Public Release: 26-Dec-2018
European wheat lacks climate resilience
European farmers need to take a new course with regard to ensuring climate-resilience of important crops such as wheat
Aarhus University
The climate is not only warming, it is also becoming more variable and extreme. Such unpredictable weather can weaken global food security if major crops such as wheat are not sufficiently resilient – and if we are not properly prepared.
A group of European researchers, including Professor Jørgen E. Olesen from the Department of Agroecology at Aarhus University, has found that current breeding programmes and cultivar selection practices do not provide the needed resilience to climate change.
– The current breeding programmes and cultivar selection practices do not sufficiently prepare for climatic uncertainty and variability, the authors state in a paper recently published in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). Not only that – the response diversity of wheat on farmers’ fields in most European countries has worsened in the past five to fifteen years, depending on country.
Researchers predict that greater variability and extremeness of local weather conditions will lead to reduced yields in wheat and increased yield variability.
– Needless to say, decreased yields are not conducive to food security, but higher yield variability also poses problems. It can lead to a market with greater speculation and price volatility. This may threaten stable access to food by the poor, which in turn can enhance political instability and migration, Jørgen E. Olesen points out.
Decreasing variation in response diversity
The researchers base their assessments on thousands of yield observations of wheat cultivars in nine European countries for qualifying how different cultivars respond to weather. The researchers identified the variation of wheat response diversity on farmers’ fields and demonstrated the relation to climate resilience.
The yield responses of all cultivars to different weather events were relatively similar within northern and central Europe, and within southern European countries – the latter particularly with regard to durum wheat. There were serious gaps in wheat resilience across all Europe, especially with regard to yield performance under abundant rain.
– The lack of response diversity can pose serious problems with regard to food security. Therefore, farmers, breeders, and dealers in seeds and grain need to pay more attention to the diversity of cultivars grown, warns Professor Jørgen E. Olesen.
Climate resilience is imperative
Wheat is an important staple food crop in Europe and is the leading source of plant protein in our diet globally, so it is important to ensure that we have climate-resilient wheat cultivars on hand.
Rain, drought, heat or cold at vulnerable times during the growing season can seriously damage yields. Wheat yield is generally sensitive to even a few days of exposure to waterlogging and to wet weather that favours disease. In addition, heat stress rather than drought sensitivity appears to be a limiting factor for adaptation of wheat to climate change in Europe.
The dominant approach of adapting crops to climate change by tailoring genotypes to the most likely long-term change is likely insufficient. The capacity of a single crop variety to maintain good yield performance under climatic variability and extremes is limited, but diversity in responses to critical weather events can effectively enhance climate resilience. Therefore, a set of cultivars with diverse responses to critical weather conditions is prerequisite to promoting crop climate resilience.
The authors stress that the need for climate resilience of staple food crops such as wheat must be better articulated. Increased awareness could foster governance of resilience through research and breeding programmes, incentives and regulation.
###
You can read the article “Decline in climate resilience of European wheat” published in PNAS here.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Lack of resilience in European wheat industry must be doing it a World of Good:-
“Big volumes may be the ‘new normal’ for European wheat by Karen Braun
(Reuters) – Wheat production in the European Union has seemingly entered a new realm thanks to big yields, and this trend may continue for a third consecutive year in 2016.
A combine harvester unloads grain into trailer at a field in Slupca near Poznan, Poland August 1, 2015. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel – RTX1MOTR
The EU produces, consumes and exports the largest volume of wheat in the world. The highest-yielding wheat on the planet is also grown in Europe.
Wheat production in the EU has hit consecutive record-high levels in the last two years, and not just by a hair, by miles.
As final production reports are beginning to roll in, some analyst estimates of the 2015 wheat crop have edged out 2014’s 157 million tonnes and are pegged as high as 158 million. The recent 10-year average is 141 million tonnes.
The assist can be credited to France, Europe’s largest producer, as it added 4 million tonnes on the year for the 2015 wheat harvest. But other countries have surely contributed, as record wheat yields were observed in half of EU’s 28 countries in either 2014 or 2015.
Large harvested area has supported Europe’s recent wheat volumes, but the increase in yearly average yield, or trend yield, is driving the production train.
Given the increases to trend yield and healthy harvested area forecasts, wheat production in the EU should once again exceed 150 million tonnes in 2016 barring any extreme weather events over the next eight months.
THE POWER OF YIELD
Crop tonnage relies on both harvested area and yield, but yield has been doing the legwork for European wheat, owing mostly to research and advancements in seed technology.
