‘Climate grief’: The growing emotional toll of climate change

From NBC News

Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future.

Image: Embers fly above a firefighter as he works to control a backfire as the Delta Fire burns in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest
The Delta Fire rages in Shasta-Trinity National Forest in California on Sept. 6.Noah Berger / AP file

Dec. 24, 2018 / 5:35 AM ‎EST

By Avichai Scher

When the U.N. released its latest climate report in October, it warned that without “unprecedented” action, catastrophic conditions could arrive by 2040.

For Amy Jordan, 40, of Salt Lake City, a mother of three teenage children, the report caused a “crisis.”

“The emotional reaction of my kids was severe,” she told NBC News. “There was a lot of crying. They told me, ‘We know what’s coming, and it’s going to be really rough.’ “

She struggled too, because there wasn’t much she could do for them. “I want to have hope, but the reports are showing that this isn’t going to stop, so all we can do is cope,” she said.

The increasing visibility of climate change, combined with bleak scientific reports and rising carbon dioxide emissions, is taking a toll on mental health, especially among young people, who are increasingly losing hope for their future. Experts call it “climate grief,” depression, anxiety and mourning over climate change.

Last year, the American Psychological Association issued a report on climate change’s effect on mental health. The report primarily dealt with trauma from extreme weather but also recognized that “gradual, long-term changes in climate can also surface a number of different emotions, including fear, anger, feelings of powerlessness, or exhaustion.”

In the last few months, a string of reports have delivered dire warnings. The U.N. report said the worst effects — such as the flooding of coastal areas caused by rising sea levels, drought, food shortages and more frequent and severe natural disasters — could arrive as soon as 2040. In November, the Trump administration released a report with similarly alarming findings. Both reports said cutting greenhouse gas emissions could still avert many of these effects, but a study earlier this month found that after holding steady from 2014 to 2016, emissions rose in 2017 and are on course to hit an all-time high in 2018.

The reports came amid a string of powerful natural disasters, including some that wiped out entire communities, such as Paradise, California, incinerated by the Camp Fire, and Mexico Beach, Florida, washed away by Hurricane Michael.

According to a Yale survey taken this year, anxiety is rising in the U.S. over the climate. Sixty-two percent of people surveyed said they were at least “somewhat” worried about the climate, up from 49 percent in 2010. The rate of those who described themselves as “very” worried was 21 percent, about double the rate of a similar study in 2015. Only 6 percent said humans can and will reduce global warming.

Dr. Lise van Susteren, a psychiatrist in Washington and co-founder of the Climate Psychiatry Alliance, said it’s becoming harder for patients to ignore the threats of climate change.

“For a long time we were able to hold ourselves in a distance, listening to data and not being affected emotionally,” she said. “But it’s not just a science abstraction anymore. I’m increasingly seeing people who are in despair, and even panic. “

A 10-Step Program for Climate Grief

After the U.N. report was released, Jordan looked for a way to help her children cope. She saw a sign at her church for a support group that deals with the issue, the Good Grief Network.

Founded by Aimee Reau, 30, and LaUra Schmidt, 32, Good Grief offers a 10-step program to help people deal with collective grief — issues that affect a whole society, like racism, mass shootings and climate grief.

The program runs as a 10-week cycle, each weekly meeting tackling a different step. It’s currently in its third cycle in Salt Lake City and is also running online. The steps encourage participants to confront their climate fears and sadness and acknowledge that they are part of the problem as polluters in a carbon-fueled system, but also find the motivation and strength to be part of the solution.

“What helps people is building community, talking openly about the problem and how it affects them,” Schmidt told NBC News. “There’s a lot of pain about the climate people are bottling up.”

For Jordan, who works as an interpreter of American Sign Language, the program has been helpful.

“Grieving with other people is so healing, being able to talk openly and cry it out,” she said. “We look each other in the eye and say, ’this is really happening.’ ”

Jordan plans to bring the program back to her family and hopes that it will help her kids cope. “They express sadness over the loss of animal species and anxiety over the unknown, like if there will be enough food in the future and where people displaced by rising seas will live,” she said.

In September, Reau and Schmidt presented their program at Uplift Climate, an annual conference on climate change for people under 30, held entirely outdoors. This year’s event was held in New Mexico’s Cibola National Forest.

Aimee Reau, left, and LaUra Schmidt, creators of the Good Grief Network, hold a sign listing their 10 steps to deal with climate grief at the Uplift Climate conference in September.
Aimee Reau, left, and LaUra Schmidt, creators of the Good Grief Network, hold a sign listing their 10 steps to deal with climate grief at the Uplift Climate conference in September.Avichai Scher / For NBC News

“Is this the climate change depression session?” asked Kelton Manzanares, 27, from Utah.

