Women Go On BirthStrike Because Of Climate Change

5:46 PM 03/05/2019 | Politics

Caitlin McFall | Contributor

BirthStrike is the newest movement in the push to advance climate change regulations.

At least 60 women have joined the BirthStrike movement, which encourages women to refuse to have children because they believe the earth is in crisis due to climate change. Members of this newly formed group believe it would be unjust to raise children in a world that could look vastly different than the world they grew up in.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been outspoken on this subject, holding a live Q&A from her kitchen and asking the question, “Is it OK to still have children?” (RELATED: Poll: 1/3 Of Americans Share Ocasio-Cortez’s Worry About Having Kids With Climate Change)

According to a report released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which is a body in the United Nations focused on assessing the world’s climate trends, having fewer children is the best way people can cut down on CO2 emissions. And this has prompted the formation of BirthStrike.

The report estimates that having one child less per family will save 58.6 tons of CO2 per year, whereas living car-free is estimated to only save about 2.4 tons of CO2 per year.

AOC has not said that people should stop having children. But she has emphasized that “we need a universal sense of urgency” and that the “watered-down proposals” being offered “are frankly going to kill us.”

Tune in to see what exactly is happening with this BirthStrike movement.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

170 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric H
March 6, 2019 10:03 am

That is one way to cull those that cant think for themselves from this planet….

Now all of us who can think for themselves just need to have 4-5 children and eventually we will take over the Earth….haha

Joel Snider
Reply to  Eric H
March 6, 2019 10:41 am

Or stop indoctrinating the ones allowed to be born (or at least born and allowed to live), in the public school systems.

Greg
Reply to  Joel Snider
March 6, 2019 12:19 pm

At least 60 women have joined the BirthStrike movement

Yeah, that’ll do it. LOL Looks like the level of indocrination is not quite fit for purpose yet.

J Martin
Reply to  Greg
March 10, 2019 11:29 pm

Wow! 60 women. We are down to about 158,000,000 females left. Cut out to you, too old and I bet there’s no more than 110,000,000 left. Bet you single guys are distraught that your blind date won’t have your baby.

Sara
Reply to  Joel Snider
March 6, 2019 12:26 pm

Let them swear off having children. Get themselves neutered and spayed. I am ENTIRELY in favor of that. No need to have feral children dumped on someone’s farm or front lawn in the suburbs in a cardboard box, right?

Seriously, if they find having offspring offensive to their senses, it means fewer of THEM. And when they die, no one will remember their names.

MarkG
Reply to  Joel Snider
March 6, 2019 5:48 pm

Yes.

The SJWs aren’t having kids. They utterly rely on being able to take other peoples’ kids and indoctrinate them into SJWs in their government indoctrination camps.

Homeschool or die.

Jeff Labute
Reply to  Eric H
March 6, 2019 10:44 am

I already did my 5 kids, and don’t feel guilty at all.
These are probably women that were’t going to have children anyways for other reasons.

Greg
Reply to  Jeff Labute
March 6, 2019 12:09 pm

No, they probably have been so brainwashed from birth that they truely believe what they say.

I’d like to see a more rapid solution to the problem but if Darwinian selection is all we’ve got it’s a good start. All those who deny that climate changes all the time should be encouraged not to reproduce.

Intelligence and the ability to asses one’s environment is an essential survival trait. These women clearly fail. The sooner the blood line disappears the better.

BTW, I don’t give them more than five years before they have a “happy accident”.

Joel Snider
Reply to  Greg
March 6, 2019 12:18 pm

‘I don’t give them more than five years before they have a “happy accident”.’

That’s another constant.

John Endicott
Reply to  Greg
March 6, 2019 12:19 pm

Great minds Greg, down below I said something similar: Of the birthstrikers that aren’t too old, too young, or too lesbian to have children through the normal means, I suspect half of them will be pregnant within 5 years.

David
Reply to  Greg
March 6, 2019 5:10 pm

If they believe in climate change they probably shouldn’t be peeing in the gene pool anyway.

Don
Reply to  Jeff Labute
March 6, 2019 12:16 pm

Right there with you Jeff. My five are in the pipe either in college or working. No guilt at all.

Rhys Jaggar
Reply to  Jeff Labute
March 7, 2019 1:57 am

How on earth do children survive being born in Miami?

It is two degrees warmer than in NYC and DC.

The place should be a ghost town, instead it is full of latinos procreating.

Martin Mason
Reply to  Jeff Labute
March 7, 2019 1:48 pm

Jeff, did you need 5 kids?