Case in point: back in the early 1960s, EU wheat area was up near current levels but production volume is three times as large today. (tmsnrt.rs/1QPPsyg)
When “adjusting for inflation” by applying 2016’s trend yield back through a production history since 1981, a wheat volume above 150 million tonnes would have been reached one out of every three years instead of the current rate of one in 10. And the past two years would have ranked fourth- and sixth- largest.
Trend yield is still increasing in the EU, but at a diminishing rate overall, less than 1 percent per year since 2004. But that is not true for all countries.
Average yields are still increasing in Eastern Europe, particularly in the Baltic nations, where yield is still in the skyrocketing stage. (tmsnrt.rs/1QPQvhz)
Wheat yields in Western Europe are remarkably higher than anywhere else in the world. Yields average just under 3 tonnes per hectare in the United States but above 8 tonnes per hectare in the United Kingdom. This equates to nearly 120 bushels per acre.
Over the past two years, final yield rose above trend in most European countries following two mild winters with relatively favorable spring weather. In 2014, EU’s huge wheat crop stemmed mostly from record yields in central Europe and the United Kingdom.
In 2015, much of continental Europe descended into drought at the tail end of the season but trend-or-above yield was recorded in most countries, demonstrating in part the resilience of wheat in drier weather. (tmsnrt.rs/1Ic0xIw)”
That article is a couple of years old, so while it is/was good news, it is a bit dated. Something more current would have more impact.
Definitely. Three years ago it was a completely different climate. I see climate changing on a daily basis.
Me, I’m perfectly mitigated. Every year I’m becoming hotter, more variable and extreme.
That………is weather, not climate
Which part of “new normal” don’t you understand?
Down from the 2015 record but part of a trend of increasing yields during warmest and most extreme decades evah https://www.indexmundi.com/agriculture/?country=eu&commodity=wheat&graph=production
Hmmm, warmer, longer growing season and higher CO2. I wonder why yields are not collapsing?
I know, and that gradual increase in rain pretty much everywhere ought to be destroying crops from Kalamazoo to Timbuktu.
When you say it THAT way, you make it sound like more favorable growing conditions are a good thing.
My friends farm in Western Australia has had one of the best years eva for wheat.
Just watching the (Oz) ABC weather report and the colour shaded temperature plot ranges from orange to red to purple to black as if the continent has been lowered into hell itself but then when thay just post the temperatures in numbers for various locations there are mainly 30’s, the odd 20 something and a 40 or two….. its summer in Australia…. and…..
Self serving alarmist crap from the msm relentlssly using doom laden language and graphics until they juist have to report the odd fact and have to take a cold shower just to be able to do it…
More a national broacdcaster it is nothing short of utter corruption and it seems to me to be all about the careers of the presenters, the program producers and of course the ratings.
Meanwhile on the ground it is summer. Mid to high 20’s in Tasmania, nudging 40˚C in Perth, 30’s on most of the east coast and Adelaide is hot. There is a ‘forecast’ (punt) of maybe 5 days above 40˚C somewhere which will “smash” the “previous record” (actually the existing record) of 4 days back in the mid 1940’s. And?? A statistically insignificant occurrence given only 100 to 150 tyears of data, even ignoring UHI effects. As I said, sexed up propaganda which as all about the actors eading the script.
“Heatwaves are caused by combinations of temperature, humidity and air movements that cause unusually high and sustained temperatures. There are parts of WA (eg. Marble Bar) that experience significant (+ 40 o C) sustained temperatures during the year, but these are not classified as heatwaves because such temperatures are not unusual and individuals living in the area have had time to acclimatise to the heat .”
https://semc.wa.gov.au/Documents/TheHub/NaturalHazardFactsheets/Heatwave%20Hazard%20Factsheet.pdf
“The small mining town over 100 kilometres inland from the Pilbara coastline, has been synonymous with extreme heat since recording 160 days in a row over 100 degrees Fahrenheit (37.8 degrees Celsius) in the summer of 1923-1924. It remains as the world record for the longest sequence of days above 100 degrees Fahrenheit.”
http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2014/12/04/4142607.htm
WeatherZone.com has 3 news excerpts every day on a sidebar when viewing the daily ssta map. The headlines are a constant and unrelenting heat waves, droughts, too much rain, not enough rains cattle/animals suffering, etc. I have used their site daily for 4 years now. Makes me wonder why anyone would want to live in Australia according to what this site shows. …http://www.weatherzone.com.au/climate/indicator_sst.jsp?lt=global&lc=global&c=ssta
Exactly right about what constitutes a heat wave.
