New study offers roadmap for detecting changes in the ocean due to climate change

Some impacts — like sea temperature rise — are already in progress; others expected to occur within next century

Princeton University

209107_web

Researchers led by Princeton University examined a range of possible climate-related impacts on the ocean to predict when these impacts are likely to occur. Some impacts – such as sea temperature rise and acidification – have already begun while others, like changes to microbial productivity, which serves as the basis of the marine food web, will happen over the next century. Images from NASA EarthData show ocean color, an indicator of microbial productivity.Credit NASA

Sea temperature and ocean acidification have climbed during the last three decades to levels beyond what is expected due to natural variation alone, a new study led by Princeton researchers finds. Meanwhile other impacts from climate change, such as changes in the activity of ocean microbes that regulate the Earth’s carbon and oxygen cycles, will take several more decades to a century to appear. The report was published Aug. 19 online in the journal Nature Climate Change.

The study looked at physical and chemical changes to the ocean that are associated with rising atmospheric carbon dioxide due to human activities. “We sought to address a key scientific question: When, why and how will important changes become detectable above the normal variations that we expect to see in the global ocean?” said Sarah Schlunegger, a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton University’s Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (AOS).

The study confirms that outcomes tied directly to the escalation of atmospheric carbon dioxide have already emerged in the existing 30-year observational record. These include sea surface warming, acidification and increases in the rate at which the ocean removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

In contrast, processes tied indirectly to the ramp up of atmospheric carbon dioxide through the gradual modification of climate and ocean circulation will take longer, from three decades to more than a century. These include changes in upper-ocean mixing, nutrient supply, and the cycling of carbon through marine plants and animals.

“What is new about this study is that it gives a specific timeframe for when ocean changes will occur,” said Jorge Sarmiento, the George J. Magee Professor of Geoscience and Geological Engineering, Emeritus. “Some changes will take a long time while others are already detectable.”

The ocean provides a climate service to the planet by absorbing excess heat and carbon from the atmosphere, thereby slowing the pace of rising global temperatures, Schlunegger said. This service, however, comes with a penalty — namely ocean acidification and ocean warming, which alter how carbon cycles through the ocean and impacts marine ecosystems.

Acidification and ocean warming can harm the microbial marine organisms that serve as the base of the marine food web that feeds fisheries and coral reefs, produce oxygen and contribute to the draw-down of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration.

The study aimed to sift out ocean changes linked to human-made climate change from those due to natural variability. Natural fluctuations in the climate can disguise changes in the ocean, so researchers looked at when the changes would be so dramatic that they would stand out above the natural variability.

Climate research is often divided into two categories, modeling and observations — those scientists who analyze observations of the real Earth, and those who use models to predict what changes are to come. This study leverages the predictions made by climate models to inform observational efforts of what changes are likely, and where and when to look for them, Schlunegger said.

The researchers conducted modeling that simulates potential future climate states that could result from a combination of human-made climate change and random chance. These experiments were performed with the Earth System Model, a climate model which has an interactive carbon cycle, so that changes in the climate and carbon cycle can be considered in tandem.

Use of the Earth System Model was facilitated by John Dunne, who leads ocean carbon modeling activities at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory in Princeton. The Princeton team included Richard Slater, senior earth system modeler in AOS; Keith Rodgers, an AOS research oceanographer now at Pusan National University in South Korea; and Jorge Sarmiento, the George J. Magee Professor of Geoscience and Geological Engineering, Emeritus. The team also included Thomas Frölicher, a professor at the University of Bern and a former postdoctoral fellow at Princeton, and Masao Ishii of the Japan Meteorological Agency.

The finding of a 30- to 100-year delay in the emergence of effects suggests that ocean observation programs should be maintained for many decades into the future to effectively monitor the changes occurring in the ocean. The study also indicates that the detectability of some changes in the ocean would benefit from improvements to the current observational sampling strategy. These include looking deeper into the ocean for changes in phytoplankton, and capturing changes in both summer and winter, rather than just the annual mean, for the ocean-atmosphere exchange of carbon dioxide.

“Our results indicate that many types of observational efforts are critical for our understanding of our changing planet and our ability to detect change,” Schlunegger said. These include time-series or permanent locations of continuous measurement, as well as regional sampling programs and global remote sensing platforms.

###

The project was funded by NASA and NOAA grants. Additional support came from the Institute for Basic Science in Busan, South Korea, and the Swiss National Science Foundation.

The study, “Emergence of anthropogenic signals in the ocean carbon cycle,” was published in Nature Climate Change on August 19, 2019.

From EurekAlert!

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
75 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 20, 2019 6:40 am

The Amazon affects a huge portion of the Atlantic. The pH of the outflows of the river components vary widely, but the main body at the mouth is roughly 6.2. It really is acidic. I would love to see some sort of comparison between its ‘acidification’ of the oceans vs the touted CO2 acidification.

