Global greening is happening faster than climate change, and it’s a good thing

by Matt Ridley, writing in Die Weltwoche

REJOICE IN THE LUSH GLOBAL GREENING CO2 is plant food. The greening of the earth means more food for animals and greater crop yields for humans. Why is no one talking about it?

Click to enlarge. Green areas are the areas in which the vegetation has increased since 1982, massively in some areas. Infografic: Boston University

Amid all the talk of an imminent planetary catastrophe caused by emissions of carbon dioxide, another fact is often ignored: global greening is happening faster than climate change. The amount of vegetation growing on the earth has been increasing every year for at least 30 years. The evidence comes from the growth rate of plants and from satellite data.

In 2016 a paper was published by 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries that analysed satellite data and concluded that there had been a roughly 14% increase in green vegetation over 30 years. The study attributed 70% of this increase to the extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The lead author on the study, Zaichun Zhu of Beijing University, says this is equivalent to adding a new continent of green vegetation twice the size of the mainland United States.

Global greening has affected all ecosystems – from arctic tundra to coral reefs to plankton to tropical rain forests – but shows up most strongly in arid places like the Sahel region of Africa, where desertification has largely now reversed. This is because plants lose less water in the process of absorbing carbon dioxide if the concentration of carbon dioxide is higher. Ecosystems and farms will be less water-stressed at the end of this century than they are today during periods of low rainfall.

There should have been no surprise about this news. Thousands of experiments have been conducted over many years in which levels of CO2 had been increased over crops or wild ecosystems and boosted their growth. The owners of commercial greenhouses usually pump CO2 into the air to speed up the growth of plants. CO2 is plant food.

This greening is good news. It means more food for insects and deer, for elephants and mice, for fish and whales. It means higher yields for farmers; indeed, the effect has probably added about $3 trillion to farm incomes over the last 30 years. So less land is needed to feed the human population and more can be spared for wildlife instead.

Yet this never gets mentioned. In their desperation to keep the fearmongering on track the activists who make a living off the climate change scare do their best to ignore this inconvenient truth. When they cannot avoid the subject, they say that greening is a temporary phenomenon that will reverse in the latter part of this century. The evidence for this claim comes from a few models fed with extreme assumptions, so it cannot be trusted.

This biological phenomenon can also help to explain the coming and going of ice ages. It has always been a puzzle that ice ages grow gradually colder for tens of thousands of years, then suddenly warmer again in the space of a few thousand years, at which point the huge ice caps of Eurasia and North America collapse and the world enters a warmer interlude, such as the one we have been enjoying for 10,000 years.

Attempts to explain this cyclical pattern have mostly failed so far. Carbon dioxide levels track the change, but these rise after the world starts to warm and fall after the world starts to cool, so they are not the cause. Changes in the shape of the earth’s orbit play a role, with ice sheets collapsing when the northern summers are especially warm, but only some of these so-called “great summers” result in deglaciation.

Recent ice cores from the Antarctic appear to have fingered the culprit at last: it’s all about plants. During ice ages, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere steadily drops, because colder oceans absorb more of the gas. Eventually it reaches such a low level – about 0.018% at the peak of the last ice age – that plants struggle to grow at all, especially in dry areas or at high altitudes. As a result gigantic dust storms blanket the entire planet, reaching even Antarctica, where the amount of dust in the ice spikes dramatically upward. These dust storms blacken the northern ice sheets in particular, making them highly vulnerable to rapid melting when the next great summer arrives. The ice age was a horrible time to be alive even in the tropics: cold, dry, dusty and far less plant life than today.

As Svante Arrhenius, the Swede who first measured the greenhouse effect, said:

“By the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates.”

Enjoy the lush greenery of the current world and enjoy the fact that green vegetation is changing faster than global average temperatures.

Full post (in German)

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 1 vote
Article Rating
275 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GUILLERMO SUAREZ
July 5, 2019 7:02 pm

Who can take tomorrow – add some CO2- make it rain profusely so the chlorophyll then blooms – The Carbon Man – Oh the Carbon Man can- The Carbon man can -when he brakes the bonds created -during million sunny days when human beings were just shrews —- The carbon man can -take the “climate change” , and turn it into sunny visions – end alarmist contradictions- feed the poor as moral mission.