“You’re in the right place,” replied Schmidt. Manzanares took his place in the circle of about 20 people in a patch of grass.

Schmidt asked participants what they wanted to get out of the session.

“Hope,” said one woman.

“Empowerment,” said another.

“It’s OK to feel sadness, grief and despair,” Schmidt told the group. “We’ll aim to normalize those hard feelings.”

Manzanares explained that drought has hit his community hard. Springs that were once flowing are now dry. Hungry and thirsty cattle are ruining once pristine land by scrounging for nourishment wherever they can find it. “I feel like I’m in a state of mourning or grieving when I think about it,” he said.

Bill McKibben, a climate activist for over 30 years who runs the climate advocacy organization 350.org, said groups like Good Grief can be an effective way to deal with climate grief.

“We can’t just be individuals, we need to join together and be a movement,” he said in an interview. “It makes you less grief-stricken. The best antidote to feeling powerless is activism. It doesn’t make you less sad, but adds hope, solidarity and love.”

Even though the latest U.N. report was a “kick in the stomach” for him, he cautioned that those experiencing existential grief over climate change are not its main victims. “It’s poor communities with flimsy homes that are washing away,” he said.

Distraught Over Having Kids

Almost all of the young people interviewed for this article said they were struggling with the ethical implications of having children.

“I’m definitely not having kids,” said Marcela Mulholland, 21, a student at the University of Florida in Orlando and a participant in the Uplift session. “I don’t have hope that we will avoid climate catastrophe. The changes that need to happen aren’t happening.”

Jordan said she used to talk with her kids about becoming parents someday. “I’d say, ‘You’ll be such a good dad.’ Now, it feels wrong. They don’t talk about it anymore either,” she said.

Antonia Cereijido, 26, a radio producer in New York City, is conflicted. “If I did have kids, they would have the worst life ever,” she said. But an environmental scientist told her that raising a climate-conscious child could be better than not having a child. “That did wonders for my anxiety, hearing that from a scientist. So now I’m not sure.”

At Uplift, Manzanares, who was about to become a father, said having a baby gives him hope. “It’s the most positive affirmation I can make about the future,” he said. “We aren’t giving up. This is a multigenerational problem.”

Read the full story here.

Indirect HT/Marcus

 

 

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
141 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Russ R.
December 28, 2018 11:30 pm

It is another attempt to put the genie of Liberty back in the bottle of Government Control of the public. They will come for your freedom, and offer security from the evils of climageddon. And all the security they offer will cost is your support to take away the wealth of the energy producers, who are so recklessly destroying the Earth. And give that money back to the public injured by flood, fire, and snowstorm. And once they have the energy, they will have leverage over most of the industrial, and transportation industries. The rest will get in line if they don’t want to be crushed. This is another round in an ongoing battle for freedom and equality of rights. Just as real as the one Abraham Lincoln expressed at Gettysburg:

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.

The question is with large parts of our own government, the UN, the school systems, the media, the Hollywood elites, and the climate apparatchik, fighting to take away our birthright, will the public cower in fear, or fight back and pass on to the next generation the blessings of Liberty?

Ian Macdonald
December 29, 2018 5:03 am

I reckon the climate campaigners are under some delusion that if we live exactly as Gaia intended (whatever that lifestyle actually is!) then we shall be rewarded with a kind of paradise on earth in which no-one gets sick or old, no-one suffers pain or hunger, and we are all happy.

The problem with this notion is that history contains nothing to suggest that life before civilisation was anything of the sort. For the most part it was hard, brutal and short.

I also wonder if maybe there is a Gaia, in the sense of the planet as a whole having a collective sentience. Aware of the risk of plants dying out as CO2 levels became dangerously low, she may have evolved humans as a solution to that problem, being a species with a liking for drilling holes in the ground. 😉

Sara
December 29, 2018 5:52 am

I have this all figured out now. These anxiety-ridden people don’t go to Church. They weren’t brought up in an organized religion, so they have no faith in anything, and while God is an invisible Friend for someone like me, they don’t even have that. Poor things.

They aren’t even pagans, so they don’t have any pagan gods like Zeus or Odin to call on to set things right. Gaia was an invention of some hippie in the 1960s, but still, the idea settled in and pagan gods came back into style. When there’s a straight-line wind roaring at you, it’s the Wild Hunt. Stuff like that. And there’s Buddhism, which tells you to focus on the problem and find a sensible way to solve your issues with it.