By the way, there is a massive underwater reef system at the mouth (where the models say there should not be), as well as the best fishing in the world. Go figure.

August 20, 2019 8:22 am

From the first paragraph in the above article attributed to Princeton University: “Some impacts – such as sea temperature rise and acidification – have already begun . . .”

Really? As regards quantitative, accurate measurements of global sea temperatures and associated trends, the only measurements that we have come from the network of Argo subsurface floating/diving sensors. These sensors showed that over the period of Jan 2005 to Dec 2014, most of the area of the world’s oceans had temperature change rates within the range of -0.8 to +0.4 C/decade, with a global average of +0.12 C/decade, but unquantified uncertainties on these values (ref: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/01/22/learning-from-the-argonauts/ ).

Sorry, I did not locate a source that updated this data to 2018 or later.

Since the Princeton author(s) specifically associate such “impacts” with “climate change” (whatever that last term is meant to be), it begs the question: For how many years since the end of Earth’s last glacial period has this ocean warming been occurring?

Hint: the Argo network did not start producing global-scale data until about Nov 2007, when its originally planned global array of 3000 “floats” was attained.

August 20, 2019 9:13 am

Pacific wide SSTs have fluctuated by 2 degrees C or more over the last two centuries, on a multidecadal timescale:

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2001GL013223

Therefore again this ocean warming story fails the null hypothesis test.
There is no evidence whatsoever that recent ocean warming is not background natural variation.

And this study shows how multiple low frequency proxies demonstrate clear MWP warming and LIA cooling over the NH, in stark contrast to the fictitious stasis of Mann’s notorious hockey stick (re)construction.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/45019839/Corrigendum_Highly_variable_Northern_Hem20160423-11956-gpd91b.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DCorrigendum_Highly_variable_Northern_Hem.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20190820%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20190820T160521Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=000cffefbde6739c50fdf0ec82168e878a2f223773ddf5fc240b8eb0a2b4b81e

Chad Jessup
August 20, 2019 9:45 am

“Sea temperature and ocean acidification have climbed during the last three decades to levels beyond what is expected due to natural variation alone, a new study led by Princeton researchers finds.”

That statement probably says more about what they don’t know than what they know, as it appears to be another case of the proverbial tail wagging the proverbial dog.

Clyde Spencer
August 20, 2019 10:15 am

The article stated, “Meanwhile other impacts from climate change, such as changes in the activity of ocean microbes that regulate the Earth’s carbon and oxygen cycles, will take several more decades to a century to appear.” There is no justification in the press release for the claim because measured changes in temperature and pH should have immediate impact on the microbe environment.

It is turtle models all the way down!

TomRude
August 20, 2019 1:01 pm

Another new study is making the rounds, even at the CBC…
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/sea-ice-loss-cold-winters-1.5247381
The study is putting to rest the Overland Arctic sea ice loss/ mid latitude cold winters fairytale:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0551-4

Minimal influence of reduced Arctic sea ice on coincident cold winters in mid-latitudes
Russell Blackport, James A. Screen, Karin van der Wiel & Richard Bintanja
Nature Climate Change (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract
Observations show that reduced regional sea-ice cover is coincident with cold mid-latitude winters on interannual timescales. However, it remains unclear whether these observed links are causal, and model experiments suggest that they might not be. Here we apply two independent approaches to infer causality from observations and climate models and to reconcile these sources of data. Models capture the observed correlations between reduced sea ice and cold mid-latitude winters, but only when reduced sea ice coincides with anomalous heat transfer from the atmosphere to the ocean, implying that the atmosphere is driving the loss. Causal inference from the physics-based approach is corroborated by a lead–lag analysis, showing that circulation-driven temperature anomalies precede, but do not follow, reduced sea ice. Furthermore, no mid-latitude cooling is found in modelling experiments with imposed future sea-ice loss. Our results show robust support for anomalous atmospheric circulation simultaneously driving cold mid-latitude winters and mild Arctic conditions, and reduced sea ice having a minimal influence on severe mid-latitude winters.

Poor CBC probably did not realize the can of worm they opened with publicizing this one… Since for years now the Overland, Francis and others had managed to convince media that their sea ice loss was at the origin of everything, including cold winters, polar vortex etc…
A further comment is give open access:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0560-3.epdf?referrer_access_token=ZObKBzESyrp3LX7IkGeIfNRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0PjAtL2Tv4RSwaeGLxqBF2MsKY7SjASOYWlzI6FOroSSl4z__mNF-RdvOCVmN3nhl-reRmPzvC_9CKG6i34SuUBpokw-NfEkn1ug28IwCJK9y_BJaNl7E4TzTIKYaDUmYRAtp2PrmMqU0BjvxAHCHj2m2tGfnadLOQmkMGLU-aMpgcTxickSD-OB7m9EE8Clk3KEs8B246pg5pcJdM7cpE6&tracking_referrer=www.cbc.ca

1sky1
August 20, 2019 1:32 pm

The data to validate the far-reaching premises of this paper simply aren’t available. It’s a claimed “roadmap” produced by those who have never traveled.

