Cincinnati, aptly the home of the Flying Pig Marathon, and formerly known as Porkopolis, has been the 100th city to fight climate change by pledging to be powered 100% by renewable energy. Chances of success are likely to be high, according to the mayor. As a former Cincy resident who knows the climate for wind and solar, I say, in a pig’s eye. BTW if you’ve never had it, and want to try something truly unique, try this Cincinnati Chili mix. – Anthony
By Steve Goreham
Mayors in more than 100 US cities have announced plans to transition their electrical power systems to 100 percent renewable by 2050. They propose replacement of traditional coal, natural gas, and nuclear generating stations with wind, solar, and wood-fired stations. But none of these mayors has a plausible idea of how to meet their commitment.
In December, Cincinnati became the one-hundredth US city to commit to 100 percent electricity from renewable sources, with a target to achieve this goal by 2035. Cincinnati Mayor John Cranley stated, “It has become clear that cities will lead the global effort to fight climate change, and Cincinnati is on the front lines.” Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson also pledged to reach 100 percent renewable electricity by 2050 as part of the city’s 2018 Climate Action Plan.
But these announcements appear to be a folk tale worthy of the Brothers Grimm.
In 2018, renewables provided less than 3 percent of Ohio’s electricity, which came 47 percent from coal, 35 percent from natural gas, and 15 percent from nuclear generators. Mayors Cranley and Jackson appear to have failed to consider the cost or scale of their energy change commitments.
As part of the effort, the Ohio Power Siting Board approved the Icebreaker Wind Facility last July. The Icebreaker project would initially construct six 3.5-gigawatt wind turbines in Lake Erie, ten miles off the coast of Cleveland, at an estimated cost of $126 million. The project would annually produce only about 75 gigawatt-hours of electricity, but plans call for an expansion to over 1,000 offshore wind towers.
Renewable energy is fashionable, but also expensive. The Icebreaker wind turbines cost $21 million each, or about six times the US market price for wind turbines, which is about $1 million per megawatt. The cost for expansion to 1,000 turbines would approach $20 billion. These renewable system costs will be in addition to existing power generation plants, 90 percent of which must be maintained to provide security of electricity supply when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine.
In 2017, Ohio residents consumed 119,000 gigawatt-hours of electrical power. If completed, the 1,000 wind turbines of the expanded $20 billion Icebreaker project would deliver about 12,000 gigawatt-hours, or only about 10 percent of Ohio’s electricity need.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter pledged their cities to 100 percent renewables by 2030. Major wind system build-outs during the last five years boosted Minnesota to the eighth-leading wind energy state in the US. Renewables now provide about 27 percent of the state’s electricity. But Minnesota residents are paying for it. Over the last nine years, Minnesota power prices increased 34 percent, compared to the US average price rise of 7 percent.
In Wisconsin, Madison Mayor Paul Soglin announced last July the city’s commitment to 100 percent renewable electricity by 2050. But Wisconsin is not exactly the sun belt. Traditional generating stations provide 92 percent of the state’s electrical power and Wisconsin is a poor location for both wind and solar.
Not to be deterred, the City of Madison announced in 2017, a contract for five “utility-scale” solar arrays that would deliver 20 megawatt-hours of electricity per year. But Wisconsin consumes 65,000 gigawatt-hours of electricity each year. More than thirty thousand such “utility-scale” solar projects would be needed to supply just one percent of Wisconsin’s electricity.
City officials in Atlanta pledged to reach 100 percent renewables by 2035, but have been honest about the fact that they don’t know how to do it. Only about 6 percent of Atlanta’s electricity comes from renewable sources, about the same amount as the state of Georgia. So, Atlanta proposes purchasing large amounts of renewable energy credits from wind and solar generators in other states, so that they can claim their green energy status.
Energy does not have color. No one can tell whether the electricity from their wall outlet is green or provided by a coal-fired plant. Purchasing renewable credits from other locations is the slight-of-hand method that allows city mayors to claim 100 percent renewable status.
Maybe these mayors have learned a way to spin climate change straw into gold. Cincinnati, Cleveland, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Atlanta, and several other cities will receive $2.5 million grants from the Bloomberg Philanthropies group of billionaire Michael Bloomberg for their efforts to “fight climate change.” Unfortunatly, these grants will only be a drop in the bucket compared to the billions in additional electricity costs that citizens will pay for renewable electricity programs.
California is the center of the 100-percent-renewables fable. More than 30 California cities have committed to 100 percent renewable electricity, including San Diego, San Francisco, and San Jose, as well as the state of California itself. The state is doing a great job of boosting electricity prices. According to the US Department of Energy, California 2017 residental electricity prices were 18.2 cents per kilowatt-hour, about 50 percent higher than any other state in the West. Look for California rates to double in the next two decades, driven by efforts to achieve high penetration of renewables.
So is your mayor smarter than a fifth grader? When it comes to energy policy, maybe not.
Originally published in The Western Journal. Republished here at the request of the author.