So I have gone to the trouble of finding an applicable passage from the New Testament, which might give these benighted souls some sort of comfort. It’s from the Book of Matthew: Matthew 6:25-34 American Standard Version (ASV)

25 Therefore I say unto you, Be not anxious for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than the food, and the body than the raiment?
26 Behold the birds of the heaven, that they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; and your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are not ye of much more value than they?
27 And which of you by being anxious can add one cubit unto [a]the measure of his life? (Read that again and think about its meaning.)
28 And why are ye anxious concerning raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin:
29 yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
30 But if God doth so clothe the grass of the field, which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?
31 Be not therefore anxious, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?
32 For after all these things do the Gentiles seek; for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.
33 But seek ye first his kingdom, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
34 Be not therefore anxious for the morrow: for the morrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof

You see what I’m referring to? It addresses environmental issues, soothes anxieties stirred up by an invisible bogeyman, and doesn’t ask for any of your money.

I may post this in a seemingly sarcastic way, but these people have no faith in anything and have nothing to fall back on. So they form these anxiety therapy circles, feel better about it all for a few minutes, but they still have nothing to fall back on.

This is not a joke. I see it in the fraud foisted on the gullible by despicable con artists like de Caprio – people who know intrinsically that they are lying in their teeth, but want the attention and whatever cash they can mooch off of their followers. It is disgusting.

This climate change scam preys on the weak-minded who have never taken on any kind of religion. They endlessly repeat “I believe in –” which is the first sign of a desperate need to have something to turn to. In this case, it is false gods and money-grubbing scoundrels leading them down a treacherous path.

It’s even worse when they do this to their own children and turn them into neurotic little hamsters who feel trapped by it. It’s no wonder at all these kids are getting strung out on lethal chemicals.

Encourage them to go to Church. They may find a little peace there.

Reply to  Sara
December 29, 2018 2:56 pm

In this case would you kindly like to tell me following your theorisings as to why Professor (sir!) John Houghton is one of the prime UK nutters promulgating the very AGW lies and distortions you claim he can’t possibly do…and happens as far as I can see to be the son of S M Houghton….

This is a fairly frightening story, which many more should be aware of.

https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2007/7-december/features/interview-john-houghton-scientist
http://www.consejoculturalmundial.org/winners/winners-of-the-world-award-of-science/prof-sir-john-houghton/
https://www.bookdepository.com/In-the-Eye-of-the-Storm-John-Houghton/9780745955841

I see nothing but contradictions in shallow, superficial reasoning.

tom s
December 29, 2018 6:57 am

So the leftist-scum take weather extremes that have always occurred, yet are in many cases becoming less severe (tornadoes, hurricanes etc…) and politicize it to scare the populace into taxing submission? They are a disgusting lot. And I believe nothing they ever say about anything. Great eh?

Tasfay Martinov
December 29, 2018 7:00 am

Psychologically it’s a sad0-mas0chistic compact between many who want to scare and many who want to be scared. Enjoy!

Jimmy
December 29, 2018 7:23 am

For being brainwashed into thinking a very tiny amount of atmospheric gas is the main reason for the earth’s changing climate, and that humans contribute an even tinier amount of that tiny amount of atmospheric gas, parents should sue the schools and government agencies for child abuse.

David Wells
December 29, 2018 11:11 am

Sent this to the BBC in 2013. Did it make a difference no. I suffer consistent grief because of the number of people who believe abating Co2 gives humanity the ability to manipulate or modify our climate. Or because weather is used to foment angst about climate have persuaded themselves to believe we must adopt the precautionary initiative just in case. Liz Bentley CEO WMO in UK said in response to a question from a BBC presenter “how can we avoid climate change” Bentley said “well its little things like leaving the car at home and walking the children to school”.

How come it is the supposedly well educated with lots of letters after their names have such a heightened capacity for being thick witted and stupid?

“Fact: Excluding CO2, 99.96% of ‘the sky’ is made up of all the other atmospheric gases. This leaves CO2 at just 0.040% (400 parts per million). For those decision makers who have still not grasped how miniscule this amount is and prefer it explained in simple terms, think of 1 x Imperial Gallon of CO2 to every 3,200 gallons of air (0.040% of 3,200 = about 1).

Fact: There are two types of CO2 – ‘naturally occuring’ and ‘man-made’. 96.775% of CO2 is naturally occurring, thus leaving man-made CO2 3.225%. For those decision makers who still have not grasped how miniscule this amount is and prefer it explained in simple terms, there are 8 pints in 1 x Imperial Gallon. Of the gallon of CO2, 7.75 pints of it is completely natural and 0.25 pints is man-made (96.775% of 8 pints = 7.75 pints).