John Sandhofner
August 20, 2019 3:15 pm

Once again the results are the outcome of computer modeling which have been shown to be very unreliable regarding climate modeling. Scientists are so attached to their modeling since that is all they have. And now with the faster, more capable computers they seem to put more confidence in their modeling when the key to the whole study is realism of the models and the input they use. It is educated guess work at best.

Bob Weber
August 20, 2019 5:32 pm

The ocean provides a climate service to the planet by absorbing excess heat and carbon from the atmosphere, thereby slowing the pace of rising global temperatures, Schlunegger said. This service, however, comes with a penalty — namely ocean acidification and ocean warming, which alter how carbon cycles through the ocean and impacts marine ecosystems.

The ocean does not absorb excess heat, in fact, there is no such thing as excess heat – just heat.

The ocean heat comes from solar energy absorbed in the top ocean layer. The heat transfers in one direction only, from the ocean to the atmosphere – there is no ocean absorption of ‘excess’ atmospheric heat.

The ocean isn’t absorbing ‘carbon’ per se – it absorbs carbon dioxide, which follows a natural law discovered by Henry Cavendish, then formulated by William Henry in 1803, which is called Henry’s Law, where pressure (and ultimately temperature) controls outgassing and sinking of various atmospheric compounds:

Henry’s Law: CO2 solubility in water, and Atmospheric CO2
Henry, W. (1803). “Experiments on the quantity of gases absorbed by water, at different temperatures, and under different pressures”. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 93: 29–274. doi:10.1098/rstl.1803.0004.

http://geologycafe.com/oceans/images/solubility_curves_gases.jpg

In the real world, there is a significant lagged CO2 sensitivity to HadSST3, driving highly correlated CO2 and SST3 trends.

It gets better. There is a high correlation of Niño34 to CO2 in the first seven months of the year, which I used to find the simple relationship of atmospheric Mauna Loa CO2 to equatorial ocean temperature, revealing the ocean outgasses CO2 above 26.5C, and sinks below it, following the operational principle described by Henry’s Law.

The number one reason CO2 has risen in a linear-like fashion is the Nino 4 region has been warmer than 26.5C all but two months since 1870, outgassing CO2 the whole time, driving the trend.

The real ocean physics and carbon cycle revealed here completely invalidates what the Princeton, NOAA, and NASA people promote. They don’t even know the ocean warms/cools via the solar cycle TSI influence which then drives CO2, so they really don’t offer true science, physics, or dependable road map, just more self-deception. More grant monies in their hands would be wasted.

Obliviousness like that should not be rewarded or repeated. Man-made emissions are greatly overrated compared to nature’s predictable production. Reducing them will make no difference to the climate.

Bob Weber
Reply to  Bob Weber
August 20, 2019 6:54 pm

Here is an updated version of the last link.

The ocean would be less acidic now from sesquicentennial CO2 outgassing, not more acidic, not a net sink.

Dan Cody
August 21, 2019 6:55 am

I read some years ago that the Atlantic conveyor belt or the oceanic circulation is slowing down due to less salinity because of more fresh water in the mix.This in turn leads to the gulf stream slowing down leading to much colder and harsher winters for Europe.This all also has repercussions for other ares of the planet as well.
Can anybody out there help me with all this? Is it true? If so,what other repercussions does this have elsewhere on the planet other than Europe? Is it just the Atlantic’s circulation being affected or is it all over the planet? Thanks.

Bob Weber
Reply to  Dan Cody
August 21, 2019 7:45 am

Salinity isn’t the cause here. The heat flow from the tropics controls the Atlantic as well as other areas.

http://climate4you.com/images/NODC%20NorthAtlanticOceanicHeatContent0-700mSince1955%20With37monthRunningAverage.gif

Dan Cody
Reply to  Bob Weber
August 21, 2019 7:48 am

Thanks Bob for you’re input.But is it true that the ocean is losing it’s salinity and if so,what oceanic/atmospheric
or other effects can this have on the planet?

Bob Weber
Reply to  Dan Cody
August 21, 2019 10:21 am

The biggest difference I can imagine without doing more research into it is the possible effects on internal circulation from density differences, on the polar ocean freezing point obviously, and also on evaporation.

Is it ‘losing it’s salinity’? How can it? Is there less salt in the ocean now? If so where did it go? Is there more water or less now?

Salinity under constant salt supply would increase if more water evaporated out of the ocean without returning or a colder ocean during lower sea levels, so relatively speaking, the opposite is also true, higher sea levels would then imply decreasing salinity. Sea level has increased with a trend similar to the SST trend, from higher solar absorption, so assuming no net change in the amount of water or salt, the salinity has changed by some slight non-terrifying amount due to centuries of thermosteric water column volume increase.