She is being used as a human shield, spewing nonsense, but beyond criticism because she is a child, parroting what she has been told. The MSM laps this up. What a fcuked up world we live in.
“She is being used as a human shield, spewing nonsense, but beyond criticism because she is a child, parroting what she has been told. The MSM laps this up. What a fcuked up world we live in.”
Exactly. Cowards hide behind women and children when they are afraid of a counter attack.
Who wrote her speech that she read? I think that she did a good job delivering it despite the nonsense. She mentioned science. The AGW conjecture seems plausible at first but a more indepth look at reveals that it is based on only partial science and is full of holes. For example, the AGW conjecture depends upon the existence of a radiant greenhouse effect caused by trace gases with LWIR absorption bands. Such a radiant greenhouse effect has not been observed in a real greenhouse, in the Earth’s atmosphere or anywhere else in the solar system for that matter. The radiant greenhouse effect is nothing but science fiction so hence the AGW conjecture is nothing but science fiction as well. The reality is that, based on the paleoclimate record and the work done with models, the climate change we are experiencing today is caused by the sun and the oceans over which mankind has no control. Despite the hype, there is no real evidence that CO2 has any effect on climate and there is plenty of scientific rationale to support the idea that the climate sensitivity of CO2 is zero. It is all a matter of science. Apparently it is science that Greta is not aware of. She has a general science mentality, assuming that all of the science “facts” that she has read in text books and what her handlers are telling her are true. She really needs to be back in school.
The problem being that these days the crap she is spewing is taught at the schools, all taken over by leftist “administrators” who have the same one-sided view of everything as the “media” that refuses to give any column space or air time to anyone who speaks out against the nonsense.
What “nonsense” would that be? I will issue you the same challenge I have to many other “church of the oil industry” zealots. Produce one (1) published, peer reviewed study using ALL the available data that contradicts what the science has been saying for thirty years. One. This girl has Asperger’s and English is certainly not her first language. How is your second, third or fourth language? How many royal societies do you belong to? Past all that, that this child has already accomplished more than you ever will, go ahead and produce said paper and I will come back here and apologise in public.
Shame on the child traffickers in climate eco-extremism.
The science in this case has never been ‘crystal clear’. If ECS is 1.5, which even the IPCC says it could be, there is less need to do anything.
She is making the classical mistake since someone first thought the rain gods needed to be appeased, confusing ‘ought’ with ‘is’; a very common teenager style mistake. The ‘ought’- meaning moral imperative is clear, the ‘is’ -what ECS actually is and how we should respond, is not.
As it’s Wednesday somewhere on the globe today a little humor seems appropriate-
https://cliscep.com/2019/09/22/wmo-climate-alarmist-dossier-released-ahead-of-un-summit-is-further-sexed-up-by-the-bbc/#comment-43082
From the ten seconds I could bear to watch, looks like she’s auditioning for the part of a witch in the school play. “How dare you. And your little dog, too.”
“looks like she’s auditioning”
I think someone coached her about uttering little gasps at the end of each phrase, for dramatic effect.
“You have stolen my dreams and my childhood…”
Well maybe you should have dreamed about never having to go to school again, sailing across the ocean in a multi million dollar racing yacht and becoming world famous.
I mean if THAT was you dream you could be fist pumping the air right now. Nailed It!
Her age has stolen her childhood.
Made your points but a bit sarky and snarky, still as you say…she dished it out…
Good background…
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/must-read-greta-thunberg-pushed-to-prominence-by-antifa-parents-and-soros-connections/