Reply to  Eric H
March 6, 2019 12:43 pm

This has been obvious in the USA for some time. Republicans have more children than Demonizers (Democrats)

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fatherly.com/health-science/republicans-have-more-children/amp/

Trevor
Reply to  Martin Cropp
March 8, 2019 1:04 pm

True, but the Demonizers are stealing those kids via indoctrination in the public school system.

Charles Higley
Reply to  Eric H
March 6, 2019 1:11 pm

Exactly,
I have always said that, if the libtards think there are too many people, they should lead the way by volunteering to be gone. Now, they are stepping up and sacrificing their offspring. Wow, a gift that will keep on giving for decades.

Rocketscientist
Reply to  Eric H
March 6, 2019 1:17 pm

I highly encourage idiots of all stripes to exclude their DNA from the gene pool.
The world could certainly get by with fewer fools.
At least in this case its self limiting.

Paul of Alexandria
Reply to  Rocketscientist
March 6, 2019 5:48 pm

Could we actually give an entire political party the Darwin Award?

Trevor
Reply to  Rocketscientist
March 8, 2019 1:05 pm

If only the people who drive slow in the left lane could be convinced to go on birth strike.

Trevor
Reply to  Rocketscientist
March 8, 2019 1:09 pm

The anti-vaxxers are doing something simlar. They’re still having kids, but many of them will not live long enough to reproduce due to their parents’ stupidity. I hate it for the kids who have to die because their parents are idiots. But at least their ability to pass their views on to their children is hampered.

Bernie Goetz
Reply to  Eric H
March 6, 2019 1:34 pm

Be comforted. 99% of third world women won’t pay attention to this.

LdB
Reply to  Bernie Goetz
March 6, 2019 6:28 pm

There is an irony that regardless what these morons do India and China will make it insignificant.

Reply to  LdB
March 6, 2019 8:16 pm

As with my earlier comment, which might show up eventually

Jon Scott
Reply to  Bernie Goetz
March 6, 2019 10:21 pm

100%! We have out of control exponential Third World population growth and these lemming like libtards do the ultimate religious virtue signalling! Bet 50% of them are over 35 and already have kids. The rest of them well look for the happy “accident” in a couple of years time. Pathetic mindless believers. Jonestown resident wannabes?

John Brisbin
Reply to  Eric H
March 6, 2019 1:57 pm

Perhaps they can use the spare time to make uncomfortable rocking chairs like the original Shakers. Would it be too much to call them ‘Fakers’?

Reply to  Eric H
March 6, 2019 8:14 pm

As wth apparently so many other ways in which they are ignorant, these people don’t know much about what is really going on vis a vis population.

Rod Evans
Reply to  AndyHce
March 6, 2019 9:26 pm

Let’s be fair.
They don’t have much of a clue about anything, do they?

Derg
Reply to  Eric H
March 6, 2019 11:41 pm

Idiocracy in reverse 🤔

Reply to  Eric H
March 7, 2019 9:08 am

Right – the real goal should be to have fewer far-left liberal, socialist and radical green children. Solves most problems. Children with common sense and a belief in facts and science are welcome.

Dennis Thomason
March 6, 2019 10:04 am

Sounds very good to me. I don’t want them having little alarmist that will grow up to cause my grandchildren grief.

Reply to  Dennis Thomason
March 6, 2019 10:59 am

There is an irony here. When they grow old, being lonely and childless they will expect other people’s children to befriend them and perhaps even look after them.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
March 6, 2019 11:14 am

Or demand for a government program to force other people’s children to spend time with them.

Bryan A
Reply to  Tom in Florida
March 6, 2019 11:57 am

And to force other peoples children to care for them in their aged times.
I wonder if part of AOCs GND will be to force other peoples kids to take these aging martyrs into their homes for end of life care

Rocketscientist
Reply to  Bryan A
March 6, 2019 1:50 pm

Where do you think the money to pay for all of AOC’s agenda comes from …other peoples kids paying taxes.
Of course, by then we’ll have the euthanasia panels to ‘retire’ these aged fools.