Are you still with me? Good.

Fact: For every 3,200 gallons of air, 7.75 pints of CO2 is naturally produced by: All plant photosynthesis, Respiration in all animal life, Volcanic eruptions, Geysers, Natural ‘wildfires’, Marine life Respiration (incl. Corals), Micro-organism respiration, Anearobic digestion (plant decay), Cellular respiration, Food digestion waste (flatulence), Natural animal decomposition (Decay), Calcification (Stalactites & Stalagmites) and Natural fermentation (yeast moulds).

Fact: For every 3,200 gallons of air, JUST 0.25 pints (5 Fl.oz.) is produced by humans. This includes: Burning of any fossil fuel (oil, oil derivatives, coal, natural gas, peat and wood alcohols); Burning of timber or crops (wood burners, domestic fires, wood chips in bio-mass, charcoal, human caused forest fires, garden incinerators); Global alcoholic beverage market (brewing industry, wine & champagne production, beer dispensing propellant, distillation); Carbonated drinks & beverage industry (man-made CO2 injected into soft drinks as a novelty effect – adding no flavour whatsoever); Decaffinated coffee manufacture; Food Manufacture (the world’s entire daily bread production, sodium bicarbonate aeration in snackfoods/biscuits/crackers/cakes/sponges, yeast extract, modified air packaging to prevent oxidising, dry ice used to keep fruit & vegetables fresh); Refridgeration (fridges, freezers, air-conditioning); Industrial Processes (coolant gas in welding & fabrication, lime kiln processes, industrial waste incineration, sand-blasting using highly pressurised pellets of frozen CO2, laser cutting of all PCB’s for electronics/TV’s/computers); Propellants (fire extinguishers, air bags, life vests, aviation ‘exit slides’); Stage, film & theatre (dry ice, CO2 cannons); Water purification; Limescale removal products; Denture cleaning products; . . . . and finally, anything humans throw out for Composting (garden waste, peelings, etc.).

And my point is . . . . how can such a minuscule amount of man-made gas be responsible for a 1 degree C temperature increase in the last century – and that our decision makers feel that by curbing just the ‘burning of fossil fuels’ part of this minuscule amount of man-made gas (ignoring all the other ways we manufacture the stuff) that they will save the world from doom – however much it costs”.

Sara
Reply to  David Wells
December 29, 2018 9:14 pm

How? Because when you set out to con people, you pick a means of running the con that is easy for even the least informed to “get”, no matter how blatant you make the lies.

Once the target is ‘hooked’, the con proceeds.

Less than 150 years ago, the entire human species lived in a world lit ONLY by fire. Fire produces CO2. Homes were heated by fire, food was cooked by fire. No modern conveniences including electricity were available.

If you bring up a fact like this, and how we’ve benefited from the reduction by finding other sources to cook, light and heat our homes, and communicate, you will get a blank look.

John Sandhofner
December 29, 2018 2:33 pm

“Experts call it “climate grief,” ” What a shame. All self induced depression. All brought to you by the media and phony science. It demonstrates how much hype these children are receiving from parents, teachers, etc. I feel sorry for this generation of kids who have been made to drink the kool-aid and will, later in life, discover it was all a political ploy. Many will blame their parents for being so gullible. Worse yet they are missing out on being happy during the most important time of their young life.

Derek Colman
December 29, 2018 5:40 pm

It’s actually criminal to cause this stress and anxiety in children. Children are extreme gullible by nature. They are pre-programmed to learn from adults which is intended to be for survival purposes. However climate alarmists are deliberately targeting children to take advantage of their gullibility. If I was in this lady’s shoes I would sit my children down and explain to them that not all adults tell the truth, and that many of them are wrong. The problem for this lady is that she is also taken in by it, and so are many more because they don’ t understand science so can’t see through the BS.

Pamela Gray
December 29, 2018 8:25 pm

Idiots

mike macray
December 30, 2018 7:09 am

…”Dr. Lise van Susteren, a psychiatrist in Washington and co-founder of the Climate Psychiatry Alliance, said it’s becoming harder for patients to ignore the threats of climate change.

“For a long time we were able to hold ourselves in a distance, listening to data and not being affected emotionally,” she said. “But it’s not just a science abstraction anymore. I’m increasingly seeing people who are in despair, and even panic. “

This is what happens when the cart is put before the horse. Without proper ‘grounding’ i.e. critical thinking to check the hypothesis against reality (experience?) it is hard to know to which end of the horse the cart should be attached.
cheers
Mike