Researchers chart path to cheaper flexible solar cells

Public Release: 7-Feb-2019

Georgia Institute of Technology

 

191726_web
A researcher at Georgia Tech holds a perovskite-based solar cell, which is flexible and lighter than silicon-based versions. Credit Rob Felt, Georgia Tech

There’s a lot to like about perovskite-based solar cells. They are simple and cheap to produce, offer flexibility that could unlock a wide new range of installation methods and places, and in recent years have reached energy efficiencies approaching those of traditional silicon-based cells.

But figuring out how to produce perovskite-based energy devices that last longer than a couple of months has been a challenge.

Now researchers from Georgia Institute of Technology, University of California San Diego and Massachusetts Institute of Technology have reported new findings about perovskite solar cells that could lead the way to devices that perform better.

“Perovskite solar cells offer a lot of potential advantages because they are extremely lightweight and can be made with flexible plastic substrates,” said Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena, an assistant professor in the Georgia Tech School of Materials Science and Engineering. “To be able to compete in the marketplace with silicon-based solar cells, however, they need to be more efficient.”

In a study that was published February 8 in the journal Science and was sponsored by the U.S Department Energy and the National Science Foundation, the researchers described in greater detail the mechanisms of how adding alkali metal to the traditional perovskites leads to better performance.

“Perovskites could really change the game in solar,” said David Fenning, a professor of nanoengineering at the University of California San Diego. “They have the potential to reduce costs without giving up performance. But there’s still a lot to learn fundamentally about these materials.”

To understand perovskite crystals, it’s helpful to think of its crystalline structure as a triad. One part of the triad is typically formed from the element lead. The second is typically made up of an organic component such as methylammonium, and the third is often comprised of other halides such as bromine and iodine.

In recent years, researchers have focused on testing different recipes to achieve better efficiencies, such as adding iodine and bromine to the lead component of the structure. Later, they tried substituting cesium and rubidium to the part of the perovskite typically occupied by organic molecules.

“We knew from earlier work that adding cesium and rubidium to a mixed bromine and iodine lead perovskite leads to better stability and higher performance,” Correa-Baena said.

But little was known about why adding those alkali metals improved performance of the perovskites.

To understand exactly why that seemed to work, the researchers used high-intensity X-ray mapping to examine the perovskites at the nanoscale.

“By looking at the composition within the perovskite material, we can see how each individual element plays a role in improving the performance of the device,” said Yanqi (Grace) Luo, a nanoengineering PhD student at UC San Diego.

They discovered that when the cesium and rubidium were added to the mixed bromine and iodine lead perovskite, it caused the bromine and iodine to mix together more homogeneously, resulting in up to 2 percent higher conversion efficiency than the materials without these additives.

“We found that uniformity in the chemistry and structure is what helps a perovskite solar cell operate at its fullest potential,” Fenning said. “Any heterogeneity in that backbone is like a weak link in the chain.”

Even so, the researchers also observed that while adding rubidium or cesium caused the bromine and iodine to become more homogenous, the halide metals themselves within their own cation remained fairly clustered, creating inactive “dead zones” in the solar cell that produce no current.

“This was surprising,” Fenning said. “Having these dead zones would typically kill a solar cell. In other materials, they act like black holes that suck in electrons from other regions and never let them go, so you lose current and voltage.

“But in these perovskites, we saw that the dead zones around rubidium and cesium weren’t too detrimental to solar cell performance, though there was some current loss,” Fenning said. “This shows how robust these materials are but also that there’s even more opportunity for improvement.”

The findings add to the understanding of how the perovskite-based devices work at the nanoscale and could lay the groundwork for future improvements.

“These materials promise to be very cost effective and high performing, which is pretty much what we need to make sure photovoltaic panels are deployed widely,” Correa-Baena said. “We want to try to offset issues of climate change, so the idea is to have photovoltaic cells that are as cheap as possible.”

###

This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy EERE postdoctoral fellowship and grant Nos. DE-SC0001088 and DE-AC02-06CH11357, the California Energy Commission under grant No. EPC-16-050, the Skoltech NGP Program under grant No. 1913/R, the Hellman Fellowship and the National Science Foundation under grant Nos. CBET-1605495, DMR-1507803, GRFP 1122374, CHE-1338173 and ECCS-1542148. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring agencies.

CITATION: Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena, et al., “Homogenized halides and alkali cation segregation in alloyed organic-inorganic perovskites,” (Science, February 2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5065

From EurekAlert!

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

118 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ferdberple
February 12, 2019 10:08 am

Most of the people in the US would have frozen to death over the past week if they were relying on solar power to heat their homes, no matter how efficient the panels.

February 12, 2019 10:22 am

Cue the mindless naysayers…

Though PV panels aren’t a base load power solution, they ARE a solution for a lot of energy needs. Stop hating on them. Making them cheaper and more efficient is a GOOD thing. And eat some food, you all sound hangry.