Steve Goreham is a speaker on the environment, business, and public policy and author of the book Outside the Green Box: Rethinking Sustainable Development.
Of course, no discussion of Cincinnati and animals flying can be complete without WKRP’s Turkey Drop, where their competing radio station had the call letters WPIG. I’ll just leave this here.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

This post is mostly about Cincinnati, but if you live in a city in the U.S., it is coming to your city too. The first you may hear of it is a newspaper notice about a public meeting to get citizen reaction to a “climate Plan”. It will probably be short notice- as in: “there is a meeting this evening.” But you can bet the local Sierra Club chapter will have heard about the plan months ago. They probably helped write the plan as a “stakeholder.”
This is all part of a plan to get cities to buy into the Paris Accord at the local level. The organizers intend to kill off opposition by ” death by a 1000 small cuts.’ You can make snide remarks and mock them if you wish. But make no mistake: the organizers are deadly serious, and the supporters well organized and well funded.
Two nights ago I attended such a meeting in San Antonio, Texas. It was held by the local municipally owned electric and gas utility, CPS Energy covering their part of the San Antonio “Climate Action Plan.” The goal of all these plans is to be “carbon neutral” by 2050. About 35 people spoke at the meeting, All but about 5, spoke in favor of the plan. If there was any criticism of the plan from these people, it was that the was that the specified actions weren’t happening fast enough. Almost all who spoke in favor of the plan actually were somehow involved in the plan’s preparation. With only 5 or so not in favor of the plan, of course the local newspaper reported: “citizens overwhelmingly supported the plan.”
Skeptics of CAGW are not going to be able to stop this title wave. I fear the economic consequences of these city Climate Action Plans will make what is happening in the UK and South Australia seem mild by comparison.
So… 2050… minus 2019… So 31 years in the future?
Wow. Ignoring the fact that ‘It May Already Be Too Late(tm)’ and ‘Worse Than First Thought(tm)’, how many years is this brave progressive planet saver from retirement?
“Cincinnati Mayor John Cranley stated, “It has become clear that cities will lead the global effort to fight climate change, and Cincinnati is on the front lines.” Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson also pledged to reach 100 percent renewable electricity by 2050 as part of the city’s 2018 Climate Action Plan.”
Doesn’t tell from whom that famous mayors will take the money for their wealthy cities green dreams.
Why is it that it is usually urban areas that vote in people that want to do stupid things to “Save The Planet”?
Perhaps because they are so removed from the “Nature” they adore?
PS I grew up in the Greater Cincinnati area.
Just where would the solar and windmill power plants be set up?
Farm land in rural areas.
More hot air. Less food.
(I wonder if millennial in urban areas realize that grocery stores aren’t equipped with “Star Trek”-type food replicators?)
“Traditional generating stations provide 92 percent of the state’s electrical power and Wisconsin is a poor location for both wind and solar.”
Not to mention they have anyway 100% capacity by fossil powered energy to provide for.
Expert schmeckspert hick-hacks:
News – 100 Percent Renewable Cities—Is Your Mayor Smarter than a 5th …
https://www.heartland.org › news-opinion
vor 11 Stunden · The Icebreaker project would initially construct six 3.5-gigawatt wind turbines in Lake Erie, ten miles off the coast of …
https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/100-percent-renewable-citiesis-your-mayor-smarter-than-a-5th-grader
“The Icebreaker project would initially construct six 3.5-gigawatt wind turbines in Lake Erie, ten miles off the coast of Cleveland, at an estimated cost of $126 million.”
–>
Robert W Turner February 20, 2019 at 10:12 am
3.5 GW wind turbines? Shouldn’t that be 3.5 MW turbines?
Reply
Joel O’Bryan February 20, 2019 at 11:22 am
You are correct. The writer (Steve Gorham) is so ignorant of the basic technology that he can’t spot obvious errors in his writings.
Good for them – provided they ABSOLUTELY do not use fossil fuels for any back-up power ever,
Atlanta proposes purchasing large amounts of renewable energy credits from wind and solar generators in other states, so that they can claim their green energy status.
Wonder what happens when all these cities, etc, claim 100% renewable-use and the add-up of that total exceeds the actual total renewable generation?
It is entirely possible for a city to be powered 100% by renewables, as it is to be powered 100% by hamsters in wheels driving dynamos.
It does not mean the city will be getting much electricity, or have many residents once everyone has decamped to cities that have a continuous, reliable electricity supply.
Welp, I was seriously looking at locating some data center stuff in Cincinnati because of the way the Internet fiberoptic infrastructure is laid out in teh US but it looks like either Indianapolis or Louisville now. Power is the main constraining cost of data center operations and this promises to push data center operators out of Cincinnati.
Check out Northern Kentucky, right across the Ohio River from Cincinnati.
The IRS has a center there so the communication network must be good and the Mayor of Cincinnati’s stupid plan shouldn’t cross the Ohio River.
Cincinnati politics can be really goofy. Jerry Springer was mayor is the 1970’s, AFTER he was caught paying a prostitute with a check while on city council.