The daily weather in Florida which we get every single day from May until October would be described in apocalyptic terms in other parts of the country.
Three or more days of Florida weather in NYC is a catastrophe.
Except it actually is not.
Even as people are far more able to counteract hot weather that in the past, whether by air conditioning or access to swimming or municipal “cooling centers”, or even simply inexpensive fans, they have had far LESS of it to deal with than folks in the past, who nonetheless survived that heat unless that person was ill or weak to begin with.
yeah i noticed they were (pretty much forced) to admit the 40s were as hot before
and supposedly co2 wasnt an issue then
hmm?
gotta admit this media beatup and talk of evacuating any supposed to be hot spots is annoying me
if people evacuated at this time..where to go as accom is booked out for holidays, travelling in hot weathers even more stressful and pets n livestck need to be watched and watered etc
probably more health risks in following their lousy advice
So conspicuously missing is the beneficial mastodon in the room, elevated CO2! Look, we had a 15% expansion in global forest cover alone and bumper crops in everything everywhere. The globe hasnt’ warmed significantly since 1940 when 0.8C was the warming level reached since 1850- pre Industrial Revolution with ppm CO2 max of 280. Forty-two % more CO2 since 1940 and this accompanied a 40 year deep cooling that scared all the scientists and then 20 years climbing out of the ice age cometh panic to 1997 after which, an 18 year plateau that we may be descending back to with the fall from El Nino 2017.
So far, doing nothing has been the best strategy for agricultural output, CO2 is unquestionably big net positive and we are still waiting for a global warming of whatever cause that is net positive of natural variation.
Since we won’t really do anything about global warming anyway, my bet is on my “Garden of Eden Earth^тм” with peak population at 9B and abundance of all resources and consequent peace and prosperity.
“STRANGE AS IT SEEMS, NO AMOUNT OF LEARNING CAN CURE STUPIDITY, AND HIGHER EDUCATION POSITIVELY FORTIFIES IT.”
– Stephen Vizinczey
“INCREASING ATMOSPHERIC CO2 HAS CAUSED A STATISTICALLY-SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN EXTREME ACADEMIC STUPIDITY.”
– Allan MacRae
They had a heat wave and drought…it dropped production a tiny little biddy bit…..
“– Needless to say, decreased yields are not conducive to food security, but higher yield variability also poses problems. It can lead to a market with greater speculation and price volatility. This may threaten stable access to food by the poor, which in turn can enhance political instability and migration, Jørgen E. Olesen points out.”
….not too hot…not too cold….the three bears
“. Such unpredictable weather”…..they have never been able to predict the weather
They were growing wheat in Sicily during the Roman Warm Period.
It will still be growing in Sicily in 2100, blithely oblivious to all of the ‘Climate Change’ bloviations.
No worries, mate!
The article and references both use the word “climate” often, when they really mean “weather variability”.
Looks to me like they fancy themselves experts when in reality they don’t know shinola …
Yup. They appear not to consider that the crops grown are actually the result of farmers making rational choices as to what best suits their own needs. This also suggests that problems due to weather variability are actually decreasing, not increasing.
And, of course, it took nineteen (19) authors to somehow figure out that all is really doom and gloom while yields are improving.
Sun Cycles 24-27 ushering in a new Solar Grand Minimum will mean crop failures driving famine: https://youtu.be/Etu4FlW_jps
That is as much guess-work as the article in the original post. While I would like to see the CAGW crowd embarrassed by more failed predictions, I don’t want to see crop failures and famine, and I’m certainly not going to cheer lead for that kind of disaster.
Paul,
Nothing to get worried about either way: these good folks, agroecologists turned socio-economists, are mixing and matching the use of both weather and climate to support their pseudo argument.
The foundation of all Malthusian/ neo-Malthusian fear mongering is the spectre of food shortages. At the time it became the justification for social Darwinism – if we run out, we’ll make sure the developed cultures survive. Today it’s the justification for authoritarian policies to “combat” climate change and in the process do away with the market economy that said in passing has pulled 95% of the world’s people out of grinding poverty and provided all the food the 7 billion of us need.
I would like to know what evidence there is that European weather is “more variable and extreme”.
Tom, don’t you read the news? They keep saying that the weather is “more variable and extreme”, so it must be true! /sarc.