Bryan A
Reply to  Bryan A
March 6, 2019 8:57 pm

And the Soylent Green processing plants

Thomas Homer
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
March 6, 2019 11:17 am

Michael in Dublin: “When they grow old, being lonely and childless they will expect other people’s children to … ”

– continue paying into Social Security
– join the military and protect this country
– drive the economy
– …

Reply to  Michael in Dublin
March 6, 2019 12:48 pm

And if the temperatures have not increased as the computers predict, they will have every right to be angry.
Regards

Reply to  Michael in Dublin
March 6, 2019 1:14 pm

Isn’t this the plot to the movie “Greta”? 😉

Latitude
March 6, 2019 10:05 am

obviously….a conservative plot

J Mac
Reply to  Latitude
March 6, 2019 9:57 pm

Why would any rational male want to have children with a mentally ill woman suffering from self induced delusions of impending global doom?

That’s not a ‘plot’. It’s self-respecting sanity.

MarkW
March 6, 2019 10:07 am

BirthStrike?

I got news for you, when the baby is ready to come, it comes.

Reply to  MarkW
March 6, 2019 11:04 am

MarkW

Nope, that’s the bloke.

Bryan A
Reply to  HotScot
March 6, 2019 11:59 am

More like a Sex Strike
Bring on the Age of Spinsters

Dr Deanster
Reply to  MarkW
March 6, 2019 12:01 pm

Unless u live in NY. Then, you can abort it last minute ….

Tom Abbott
Reply to  Dr Deanster
March 6, 2019 1:23 pm

“Unless u live in NY. Then, you can abort it last minute ….”

Even later in Virginia. Being a fully-fuctioning human being won’t help you there.

March 6, 2019 10:08 am

Population replacement will come to the practitioners’ neighborhoods.

MarkW
March 6, 2019 10:08 am

The world of today looks a lot different from the world of 1960. The fact that I’m typing this on a personal computer is just one, small example of how different it is.

Bryan A
Reply to  MarkW
March 6, 2019 12:00 pm

PC…chute…I’m doing this on my phone

Craig from Oz
Reply to  MarkW
March 6, 2019 5:03 pm

To think, back when I had hair being nuked to the stone age by the Soviets was considered a realistic threat and the Sahara was bigger.

GASP! Good think I never spent my teen years playing with wild oats or I would be having to split my child support between giving money and explaining what nuclear destruction was.

Bill Powers
March 6, 2019 10:09 am

This is the best argument for abortion the left has put forward to date.

EDITH wENZEL
Reply to  Bill Powers
March 6, 2019 10:38 am

Brilliant Brilliant Bill. Thanks for thinking of that response. You are so right.

March 6, 2019 10:13 am

It’s evolution in action.

Astrocyte
Reply to  Leo Smith
March 6, 2019 10:35 am

You beat me to it.

Darwin’s theories in action!

Gary
March 6, 2019 10:16 am

If your are going to radicalize and terrify your offspring with scary stories, you won’t be a good parent. Good parents nurture prepare their children for a future that unfortunately includes the crazy doom-mongering of nut jobs like this group.

Tom Halla
March 6, 2019 10:18 am

If having the tendency to accept ridiculous arguments is heritable, their not having children is a good idea.

March 6, 2019 10:21 am

AOC’s deepest thoughts just keep on giving and giving to America….we should all be glad we can use her as an example to our neighbors and children….

icisil
Reply to  DMacKenzie
March 6, 2019 11:37 am

An interesting timeline about who’s behind AOC . She simply answered a casting call and won the part.

https://twitter.com/Lady_Vi_2U/status/1101609934247129088

AOC wasn’t elected .. Justice Democrats were. EVERY word out of her mouth is orchestrated and scripted by them!

BillP
March 6, 2019 10:22 am

I am wondering if this could qualify for a Darwin Award.

Normally someone has to die to receive the award, but the key requirement is to remove one’s self from the gene pool in a stupid manner, which these people plan to do.

John Endicott
Reply to  BillP
March 6, 2019 12:00 pm

The only question is will they follow through. These loony-lefties often talk the talk, but its rare to find one that walks the walk. Of the birthstrikers that aren’t too old, too young, or too lesbian to have children through the normal means, I suspect half of them will be pregnant within 5 years.

Grant
March 6, 2019 10:25 am

Best news I’ve heard all day.

Edith Wenzel
Reply to  Grant
March 6, 2019 10:41 am

where you planning to have a baby before you heard crazy Cortez speak Good for you I didn’t know men had transitioned into that role. You would have loved it.

bluecat57
March 6, 2019 10:26 am

As long as they don’t go on a sex strike or abortion binge.

n.n
Reply to  bluecat57
March 6, 2019 10:39 am

They have two humane choices: sex strike and conception strike. An abortion binge is a birth strike in progress, which is two strikes/choices too late.