J Mac
July 5, 2019 9:31 pm

Feed the Plants. Feed ’em! They feed us… and all the other animals on the planet.

Photios
Reply to  J Mac
July 6, 2019 5:37 am

Triffids feed on us…

J Mac
Reply to  Photios
July 6, 2019 4:40 pm

Ah yes – Triffids. Science fiction that is hazardous to the blind and gullible, just like ‘Catastrophic Climate Change’!

For a farmer with a full cab on his haylage chopper, a field of triffids would be a good day for making hay! Science fictionally speaking, that is.

L
July 5, 2019 10:23 pm

It’s easy to overlook the obvious. Jack Dale said nothing out of the ordinary about the results of the hoo-ha we are mired in. All of his remarks are reasonable; he also didn’t complain about the current results. Nor did he predict the end of the World from either view of the current nonsense. Much adoo about nothing. Sounds about right to me.

Reply to  L
July 6, 2019 8:09 am

WTH?

MarkW
Reply to  L
July 6, 2019 12:35 pm

His comments were reasonable, and completely wrong.
Of course that doesn’t matter to his co-religionists.

SAMURAI
July 5, 2019 10:45 pm

Leftist CAGW zealots always downplay the huge benefits of higher CO2 levels because this reality destroys the doom and gloom predictions of the disconfirmed CAGW scam.

We should be ecstatic we’ve enjoyed 0.85C of global warming recovery since the end of the Little Ice Age in 1850 (of which CO2 contributed around (0.4C) , and the huge increase in crop yields, extended growing seasons, less crop frost loss, healthier oceans, and increased plant drought resistance we’ve enjoyed.

Leftists have been brainwashed into believing CO2 is an evil and dangerous pollutant which must be eradicated, which, ironically, would be an extinction event…

Tom Abbott
July 6, 2019 5:25 am

From the article: “In 2016 a paper was published by 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries that analysed satellite data and concluded that there had been a roughly 14% increase in green vegetation over 30 years. The study attributed 70% of this increase to the extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The lead author on the study, Zaichun Zhu of Beijing University, says this is equivalent to adding a new continent of green vegetation twice the size of the mainland United States.”

end excerpt

and from a previous WUWT article:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/07/04/how-trees-could-save-the-climate/

Reforest an area the size of the USA

The researchers calculated that under the current climate conditions, Earth’s land could support 4.4 billion hectares of continuous tree cover. That is 1.6 billion more than the currently existing 2.8 billion hectares. Of these 1.6 billion hectares, 0.9 billion hectares fulfill the criterion of not being used by hu-mans. This means that there is currently an area of the size of the US available for tree restoration. Once mature, these new forests could store 205 billion tonnes of carbon: about two thirds of the 300 billion tonnes of carbon that has been released into the atmosphere as a result of human activity since the Industrial Revolution.”

end except

My question is: How much carbon is stored by the 14% increase in vegetation growing on the Earth currently?

Photios
July 6, 2019 5:35 am

Here is an ancient, but still relevant folksing:

GREEN GROW THE RUSHES, O

I’ll sing you twelve, O
Green grow the rushes, O
What are your twelve, O?
Twelve for the twelve Apostles
Eleven for the eleven who went to heaven,
Ten for the ten commandments,
Nine for the nine bright shiners,[b]
Eight for the April Rainers.[c]
Seven for the seven stars in the sky,[d]
Six for the six proud walkers,[e]
Five for the symbols at your door,[f]
Four for the Gospel makers,
Three, three, the rivals,
Two, two, the lily-white boys,
Clothed all in green, O[g]
One is one and all alone[h]
And evermore shall be so.

The question I have is: Which digit applies to Moonbat?

Tom
July 6, 2019 6:30 am

Least anyone forgets, the predictions of catastrophic global warming are not based on the warming directly due to the CO2 greenhouse effect, but upon the dodgiest of all science- feedbacks.

Global Cooling
July 6, 2019 6:31 am

50 years ago starvation was a big problem. Now we have a lot of more people and hunger has mostly disappeared. CO2 and genetically modified crops may have something to do about increase of harvests.