MarkW
Reply to  stinkerp
February 12, 2019 11:54 am

If they aren’t a base load power solution, then why are they being sold as a base load power solution?
If they aren’t a base load power solution, then they are close enough to useless that the difference doesn’t matter.
Nobody “hates on them”, whatever the heck that really means. What we hate is that certain morons want to use them as base load power and they want us to pay for it.

Lee L
February 12, 2019 10:39 am

Well yes, half or better as long as you don’t need to use your energy to HEAT something (say, your home).
Hawaii is a bit of a very best case in sofar as it is usually pretty warm and not cloudy. It still suffers from that pesky night thing though.

February 12, 2019 11:16 am

Leo Smith says it all. Its interesting and who knows it may benefit a isolated place where its too far from the grid, but back here in the real world it is completely useless.

I am sick of the Warmers Green industry completely ignoring the simple fact that all renewables need back up power supply. They talk about how today its cheaper to use renewables, after all the Sun and wind ” are free”, but then completely ignore the fact that this Free power still needs Back Up.

This fact is what we need to publisise , every time a Green talks about renewables , we should say “But what about the cost of the Backup.

Of course at that point, if they can think quickly, they will waffle on about the need to “Save the Planet” and that we must all make sacrafices etc.

MJE

Lucius von Steinkaninchen
February 12, 2019 11:27 am

I’m still waiting for research on solar cells that produce *and* store energy on the same device.

February 12, 2019 11:49 am

Regarding “Back up power, any data available about the “Damage” caused by the need to be constantly changing the output of the fossul fuel power supplies. They were designed to be run at a near constant speed.

If additional maintenance is needed, this just adds to the cost that we have to wear to keep the Greens happy. .

MJE

Adam
February 12, 2019 12:27 pm

These university researchers would doubtless like to become wealthy entrepreneurs. Were there a different president, they might receive untold millions in subsidies. The products they developed would then receive untold millions in subsidies. The companies which remediate the environmental damage they cause would then receive untold millions.

Various former politicians and government officials would no doubt pocket a few bucks as executives, stockholders, consultants, lobbyists and the like.

Jonthetechnologist
February 12, 2019 1:51 pm

Alvin Marks – Lumeloid 1986 – inventor of polarized films (sunglasses). Easy to find info.
Someone is keeping it from market.
Perfect for space applications etc..
Even if output estimates are wrong by half it is still triple current PV tech.

Reply to  Jonthetechnologist
February 13, 2019 12:53 am

No one is keeping it from the market. Why would they? The patent – if issued – has run out.

Flight Level
February 12, 2019 3:27 pm

Sounds quite an interesting challenge. About all elements, heat, humidity, UV, heat, cold, oxygen, time, electric current, contribute to an accelerated decay and void the 3 month manufacturer guarantee.

Further on the line, the otherwise limited shelf-life could lead to a more than welcome, subsidized by green energy requirements, boost of express air cargo.

What not to like ?

John Pickens
February 12, 2019 9:22 pm

For large area (>100cm2) perovskite solar cells, the best efficiency I have been able to find on internet searches is 8%. And this is a stacked junction cell on a glass substrate. And they degrade “rapidly”, is the best description I’ve seen.

I personally worked on developing thin film amorphous silicon on glass solar cells, and we were the first to deliver stable >10% efficiency, >100cm2 cells to SERI in Denver, CO. This was back in the late 1980s. Still not competitive with polycrystalline silicon after 30 years.

I won’t be holding my breath for perovskite cells.

February 13, 2019 3:08 am

Intermittency of wind and solar is a huge problem, especially for electrical grids, but let’s discuss off-grid applications.

There are what – over a billion people out there with NO grid energy? Progress in providing grid energy to them has apparently been stifled by uber-green fanatics in governments, at the World Bank and the IFC.

The uber-Green excuse has been that the poorest people in the world cannot have cheap, dispatchable grid energy because increasing atmospheric CO2 will cause us all to burn up from runaway global warming – the nonsense CAGW mantra for which there is NO credible evidence. Several decades of energy progress have been lost because of green nonsense.

The current solution for off-grid people is typically solar-plus-battery, to provide lighting in the evening and also power for mobile phones and computers and internet access systems. Until grid energy can be provided, this off-grid application is one possible solution for the poorest people on Earth.

These systems will not provide enough power for heating or cooking, but the availability of something as basic as lighting after dark, electronic communication and computer access is a huge step forward, especially when you start from nothing.

Gorodon Jeffrey Giles
February 13, 2019 9:27 am

Leave it to the Greens….. they’re the new Reds….. to deliver to us as a “miraculous improvement”…. a product that contains high amounts of lead that disintegrates rapidly through its short-term lifespan leaving us with massive amounts of poisonous material to pollute the earth with. Love it!

These idiots just can’t help themselves…one step forward… two steps back…then get a gun and blow your feet off.