Caligula Jones
March 6, 2019 10:27 am

Nah, not religious fanatics at ALL:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakers

“At its peak in the mid-19th century, there were 6,000 Shaker believers. By 1920, there were only 12 Shaker communities remaining in the United States.

At the present time, there is only one active Shaker village, Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village, which is located in Maine. Their celibacy combined with external and internal societal changes resulted in the thinning of the Shaker community, and consequently many of the other Shaker settlements are now village museums.”

Darwinism in action.

Gary Ashe
March 6, 2019 10:27 am

I bet they are all over-weight hogw.

Weight-watchers for SJW’s and lonely bints.

ResourceGuy
March 6, 2019 10:29 am

This is good news in many respects.
1- shorter waiting times for doctor appointments of other couples, especially in health service rationing countries
2- less stressed delivery room services and staff
3- better choices for day care services and grammar schools
4- less financial pressure in health service budgets
5- fewer Green divorces and broken homes
6- more space for migrants with other (traditional) values

The only downside is more free time for paid protesters and over-represented policy advocates.

Michael S. Kelly LS, BSA Ret.
Reply to  ResourceGuy
March 6, 2019 2:53 pm

Another downside is that the crushing burden of $21 trillion in national debt and $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities will fall on fewer shoulders. This will not end well.

LdB
Reply to  Michael S. Kelly LS, BSA Ret.
March 6, 2019 6:30 pm

Just let in more climate refugees 🙂

Tonyc
March 6, 2019 10:32 am

Finally, a progressive movement I can get behind.

Gator
Reply to  Tonyc
March 6, 2019 11:02 am

My thoughts exactly. But how do we convince the rest of the leftards to self-extinct.

Bryan A
Reply to  Gator
March 6, 2019 12:03 pm

Although self extinction is the likely end result, the process will still take decades

n.n
March 6, 2019 10:35 am

It could be worse. It could be “Planned”, and that is CAGCC or catastrophic anthropogenic global child culling, a wicked solution.

Trebla
March 6, 2019 10:36 am

I hope that great idea catches on. We have boatloads waiting at the borders to take up the slack. By the way, even in the best of all possible worlds, your children eventually die. Did that thought occur to them?

n.n
Reply to  Trebla
March 6, 2019 10:41 am

Why wait, when a carbon-free humanity, less humanity, is technically and socially within their reach. Sequester now. Sequester often.

March 6, 2019 10:39 am

BirthStrike? — shouldn’t that be “BrainStrike”? — a condition of a thinking mind where an otherwise intelligent person acts stupid.

March 6, 2019 10:43 am

An Open Letter to the Women of the Birthstrike Movement:

I hope you are extraordinarily successful in recruiting other women to your movement, especially female bureaucrats and politicians.

Thank you for helping to improve the gene pool for all humans.

Sincerely,
An Uncaring Male

griff
March 6, 2019 10:46 am

The birth rate/population is falling sharply in many countries… Korea and Japan, for example.

In neither of those is anyone doing it for reason of climate change…

Gator
Reply to  griff
March 6, 2019 11:01 am

So you personally interviewed them all? Amazing that you have that kind of time, and yet still have time to pollute threads with your idiocy.

Reply to  griff
March 6, 2019 11:03 am

How many Koreans and Japanese did your poll for your survey?

Was it a statistically valid sample?

Reply to  griff
March 6, 2019 11:08 am

griff

All thanks to fossil fuel derived prosperity.

MarkW
Reply to  griff
March 6, 2019 11:16 am

How exactly, was that relevant to the topic at hand?

John Endicott
Reply to  griff
March 6, 2019 12:07 pm

The birth rate/population is falling sharply in many countries…

And every single one of those countries has something in common. I know you know what it is, even if you can’t bring yourself to admit it. every single one of those countries is a prosperous first world nation that got to be a prosperous first world nation through the use of cheap plentiful fossil fueled energy

Reply to  John Endicott
March 6, 2019 8:22 pm

To find out how wrong you are, just view the very interesting and entertaining video I posted above.
The UEL (without the quotes) is
“https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FACK2knC08E&feature=youtu.be”

R Shearer
Reply to  griff
March 6, 2019 5:52 pm

This reasonable comment represents a 5 sigma event.

Coeur de Lion
March 6, 2019 10:48 am

I must say as a man, I’ve never liked the idea of having a baby.

March 6, 2019 10:58 am

I support Birthstrike and highly encourage all climate alarmists to join. Increasing the collective intelligence of humans through self-attrition is called winning.

1 2 3 4