PhilJ
July 6, 2019 7:15 am

More plqnt life also means more co2 converted to o2, thus increasing the supply to boost the recovery of the ozone layer…

Of course a cooling mesosphere also boosts the supply of atomic O falling back into that layer as well….

As the ozone layer recovers, more uvb will be absorbed there and less by the oceans….

Reply to  PhilJ
July 6, 2019 8:41 am

Except that the increase in CO2 is accompanied by a decrease in O2.

http://scrippso2.ucsd.edu/

Burning of fossil fuels takes O2 from the atmosphere as it adds CO2

Johann Wundersamer
Reply to  Javier
July 10, 2019 1:14 am

Burning of fossil fuels takes O2 from the atmosphere as it adds CO2. – – >

By burning fossil fuels, O2 is displaced from the atmosphere by adding CO2.

Und das ist gut!

LYRICWIKI

Extrabreit:Es Tickt

https://youtu.be/luNLm3JfGmA

Es Tickt

This song is by Extrabreit and appears on the album Ihre Grössten Erfolge (1980).

Wenn ich vollgedröhnt bis oben
Mit reichlich Kaffee obendrauf
Alle Antennen rausgezogen
Durch Nachmittagsstraßen lauf’

Die Nerven fangen an zu sirren
Ein G.T.I. fährt mich fast platt
Ich höre Glas und Blicke klirren
Ich lebe in dieser Stadt

Oh, die Stadt ist ‘ne Ruine, die schon bröckelt
Die Stadt ist eine Bombe, die noch tickt
Ich sehe Menschen an den Ecken warten
Daß man ihnen Feuer gibt

Ah, die Stadt ist ‘ne Ruine, die schon bröckelt
Die Stadt ist eine Bombe, die noch tickt
Ich sehe Menschen an den Ecken warten
Daß man ihnen Feuer gibt

Sie steh’n im Vakuum der Haltestelle
Kinder rotzen über Bäume
Die CB-Funker fordern mehr Kanäle
Einkaufstüten platzen wie Träume

Oma kauft ‘ne Tiefkühltruhe
Bis oben voll und kein bißchen satt
Jetzt im Moment klaut einer Schuhe
Ein kleiner Aufstand findet immer statt

Die Stadt ist ‘ne Ruine, die schon bröckelt
Die Stadt ist eine Bombe, die noch tickt (Tick-tack)
Ich sehe Menschen an den Ecken warten
Daß man ihnen Feuer gibt

Andrew Pollock
July 6, 2019 11:19 am

Global greening by higher CO2 levels sounds wonderful. I guess we have nothing to worry about after all. The billions of people that will be displaced by rising sea levels and extreme heat will be happy to hear that green pastures await them in welcoming countries.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Andrew Pollock
July 6, 2019 2:29 pm

Whoa! Easy on the Klimate Koolade pal. Try some nice Red Rose reality tea instead.

son of mulder
July 6, 2019 1:38 pm

If stuff is growing more quickly won’t it increase the frequency of forest fires?

shoehorn
July 6, 2019 1:44 pm

Feed the trees, man.

Richard M
July 6, 2019 2:04 pm

I really think we should refer to Jack, Keith and Chris by their real names ……. Walt, Larry and Igner.

The big question is, who is Mom and why has she sent her boys here?

Dipchip
Reply to  Richard M
July 6, 2019 2:58 pm

When a Web-site is having an impact on the bottom line of a scam, a professional hit squad is employed to counter the sites impact. You can not converse with them they are not interested in your opinion they are simply here to mislead any new viewers attracted to the site. New viewers can influence the scams ability to rope in new members and reduces their ability to grow their scam.

2hotel9
Reply to  Richard M
July 6, 2019 4:22 pm

OK, thought it was not possible to have a higher opinion of the readership of WUWT! Have to reassess, a subtle yet poignant Futurama reference changes the Game. Bravo, good sir, bravo and hussah!

Jack Dale
Reply to  Richard M
July 7, 2019 9:19 am

Wow. I have not seen a seen and heard such an erudite comment since I left junior high school. It is right up there with “Your mother wears army boots.”

But when both you and your arguments lack substance, this all you have left.