As with all “projections” of this ilk, what are the chances that plant breeders, seeing any change that will impact yield (greater or less) will sit on their collective thumbs, sit in the corner and rock saying “Were all doomed”? Absolutely NONE! As far as the AGW Alarmists, that is a different story…
…they had a heat wave and drought
Some days have been sunny….some days not…some days rainy….SHOCKING!
Please can we have some more money to make our wheat more resilient?
Are they referring to the possibility that global cooling (a la little ice age) could practically wipe out European grain production?
Oh, silly me. Sorry.
Total crap. Australia already has high yield wheat cultivars for a variety of climates from dry sub-tropical regions down to cool temperate regions.
Decent plant breeding and or genetic engineering should produce suitable crops for variable and warmer seasons because we’ve been doing it here for 200 years, as have the US and Canada.
+10
sticking to standard breeding would be fine
last damned thing we need is GM wheat
what monmongrels created did NOT get approval
pity so few even ask why?
thats aside from people refusing to purchase or eat it
For those interested in the actual paper, it’s here:
Decline in climate resilience of European wheat
https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/12/18/1804387115
Sorry, I didn’t read the last line in the post.
More fake news. The world temperature (if there is such a thing) has remained in a somewhat “pause” state going on 20 years yet we still keep getting all of these “it’s the fault of climate change” scare stories.
The climate is not only warming, it is also becoming more variable and extreme
If you omit events like the summer of 76 or the hurricane of 87
In today’s world we no longer have weather, but we have loads of extreme weather. Today, for example, was extremely dry; it didn’t rain.
Forecasting wheat yields under extreme weather conditions
The authors conclude that crop yield forecasting will have to improve to be able to cope with increasingly unprecedented weather conditions.
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/science-update/forecasting-wheat-yields-under-extreme-weather-conditions
How can something be “increasingly unprecedented”?
Either it is unprecedented or it has happened before.
Genetically Modified agriculture has been the main staple of human advancement. Why European farmers and politicians decided that 125 thousand years of human presence was to be ignored is beyond me. Unless of course, it was a reaction to having to change and adapt, particularly in the face of US agricultural pressures. Ever notice that the John Deere conbine has increased its harvesting reaper head from 16 feet to now 32 feet? It’s hard to miss the US agricultural productivity. Something that Europeans, stuck in their old ways, have a hard time to envision let alone compete. Kicking and screaming dragged into the 21st Century.
Notice that the article scrupulously avoids mention of ‘genetically modified’. GM and CRISPR are obvious technologies to develop new [enter word here] tolerant varieties, yet the EU has chosen to stay with breeding programmes. Once more, ignorance, unreasoning fear and politics handicaps the European future.
I think the farmers and the seed suppliers who’s livelihood relies on their practical selection of seed and creation of hybrids have forgotten more about this subject than the academics in Ivory towers who wrote the above bilge will ever know.
IIRC the UK used to buy a lot of Canadian wheat until a European directive switched us to German wheat and removed most of out dietary selenium in the process. Easy to compensate if you can find shaggy ink cap mushrooms or mineral supplement pills.
“The climate is not only warming, it is also becoming more variable and extreme. Such unpredictable weather can weaken global food security if major crops such as wheat are not sufficiently resilient – and if we are not properly prepared.”
The climate IS warming, IS more extreme – there seems to be no If about that part, in their mind.
Since the weather has already changed, why the need to say crops MIGHT fail? If the change is here, the correlating result should be here.
Unless their prediction was wrong.
SR
Or, was there a prediction of what amount of change is needed to reduce crop production, and I missed it?
All they need do to get me on board is make an actual prediction of amount of crop loss per degree of temperature rise past a stated temperature.
SR
Crop yields worldwide are up 3x since 1960. All because of things the libbies hate:
*Higher CO2
*Slight warming
*GM crops
*Fertilizer made with natgas
*Diesel powered farm equipment
*Pesticides
*Water projects
Yes – As a farmer, I can attest to the fact that we have a massive surplus of all crops.
From the article: “The climate is not only warming, it is also becoming more variable and extreme. Such unpredictable weather”
The obligatory, over-the-top scargemongering about CAGW. Claims which couldn’t be proven if the author’s lives depended on it. Lots of groupthink in the article, making claims that can’t be backed up with evidence.
They are so sure of themselves, too.
“They are so sure of themselves, too.”
Of course they are – they said it, therefore they are correct! Any printed statement by the politically correct crowd is automatically 100% accurate as soon as it is printed. Just ask them if they are correcr, they’ll tell you.
So to all those who believe in climate change… plant rice. 🙂
Cultivars, as O.P. indicates, that are ammenable to “water-logging” & “heat stress” (apparently less so than European droughts) need to be introduced. It is gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA) responsive cultivars that will be suitable; GABA in plants is induced by both abiotic (ex: drought/heat) & biotic (ex: herbivore insects) stresses.
In some kinds of grass plants heat stress induces 2.3 times more GABA synthesis than otherwise. GABA in plants, among other things (ex: pollen tubes have a gradient of GABA), is relevant because it keeps photosynthesis to keep going (I’ll skip the nuances of this) under abiotic stress.
As for “water logging”, this creates oxygen deficit in roots (hypoxia) & the plant response is to synthesize GABA (enzyme GAD plus H+ ion released from internal cell store de-carboxyl-ates glutamine —> GABA plus internal CO2). Root cell hypoxia cuts down cellular respiration (alters ratio of NAD:NADH in cell) & then the enzyme (which needs NADH) synthesizing succinic acid is not producing the intermediate molecule succinate for that cell to drive one of it’s basic cycles.
GABA can be acted on by a different plant enzyme (succinic aldehyde) to convert it into succinate. Thus root build up of it (GABA) provides a pool of substrate ready to quickly plug succinate into the cells’ Krebs cycle.
Different plant tissue & different aged plant tissue will have different GABA ranges; plus there are 24 hour cyclic changes in the level of GABA & also it’s precursor glutamate. European wheat agronomists should be looking at cultivars with appropriate GABA responses.
Another cultivar selection should take into account that with a rise in plant GABA this causes the cellular pH to rise (H+ ions got used making GABA), which in turn causes it’s synthesizer enzyme (GAD, which is activated by H+ ions) to down-shift & then the production of GABA peaks for that plant geno-type. There has been progress manipulating plants to produce more GABA.
Let me tell you a secret I learnt from a witch: water is wet….
What a shock that individuals and cultures act in their own self-interest to ensure survival and prosperity. Agricultural businesses are potentially the hardest hit by significant climate change, but none of them are screaming alarms. Why is that? Perhaps there is no reason to panic. If the climate warms, growing regions will move a little north. If the climate cools, a little south. As Keith observes, there are cultivated varieties adapted to different conditions in every significant agricultural category. One advantage to a global economy is the ability to adapt to climate variation.
Ah yes, but that’s the trap you see, the mass selling of abundant capitalist pastries is what further unhinges climate which drives cold and snowy conditions in winter, so we’ve about 10 years tops before an exponential growth of CO2 and the resulting baker’s pastries explosion alters the planet’s orbital stability, and things get colder again.
So… you’re saying the Belgians are waffling on this?
Thank you Shoki. My cousin is a farmer in South Australia which runs wet some years and dry some years but rarely average. He continues to make a increasingly good living growing broad acre crops. He follows weather patterns and tries new hybrids of crops and new techniques. He has never complained about climate change. But he constantly adapts and tries new things which one of the main reasons mankind has got to where it has – adaption and creativity.
‘global food security’
Shorthand for global government taking over agriculture. Billions will die.
“Researchers predict that greater variability and extremeness of local weather conditions will lead to reduced yields in wheat and increased yield variability.”
—
Sounds like perpetual misery, poverty and extremey-ness are upon us again. Not one bit of this will occur though as doom-laden climate predictions always turn out to be wildly inaccurate and the track record shows it’s much safer to say the diametric opposites will occur instead. So in a way this is actually back-handed good news for bakers and consumers of pastries everywhere.
|
“The phenomenal rise in the abundance of delicious freshly-baked pastries which we experience today is directly attributable to wildly incorrect extremey climate forecasting.” – UN IPCC
OT: subsurface equatorial Pacific temp confirms El Nino development is dissipating once more.
http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/oceanography/wrap_ocean_analysis.pl?id=IDYOC007&year=2018&month=12
Early freezes, late frosts, drought and deluge are all symptoms of changes brought on by natural cycles. Europe has been hungry before… she will be hungry again. Those wheat surpluses can disappear real quick. We are only one VEI7 or GSM away from food insecurity. A little diversity in the genetics would be a good thing, even if in all honesty I don’t think it won’t be enough.
Oh, come on. Both you and the author of the study assume that farmers are stupid, that they won’t adjust their varieties, and their suppliers won’t be developing different varieties. Just keep people who don’t know anything about farming (Gvm’nt & Ivory Tower types) out of it and they will do just fine.