Jim Ross
Reply to  Jack Dale
July 7, 2019 12:58 pm

Jack Dale,

Upthread you said: “Using carbon isotope analysis the nearly 50% increase in atmospheric CO2 since the start of the Industrial Revolution can be directly attributed to the burning of fossil fuels.”

I am not exactly sure what you mean by “directly attributed”. NOAA estimates the δ13C of burning fossil fuels as -28 per mil (in contrast to oceanic emissions at -9.5 per mil). The decline in atmospheric δ13C reflects a 13C/12C ratio of the incremental CO2 of -13 per mil (easy to confirm by applying the so-called Keeling plot to the actual observations). I would appreciate your explanation of your statement regarding “directly attributed”.

Jack Dale
Reply to  Jim Ross
July 7, 2019 1:35 pm

I will let a geologist explain it in plain language.

http://www.jamespowell.org/Stuff/Ourfault/Ourfault.html

Jim Ross
Reply to  Jack Dale
July 8, 2019 2:06 am

I thought you probably did not have a clue, but thank you very much for confirming it. I gave you actual data, observations, and you respond with a Mickey Mouse graph showing that CO2 emissions (not atmospheric CO2) and atmospheric δ13C go in opposite directions (mostly, but not all of the time). That’s a geologist’s idea of a scientific proof?

July 6, 2019 3:27 pm

Compare this map to the one in the article above from an earlier map (no date available) which is in wakapedia…:

comment image

2hotel9
Reply to  Jon P Peterson
July 6, 2019 4:11 pm

Looks good to me, a lush, growing, vibrant planet which has no problem supporting the Human Race and all its varied animal and plant species.

Only problem I can discern is our failure to irrigate the desert regions. Not a problem! Once we round up the greentards and put them into forced labor camps to achieve that goal, we, the Human Race, will be back on track to expand off this “delicate” ball of dirt into the surrounding regions of our Solar System and then out into the closer galactic regions, and so on and so on. And the greentards will earn a place for their grandchildren in the Human Race’s advance. Their very labors will feed, clothe, house and educate them to be actual, useful Human Beings, instead of the oxygen and resource wasting parasites they currently are.

Does this REALLY need a sarc tag? Of course greentards will never be actual, useful Human Beings. Humans can dream though. Can’t we? Or has the Democrat Party made that illegal, too, just as giving birth to Human babies is being made illegal in New York State, California, New Mexico, Washington State, etc etc. When will the Human Race rise up and wipe this leftist, anti-human cancer from our species?

MS25
July 6, 2019 10:15 pm

At 415 ppm CO2 versus 280 ppm pre-industrial, total effect is now almost 50% more biomass due to CO2 fertilization.

“Since the beginning of the industrial era, photosynthesis has increased in nearly constant proportion to the rise in atmospheric CO2”

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-05/jcu-hpa050919.php

Charlie
Reply to  MS25
July 8, 2019 6:56 am

Roots of plants grow deeper with higher CO2 so can cope better with drought which is why gas is pumped into certain glasshouses. The issue which is ignored is the increase in photosynthesis by phytoplankton.

The Voice of Truth
July 8, 2019 1:49 am

You guys know that the greening story has been debunked a gazillions times, right?
Studies have proven the greening to be a myth The relationship between CO2 in the atmosphere and plant growth is far more complex than you guys intentionally misrepresent.
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate3115.html
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2016/08/30/1606734113.full.pdf

DCA
Reply to  The Voice of Truth
July 9, 2019 11:41 am

Maybe you have made that assertion “a gazillions times” right? The links you provide do no such thing.

Charlie
July 8, 2019 7:04 am

The atmosphere of the Cretaceous had 6-7 times the CO2 what it has to day. Over the last 600 million years the Earth’s climate has been warm, humid and with higher than today’s CO2 levels. Over the last 2.5 million years , there has been tens of ice ages , followed by warm interglacial periods. We are in a warm inter-glacial period and about 1000-1500 years overdue for an ice age.

richard
July 9, 2019 3:45 am
July 19, 2019 1:21 am

If global warming is happening faster than why we are not taking… effective steps in implementing the initiative for faster recovery of the planet.